Socialism Has Destroyed the Social Structure

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

Nursing Home

 

World Fertility RateOnce upon a time, couples would have three to five children for that was their retirement. Family was everything. Then came Marx who effectively replaced the family with politicians. The family structure has declined steadily since the introduction of socialism. Children no longer save to take care of their parents for that is government’s job.

While some still tout that we are becoming over-populated, the number of children has been dropping remarkably. In China they implemented the one-child rule. That resulted in couples only wanting boys to carry on the family name. But daughters are typically those who take care of their parents zealously. China passed rules that the only child had to visit their parents. Now, the government is stepping in again and reducing the credit of adult children who do not visit their parents.

In the West, family size has fallen by about 50% from World War II. In Eastern Europe, the family structure remains intact only because people learned under communism not to count on the state for anything. In the West, people are living the dream — and that is all it is. They actually think government cares about them. This is why there is a new awakening we are watching with the manifestation of an new anti-establishment era.

Married Family with Children

Socialism has drastically altered the family structure. Government claimed it would replace the parents, and as a result, they succeeded in altering the very foundation of humanity that supported the family for centuries.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
September 2, 2016 11:08 am

Whenever I see a hot young woman, I yell out my car window “I want to put a baby in you!” So far, it’s not working at all. Selfish bitches. Maybe it’s the 15 year old minivan.

Wip
Wip
September 2, 2016 11:16 am

Can someone post this pleeeeeeaaaasse?

http://m.townhall.com/columnists/calthomas/2016/09/01/trump-calls-for-an-oath-to-america-n2212606

It’s about Trump wanting a loyalty oath.

Stucky
Stucky
  Wip
September 2, 2016 11:25 am

Loyalty oaths have been tried in the past, but eventually were struck down by the courts as either too vague, or an unconstitutional violation of free speech. These applied, as far as I can tell from reading their history, only to American citizens.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has suggested something different. He wants to screen people coming into America to see if they share American values. Trump says he would exclude not only people who sympathize with terrorists and believe in Sharia law, but those “who do not believe in our Constitution, or who support bigotry and hatred.”

Think of it this way, would the NAACP admit a member of the KKK? Who would deny them their right to turn racists away?

From the reaction of the media and Democrats (but I repeat myself), one might think Trump’s name is a synonym for “bigot” and that he is attempting to create a master race in America. Not so fast.

As World Magazine editor Marvin Olasky points out in the publication’s Sept. 3 issue, “Millions of Americans are here because their ancestors signed ‘declarations of intention’ similar to what Trump is suggesting.”

Olasky found the declaration of intention Albert Einstein signed in 1936. He became a U.S. citizen four years later. Here is what it said: “I will, before being admitted to citizenship, renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty. … I am not an anarchist; I am not a polygamist nor a believer in the practice of polygamy.” Olasky writes that his immigrant grandfather signed a similar declaration in 1914.

A century ago, he says, “anarchist” was the equivalent of today’s terrorist. Some anarchists planted bombs, one assassinated President William McKinley.

Olasky continues: “Since Sharia law allows and even proposes polygamy as an act of justice, U.S. law excluded Muslims who embraced it. There were to be no divided loyalties.” In order for Utah to enter the Union, the state had to renounce polygamy, a doctrine believed and practiced at that time by some Mormons. President Obama is admitting people into America who believe in Sharia law, and the polygamy it allows.

“No divided loyalties” was the key phrase in Olasky’s last sentence. How long ago and far away that seems today when our loyalties are more divided than at any time since the Civil War. Diversity has replaced unity and hyphenated identifiers now divide races and ethnic groups. “Out of many, one” is fading as our national motto. Out of one, many, is rapidly becoming our new one.

Much of mainstream media fuel the division because conflict sells. They promote our flaws instead of the phrase from “America the Beautiful,” one of our great patriotic hymns, “God mend thine every flaw.” Instead, too many seem intent on exposing, even promoting, new flaws and dividing us further.

Who will love America if we don’t? Who will sacrifice their lives for freedom if not us? We had better realize America is something special, or risk losing it.

Another verse from “America the Beautiful” is worth recalling as the presidential election approaches:

“O beautiful for heroes proved

In liberating strife.

Who more than self their country loved

And mercy more than life.”

