ILLINOIS IS BROKE

Via Chicago Tribune

Comptroller says Illinois lawmakers will have to get in a long line to get paid

 

Illinois Comptroller Leslie Geissler Munger plans to delay monthly paychecks for lawmakers and statewide officials, saying there isn’t enough money to pay the state’s bills and that other services should come first.

The comptroller’s office will still process the paychecks, estimated at $1.3 million a month, but lawmakers won’t get the money right away because the payments will be thrown onto the state’s huge pile of unpaid bills.

Munger acknowledged the idea is to apply pocketbook political pressure to lawmakers to spur a resolution to the 10-month budget fight between Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner and Democrats led by House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton. She argued that lawmakers’ paychecks are taking away money from nonprofit social service providers and small businesses who have seen their payments delayed during the impasse.

“I am hoping that this will help everyone understand what it feels like, really, to be among the group of people who are waiting months for payment,”  Munger, a Lincolnshire Republican, said at a rare Sunday morning news conference in Chicago.

Munger, appointed by Rauner after the December 2014 death of Judy Baar Topinka, faces a special election in November against Democrat Susana Mendoza, the Chicago city clerk. Neither candidate is well-known statewide, and the contest is low-profile in a presidential election year. Munger’s decision on lawmakers’ paychecks gets her name out there in a populist way.

Mendoza blasted the decision as “10 months late and many dollars short.”

“Yes, we should not pay elected officials where possible before paying more urgent bills, but when is Comptroller Munger going to stand up to Gov. Rauner and demand an end to his extreme agenda and pass a budget?” Mendoza asked in a statement emailed by her campaign.

Currently, there is a delay of at least two months on most invoices at the comptroller’s office as the state is racking up bills without enough money to cover the costs. That’s the result of a mix of court orders and existing laws that have allowed state government to operate almost as normal even though Rauner and lawmakers haven’t agreed on a full tax-and-spending plan. Rank-and-file state workers are being paid by court order, and lawmaker salaries are being paid because they’re written into law.

Until now, paychecks for state workers and lawmakers have been going out on time, but Munger contended it’s unfair for elected officials to receive their salaries on time while others who provide services for the state have to wait.

“I do not relish taking this action,” Munger said. “Many of our leaders are true public servants who care about their constituents and their communities, and they are earning their pay. But so are the many organizations and businesses all throughout Illinois who have, in good faith, provided services to the state but still wait months for payment.”

Munger also is trying to distance herself from the blame game of the budget stalemate, which is expected to loom large in the upcoming election. Both Rauner and Democratic leaders generally agree that it will take a mixture of spending cuts and new taxes to balance the state’s books. But before getting there, Rauner wants Democrats to help him pass his pro-business, union-weakening legislative agenda, which they have refused to do.

Both sides are making a political calculation that voters will side with them in November House and Senate contests, leaving little incentive for a compromise in the meantime.

On Sunday, Munger insisted she had not consulted Rauner, his staff or Republican leaders in the legislature before making the decision. She acknowledged the political implications of holding up lawmaker pay while casting herself as a defender of the ordinary people who’ve been hurt by Springfield politics.

“It all adds up, and that $1.3 million can mean a lot to a nonprofit,” Munger said. “It may prevent some from being laid off or keep a critical community program going. It could mean a lot to the small business providing services to the state that has been waiting months and months for payment.”

It’s not the first time legislators have seen their pay targeted amid political gridlock, and the move undoubtedly will bring up legal questions about the separation of executive and legislative powers.

In July 2013, Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn used his veto powers to eliminate lawmakers’ pay from the state’s annual spending plan to try to force action on a proposal to overhaul the state’s employee pension plan. Democratic legislative leaders sued, and lawmakers went two months without salary before a judge ruled that the move was unconstitutional and the comptroller eventually had to cut the checks.

Munger contends that her decision is different because she’ll still be processing the paychecks, but instead of cutting the checks immediately, she’ll add them to the pile of unpaid bills, which get paid on a delay. Munger said her attorneys came up with a legal opinion late last week that approved the move, but her staff refused to produce a copy of the opinion when the Tribune asked for it.

The comptroller estimated that elected officials, whose next paycheck is due April 30, will have to wait until May or June for their April pay. But she also warned that the delay in paying bills “will grow dramatically” in the summer and fall months, when tax collections are down. April is the peak month for tax collections, and still the state has an $8 billion bill backlog, Munger said.

The delay will also apply to statewide officeholders, including the treasurer, secretary of state, lieutenant governor and Munger herself, she said. Rauner, a wealthy private equity specialist who campaigned on a pledge to serve as governor for free, does not collect a salary.

The 177 legislators receive a base salary of $67,836, but most earn thousands more in stipends by serving in Democratic or Republican leadership positions, or acting as chairman or vice chairman of legislative committees.

