DNC Platform Committee Member: ‘I Don’t Think Anyone Should Have A Gun’

This is what you’ll get if Hitlery gets elected.

 

Via Truth Revolt

 

 

Responsible for shaping the policy platform of the Democratic Party as a committee member of the DNC, Bonnie Schaefer denied everyone their Second Amendment right by sharing her personal opinion that nobody should own a gun.

The multi-millionaire one-percenter said this at a DNC planning event on Wednesday:

“You’re absolutely correct; not just keeping the guns out of the hands of mentally ill people and criminals, but I really don’t personally think anyone should have a gun. I mean, that’s just my own philosophy. Nothing is ever solved when you have a gun in your hand, except the worst possible scenario.”

What she may not realize, as Townhall noted, is that the DNC convention will be flanked by armed security guards. Lucky for her, she won’t have to worry about her own safety if a worst possible scenario-type of thing goes down while she’s in attendance.

Don’t ever let it be said that Democrats aren’t after your guns. Many of them are, and like Schaefer, they sit in powerful thrones, dictating policy.


 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
35 Comments
Persnickety
Persnickety
June 10, 2016 1:58 pm

The Demons are going full-retard. Maybe that will move along the impacted bowel movement that is our national political system.

Dutchman
Dutchman
June 10, 2016 2:02 pm

Cunt.

Rdawg
Rdawg
June 10, 2016 2:07 pm

@Dutch,
And that’s the nicest thing you can call her…

VegasBob
VegasBob
June 10, 2016 2:08 pm

It’s too bad it’s not legal to shove a gun up this dumb cunt’s ass and blow the crap out between her eyes…

Tim
Tim
June 10, 2016 2:10 pm

“Nothing is ever solved when you have a gun in your hand……”

Unless you need to shoot someone dead to protect yourself or your family.
Unless you enjoy shooting wild game to eat.
Unless you enjoy plinking cans down at the abandoned rock quarry.
Unless you want to teach your kids how to handle a potentially dangerous tool safely & maturely.
Unless Human Freedom is important to you.

Bostonbob
Bostonbob
June 10, 2016 2:25 pm

Yes, I guess that whole WWII thingy would have resolved itself. We didn’t need any guns to protect our nation according to her. Screw the French and the English, they didn’t need guns they had Hitler to protect them. Screw the Chinese and the rest of Asia they had the Japanese to protect them. Stupid is as stupid says.
Bob.

Gator
Gator
June 10, 2016 2:32 pm

I get it, it’s bad, but I don’t think hildabeast would be able to get anything meaningful through. Anything that could be gotten away with via executive action, Obama would have done it already. She is no more likely to get a substantial law passed than Obama either. They are risking turning a bunch of people into single issue voters though.

Persnickety
Persnickety
June 10, 2016 2:50 pm

Gator, Obama hasn’t seriously tried to do much. While gun owners were terrified of him in 2008, reality is that he’s done less to ban guns (federally) than Clinton, Bush 1, and even Reagan. Only Bush 2 was better for gun owners than Obama. I think Obama was 80% posturing, 20% cold calculation that it wasn’t worth wasting time on.

Hillary seems crazed and focused on guns. I wouldn’t be too relaxed about the threat that her bunch of marxist neocon idiots could pose.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
June 10, 2016 3:00 pm

On one hand I agree with the cunt………….if no one, and mean no one…….not criminals, cops or protectors of the elite have guns then I agree………we shouldn’t have guns. So, just as soon as the cunt can arrange that I’ll consider giving up mine but until then she can fuck right off!

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
June 10, 2016 3:23 pm

In my opinion, no DNC member (or their security staff) needs guns. Look, just their having guns makes it likely that DNC members will avoid consequences for trying to restrict other people’s Constitutional rights!
Why. it would be just like the massacres in the Soviet Union (kulaks), Red China (peasants), Cambodia (anyone with education), or North Korea (right now!). If no DNC members or their security staff had guns then the rest of us would feel a LOT safer ….

Greg in NC
Greg in NC
June 10, 2016 3:25 pm

She is not the problem, those that support her and others of her ilk are the problem. When the SHTF remember, those that voted for, support, and endorse those kind of people are the power behind them. Remove that power and you remove the problem.

She doesn’t even believe her own statement. She knows if she said that without being surrounded by agents with guns, she would be beaten to death. She loves guns more than us citizens do.

bb
bb
June 10, 2016 3:49 pm

Boston Bob , you said it well.

Tim ,I see living around all that diversity in Dallas has wised you up.

Penn Head ,you seem to be getting smarter . Must be my influence.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
June 10, 2016 4:02 pm

So they plan on disarming the military and law enforcement?

Am I the only one hearing crickets?

Bostonbob
Bostonbob
June 10, 2016 4:10 pm

HSF,
Shouldn’t you still be working. Only kidding, you do more work by 9:00 than most do in a week, but I did run a Spartan Race last Sunday. Not Pretty, but I finished and completed 18 of the 22 obstacles, lots of burpees. I was hoping you would write about goats in you farm essay. As a 4Her in the 1970s we had a herd of goats, funniest animals on the planet.
Bob.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
June 10, 2016 4:31 pm

My hands are so wasted from the last couple of days work I literally cannot use them. After chores I took a day to read, rest, write, enjoy the day and let my hands recuperate.