Who among our leaders demonstrate their love of America more than their love of self? Go to YouTube.com and listen to the late Ray Charles’ version of this hymn to America. If it doesn’t make you tear up, perhaps you’d better check your patriotic meter.

There is nothing wrong and much right about what Trump proposes for people who want to become citizens of this country. He is no more a bigot than those who wrote the oath taken by Albert Einstein and many others.

kokoda
kokoda
  Stucky
September 2, 2016 12:23 pm

“From the reaction of the media and Democrats (but I repeat myself)” – wonderful

Wip
Wip
  Stucky
September 2, 2016 12:31 pm

Thanks Stucky but, shit, I could’ve done THAT!

Maybe it’s own post?

Rise Up
Rise Up
  Stucky
September 2, 2016 1:59 pm

Great comment, Stucky! From the USCIS website:

“Deciding to become a U.S. citizen is one of the most important decisions in an individual’s life. If you decide to apply to become a U.S. citizen, you will be showing your commitment to the United States and your loyalty to its Constitution. In return, you are rewarded with all the rights and privileges that are part of U.S. citizenship.”

Islam and the US Constitution are incompatible. It is impossible to support both, since one of the primary tenets of Islam is that it is supreme to all other religions and governments.

Dutchman
Dutchman
  Stucky
September 2, 2016 2:22 pm

How about a ‘pitcher’ of dem cabinets?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Wip
September 2, 2016 11:34 am

I have no problem with desirable (meaning educated, skilled, self supporting and such) immigrants coming here to become one of us, an American.

I have a big problem with immigrants, legal or otherwise, coming here to remain what they are, live off of us, and demand we become like them instead of remaining what we are.

The latter type seem to be the almost exclusively dominant type lately, another reason to vote for Trump.

Stucky
Stucky
September 2, 2016 11:21 am

“There are two things J. Hovah hates. Yea, even three things. Parents you don’t provide for their young children. Children who don’t take care of their elderly parents. And, Socialism. Yea, J. Hovah hateth these three things and will cast into the eternal Lake Of Fire those who practice such abominations.” —- Stucky Proverbs 3:10-12

Rise Up
Rise Up
September 2, 2016 11:30 am

There are more than societal factors in play with regard to the declining birth rates.

There seems to be rise in male infertility, possibly linked to water pollution.

“New research strengthens the link between water pollution and rising male fertility problems. The study, by Brunel University, the Universities of Exeter and Reading and the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, shows for the first time how a group of testosterone-blocking chemicals is finding its way into UK rivers, affecting wildlife and potentially humans.

“… studies have also suggested that there may be a link between this phenomenon and the increase in human male fertility problems caused by testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Until now, this link lacked credence because the list of suspects causing effects in fish was limited to estrogenic chemicals whilst testicular dysgenesis is known to be caused by exposure to a range of anti-androgens.”

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090118200636.htm

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Rise Up
September 2, 2016 11:43 am

That’s why I keep offering my proven services.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
September 2, 2016 12:58 pm

Hey ISKA…I feel yer’ pain Bubba !

It was 35 years ago today that I asked the woman of my dreams out on a date .
Two years later I asked her to marry me.

She said no both times !

ISKA…do you know the difference between a bitch and a slut ?

A slut sleeps with everyone. A bitch sleeps with everyone but you !

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
September 2, 2016 1:03 pm

Socialism is a destroyer of both social constructs and human beings .It kills productivity,work ethic,food chains and a laundry list of other things. The reason it never works is because you can’t get rid of basic human instincts .

23 trillion dollars was wasted on the ” poor ” here in the USA. It would have been better spent just cutting everyone a check….or crap that’s what 40 million plus FSA members are already getting…Never Mind !

Barefoot in the Woods
Barefoot in the Woods
September 2, 2016 2:10 pm

What does the world look like a generation from now? Is everyone infertile and mentally defective/autistic? Did the service economy lead to prosperity? Did a terrible calamity wipe out large numbers of humans, as they have done to all the other species?

We are on a precipice and the facade of modern/industrial society is cracking. I fear the seismic waves when the levee breaks.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
September 2, 2016 6:29 pm

Barefoot…in two generations the planet will be like the Eloi and the Morelocks from H G Wells “The Time Machine” .