(Tip from ditchner)
Does anyone really believe there is a plausible explanation for what this video suggests? And in spite of our next POTUS’s resounding “What difference does it make?”, I can’t help but think the dustification theory extends beyond the concrete and steel of those buildings and touches upon the fabric of our society. The “dustification” of the social bonds is ongoing, but somehow I feel like the crumbling of our national pride and social cohesiveness started at the same time and were implemented by the same hand(s).
Why bring this up again? Well, it IS that time of year again and ditchner posted this video in the Turning Tide comment string. I’m getting too settled into being a hillbilly to worry about the truther/anti-truther battle that may or may not rage outside my forty acres and a mule, but 15 years ago, I noticed the chunks of material turning into ash or dust when I first saw the buildings fall. Nick and I talked about how very hot that fire must be to cause the concrete to turn to ash in midair. We watched the towers fall again and again and again those first hours and days, mesmerized as I’m sure most of the viewers in this country were. And then, suddenly, there was a movement by media? TPTB? WHOM? to stop showing the images on television for quite some time to prevent unnecessary psychological trauma to those who were watching loved ones die in the buildings or some similar claptrap. But the images were everywhere and they all said the same thing: Something doesn’t add up, so let’s attack Afghanistan and Iraq.
I don’t want Bea to pop on here attacking Stucky (but can’t stop it) and I don’t think any purpose is served by debating dustification over thermite over airplane fuel-fed fires. I just want to share this video and remember that 15 years ago TODAY (September 9) was a Sunday. I took my son to church, read a pack of 3-5 year-old children a story about Jesus, fed them grapes, melon chunks and apple slices while they colored, played with blocks or watched a Veggie Tale video until their parents were absolved of their weekly sins and came by the classroom to pick them up. Then, my son and I went home to where my husband was skipping church for the umpteenth consecutive Sunday because, as a lapsed Catholic, all he has to do is give a last second confession and he gets into Paradise on a technicality.
Two days later, the entire world changed.
Remember that you molded me like clay. Will you now turn me to dust again?
Lets see: Ruby Ridge, then Waco, the Murrah Bldg, the Twin Towers, the USA invasions of the Middle East and North Africa…there is a trend in the scale of Deaths in these Holocausts. Now I see Muslim Terrorist being helped to over-running Europe and the USA; our MSM and WDC demonizing Russia, Conservatives, and fomenting wars in the Ukraine, Syria, and SE Asia…a little war here, a little war there and sooner that later it adds up to a Global War (NeoCon Nirvana).
rhs….before the year 2000 at a Thanksgiving family dinner, I replied to someones thought and said that Ruby Ridge and Waco were the beginning of a Police State.
To everybody else at the table, I was wearing a dunce hat. I was pretty ticked off at Waco and our gubbermint action to ‘save’ the innocent people inside the compound.
Fuck the FBI, BATF and all those wonderful LEO’s that enjoy emptying their guns at the population.
Kokoda, what (if any) have been the statements of family members who thought you were wearing a dunce hat in Thanksgiving family dinners since 9/11/2001?
The National Socialist state, the dystopia nightmare, is here.
Ho lee shit. That is new to me.
Lapsed Catholic. I had to laugh at that one. Seeing as I am one as well. This 911 debate never gets old. Truth is hard to find in Empire of lies. That quote is from Ron Paul, I think, and sums up the futility of discussing it.
The public keeps hoping tomorrow the politicians and oligarchs running the world will have a revelation. Wake, confess and ask forgiveness. Be then redeemed on a technicality.
It is insanity defined.
As stated yesterday, only the aliens from Roswell have that kind of technology. Their accomplices the Masons and Jesuits were the instruments.
[img
[/img]
I think he forgot DA JOOS!!!!
Building 6 is the real smoking gun.
dilligaf
Why do you feel that BLDG 6 is the real smoking gun?
Where is the rest of the video?
