Question of the Day, Mar 22

In the wake of the latest terror attack, should muslims be eradicated from Europe & the U.S., or should we not judge a group based on a few bad apples?


Author: Back in PA Mike

Crotchety middle aged man with a hot younger wife dead set on saving this Country.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
44 Comments
rhs jr
rhs jr
March 22, 2016 8:05 pm

It is not in the genes; it is in the koran. Impose Islam on Africans, Hindus or Asians and you get the same barbaric results. We all need to condemn the koran if we are ever to get rid of this devil cult.

kokoda
kokoda
March 22, 2016 8:13 pm

“not judge a group based on a few bad apples”

This is an incorrect aphorism in regards to Mooslims. How about: Islam is a cancer that keeps on spreading.

Yes, get rid of all the Neanderthals from Western Developed countries.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 22, 2016 8:28 pm

We have no power to make that decision, that’s for the power elite billionaires to decide.

THEY decided to bring them here as a weapon, THEY will decide when they will vacate. Don’t kid yourself that WE have any say in this matter.

wip
wip
March 22, 2016 8:33 pm

Black man says he slashed white womans neck because she was white. Police say they are trying to find the answer to why he did it (I added that.)

http://nypost.com/2016/03/22/man-says-he-slashed-woman-because-she-was-white/

Persnickety
Persnickety
March 22, 2016 8:36 pm

“Yes, get rid of all the Neanderthals from Western Developed countries.”

Ironically, this common insult is so ignorant it’s basically an unintended compliment. There is a strong correlation between European genes and Neandarthal DNA. All modern humans outside of sub-Saharan Africa have some Neandarthal DNA, but the concentrations are highest in northern European and northern Asian peoples. I don’t know of a study directly linking Neandarthal DNA with intelligence or other desired features, but there are conclusive studies linking Neandarthal DNA with those two populations, and numerous studies showing those two populations rank highest for intelligence.

So, actually, we need to limit and monitor the non-Neandarthals in our developed countries, as the pure “Homo Sapiens” are often correlated with social problems.

JIMSKI
JIMSKI
March 22, 2016 8:36 pm

Bea

Disagree

A few guys with 338 lapau and training could change a lot of minds. Ok change them into red clouds of ick but I am totally ok with that.

nkit
nkit
March 22, 2016 8:38 pm

Ask yourself: Self, if the Muslim population becomes the majority of the population, do you think that the “peaceful Muslim” friends you have had for decades before they became the majority would fight to stop extremist Muslims from beheading you due to a Sharia Law transgression?

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
March 22, 2016 8:45 pm

NKIT just cut through all the bull shit.

cynic
cynic
March 22, 2016 8:46 pm

‘Good’ Muslims are the bad people!

kokoda
kokoda
March 22, 2016 8:53 pm

Persnickety……..somehow, you took something soooo simple and tried to impress with the basic evolution understanding about which everyone is aware. Somehow, you don’t understand that the Musloid Morlocks following Islam are living in a culture that is 1,000-10,000 years in the past.

For you, I will have to be crystal clear – the Mooslims have not progressed mentally and culturally in at least 1,000 years.

card802
card802
March 22, 2016 8:56 pm

Out of all the “end of the world as we know it” books I like to read, EMP’s, viruses, asteroids, economic collapse, a black hole pulling the entire solar system off kilter are the normal causes.

Not once has any author touched on the possibility of muslims vs everybody else in a final battle to the apocalypse.

Oh, the other books are fiction……….

Unless:

The Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations had just finished giving a speech, and walked out into the lobby where he met President Trump.

They shook hands, and as they walked the Iranian said, ”You know, I have just one question about what I have seen in America.”

President Trump said, “Well, anything I can do to help you, I will.”

“My son watches this show ‘Star Trek’ and in it there is Chekhov who is Russian, Scotty who is Scottish, Uhura who is Black, and Sulu who is Chinese, but no muslims.
My son is very upset and doesn’t understand why there aren’t any Iranians, Syrians, or Iraqis on “Star Trek.”

President Trump smiles whimsically and answers, “Because Star Trek takes place in the future.”

bb
bb
March 22, 2016 8:57 pm

Penn Head ,your reply ???

Stucky
Stucky
March 22, 2016 9:05 pm

GREAT Question!

