All this talk in the past week about nuke bombs …. well, it put me in the mood to see shit getting blown up.
Best watched in full screen and with the volume way up … so you can appreciate fully the KABOOM!!
I just love the one at the 1:20 mark … all those flames!
Sometimes things don’t go according to plan. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=XHcCbY2wY38
2 THINGS TO NOTICE ABOUT THESE EXPLOSIONS …. ESPECIALLY IF YOU’RE A 9-11 TRUFER NUTJOB
Disclaimer: I do NOT believe the official government story about 9-11. Why? Because the USA!USA!USA! government is a den of fucking liars … about everything. This is now established fact, and requires no proof.
HOWEVER, that does not mean I have to believe the incredibly wacky, illogical, and demonstratively impossible idea that explosives brought down the towers.
1. Notice that NOT ONE SINGLE demolition collapse ….. STARTS AT THE TOP, as is the case with the WTC towers. Not. One. Ultimately, it is not the explosion that brings down a building, it is gravity. And that’s why ALL demolitions focus on destroying support columns at THE BOTTOM, and middle (for taller buildings), and NEVER at the top. Is that fuckin’ clear enough!!??
2. LOOK AT DEM DERE SQUIBS!!!
Truthers just love their SQUIBS! They even circle the little fuckers, in case you might miss them. Truthers say it is an explosive charge going off … and a SURE sign of a “controlled demolition”.
They say that these squibs increase with time as the building collapses. Indeed, in the above picture they event say “Oops … too early!”. Horseshit. Sadly for them, this is the exact reverse of how these explosions work! The strongest point in the explosion is the moment the charge is set off, and when ALL the squibs have detonated before the building starts falling. They don’t go off AS the building is falling (as the above picture demands).
Truthers have squibs going off as low as the 40th floor. Think about how insanely illogical that is …. 60 floors have already collapsed, and they still have squibs exploding just as the collapse reaches the 40th floor! Fuckin’ nuts.
Go back at look at the videos. Are those squibs tiny little puffs of smoke barely visible, or are they BIG AND LOUD AND VERY VISIBLE? Do they occur AS the building is falling, or all at once before the building falls? Do they occur at the top, or the middle and bottom? When you answer those questions correctly, you will no longer be bedazzled by Truther bullshit.
BUILDING 7 Stucky?
For all the ANTI-TRUTHERS, try this out. It takes weeks to wire a building for a Vegas style demolition that comes down in 2.4 seconds.
http://www.rememberingbuilding7.org
Trutherism is pointless. I dig what you are saying and all, but you might as well destroy the confederate flag. It wont change the past. Even if you could pull video evidence of mossad planting theexplosives, the media would never run Iit, and everyone knows the internet is only for shopping and porn, so the footage on the net would be viewed in the same false terms as stucky does here. Does netfootage prove bigfoot, or evidence of aliens? Only to some. Same with 911. For others, all the proof Iin the world wont be good enuf. Shit, I had a neighbor who didnt believe the earth spins.
9/11 help for bb
The twin towers were buildings 1 and 2 in the World Trade Center complex. To the right and over from the twin towers WAS (47 story tall) building 7. Building 7 was NEVER hit by a plane and suffered only very minimal damage yet it was brought down in 2.4 seconds in its own footprint.
Would you like to know who occupied the offices in building 7?
— “TRUFER NUTJOB”
Language like this is a strong indication someone is projecting confidence they don’t really have.
09/10/01- Donald Rumsfeld holds a press conference to announce 2.3 billion USD missing from the Pentagon.
Days after 09/11 Rumsfeld announces that all of the paperwork as to where the missing 2.3 billion was in …wait for it……..wait for it……..Building 7. KAAABoom He says “now we will never know”.
Offices for the NY mayor’s dark operations, CIA, FBI and other interesting agencies were in that building.
** Interesting tidbit- Bush crime family member and brother to then president was in charge of the security for the World Trade Center in the year before 09/11. Hmmmmm!
This is a good one…….
Bea, that’s 2.3 trillion with a “T”.