One of the perks of being your own boss, I suppose.

monger
monger
June 10, 2016 4:41 pm

heard the dnc convention was getting unscalable fence, animal farm, all this is now, when you realize that, perhaps you can wake up,
while the collective declares it owns your body, it cant own your mind unless you let it

Rise Up
Rise Up
June 10, 2016 4:44 pm

Gator says: I get it, it’s bad, but I don’t think hildabeast would be able to get anything meaningful through. Anything that could be gotten away with via executive action, Obama would have done it already. She is no more likely to get a substantial law passed than Obama either. They are risking turning a bunch of people into single issue voters though.
———————————-
It’s the potential to nominate liberal, gun-restricting Supreme Court judges with a Hitlery presidency that any 2nd Amendment supporter needs to be concerned with. Especially with the 9th circuit court ruling yesterday on concealed carry in CA that will certainly bubble up to the Supreme Court eventually.

TPC
TPC
June 10, 2016 5:10 pm

“Naked force has resolved more conflicts throughout history than any other factor. The contrary opinion, that violence doesn’t solve anything, is wishful thinking at its worst. People who forget that always die.”

-Jean Rasczak, Starship Troopers

You have to struggle to find times where violence or the threat of violence wasn’t what solved the conflict.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 10, 2016 5:14 pm

” Nothing is ever solved when you have a gun in your hand, except the worst possible scenario.”

Wonder what the police think about that.

Bostonbob
Bostonbob
June 10, 2016 5:23 pm

HSF,
A well deserved rest. I remember my first day running a jackhammer, no gloves, my hands were junk the next day, but at least I was smart enough to get gloves, even though I hated wearing them in the summer.
Bob.

yahsure
yahsure
June 10, 2016 5:35 pm

Tyrants all want an unarmed populace.

ASIG
ASIG
June 10, 2016 5:41 pm

In California where obtaining a CCW permit is next to impossible depending upon which county you live in, it appears that judges are an exception. As an example Los Angeles County where it is next to impossible for an average citizen to get a CCW, there are 87 judges that have CCW permits. And it is the judges in California that say you have no right to carry a gun.

This country is already too far down the road to a society of two classes, ordinary people and then the privileged class. The privileged class are writing the rules to exempt themselves and give themselves special privileges. As George Carlin says “it’s an exclusive club and you aren’t in it.”

ASIG
ASIG
June 10, 2016 5:48 pm

And let’s not forget that Diane Feinstein the most rabid anti-gun crusader in congress has a CCW permit to carry a gun. She’s a special person you are not. Her life is worth protecting yours is not. She’s in the club you are not.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
June 10, 2016 5:56 pm

HSF, Bag Balm + White cotton gloves = miracle for your hands.

After an especially savage week finishing concrete I would slather my paws with Bag Balm…..nice and thick, put on a pair of white cotton gloves and sleep like the dead. Next morning my hands were a thousand times better. I hate the smell of that stuff but it works!

Sensetti
Sensetti
June 10, 2016 6:16 pm

Libtards are crazy! They live in a parallel dimension which is void of logic & reason!

WTF
WTF
June 10, 2016 8:57 pm

The stupid runs deep with this one.

WTF lol

Diogenes
Diogenes
June 10, 2016 9:15 pm

I just purchased an AR 15 tonight in honor of Hellary.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
June 10, 2016 10:41 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

Hollow man
Hollow man
June 10, 2016 11:58 pm

Supreme Court is the key.

Rob in Nova Scotia
Rob in Nova Scotia
June 11, 2016 7:11 am

IS

Funny I was watching her giving a speech not long ago and thought the same thing.

Tyranny is just a pen stroke away and easy to enforce even now. All one needs to do is look towards Oklahoma. There, the Blue Thugs are stealing money on the roadways one Debit card at a time. Those who wrote that law should be scorned, the ones who enforce it ashamed. But enforce they do. There is no shortage of people willing to work for a few bucks to trample on other citizen’s rights. Take away the guns and things can only get worse. Then decent folk can be certain that the cops will only protect and serve themselves.

John Coster
John Coster
June 11, 2016 8:56 am

“Nothing is ever solved when you have a gun in your hand, except the worst possible scenario.” Incoherent speech reveals incoherent thinking. You don’t “solve” a scenario; you write one or read one, act one out etc.The worst possible scenario is what we are witnessing now on the stage of American politics, particularly that part of the script devoted to the Democrats’ presumptive candidate.

indigentandindignant
indigentandindignant
June 11, 2016 8:59 am

No one should have A gun. You need several. You can not hunt pheasant with your self defense pistol for example. And a barret is useful in preventing or addressing tyrany, but makes a lousy home defense weapon.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 11, 2016 9:30 am

Hillary is going to make a massive push against private ownership of guns with severe restrictions on who can own one, what kind it can be and what it can be legally used for.

It is likely she will succeed the same way Obama has succeeded with his radical agenda. It doesn’t need to be an outright ban, just restrictions so severe it makes legally owning or using one meaningless for all practical purposes.

There will be no effective political will to oppose this, The leadership on right side of the aisle is more interested in catering to the left side than in opposing it.

But maybe we’ll be allowed to retain as much freedom as Germany where many of its citizens are still able to get a permit to legally own a blank gun.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 11, 2016 9:34 am

Diogenes,

If you left a paper trail (i.e. a recorded purchase with a background check involved) you also left a map to it and yourself as well.

If you live in a mandatory background check state you also better have it when they come looking for it.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
June 11, 2016 12:48 pm

I keep hearing that the Military would never enforce tyrannical edicts . The Okie Patrol boys is a great example that they will. If one of the Okie boys was a family member I’d ostracize him from the family for being a Gestapo member .

This lady is the reason gun sales keep setting records.