Serving in the House or Senate is a part-time job, with lawmakers typically in session a few days a week from January through May, and again for a couple of weeks in the fall. For some legislators, the state salary is their primary or only source of income, which means not getting paid is a financial hardship that turns up the pressure to get a budget resolution. Other lawmakers, including many of the legislative leaders, have lucrative law practices, other jobs or financially successful spouses.

Madigan, for example, has a law firm that specializes in Cook County property tax appeals. Cullerton is a partner at the Thompson Coburn law firm. House Republican leader Jim Durkin is a partner at Arnstein & Lehr. Spokesmen for the two Democratic leaders would not comment on Munger’s decision.

Rank-and-file lawmakers could feel the squeeze, which might create pressure for movement on the budget issue at the statehouse.

Democratic state Sen. Michael Noland of Elgin is an attorney who pulled in about $76,000 from the state and $10,000 from his law practice in 2014, according to financial disclosure forms from a bid for Congress. That year, Noland cited “financial hardship” when he modified his mortgage through a federal program that helps homeowners reduce monthly payments and avoid foreclosure. Noland told the Tribune earlier this year that his family had struggled financially after the pay freeze episode with Quinn.

Chicago Tribune’s Monique Garcia reported from Springfield.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
JIMSKI
JIMSKI
April 20, 2016 10:18 am

THAT BITCH! – Sarc off

D.B. Cooper
D.B. Cooper
April 20, 2016 10:24 am

Good the Law makers should of be the 1st in line not to get paid, as they are always 1st in line to rip off the people of Illinois and to offer up free shit that will never be honored.

Dutchman
Dutchman
April 20, 2016 10:26 am

From Wikipedia:

“Six Illinois governors have been charged with crimes during or after their governorships; four were convicted, and of those, one (Blagojevich) was the first to be impeached and removed from office.

Acquitted:

Len Small (R), governor from 1921 to 1929, was indicted in office for corruption. He was acquitted; thereafter, eight of the jurors received state jobs. Among his defense lawyers was a former governor, Joseph W. Fifer, who asserted in pre-trial hearings, that the governorship has the divine right of kings.[3]

William G. Stratton (R), governor from 1953 to 1961, was acquitted of tax evasion in 1965.[4]

Convicted:

Otto Kerner, Jr. (D), governor from 1961 to 1968; Stratton’s successor and later a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, was convicted of 17 counts of bribery, conspiracy, perjury, and income-tax charges from his time as governor,[5] and received three years in prison and a $50,000 fine in 1973. He was prosecuted by future Illinois governor Jim Thompson.[5]

Daniel Walker (D), governor from 1973 to 1977, was later involved in the savings and loan scandals and convicted of federal crimes related to fraudulent loans to himself from his own First American Savings & Loan Association of Oak Brook. He was sentenced to seven years in prison with five years of probation following his release.[6]

George Ryan (R), governor from 1999 to 2003, was convicted in 2006 of corruption related to his time as Illinois Secretary of State in the 1990s, when commercial driver’s licenses were issued to unqualified truckers in exchange for bribes, and one of the truckers was involved in a crash that killed six children. Former governor Jim Thompson, whom Ryan had served under as Lieutenant Governor of Illinois in the 1980s, was manager of the law firm that defended Ryan.[7] Ryan was released in 2013.

Rod Blagojevich (D), governor from 2003 to 2009, and Ryan’s successor, was impeached and removed from office by the Illinois General Assembly in a unanimous vote in January 2009 after being tied to multiple “pay to play” schemes, including attempting to sell the former Senate seat of recently elected President Barack Obama.[8] In August 2010, he was convicted of lying to the FBI in connection with the investigation, but the jury deadlocked on 23 other charges.[9] Blagojevich was retried on 20 counts from his 2010 trial and on June 27, 2011, Blagojevich was convicted on 17 counts of fraud, acquitted on one count and the jury was hung on two. On December 7, 2011, Blagojevich was sentenced to 14 years in prison.”

Ed
Ed
April 20, 2016 10:29 am

Well, you gotta admit, little ol’ Leslie is kinda hot for an old white lady.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 20, 2016 10:48 am

Expect the Feds to start bailing out the Democrat run States soon by taking on their debt as Federal debt to free them from it.

Where will the money to cover it come from?

That should be obvious, the Conservative run States. The responsible are always expected to cover the consequences of the irresponsible.

ThePessimisticChemist
ThePessimisticChemist
April 20, 2016 11:10 am

We have a serious corruption issue, and I don’t just mean the US of A.

I cannot support higher taxes in any facet until complete transparency occurs.

Drag their trash out and lay it in the sun for all to see.

PS: Illinois has the highest effective tax rate in the nation. Mo’ money mo’ problems.

https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/

Card802
Card802
April 20, 2016 12:05 pm

This will give the fucknuts a way out.

The fed gov will change the rules to allow a state to file bankruptcy.