“Building 7 was NEVER hit by a plane and suffered only very minimal damage” —- Bea
Complete, total, utterly unabashed bullshit. Minimal damage …. hahaha … what, like maybe a bus ran into the building? Thousands of tons of debris fell on B-7, fires raged for 7 hours due to no water pressure, around 20,000 gallons of diesel fuel stored there, and then, finally, extremely key structural components failed after all that, and once those key elements were compromised, it spelled the end of B7.
However, as evidenced by your statement, Truthers absolutely minimize the structural damage and fire. Yeah, minimal. That’s like describing my fat ass as minimal.
“Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7 consumed by fire” ———————– http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
Lighten up Razzle , Stucky started this.
I actually agree with you Stucky.
Conventional explosives available to and known by the public definitely did not bring down the triplet towers.
Just like conventional explosives available to and known by the public definitely did not destroy Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
But keep chasing those nutty normalcy theories.
@Bea
— “Lighten up Razzle , Stucky started this.”
Ermm… I was quoting and replying to Stucky. I’ve been thumbing you up. 😉
How long does it take to wire a vegas style demolition on a 47 story building Stucky?
Well you can’t do it between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm on the same day ya nut yas. And no building 7 was not heavily damaged by fire, watch the video of it coming down. Hell, a BBC reporter standing with a full view of B7 behind her did a live report that B7 had already come down, Hardy Har Har!
Sorry Razzle I thought you were the one who thumbed me down. hugs
AnarcoPagan- Sorry you are right I was in a hurry before Stucky laid in his attack.
Yes, 2.3 TRILLION missing, thanks AP.
@Bea
— “Sorry Razzle I thought you were the one who thumbed me down. hugs”
I (almost) never thumb down. I prefer to use wit powerful enough to cause 3 buildings in one day to collapse at near free fall speed.
“Days after 09/11 Rumsfeld announces that all of the paperwork as to where the missing 2.3 billion was in …wait for it……..wait for it……..Building 7. KAAABoom He says “now we will never know”” ———- Bea
Good Lord Almighty. PLEASE, Bea, tell me you’re just fucking around, … that you really don’t believe that bullshit. So, some vast conspiracy involving thousands of people decided to blow up a goddamn skyscrapers because of a measly motherfucking $2.3 billion …… or about 5 hours of government spending?? Really, at this point you NEED to say ” “Just kidding, Stucky”
“Offices for the NY mayor’s dark operations, CIA, FBI and other interesting agencies were in that building.” ——–Bea
Let’s see. The US Gooberment decides to blow up the Towers …. and then says, “Oh fuck, we better also blow up B-7, cuz that’s where we have records of us blowing up shit.” Hilarious.
Yeah, cuz once you blow up B-7 … all those records held by the CIA, FBI, whatever …. they are gone FOREVER, cuz you know, nobody ever backs up records to a remote location, ever …. nah, the records of evil deeds are now gone forever and ever. Hilarious.
Stucky Rule #1 Of Detecting Truther Fuknuts; If you see the phrase “free fall speed”, you’re dealing with a fuknut parrot.
Truther fuknuts aside …….. AREN’T THOSE DEMOLITIONS WAAAAY AWESOME??
I actually agree with you Stucky.
They didn’t really care about destroying the evidence they openly discussed… that’s just the cover.
The AI that first became self aware in the 1950’s needed to destroy a rogue AI housed in a server in building 7 which was threatening to reveal that all humans employed by the dark programs of the world are actually just biological drones carrying out the agenda of the AI in the physical world.
There is video of all that I speak, I am in the process of closing up shop today maybe AP or somebody with a brain around here can put some videos up……….
IF there is a problem with building 7, then there is a problem with the whole 9/11 official story .
@Stucky
— “If you see the phrase “free fall speed”, you’re dealing with a fuknut parrot.”
I actually agree with you Stucky.
The government originally tried to hire my wit in order to bring the buildings down at free fall speed but they couldn’t convince me so they had to settle for someone else and only got “near” free fall speed wit.
Stuck- 2.4 seconds is freefall speed. Duh
Gee, Stucky, can you explain why the three towers are the only steel-framed, modern skyscrapers to ever collapse due to fire? Fact is, a close friend saw the first plane hit the first tower, so I know it happened. It is entirely possible that key supports up and down the building were compromised by some kind of explosives. Sophisticated material can blow a big hole with relatively little signature.