The original video, “Irrefutable” was 48 minutes long and was, in part, designed to sell more of Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did the Towers Go?” which is excellent. The 48 minute video was just too long so I shamelessly, without permission, extracted the two most important segments, reversed their order, and added in the ABC News clips of Peter Jennings asking “Where is all the Rubble….DID IT ALL TURN TO DUST?” The answer to that, of course, is YES YES YES. Peter Jennings was asking George Stephanopoulis on the ground below who explained that “… all of it simply fell down into the ground and was pulverized, evaporated” (Stucky – Now, here is where you should be laughing.) By the way, by the next day the news media suddenly lost interest in the lack of rubble that was “perplexing great numbers of us”. Suddenly it all made sense? Or, they were told that the topic was taboo!
Or they realized the rubble was filling up the below-ground levels…. the obvious answer.
How many levels were below ground? I’m not sure myself but according to wikipedia, bedrock existed 65 feet below ground level so it can be much more than that but lets be generous and say that the lower levels spanned 100 feet in depth. I don’t care how carefully you stack and pack it, you will never fit 110 above ground stories of construction materials plus the contents of the building into the lower levels of the building 100 feet deep. No fucking way…….even in the form of dust.
Yes, and I’ve been sharing it with everyone. Good work.
If the press can edit to promote their agenda, so can you.
overthecliff
So, This past week, they had a Godzilla movie fest,
and during the very first movie (Gorjia), they have this intro scene where they show the H-bomb going off, and show that scene where the test houses all disintegrate (we’ve all seen it in many different films)
the announcer goes:
“glass and steel melt under the effects of the blast wave, and concrete turns to dust”
kinda make you go, hum?
General P
Anything we have knowledge of technology wise is at least 60 or 70 years old. To think of what types of directed energy/particle beam weapons they have down at the MIC is enough to scare the shit out of you. Dustification truly makes me go hmmm.
It’s some kind of energy beam weapon. I was sitting in a Jiffy Lube one time and saw some guy (who I later found out was a NSA consulatant) reading over a DARPA- “particle beam proposal”. I challenged him on it and asked if this was a new weapon to release on the American public? He acted shocked and said no it would just be used to detect radioactive material. Yeah right. True Story!
Steel turns into dust? Wow. On what planet? You people who actually believe steel turns into dust … I’ll bet you’d love by Stuckofucka Machine. It turns lead into gold. Really.
So solly, I couldn’t let it slide without a little jab.
===============================
Now, let’s get serious.
1) HOW does steel turn into dust? I want to know the process, and the chemistry/physics behind it. You may enlist Indentured Servant … and any of our other scientists/engineers here.
2) Has steel ever been turned into dust before. Anywhere? If yes, supply the link/proof.
3.) Is there CURRENTLY an experiment/method that can turn steel into dust?
4.) All processes require energy. How much energy would be required to changle the molecular structure of, oh, let’s say, ten thousand pounds of solid steel, into dust. What event initiated this release of energy? Where did it come from? Where was it stored previously, and in what form?
5.) Energy can’t be created or destroyed … but it can be transformed. So, whatever massive amounts of energy you calculate to perform #4 above — where did it all go afterwards? Surely, it could not be dissipated/transformed only into the dust particles? Where’s the rest?
Looking forward to the answers. I’m sure it will be crickets.
Stucky, only the DOD can answer your questions. Don’t expect anyone from the general public to know the details of black op projects and how they work. There are reasons these things are top secret.
You can ask for “proof” until you’re blue in the face. Might as well save your breath.
Even black op projects need to follow the laws of Physics and Chemistry. But I agree Rise might as well save breath.
So glad Rob knows all the intricacies of top secret black ops projects. Must be a very high clearance you have!
I wasn’t being rude.
But to answer your question I don’t rise. What is your point?
You just proved Stucky’s point from last night. Rather then laying out evidence for your claim you immediately went for ad homimen attack. Yup! You must have failed reading for comprehension. So what you are saying is Black Ops work with a different set of laws. Please enlighten us with your knowledge. Spare no details.
Proof much!
