USDA Responsible For E. Coli Outbreak

Guest Post by Hardscrabble Farmer

Yesterday on NPR I caught a news story about a restaurant chain called Chipotle. They are an upscale fast food restaurant that pretends to be the same type of purveyor as Whole Foods, i.e. they market the idea of using farm fresh ingredients without actually using farm fresh ingredients. Those who think about their health when eating fast food- an oxymoron if ever there was one- choose these types of outfits because it allows them to indulge their hunger without actually correcting their previous ignorance regarding the source of their next next meal. It appears that Chipotle accidentally poisoned its customers in the Northwest with E. Coli contaminated beef.

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/chipotle-linked-e-coli-outbreak-jump-cases-expected-n455556

Not their fault, actually since Chipotle did exactly what they were told to by purchasing their products from “well known and trusted” suppliers. In addition to that, they were secure in the knowledge that the purchases of meats they made were all USDA inspected. Whew! Glad the pros are on the job, doing what they are paid to do, insuring our food supply is safe.

It seems, however, that Chipotle didn’t actually have to poison their customers. The day before they did the USDA had issued a recall on close to 80 tons of ground beef that came from- curiously- a USDA facility in Omaha, Nebraska.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/11/02/usda-issues-massive-ground-beef-recall-due-to-possible-e-coli

As of now the two events are in no way connected except that they are- in both cases the meat was inspected by the USDA, the very organization who’s sole mission is to inspect for things like this. It’s easy to miss 80 tons of contaminated meat, probably came off the line when the inspector was taking a bathroom break.

Keeping meat safe to eat isn’t rocket science. It must be kept clean, it must be used while fresh or promptly frozen or cured, it must be cooked to the proper temperature and eaten soon thereafter. When was the last time you heard of a hunter getting E.Coli? Hundreds of thousand of tons of wild harvested meat is consumed daily coming from less than laboratory condition environments and yet no one gets sick and dies from it. A salad at McDonalds? Bring your barf bag.

Continue reading “USDA Responsible For E. Coli Outbreak”

Why Is The USDA Buying Submachine Guns?

By Charles McFarlane of Modern Farmer

Why Is The USDA Buying Submachine Guns?

“Submachine guns, .40 Cal. S&W, ambidextrous safety, semi-automatic or 2 shot bur[s]t trigger group, Tritium night sights for front and rear, rails for attachment of flashlight (front under fore grip) and scope (top rear), stock-collapsib[l]e or folding, magazine – 30 rd. capacity.”

In May, the USDA’s Office of Inspector General filed a request for these weapons. But why exactly do they need them?

According to a USDA press rep, the guns are necessary for self-protection.

“OIG Special Agents regularly conduct undercover operations and surveillance. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents include criminal activities such as fraud in farm programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery and extortion; smuggling; and assaults and threats of violence against USDA employees engaged in their official duties,” wrote a USDA spokesperson.

Those seem like legitimate enforcement activities, but still: submachine guns? Not everyone believes the USDA being armed to the teeth is justifiable. On Aug. 2, the Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund launched a petition to support a bill that would curb the ability of agencies like the USDA to arm themselves. They see it as overkill and scare tactics, especially for smaller producers.

“What we have seen happen, with the FDA especially, is they have come onto small farms, raw milk producers, and raided the heck out of them with armed agents present,” says Liz Reitzig, co-founder of the Farm Food Freedom Coalition. “Do we really want to have our federal regulatory agencies bring submachine guns onto these family farms with children?”

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund petition focuses on two now infamous blows to the raw milk community – the 2010 and 2011 raids on Rawsome Food Club in Venice, California. These raids were carried out by armed federal agents, from the FDA and other agencies.

The OIG’s Investigation Development bulletins show there have been three incidents in the last year that involved firearms and two in which USDA agents were verbally threatened. Still, most of their enforcement operations surround white-collar fraud of government programs, often involving SNAP programs. “If there is fraud in the SNAP program, look at how it is implemented and make changes in the entire program,” says Reitzig. “Don’t bring machine guns onto farms.”