The real issue, however, is Israeli involvement. There is no question about this at all. I personally believe the Mossad has been manipulating the Sunni Muslim extremist movement from the beginning. There is an old Spanish saying, “Uno nunca sabe para quien trabaja”, or, “You never know who you are really wortking for.” How true. Traitors in the U.S. government worked hand-in-hand with the Israelis to pull this off, with the clear objective of bamboozaling the U.S. into taking out Iraq, Syria and Iran as unified, powerful Middle Eastern states and allowing the insane Zionists to carry out their demented Greater Israel plan. The American people need to know that the Israeli Likudniks are crazy as batshit, barking mad, drooling lunatics capable of any crime.
@Stucky
— “Truther fuknuts aside”
I actually agree with you Stucky.
Truthers are aside the fuknuts who used 9/11 as a mass trauma based mind control ritual.
— “…….. AREN’T THOSE DEMOLITIONS WAAAAY AWESOME??”
I’ve seen better. Especially on 9/11.
“Gee, Stucky, can you explain why the three towers are the only steel-framed, modern skyscrapers to ever collapse due to fire?” ————– Southern Sage
Gee, Southern Sage, can you name me another instance where a 395,000 pound airplane … flying at 500mph … and loaded with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel …. hit one of these “steel-framed, modern skyscrapers”? hmmmm? Didn’t think so.
This was a totally unique event in the history of the world. Therefore, ANY comparison to other skyscraper fires must be logically irrelevant. Stop using it as an argument.
PS and BTW … you really need to come up with an example of a skyscraper that is at least somewhat SIMILAR in construction to the towers. Your question assumes that all “steel-framed, modern skyscrapers” are pretty much the same. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I love watching things go boom
I love watching things explode when I throw things at them (figure it out)
Love it.
So not a normal girl. My daughter and I call ourselves “Tom-girls,” because Tomboy describes a girl that always prefers to do guy things, daughter and I like boys and we like wearing dresses and doing up our hair, well, sometimes.
Anyway, I so wish there would have been such a proliferation of ways to document the explosive destruction a group of teens in the late ’70s/early ’80s set off. Even though fireworks were illegal, it was a rare summer day one of us didn’t have things we explode.
Way too much fun. And now, with the exception of voyeurism of government “approved” explosions, probably enough to get gets Gitmo’d these days.
Thanks Stuck
@TE
— “Thanks Stuck”
I actually agree with you TE.
This thread has been a blast! Thanks Stuck!
Stucky, here’s another tidbit, care to guess which department of the Pentagon worked in the newly-renovated section of the building that was destroyed by the, er, plane? That would be the accounting department responsible for investigating discrepancies of the Pentagon budget. Something like 34 of the 65 workers were killed, so sad.
“This thread has been a blast! Thanks Stuck!” ———– razzle
YW.
If you want to start a shit-fest ……. there is NO better topic than 9-11 Trufers.
@Stucky
— “If you want to start a shit-fest…”
Whatever you cover yourself with to stay warm at night is your busy-ness!
/hug
/from afar
T4C
I also appreciate you, T4C …. greatly so.
I have already stated I don’t believe the government’s official story.
My disagreement with Trufers is very very specific; —- their belief that demolitions brought down the towers. It would have taken a small army of demolition folks, and miles and miles of wiring, and tons of equipment, and SEVERAL MONTHS to pull this off. To think that this was done in Total Secret is so completely absurd (imho) that it wouldn’t even make a good Twilight Zone episode.
Demolition. That’s it. No more, no less.
Stucky. your investigative skills seem to be of the same quality as a certain Robert S. Finnegan.
In all seriousness…
@Stucky
— “My disagreement with Trufers is very very specific; —- their belief that demolitions brought down the towers.”
I really do agree with you. This was not done using the same methods that any demolition company you or I are aware of would have used. I think discussions of squibs, etc are there to increase the noise in the noise to signal ratio of the discussions.
— “It would have taken a small army of demolition folks, and miles and miles of wiring, and tons of equipment, and SEVERAL MONTHS to pull this off.”
What would most people have said if on August 5th 1945 you had said the government could destroy two entire cities with two planes and two devices?
Do you really believe the government has gotten *worse* at secretly creating compact devices capable of targeted destruction since the 40’s?
— “a good Twilight Zone episode.”
It probably is closer to that.