You want to be a dick. Be my guest. I don’t have time to blow smoke up your ass.
I’m not claiming anything dumbass. But you claim you know all the military technology, but you don’t.
Admit that you don’t know what you don’t know.
There must be a missing post somewhere? Where does Rob claim to know all the military technology? I see where he asserted that black ops projects have to follow the laws of physics and chemistry but that’s it. Did somebody delete a comment?
IS
You haven’t missed a thing. And now Rise Up is calling me a dumbass. Brilliant, fucking brilliant. Rise up needs to raise his meds. I am an idiot for arguing with an idiot and he is going to beat me with experience.
Ok, the conversation didn’t add up so I figured somebody deleted something.
It’s just the typical TBP conspiracy antics. Carry on!
IS
Typical antics. So true.
Stucky – All of the phenomena we witnessed there has been duplicated on a much smaller scale by a “crazy Canadian guy”, John Hutchison. These phenomena are now known as the “Hutchison Effect”. It is done by creating an electrical field and shooting an electromagnetic beam of the proper frequency into the field. Objects in the field react in various ways. There is plenty of info on the Internet for you if you really care to know.
As far as how much energy would it take and where did it come from? Where does the energy for an atomic weapon come from? It is unleashed from the atom is it not? But something else of interest occurred that day. A Hurricane (Erin) that originated in the Bahamas a week before moved up the Eastern coastline and parked itself about 500 miles offshore of Manhattan that AM, the closest it would come. It was a larger system than Katrina, yet that AM the weather reports completely ignored it. It wasn’t until Judy Wood noticed it while studying satellite data that it was brought to light. How much energy do you suppose was available from the energy field of that hurricane? Why was it ignored by the local news/weather reporters even before the first airplane hit? Maybe it was a coincidence, maybe not.
Stuckmonious ridicule will commence in 10, 9, 8, 7….
Stuckmonious, adjective derogatory: making a show of being morally superior to other commenters.
Full Retard
Leave me alone. You want something to do? How ’bout you go fuck a duck.
Stuck, You can’t treat a bro like that!
I’m generally on your side, even when I’m not.
I liked my rollercoaster in the cabinets idea.
I liked my erection gone due to lack of male interaction idea.
Your a wealth of inspiration and I said so, your an inspiration.
“1) HOW does steel turn into dust? I want to know the process, and the chemistry/physics behind it. You may enlist Indentured Servant … and any of our other scientists/engineers here.”
I’m the only one who “enlists” me for anything……..besides my wife of course! 🙂 I’m only an amateur scientist who just happens to work with some really amazing science in my job and I struggle to understand some of that!
Steel turns to dust every second of every day. It’s called rust but I suspect that’s not what you meant. This “dustification” idea seems to relate the the Hutchinson Effect which apparently relates to work done by Tesla that has been all but covered up since his death. Tesla believed that energy could be transmitted by air without the need for wires.
The cause of this “dustification” is said to be due to a directed energy beam of some kind. Microwave ovens are a version of this. Put a cup of water in, press go and you get boiling water in seconds yet the cup is still cool enough to pick up. It works by exciting water molecules. Put a dry dishrag in the microwave and you can nuke it forever and nothing happens. Get it wet and you won’t be able to touch the thing. (great way to clean your microwave BTW).
We know other directed energy beam systems exist like invisible lasers and a crowd control device that can literally make your skin feel like it is burning. I’ve seen birds drop dead while in flight near a high power microwave transmitter. Outwardly they looked perfectly fine but they had been cooked from the inside out. I have no doubt that other directed energy beam systems exist. The one claimed to be responsible for the WTC destruction is said to use energy from the earth’s magnetic field or even the energy from a hurricane. As ditchner said, the energy from and atomic bomb comes from splitting an atom. The energy you have to spruce up your kitchen comes from food which originally came from the Sun. Everything in the Universe is the result of energy transfer/conversion. If you can harness the ability to control that energy conversion like Tesla believed, I’d imagine you can do some pretty amazing things.