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund are not the only ones interested in taking guns out of the hands of USDA agents. Utah Congressman Chris Stewart is the sponsor of the bill on the FTCLDF petition. “At its heart it comes down to this: To myself, and for a lot of Americans, there is great concern over regulator agencies with heavy handed capabilities,” Rep. Stewart told Modern Farmer.

His bill, H.R. 4934, hopes “to prohibit certain federal agencies from using or purchasing certain firearms, and for other purposes.” When asked about the USDA’s plan for submachine guns, he said, “I can’t envision a scenario where what they are doing would require that.”

Another concern is simply accountability. The request for submachine guns from the USDA doesn’t say how many guns — asking them seems like a non-starter. “They have been very unhelpful in trying to find out any information about this,” said Rep. Stewart. “We couldn’t get answers — it doesn’t seem right to me.”

However, he also cautioned: “We have never argued that federal regulators don’t need to protect themselves.” But if USDA investigations were perceived to be potentially violent he suggested, “They should do what the rest of us do, call the local sheriff.”

WTF STORY OF THE DAY

The liberal rag Phila Inquirer had this story on their front page today as an example of the “great” things being done by our beloved Federal Government. We pass Hammonton NJ on the way to the shore. It’s a podunk farm community. They employ Mexicans to pick blueberries. If the USDA was providing low interest loans to increase the blueberry crop or develop some new crop to sell to foreign countries, I wouldn’t blink an eye. But, why the fuck is the U.S. Department of Agriculture taking $600,000 of my tax dollars and supporting some theater of the absurd for farmers? This crap just piles higher and higher. We are borrowing $1.3 trillion per year from foreign countries and then we loan $600,000 at the same rate we are borrowing to some theater that will surely go under in the next 3 years. And most of the morons reading this story will see no problem with it. They won’t even question why the Dept of Agriculture has the ability to lend and grant their tax dollars to any business they choose. When you add up the money doled out to mega-corporations, bankers, the free shit army in West Philly, ethanol producers, the military industrial complex, senior citizens, and redneck theaters, your head should explode. But it won’t. The country is rejoicing. The NFL referee strike is over. Yippee!!! 

Arts angel to a theater in rural N.J.? USDA

By Howard Shapiro

Inquirer Staff Writer

 On stage at  the Eagle Theater in Hammonton, NJ are, from left, Ted Wioncek,  James Donio (Chairman), and Ed Corsi. PHOTO / CURT HUDSON
On stage at the Eagle Theater in Hammonton, NJ are, from left, Ted Wioncek, James Donio (Chairman), and Ed Corsi. PHOTO /
A little semiprofessional theater amid the farmland of Hammonton, N.J., has become the beneficiary of more than a half-million dollars in grants and low-interest loans from a most unlikely arts angel: the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The Eagle Theatre, in the center of what’s known as the blueberry capital of the world, is wasting no time spending that money – its backstage area is filling with building materials and spiffy, soon-to-be-installed sound and lighting equipment, and construction has begun on a lounge-cum-wine bar for its patrons.

Eagle’s 2013 calendar features an eight-show season that includes the first production in the area of Lombardi, recently on Broadway, and the big-cast musicals A Chorus Line and Hair. Coming up this fall: The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, the theater’s perennially popular Rocky Horror Picture Show, and a holiday extravaganza.

The Agriculture Department money is coming directly to the theater in three acts, so to speak: a $23,000 grant to improve its historic building and its ticketing and computer programming; an $89,000 20-year loan at 3.5 percent interest, mainly to enhance stage equipment; and a 30-year loan of $482,000 at 3.38 percent interest, to buy its building.

“It’s an unusual project for the USDA to finance,” said Howard Henderson, the department’s rural-development director for New Jersey. “This is a fascinating way we’ve been able to benefit a rural community.”