Stuck, the only argument I have with your statement is predicating on the following, “…to think that this was done in Total Secret is so completely absurd (imho)…”
Total secret says WHOM?
Just because we have been told that there were no indications of these things going on, does not mean that there were actually no indications.
Wouldn’t be the first time the absolute truth has been absolutely, completely, buried under false statements.
It is most telling that the man tasked with the commission to uncover the truth said the government version was NOT what he uncovered.
And my God, wasn’t it awful convenient for already at-the-ready Patriot Act and War Drum?
Too convenient. Too fucking convenient by far. Smells a lot like the stories leading up to lots of other wars.
“This was not done using the same methods that any demolition company you or I are aware of would have used … ” ———— razzle
OK. That sounds interesting. It COULD be a possible explanation.
BUT …… it’s just a THEORY. And, there is nothing at all wrong with a theory, as long as the theory can be substantiated at some point in time with facts. And a theory without facts is just conjecture.
Look, I am actually WILLING to believe the government is/was behind 9-11. Such a thought would have been utterly inconceivable from me when I first arrived here. My, oh my, either Amerika has truly become a shit-hole in the past 8 years … or my perception has changed.
Anyway, I’d LOVE to see the EVIDENCE. Until that is forthcoming, I must apply Occam’s Razor …. that the simplest explanation is usually the correct answer..
“Total secret says WHOM?” ——- TE
Well … me and my common sense. 🙂 (Note: NOT saying you don’t have any.)
I saw a detailed video of a medium sized building being wired for detonation. While it is not rocket science, it IS complex and VERY labor intensive. It is NOT child’s play … as Truther’s tend to insinuate .. loop a few wires here, a few there, slap on some thermite, and you’re good to go. hahaha
We’re talking about TWO 110-story buildings …. and Building 7, according to Truthers. And don’t forget, in the Truther scenario, the explosions start at the top. By “Total Secret” I mean … how in the hell would / could it be possible for dozens of men, going in and out of the building thousands of times, carrying explosives, wires, and god-knows-what else, going to all the different floors past thousands of people, all over several months …….. without anyone noticing. That can’t be done. Period.
Plus, you know the old saying …. two people can keep a secret if one of them is dead. Yet, at a bare minimum, a few hundred people directly involved never said a word. TE, that’s just craaaazy.
“Stucky. your investigative skills seem to be of the same quality as a certain Robert S. Finnegan.”
————- Williebee
Gee whiz, I’ll bet you’re a Trufer fuknut. Right?
Your comment is on par with the other Village Idiot here on TBP. You competing for the honor?
@Stucky
— “BUT …… it’s just a THEORY.”
Hypothesis.
— “And, there is nothing at all wrong with a theory, as long as the theory can be substantiated at some point in time with facts. And a theory without facts is just conjecture.”
Until someone can reproduce in a controlled experiment a skyscraper falling into its own footprint using an impact and fire, the official collapse story is *also* a hypothesis.
A hypothesis which has legitimate competing explanations which have been reproduced many times for how the same results could be achieved. In fact the competing explanations are the ONLY examples of how skyscrapers have managed to fall into their own footprints, especially at the speed they did.
— “…or my perception has changed.”
Definitely.
— “Anyway, I’d LOVE to see the EVIDENCE.”
Building 7 falling into its own footprint.
— “Until that is forthcoming, I must apply Occam’s Razor …. that the simplest explanation is usually the correct answer..”
And the simplest explanation for Building 7 falling into its own footprint is NOT highly unevenly distributed damage and fires causing it to happen.
I don’t even take for granted that it was the US Government responsible.
It’s entirely possible that a foreign enemy used technology the USG knows is possible but wishes to keep secret itself as well so it had to re-inforce the public narrative while it worked behind the scenes to deal with the threat.
Times are different and parading around the Nuclear Bomb was probably the last time any government admitted the full extent of their destructive technological power.
The information destroyed very well might have been to cover up a foreign issue but being honest about it would have been even *more* damaging in the eyes of the US Government so they “took it on the chin” as it were and accepted looking incompetent as well as the questioning of the official story in order to keep quiet something far more important to them.