I know that I can turn solid aluminum into dust before your eyes so I assume that the same thing can be achieved with other elements.
Search youtube for Hutchinson Effect videos. There is some freaky shit going on there which I cannot explain. Interestingly, even after the “device” is turned off, (purported) solid steel continues to degrade into dust as the steel just sits there.
Set the DARPA website as one of the sites you visit monthly. They put out “requests” for technology all the time. Basically they dream up shit that would be cool to have (like being able to climb like Spider Man) and they put out requests for anyone that can provide such a thing. The company I work for occasionally participates in DARPA research and so far it’s been pretty mundane but who knows what they do with the technology after the project “ends”.
I don’t know what to think about Dr. Judy Wood. Listening to her speak I sometimes think she sounds uneducated and at other times she seems extremely educated. This isn’t unusual for intelligent people and maybe she’s just dumbing some tings down for her audience.
“4.) All processes require energy. How much energy would be required to changle the molecular structure of, oh, let’s say, ten thousand pounds of solid steel, into dust. What event initiated this release of energy? Where did it come from? Where was it stored previously, and in what form? ”
As I just posted, I can turn any quantity of of aluminum into dust before your eyes. It produces no discernible heat or any other reactions that I can see. It works by breaking the atomic bonds that hold the aluminum atoms together and requires no energy input on my part.
“It works by breaking the atomic bonds that hold the aluminum atoms together and requires no energy input on my part.”
Requires no energy input? I call bullshit.
Kindly ‘splain how you break atomic bonds without adding energy to the system.
If you can explain where the energy input is, (not saying you can’t) then I’m all ears.
Two minute video:
Well that was hardly turning aluminum to dust.
Nor was it breaking atomic bonds, as you claimed.
Aluminum is highly soluble in gallium, so what you see here is akin to dissolving sugar in water.
You’re welcome.
How small must a particle be before it qualifies as dust? Over time the aluminum continues to break down.
Have you tried this yourself? I have. My understanding is that the gallium invades the spaces between the aluminum atoms causing the aluminum atomic structure to fail. The same quantity of aluminum and gallium still exists in the experiment but the structure of both are broken down to the point of no longer being useful. Had the WTC had an aluminum structure, a relatively small quantity of gallium could have brought them down. (I don’t think you could be a 110 ft building out of aluminum though.)
I could be wrong but a drop of water or two will not dissolve a teaspoon of sugar so I fail to see how a drop of gallium can dissolve a larger quantity of aluminum.
My understanding could be, and probably is, wrong
I think when you say that aluminum turns to dust before your eyes, what is seen in the video is not what people would imagine; particularly in the context of the WTC video. What I see is a very weakened material.
When dissolving one substance into another, it’s the physical structure, not the atomic structure that changes. There’s a difference.
I offered the sugar/water example as an analogy. Those materials have a very different phase diagram, and thus solubility characteristics. It is not reasonable to say that since a drop of water cannot dissolve a teaspoon of sugar, other combinations of materials cannot behave very differently.
Maybe The Pessimist Chemist will weigh in on the discussion.
Rdawg, I’m sure there is plenty I don’t understand about it. In my experiment I used a raw aluminum block (no paint or coatings) about 2″ square. The more time that went by the more it broke down. Most aluminum is an alloy of some sort which I’m sure affects the way it fails. I did the same thing with some six nines pure aluminum and it appeared to break down quicker but the amounts I was able to use were very small. The point is that it can appear to be turned to dust which is analogous to what happened at the WTC as opposed stirring sugar into water.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Gallium-eat-Aluminium
Thanks for the link.
“5.) Energy can’t be created or destroyed … but it can be transformed. So, whatever massive amounts of energy you calculate to perform #4 above — where did it all go afterwards? Surely, it could not be dissipated/transformed only into the dust particles? Where’s the rest?”
