For Oil Price, Bad Is The New Good

Lately, oil prices have gone up when they should have gone down. In the last week, OPEC decided not to cut production and the two major energy agencies reported that the world over-supply problem is getting worse.  Brent futures increased from $62 to $65. Bad is the new good.

The expected bad news on Friday, June 5 that OPEC would not cut production was skillfully cloaked in positive statements about growing demand. On Monday, June 8, Brent opened at $62.69 and rose to $65.70 over the next two days.

On Tuesday, June 10,  the EIA published its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) that showed that the production surplus responsible for low oil prices had increased in May to almost 3 million barrels per day (bpd).

http://www.artberman.com/wp-content/uploads/World-Liquids-Production-Surplus-or-Deficit-Brent-Crude-Oil-Price_June-2015-.jpg
Figure 1. World liquids production surplus or deficit and Brent crude oil price. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.
(Click image to enlarge)

Production fell by 106,000 bpd but consumption fell more by 156,000 bpd (Figure 2). Oil prices rose $2.19 per barrel based on that good news.

http://www.artberman.com/wp-content/uploads/World-Liquids-Production-Consumption-Brent-Crude-Oil-Price_June-11-2015-.jpg
Figure 2. World liquids production, consumption and Brent crude oil price.Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.
(Click image to enlarge)

On Thursday, June 11, the IEA came out with its Oil Market Report. The message was the same. The production surplus for the first quarter of 2015 was the highest in a decade at 1.85 million bpd and, obviously, the highest since the oil price crisis began in June of last year (Figure 3).

http://www.artberman.com/wp-content/uploads/IEA-Chart_Surplus-Deficit-11-June-2015.jpg
Figure 3. World liquids production surplus or deficit. Source: IEA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.
(Click image to enlarge)

The oil-price crisis occurred because supply (production) exceeded demand (consumption) beginning in the first quarter of 2014 (Figure 4). That situation has persisted. First quarter 2015 supply was about the same as fourth quarter 2014 but demand was lower, not a good thing.

http://www.artberman.com/wp-content/uploads/Chart_IEA-Quarterly-Liquids-Supply-Demand_June-2015-.jpg
Figure 4. IEA quarterly liquids supply and demand. Source: IEA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.
(Click image to enlarge)

There is optimism about demand but what is that based on? It’s based on increased vehicle miles travelled in the United States. I agree that is a good sign but the U.S. is not the entire world.

There is optimism about decreased U.S. rig counts but U.S. production has increased. The EIA estimates that tight oil production will decline by 91,000 bopd in July but that is more than balanced by new lower Tertiary production in the Gulf of Mexico.

There is optimism because there have been inventory withdrawals in the U.S. but those always occur at this time of year.

I agree with all of this optimism but it is basically well-informed sentiment. The hard data is that we have a production surplus in the world that is getting worse, not better–unless the data from IEA and EIA is somehow unreliable.

Markets don’t always behave rationally. Oil prices do not always reflect fundamentals like supply and demand. Over time, however, markets come into balance with fundamentals. Right now, oil prices are profoundly out of balance with fundamentals. Look for a correction.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
kokoda
kokoda
June 14, 2015 10:06 am

Oil price = supply high, demand low; rig count for tight oil production has decreased dramatically but tight oil production has NOT declined.

Price will decline much further and my prediction on this is much better than the Models used by IPCC to determine warming. At least my prediction is related to reality.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 14, 2015 10:23 am

Another brilliant government plan that costs us more money for food and fuel while brokers get rich buying and selling ethanol credits:

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/06/12/epa-plan-frustrates-fuel-sector-energy-journal/

Bob.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
June 14, 2015 2:52 pm

I’m sure SSS will be back to regale us with tales of how sub $47 oil makes fracking profitable. admin loves that.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
June 15, 2015 11:57 pm

I just came to realize that Canadian company Enbridge is slated to run an oil pipeline right through the heart of Minnesota lake country en route from the Norh Dakota Bakken fields to the port of Duluth. The “Sandpiper” line will run nearby (upstream) to property I own. Apparently they bought up all the land before publicizing the plan, and then acted as though they were considering alternative routes, which was all bullshit. While I’d been oblivious to the plan, the locals were fighting it as best they could for several years, but it was unanimously green lighted by the MN Pollution Control Agency despite having most of its members appointed by liberal Governor Mark Dayton. So in addition to the questionable economics of shale oil, they’ll be putting billions of dollars of lakeshore real estate at risk – to say nothing of possible irreparable ecological damage to a vast watershed http://www.enbridge.com/~/media/www/Site%20Images/Projects/Maps/CassCo_Overview_022514.pdf?la=en

The only remaining hope of the project being cancelled is probably a drop in oil prices making it untenable. Imagine the Keystone pipeline running next to the Shamrock. I hope the Saudis flood the market and drive oil down to $9 a barrel.