FWIW, my reply will be in the form of a 6,000 word original-post tomorrow. Tried like hell to finish it by this evening, but just couldn’t. Will continue working on it through the night until it is finished.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 22, 2016 9:06 pm

Jimski- OK I should have included “red clouds of ick” as a possible counter toward them leaving post-haste.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 22, 2016 9:10 pm

Stucky- looking forward to your particular insight on mooslimfuks as only YOU can lay it down in words and or photos. Thanks for all of the hard work.

nkit
nkit
March 22, 2016 9:14 pm

@Overthecliff…NKIT just cut through all the bull shit.

I thought that was what I was doing…..

Stucky
Stucky
March 22, 2016 9:30 pm

Thanks Bea,

It is not a Pictorial Essay. No photos. Just text.

gilberts
gilberts
March 22, 2016 9:30 pm

Let’s put their stupid evil faith to the test. Nuke Mecca. If the missiles don’t go off, Allah exists and we all bow to the East. Otherwise, their stupid little rock and their stupid little religious city gets vaporized and they get to deal with the existential crisis Christians and other moderns went through a loooong time ago. Worst case, we deal with the same suicide bomber faggots we’ve already been dealing with for 1 more generation and the war is over. Fuck Islam and all its retarded adherents.

gilberts
gilberts
March 22, 2016 9:33 pm

I’ve been over there. Ragheads are fucked up people. Churchill was right-the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

nkit
nkit
March 22, 2016 9:35 pm

Indeed. Screw the Kaaba and the Blackstone, in one shot..

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
March 22, 2016 9:35 pm

Can’t we all just allow muslims to live and kill? Islam seems to be (among our owners) an acceptable form of killing people and there are at least 5 billion spare people plaguing this planet (I might be one of the spares.) that need to exit stage left so let’s ramp this shit up! Let’s give terrorism……….uhh…..I mean…..islam…..a chance! I think China needs a little islam and India could use a LOT more!

Actually I am one of the spares since I’m not one of the inclusive, progressive, tolerant, compliant sheep.

I am grateful on a daily basis that I did not produce any cannon fodder……I mean chirrens.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
March 22, 2016 9:36 pm

Santiago y cierra, España! The Spanish battle cry before attacking the Moors.
Spanish conquerors transmitted their hatred of Muslims and blacks to the Americas.
They had quite an elaborate caste system here in the new world.
Hence the roots of Hispanic preference of things white.

Coyote is not a positive term in that regard, it designates a person near the bottom of the racial system.

ASIG
ASIG
March 22, 2016 9:45 pm

This is a very good explanation. –the three stages of jihad

Stucky
Stucky
March 22, 2016 10:01 pm

“The Spanish battle cry before attacking the Moors.” —— El Coyote, who suddenly can’t remember shit

It wasn’t the Moors. It was the Moops. Google it.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 22, 2016 10:05 pm

EC- The Spanish were stuck with those son-of-bitchez for 700 years.

EC- The Spanish were stuck with those sons-of-bitchez for 700 years.

If they don’t get the hint soon to get the hell out, they may need a nudge. No 700 year layover here.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 22, 2016 10:07 pm

Don’t make me repeat myself………lol.

I am now sure there is a ghost in my tablet.

llpoh
llpoh
March 22, 2016 10:43 pm

To answer the question – yes.

It is imperative.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
March 22, 2016 10:44 pm

If we would stop invading countries that didn’t attack us, droning weddings with hellfire missiles, and overthrowing the govs we don’t agree with, then maybe we wouldn’t be having either refugees or attacks.

In the meantime, until we can change our foreign policy, we should seal our borders and not let anyone in. I’ve been a long-term proponent of mining the border as a “no mans land”. Blow a few up and they’ll get the message. Right now, our welcome mat is out and it’s stupid (along with the fucking TSA) if we’re really fighting a “war on terror”

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 22, 2016 10:50 pm

So what are all Muslims like and what do they represent?

Simple, take a look at any Muslim controlled and dominated area of the world and you’ll find your answer right out in the open and plain to see.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
March 22, 2016 10:59 pm

Westcoaster,

I get the gist of your jibe. I’m just not sure who the ‘we’ is that you speak of?