When watching the the Dr. Judy Wood videos there are numerous clips, pre-collapse, that show ENORMOUS amounts of dust emanating from the twin towers and bldg. 7. This looks like dust rather than smoke because it is not rising as I would expect it to if it were smoke being carried by heat from a fire. It appears to move horizontally from the buildings but this could be due to selectively editing the video.
A couple off odd things about this dust are the quantity of it and how it seems to emanate from the buildings from top to bottom. I’d like to find unedited video of that morning to determine how/when that dust began to appear and if it truly came out of the buildings from top to bottom and which direction it moved. My guess is that the dust began to pour out at about the same time the directed energy beam (if real) was turned on. It would be interesting to see if the towers collapsed at equal intervals after the dust appeared.
The most compelling thing about the video above is how solid objects seem to be overtaken in speed by the dust. That defies all logic. Clearly some of the falling objects do not become obscured by dust……the dust almost appears to fall faster than the solid objects themselves.
Most of us think of dust in terms of household dust that housewives do battle with day in and day out. In the case of the WTC it might help to think of it in terms of bags filled with portland cement, bags filled with sand and bags filled with rock dust like you might purchase at Lowes or Home Depot. I think we can all agree that those bags are heavy! If the buildings were in fact “dustified” then it is clear that the majority of buildings and their contents were blown away on the wind. It would be interesting to calculate the weight/density of the WTC dust and extrapolate whether it is reasonable to believe that the dust clouds visible come close to matching the volume of missing debris.
I know this is jumping the gun n the 9/11 thing but these two videos are very good at explaining a theory of how the buildings turned to dust and provide more insight on WTC 7. Good stuff if you don’t buy the gov’t narrative.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQHD4trjCo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB2EjJVe820
My son did some work for one of the big research places in D.C. area this past summer. I wasn’t allowed to “know” what sort of work they do, but was told by someone in the company that they research how to do things twenty years from now.
I get that.
Maggie, Thanks for posting the video. I have posted it here many times in the face of Stuckmonious ridicule. Sometimes it takes a 3rd party to get the message across. My wife rarely listens to my advice but let the guy selling candy bars at the gas station mini-mart tell her the exact same thing and she’s a believer.
I love that you quoted Job and brought God into it as you did. What we saw that day was something that we, the public, had never seen before (per Judy Wood). It was close to supernatural as it seemed to defy the known laws of physics. Clearly those known laws of physics are missing a few laws because there were approximately 200,000 tons of structural steel in those buildings and by noon most of the rubble was missing.
Well, I don’t want to jump into any truf/not truf battle here, but this was a video I’d not seen. As I said, I doubt we ever know the TRUF but it does not hurt to keep looking at evidence.
I have been posting that the Russians have weapons that render our military useless for some time now. Nukes, Jets, tanks all completely worthless against scalar weapons. I should have told that to someone here that lives in NJ but he would just have called me names.
Scalar weapons are perfectly capable of turning a building into powder. These weapons are capable of things that the human mind can hardly comprehend. The Russians can bring down any plane anywhere on the planet at any time, seriously. I would imagine that the US has same or similar capability.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm#weaponization
If such weapons exist outside of speculative thinking, do you really think their first use would be to destroy a couple of buildings in a public display of them?
Sorta like advertising what you have to your enemies so they can prepare for it and direct their research in that direction as well.
Anon
Our “enemies” already have this technology/weapons.
Probably not.
There are many advanced weapons in late stages of development by everyone that would be of no use and therefore make no sense if they did. Everything from laser cannons to magnetically propelled projectile weapons with ultra high velocities are currently in the testing stage of development.
An ultimate weapon, one that can be controlled to attack specific targets, sort of makes development of any lesser weapons of little value.
Bea,
How come the websites you provide for your whack-job ideas always look like they were coded by a nine-year old?
Find your own shit rdawg. What am I your official babysitter? If you don’t think scalar weapons exist, put up your proof, the Russians and the MIC will be shocked to hear about it. Bite me.
You’re a thin-skinned little bitch aren’t you?
I admit ….. I and the Jews did it .You goy satisfied ?