The Rural Development program, financed by Congress, exists to strengthen or help establish facilities in rural communities that will improve downtowns, provide services, and encourage local activities. But money usually goes to such projects as firehouse restoration or, as in New Jersey’s northern Sussex County, a plan for hospice units.

Henderson said he wasn’t surprised when the Eagle Theatre applied for the money 18 months ago, because it was no secret around Hammonton that “we have feet on the ground in rural areas.”

“But it’s unique. I believe this is the first theater we’ve done in Rural Development in anybody’s memory over, say, the last 30 years” – much of the time that such money has been available through the Agriculture Department.

It’s not unusual for local politicians to join arts groups in seeking federal money; indeed, community theaters and arts centers in nearby Millville and Vineland have been given new life by communities that believe the arts help revitalize downtowns. In the Philadelphia area, that’s also been a mantra in Media, Bristol, Souderton, Ambler, and especially Center City, where then-Mayor Ed Rendell championed Broad Street’s Avenue of the Arts.

It was the same idea that led to the Eagle Theatre’s revival in 2006, when a 6,000-square-foot warehouse – a block from the town’s main street and within eyeshot of NJ Transit’s station on its Atlantic City Line from 30th Street Station – was about to be demolished for a parking lot.

“I became interested in knowing its history,” said Hammonton native Tracy Petrongolo, an independent filmmaker and at the time leader of Hammonton’s first arts and culture committee. The Atlantic County town – population about 15,000 – is small enough that “if you ask the right people, you will learn the history of every building,” she said, “and we found out that was the old Eagle Theatre.”

It was opened as a silent-movie house in 1914 and sometimes had vaudeville action on its stage before becoming a warehouse only 13 years later. In the 1940s, a church moved in, and in the ’60s, a local family bought it for use as storage for their auto-parts company.

The nonprofit Hammonton Revitalization Corp., along with residents called Friends of Eagle Theatre, took out a loan to buy and rehab the theater – money that most of the Agriculture Department’s loan has replaced. No tax money was used to acquire or restore it; the town chipped in, with money and sweat equity.

“The Friends of Eagle Theatre themselves were actually in there with sledgehammers,” said Petrongolo, who later ran as an independent on an arts platform and won a council seat.

Hammonton now has an arts district that includes the Eagle Theatre, a branch of South Jersey’s Noyes Museum, a branch of Richard Stockton College, a dance studio, the longtime Hamilton Arts Center, and a dozen new working lofts for artists.

One night last weekend, the little theater on Vine Street began humming 20 minutes before showtime as about 140 people streamed in for one of the final performances of a two-act romp, Completely Hollywood (Abridged). The show, which affectionately mocks films, was given a high-style production and featured one of Eagle’s two artistic directors, Ed Corsi, in the cast.

It was a crossover audience, you might say, ranging in age from young adult to seniors, and crossing racial and ethnic lines. That included Mexican Americans, who make up more than 20 percent of the town’s residents and who have turned it into a South Jersey capital of lively Mexican restaurants.

Some carried in popcorn, candy, and sodas from the fresh-popcorn counter, a throwback to the 208-seat theater’s early days.

Eagle is a semiprofessional house – “We pay actors a negotiable stipend,” said its other artistic director, Ted Wioncek 3d – but it also deals show by show with Actors’ Equity, the national actors’ union, for some productions. Wioncek and Corsi say that, given its steady growth, they foresee a day when Eagle joins the ranks of major theaters by holding a standard Equity contract.

The show was about to begin, and the theater’s board chairman, James M. Donio – a mover and shaker about town who has been a supporter since revitalization began – was there to greet audience members individually. He was the force behind the funding application to the Agriculture Department.

“Every step of the way, there was a lot of process and paperwork to go through to make sure they vetted a request from a theater,” he was saying. “There’s a lot of that with firehouses that apply – and this is a theater. And every step of the way, we could give them everything they requested.”

The houselights were about to dim as the stage was illuminated for another evening of theater in the blueberry capital of the world.