If you mean that our ruling oligarchs are largely responsible for stirring the hornets nest then dumping it in our enclosed patios then sure. Doesn’t mean the hornets don’t need to be swatted though – hornets are hornets. Mind you if their nest wasn’t in my covered patio or my back yard I probably wouldn’t pay them any attention. But they are now – unfortunately. The only difference being in the end I’m more upset with with the fucking moron who dumped the nest to begin with. He’s gonna pay sooner or later because if it was’t for him the hornets and I likely would never have met and we wouldn’t have a problem with one another. My crystal ball says “the future” is a bad time to be an oligarch. Especially if you’re allergic to hemp and steel.

harry p.
harry p.
March 22, 2016 11:02 pm

Excellent question,
Should they be eradicated? I dont think thats necessary.
Do they need to be reminded thats its a possibility that they could be erased from existence? yeah probably.

Will it happen? Not before its too late, WW3 may be a religious war and stand against islam.

nkit
nkit
March 22, 2016 11:06 pm

The Q.O.T.D. is not a yes or no question. One or the other, choose. (A) Do we kill them all, or do we kill all of those that would condemn us for wanting to kill them all? or (B) Can’t we do both?

ASIG
ASIG
March 22, 2016 11:11 pm

Show me the pictures or videos of the moderate Muslims that are trying to prevent the beheadings and the stoning’s that go on in the Muslim countries. Where is there any evidence that the so called moderate Muslims are doing anything to modify the behavior of the radical Muslims?

Muslims will protest and riot by the thousands over a cartoon that they consider an insult. Has there ever been a protest by the moderate Muslims over the beheading of a Christian?

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
March 22, 2016 11:18 pm

Actually, just reduce their population to about a dozen breeding pairs and see what happens. If they continue on the same path eliminate those with a radical bent and try again. It could be like breeding dogs, just select for the desirable traits and exclude the undesirable.

AC
AC
March 22, 2016 11:27 pm

Exterminating non-muslims is core islamic doctrine. Killing non-muslims is their religious duty. It’s in their fucking book.

The ‘moderate muslims’ are the ones enabling their trigger pullers: there really are no moderate muslims, there are just muslims that are not actively trying kill you at the moment.

Drive them back to Mecca, then nuke Mecca into a proper monument to their murderous pedophile rapist ‘prophet’ and their satanic subhuman religion.

The day it happens would be a global holiday.

Every day that even a single muslim still draws breath is a bad day for humanity.

Persnickety
Persnickety
March 22, 2016 11:42 pm

@Kokoda: you said: “Somehow, you don’t understand that the Musloid Morlocks following Islam are living in a culture that is 1,000-10,000 years in the past. For you, I will have to be crystal clear – the Mooslims have not progressed mentally and culturally in at least 1,000 years.”

I don’t feel like an epic shitfest, so I will limit my response to discussing your many mistakes. Whether Islam is many years in the past all depends on your frame of reference. Compared to the early peaks of Western society, they might be somewhere around the end of the Mycenean age or just after, aka the first dark age. (That’s about 3000 years ago, btw, in case you skipped that part of history.) Compared to some “lost tribes” in the Amazon, they might be more advanced. Frames of reference.

If you know much of Islamic history, which you presumably do not, you would know that there was a brief time around 900-1100 AD when they were one of the most advanced civilizations in the world in many respects. They had the same “Koran” but were apparently better at selective reading of it than they are today. Regardless, that book and adherence to it set the stage for their decline, as the religion condoned (1) polygamy, (2) slavery, and (3) sex with and marriage to slaves. As a result, the top of the tier males took all the native and desirable women for themselves, and the masses ended up buying slaves. Those slaves tended to be the captives or rejects of less civilized places, particularly certain parts of sub-Saharan Africa, and brought with them the genes for lower intelligence and a greater time preference for immediate gratification. Over many generations this dysgenic breeding harmed the whole society.

Meanwhile, while Islamic civilization peaked around 800-1000 years ago and has declined ever since, it nonetheless had many areas in which better-than-terrible rulers kept things in better shape than they are today. Cue up the 19th and early 20 centuries and the exploitation of oil that just happened to be under Muslim deserts. Western powers wanted it fast and cheap, and often they could bribe illiterate tribesmen cheaper than rulers in power, so we see various guerrilla actions culminating in the elevation of the house of Saud to power over most of the Arabian peninsula, an absolutely terrible turn of events. A couple decades more in the future and you have the CIA destroying a democratic and reasonably tolerant Iranian government (it’s a matter of declassified public record, look it up; or see the book Legacy of Ashes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_of_Ashes_%28book%29)) to install an unwitting and incapable “Shah”, leading in foreseeable course to the Iranian Revolution and its crazies. Or keep watching as the west works to dispose of various secular and capable military dictators throughout the Muslim world, Saddam and Gaddhafi among them, with the extremely foreseeable rise of totally insane Islamic extremists in their place.