Another interesting aspect to Dr. wood’s work is her ideas regarding the jumpers. I have yet to see the images she references but apparently many of these people were without shirts or pants. One guy apparently was even seen to be removing his pants while outside the building. (hanging on) She thinks that many of these people intentionally got their clothes wet to protect from fire and that any energy beam device might cause the water in their clothing to heat up like that crowd control beam that heats the skin of protestors causing them to remove their clothes.
She also claims that many of the people appear to be being ejected from the building to a distance far greater than they could jump on their own.
Lots of interesting things to ponder but I doubt we’ll ever know WTF really happened.
“All of the phenomena we witnessed there has been duplicated on a much smaller scale by a “crazy Canadian guy”, John Hutchison. …. There is plenty of info on the Internet for you if you really care to know.” ——— Ditchner
It’s kind of irritating that YOU make a claim, and them want ME to go hunt it down. Whatever. So I did. All I did was enter “John Hutchison”. Most of the first two pages were about what a FRAUD he is.
I discovered that he seems to be the only one who can produce the effects, but worse … not even he can replicate them—at least not in the presence of unbiased observers. His evidence consists mainly of his word and his videos. Furthermore, the biggest supporters of the Hutchison Effect are …. wait for it ……..9-11 conspiracy folks !! ha!
Read all about it here — http://skepdic.com/hutchisonhoax.html
———————-
Nevertheless, I’m not interested in experiments done, valid or not, as you said, “on a much smaller scale”.
The video posted in the article makes claims that in one moment of time there’s a solid steel girder weighing thousands of pounds … AND IN THE NEXT MOMENT IT IS DUST.
Got any info on that? Didn’t think so. Like I said, crickets.
Stucky watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQHD4trjCo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB2EjJVe820
Come Stucky, you know you have to buy every aspect of every theory out there otherwise you’re just shilling for man! Get with the program!
As an aside, *if* you could turn a 10lb. block of steel completely into dust, it would still weigh 10lbs.
What? If you burn a 20 lb. log the ashes still weigh 20 lbs? Seriously?
There’s your answer, Riser. Metal can vaporize and maybe glass also. I’m not sure about concrete. That pyroclastic cloud may have contained some vaporized steel in it. There’s this talk about squibs and dynamite. How about wiring up the beams to short circuit wires leading to the desired cut points? Electricity is the hottest form of energy next to the sun, they had generators in the building. They could have wired them up to heat up, melt and additionally set off thermite.
Early misdirections offer explanations of faulty structural engineering, jet fuel and radio witnesses on early reports that claimed to have seen the planes. Where are those witnesses now?
Attention TBPers, please stop using business consultant phrases like ‘think outside the box’ nobody ever really thought inside a box. The box is an imaginary mental bathroom or an isolation area.
FR
How does that explain dustification?
Maggie’s video derives from the original theorist of nuclear weapons used at the WTC. I assumed you had watched it. Where do you suppose I learned high falutin’ words like pyroclastic cloud?
Who mentioned burning anything let alone a log?
All of the products of combustion: gases, smoke particulates and ashes, yes absolutely, they will add up to 20 lbs.
I was gonna point that out but I didn’t wanna hafta ‘splain myself plus I wasn’t talking ’bout logs as I don’t think the WTC had that many logs in it. 🙂
I/S
If we ashed 1 oz of gold, the ash would not be as heavy? Gold ash is medicinal and I don’t remember it being very heavy.
How do you ash gold? I’ve never heard of gold ash.
Upon further reading, gold ash seems to be some sort of horseshit dreamed up by some swami trying to make a buck.
I do recall a great story about a pair of gold Nobel Prizes that were dissolved and then recast after WWII. From wikipedia:
“When Nazi Germany occupied Denmark from April 1940, during World War II, de Hevesy dissolved the gold Nobel Prizes of Max von Laue and James Franck with aqua regia; it was illegal at the time to send gold out of the country, and had it been discovered that Laue and Franck had done so to prevent them from being stolen, they could have faced prosecution in Germany. He placed the resulting solution on a shelf in his laboratory at the Niels Bohr Institute. After the war, he returned to find the solution undisturbed and precipitated the gold out of the acid. The Nobel Society then recast the Nobel Prizes using the original gold.”