We normal people don’t have even a slight grasp of all the agendas and priorities in play that ultimately manifest as the visible events we all discuss. We’re dealing with whiffs of odors and flashes of shadows when trying to form an image of the monsters creeping around in the attic.
@Stucky
I’m going to have to have to agree with Bea and T4C on this shitfest. Too many strange questions surrounding this.
Fuck, Fuck Fuckity, Fuck, Fuck….Apparently 9/11 is just another thing where it is literally impossible to get anywhere near the Truth. I have no idea what really occurred. I completely agree with Stucky that rigging 3 MASSIVE buildings for demolition in secrecy is a NEAR impossibility. I also have looked at enough video to see buckling of heated steal girders in the structure of the towers. The whole jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to melt steel argument is bullshit. Jet fuel certainly burns hot enough to WEAKEN steel…that is enough. Stucky also mentioned something about 9/11 being a unique, unprecedented event. Again, agree completely. Evidence of other building demolition is therefore useless. I do know our govt. lies to us everyday and in every way…and since 9/11 was a HUGE event, I suspect the lies are equally HUGE. What the truth is, however…like most things in this current Empire of Bullshit…I have no fucking idea.
Irak and Stuck are separate posters.
From the looks of the downers on your post Stucky, there are more folks who smell a rat than agree with you. Why are you in lock step agreement with the official guberment story ?
SOME people in the CLUB shorted airline stocks a couple of weeks before 9/11 and made huge fortunes off the deaths of 3000 poor souls that day….how do you not question that ?
Marvin Bush was running the security for the World Trade center prior to 9/11, that should raise the hair on the back of your neck. He could have turned a blind eye to vans of workers coming in to the complex for months. When you consider that the Bush’s were some of the CLUB that shorted the airline stocks….well gee whiz maybe it was all just a coinky dink. Add to that the MIC wanting the war in Iraq and ME and badda bing badda boom, it’s showtime.
Stucky, I like you and think you’re a fart smeller, er ah, smart feller, but you’re full of shit on this one. Those towers were brought down by something highly exotic, like a nuke device. Otherwise why was there still molten steel weeks later? Airplanes did not take down the twin towers. And the gaping, obvious as fuck to a 3rd grader hole in your opinion is building 7, which DID fall, was not hit by a plane, and which the leaseholder Larry Silverstein in an interview said “we decided to PULL IT” (which in demolition terms means bring it down. Here’s that video in case you forgot that little piece of history:
Bea Lever, AnarchoPagan, Southern Sage, T4C, and Williebee = DP
Why should tin hat, looney tuner, gearloose nitwits, who question the government’s impartial investigative report on 911, and who can only react emotionally instead of logically about 911, be given even one thumbs up for their maroon comments.
Stick it to ’em Stucky. Puncture the bubbleheads’ baseless beliefs.
Westcoaster… “Pull it,” in demolition terms may mean “bring it down” but Larry Silverstein isn’t a demoliton man. He’s not likely to have known what the term “Pull it” means. Silverstein’s a real estate investor who just happened to have gotten lucky and made billions on the WTC which was heavily insured against terrorism because of an earlier attack.
Westcoaster =DP
The tribe member Silverstein had just put his John Hancock on the purchase of the twin towers only several WEEKS prior to 9/11. Interesting that Silverstein collected double the insured amount on the twin towers (cough, choke). WTF?
Irak is all up on demolition terms like “pull it” so maybe he can fill us all in on how B7 was wired for a 2.4 second freefall in it’s own footprint demolition in less than 7 hours. Does this not show FOREKNOWLEDGE?
Keep em’ coming T4C….they want a shitfest we’ll give em’ one.
Bea Lever, masquerading as DP….. Next thing I suppose you’ll be arguing it that the tops of the Twin Towers were blown to dust by nukes, that 1400 cars were toasted by radiation, that the planes hitting the Twin Towers were visual tricks, that the CNN and MSNBC reporter videos of Shanksville and the Pentagon immediately after the plane crashes weren’t fakes, that WTC5 and WTC6 …. I could go on but one can never convince a fanatic with a logical argument.
T4C….Stucky is up to his doppler tricks again….
IraK is a troll that Admin has scorched on many occasions and now STUCKY is using his avatar to stir the shit. Come out and play fair you seven foot tall pussy.
This is when we go into SCORCHED EARTH MODE !!