I know I’ve probably stretched both your attention span and your vocabulary by now, so I’ll distill it to the basics:
-murderous pirate religion when formed, as seen in the Koran
-surprisingly civilized region for a short period of time c. 900-1100 AD
-decline caused by many factors with dysgenic breeding prominent among them
-further decline caused by western actions
-leads back to murderous pirate religion roots, as seen in the Koran

People looking for one single factor to explain a major issue are generally simpletons. There are multiple factors in the Muslim problem we have today. Many chapters could be written. If you wish to contribute, do some research and write one of them.

ASIG
ASIG
March 23, 2016 2:22 am
Mark
Mark
March 23, 2016 2:45 am

Same old same old.

One side will blame immigration .. And side with Trump, Le Peen, and Farage.

The other side will blame terrorism and not mention Islamic. Those people will side with Merkle, Clinton, Obbama and the rest of the EU trying to hold things together.

Who will win? Can’t say.

Administrator
Administrator
Admin
March 23, 2016 7:29 am

This is what leftist ideologues truly believe.

[imgcomment image[/img]

ZombieDawg
ZombieDawg
March 23, 2016 8:19 am

Japan can see the bleeding obvious but they keep a VERY low profile about their HATRED of all things Muslim and Islam.
Pity the phone-hugging, tv dancing and cooking show watching brain dead zombie plague on this world can’t do the same as the Japs…
Oh looky… Martin Armstrong’s models demonstrate this very terrorism cycle.
How about that eh 😉
Matrix – 0, Reality – 1

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 23, 2016 8:47 am

Islam itself is what is to be judged.

The misery, war and terrorism we see it producing is the fruit of its nature and belief.

By its fruit is a tree known.

Bob
Bob
March 23, 2016 2:09 pm

My answer to the ‘few bad eggs’ line of reasoning: Where is the condemnation of terrorism? Of the many repugnant beliefs expressed by some Muslims (infidels can be killed with Allah’s approval, murderers are martyrs, virgins await killers in heaven, etc)?

Why are the leaders of Islam NOT out in front immediately disavowing, excommunicating and other wise speaking out against those who commit senseless murder in the name of Allah whenever and wherever it occurs? Why are they not out front tracking down the killers and neutralizing the threat? Why are they so passive and silent? Why do they behave so differently from how the leaders of any other major religion would act under similar circumstances? There are only a few explanations, and all of them are evil.

It bears repeating — Have you noticed how differently they behave than any leader of any other faith would behave in the same situation? The are complicit to the point of being apologists after the fact, if not outright accessories and enablers.

I believe Muslims who are US citizens, and those legally here, pursuing citizenship or other peaceful purposes should be allowed to stay. On the other hand, I believe we should decertify Islam as any sort of recognized and respected religion, and reduce its official status to that of a political action organization subject to Federal, State and Local tax and regulation. That is the part of government we should sic on them, and it would serve us and them right!

AnarchoPagan
AnarchoPagan
March 23, 2016 2:11 pm

Many of you claim to revere the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and I seem to recall something about freedom of religion in there. Hypocrisy much?

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
March 23, 2016 2:17 pm

Islam is a mental illness, not a religion. Freedom of religion is enshrined in the U S Constitution; do you think that if Islam becomes dominant in the US, they will respect and protect the Constitution?

Dimwit AnarchoPagan, defend Islam all you want; unless you are Islamic (doubtful given your handle), Islam will NOT defend you. As a bonus, if you are an infidel (defined as any Non-Islamic plus the OTHER side [Shia or Sunni, whichever you AREN’T] you will be persecuted by Islamics. You consider that a religion?

I posted on the Loyalty Oath thread why I think Islam is a mental illness, and won’t repeat myself here. My point is if we CLASSIFY Islam as a mental illness, then we can exclude them from immigrating because discrimination against immigrants on the basis of mental illness is allowed. Get going, Congress!