I/S
Big fan of Ayurvedic medicine, a 10,000 year old form of medicine. Major process and is actually several metals mixed together and melted down over 100 times. Takes a couple of decades. The finished product will float on water if all of the toxic metal has been burned off.
So some swami dreamed it up to make a shitload o money huh? If made with real gold in a multi decade process that shit must be enormously expensive! In my quick search I thought I saw a dose of gold ash being one teaspoon. What would that cost?
What toxic metals are you referring to and why are they in the mix?
Not knowing about something does not make it worthless, fake etc. Ashed gold is a high powered antioxidant to treat a long list of diseases. Not sure if it was ashed gold (prolly not) but my mother took gold injections at her high priced physician’s office. Gold has magical properties just as silver is a fantastic antibacterial.
To answer your question, I think the mix is gold, silver, tin and something else I can’t remember.
No offense. I don’t know that much about islam either but I still deem it to be bullshit. I may really be missing out on the better things in life but my bullshit meter rarely ever lets me down.
Toxic metal burned off.
Floats on water.
Is it soft on hands too!
[img
?1411488244[/img]
From naturalnews.com: “Since gold ash powder is created through a combination of material, spiritual, and secret alchemistic techniques, the healing process is caused by a number of factors working synergistically, such as the healing properties of the metals, the four elements, and the effect of time”
Oh, the fucking stupid, it burns. I have a feeling Bea has been snorting ash a good long time. No wonder he’s so gullible.
rdawg
Did you ever hear the saying “God gave you one mouth and two ears for a reason”. Gold and silver are the best conductors of electricity on Earff which is why they put them in your electronic devices. We are electric beings inside of an electric world , the magic that these metals can do is amazing. Again, just because YOU have no knowledge of some things does not mean YOU know shit about shit.
I am well schooled in TCM, Ayurvedic and homeopathy.
Double negative much…
Too funny Bea is sòooo smart he doesn’t know what he doesn’t know…
[img
[/img]
Rob
I would expect you to show your ignorance, natural medicine was the order of the day for everyone until 100 years ago. Don’t put much faith in big pharma so I learned alternatives, if you want to make fun it just shows you don’t know what you think you know. Gold has been a supplement for medicinal purposes for over 5000 years.
http://www.purestcolloids.com/history-gold.php
Anon
Gold doesn’t react with anything. It cannot be oxidized. Bea says it can be turned to ash. As rdawg said above the stupid burns. It is the only thing that is oxidizing here today.
Both of you are grand poobahs in the house of ninkumpoops.
How about you and Bea go suck on a bucket of donkey dicks.
p.s. Get Rise up as well for your party. The stupid runs deep in him as well.
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/silver-scam/
Stucky,
If you are really interested in the truth you have to rely on nobody but yourself to seek it out. It has been my sense for some time that you’re pretty happy to bury you head in the sand on these matters and issue ridicule about them because they don’t line up with your paradigm. Did you really expect to find the best “hutchison effect” info by Googling John Hutchison? Or, did you find what you wanted to find in 5 minutes and go no farther? The powers that control this technology clearly don’t want us to know about it. The, so called, truth movement will not confront it, just ridicule it and kill the messenger. Terms like “conspiracy nuts” are thrown about and it’s back to thermite.
Here are two video links you probably did not find but I doubt you’ll spend the time watching because I still don’t think you’ve watched the DUST video even though you’ve ridiculed it from the start. 1.
– 9/11 & The Hutchison Effect – Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson & Ambrose Lane – January 14, 2008 (1/2) 2. Part 2 :
. Just because a bunch of liars call somebody a fraud it doesn’t make him a fraud. Eccentric for sure but he’s no fraud.