The courts will now rule on payment obligations to pension holders, which will be zero.

Fucknuts can sit back and blame the courts and the useful idiots will believe. Then watch as state after state files….

Cricket
Cricket
April 20, 2016 12:39 pm

I guess Illinois lottery winners should expect to continue to see IOUs for their winnings…because “That’s as good as money sir, those are IOU’s.”

David
David
April 20, 2016 1:11 pm

Won’t hurt the pols, the graft checks will be sent on time.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
April 20, 2016 1:50 pm

We HAVE to find a way to break the grip of the whole passel of entrenched, corrupt Irish Catholic Chicago politicians on IL and Chicago, but it’s easier to get God to repeal the law of gravity when you’re hauling a 40 cu.ft. refrigerator up 3 flights of stairs, than it is to unseat an elected official in this city or state, and it seems next to impossible to break the control of political dynasties.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
April 20, 2016 2:31 pm

Daley, Burke, Madigan, Cullerton… just a few of this city and state’s political families that seem impossible to topple, and who have financially destroyed us.

Vote them out?? Hell, you are lucky if you can even get an opponent on the ballot. Running against a sitting incumbent is hellish- you don’t know what harassment is until you declare as a candidate opposing an incumbent. Being ripped in the media is the least of it- you will be targeted for tax audits, arrests, and, if you own a business, inspections and fines… if you should be fortunate enough to gather enough verifiable signatures of registered voters to get on the ballot to begin with. When the signatures are being verified, each candidate can contest the legitimacy of the other candidate’s petitions. An incumbent has hundreds of foot soldiers at his disposal and can gather many times the signatures required, well enough coverage for any duplicates, unregistered voters, dead people, etc. while a new candidate is lucky if he can gather just enough signatures in the time window for gathering signatures on your petition. Many aspirants have been eliminated because enough of their signatures were disqualified to render their petitions invalid, thus the number of incumbents with no one opposing them on the ballot.

Then, if you manage to clear all the obstacles, most people will not bother to vote, or if they do, they will vote for their guy whose dad was also a state rep or alderman or whatever back in 1972, ‘cuase he goes to their church and shows up for all the neighborhood events. For example, the loyalty of the Irish-Catholic pocket of the southwest side toward Ald Ed Burke, who has been chairman of the finance committee for the past 20 years and who I hold most responsible, along with Daley the Younger, for the deplorable financial condition of Chicago, is something I cannot fathom. Folks in that corner of town speak of the guy with awe and worship, as they do both Daleys as well. Meanwhile, up north, poverty pimp Joe Moore is so entrenched, no one even bothers to oppose him. It is like this all over the city.

Suzanna
Suzanna
April 20, 2016 4:19 pm

I am in favor of states being permitted to file chapter 11.
Illinois/Chicago…I truly fear that vile state/city mostly…
because the scum will flee to Wisconsin. Close the Wisconsin
border = my vote.

Bob
Bob
April 20, 2016 5:48 pm

Suzanna, maybe Wisconsin should build a wall…LOL

Persnickety
Persnickety
April 20, 2016 6:48 pm

@Chicago999444: I lived there once – in the city, not the suburbs – and saw just a small portion of what you describe, plus some other significant things not relevant here. So guess what? I left! I knew I didn’t want that to be my life, and I also didn’t like breathing polluted air. This is back at a time when the crime rate wasn’t especially bad, the economy was solid, and Obama was an insignificant state rep. I don’t see how things have improved since then.

Mark
Mark
April 20, 2016 7:16 pm

It needs to be the Supreme Court Judges in the State of Illonoise to have any serious impact.

Llpoh
Llpoh
April 20, 2016 7:18 pm

Instead, she should have said “I do not have the money to pay all the hills, so I am not paying any until I do. Either reduce the bills or increase the money.”

That would have got hints really moving.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
April 20, 2016 8:43 pm

Persnickity, the crime is only bad in certain pockets of the city, thankfully a long way from where I live. Perhaps that’s part of the problem- people find it easy to ignore what happens in areas 20 miles away that they never enter.

Actually, the best thing that could happen to Chicago is a Chapter 9 bankruptcy, especially while we still have a decent tax base. This would free us up from all the union contracts and hopefully give us relief on the pensions. Bondholders would get burned, but surely they knew the risks when they bought them and that bonds don’t pay 5% because they are AAA-rated. We COULD, if our mayor had any guts, BK the school board right now, and free ourselves up from the CTU, but Rahm is beholden to the civil servants’ union.

Things would be rough for a couple of years, but the city could get its finances on a different footing under a court-appointed city manager, while we still have a beautiful, largely intact city. But it’s not likely to happen under IL state law.

Uncle Charley
Uncle Charley
April 22, 2016 12:12 am

Now that the most worthless of the people on earth won’t be getting paid, watch how fast they circumvent the law to turn the paycheck back on, for themselves only, of course.