“The video posted in the article makes claims that in one moment of time there’s a solid steel girder weighing thousands of pounds … AND IN THE NEXT MOMENT IT IS DUST.
Got any info on that? Didn’t think so. Like I said, crickets.”
In the DUST video between 4:10 and 5:24 you see core columns, the largest, strongest steel beams that supported the structures. From 3 separate camera angles (there are many more videos from many more cameras of this on Youtube but these cameras that were high up show it the best) you see the columns as solid steel and seconds later (in slow motion) you see them fade to dust. If you can’t see that, then you probably don’t want to see it and you’ve taken the blue pill. You can go back to your comfy life where the world conforms to the rules you learned about 30 years ago.
Unfortunately the only people who could run the types of demos/experiments that would satisfy you are the very ones who perpetrated the event.
I do not think there are enough blue pills.
If such weapons exist outside of speculative thinking, do you really think their first use would be to destroy a couple of buildings in a public display of them?
~
The act of deceiving Americans – to traumatizing Americans – into supporting the “war on terror” required a ruse of previously unimaginable proportions – so yes – IMO the towers were an ideal use for them
Sorta like advertising what you have to your enemies so they can prepare for it and direct their research in that direction as well.
~
Who’s to say the only people who aren’t aware of this technology are the peons who cannot think outside of the box – because they are discouraged 24/7.
~
~
Clarke’s first law
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
Clarke’s second law
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
Clarke’s third law
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Olga
“any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from MAGIK”, there fixed it for you.
The use of the K on the end denotes the occult or black arts. You are much more in tune than I figured. 9/11 was most definitely magik.
Why did the USA use nuclear bombs on Japan? To show them their destructive power.
If there was “future” technology used on 9/11, it may have been for the same effect.
Not saying it was the US who showed this technology…could have been Israel, possibly as a blackmail to ensure we would get involved in the ME.
To Rob: Not intended to be rude or insulting to you. I’m sure you are much more of a brianiac then myself. My point was/is that you don’t know what the military MIGHT have up their sleeves, and neither do I.
So I ask you a serious question: What technology or physics turned this part of the structure to dust? Or do you think that it did NOT turn to dust or disintegrate from a solid?
Olga, you forget that Bush Deuce had recently visited the site of the OK bombing. Nobody questioned that job either.
Clue – in ditchner’s video, there was a circulating, spiraling dark matter that was intended to represent smoke to the one side of WTC7. Now we could get into unified field physics but lets just for the moment call it a black hole or something on that level which on a quantum level disintegrated the interior of the building until BAM, it comes down. Magrav technology?
A basically “wired” sky from metal particulates in the air due to chemtrails which conduct energy directed from haarp/scalar technology. There’s your energy source, Stuck, and more great conspiracy crap…
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
SHIVA STAR
HF= Shiva was mostly built to scramble electronics. Plasma bursts could be part of whatever they used to turn those buildings into dust. (?)
This is a great post. While the video is pretty good – readers should probably see Dr. Judy Wood’s site (the woman speaking in the video)
http://www.drjudywood.com/
It’s a lame HTML site – with shoddy navigation.
You can also buy the book “Where did the Towers Go?” 500+ pages with shitloads of references, and real, actual science.
http://amzn.to/2ci58ds
I thought the video made good points and am glad it got such good follow on discussion.
in the 80s, the AWACS wing was told we would be locating a squadron at Minot. Never happened, but I can’t imagine that much interesting research going on at Minot. Sorry I missed it.
Well, sadly, here am I in the Dust toasting to 100 because I can’t stand to read one more thing about Hillary or Trump today.
Welcome to the club.
You forgot to say 100…I win.
That was implied. Toast.
Hurrah, that’s what I was seeking for, what a stuff! existing here at this
blog, thanks admin of this website.
Hello! Quick question that’s entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile
friendly? My website looks weird when viewing from my iphone4.
I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able
to correct this issue. If you have any recommendations, please share.
Many thanks!
I don’t usually return to an article of my own here that has “died” a natural death on TBP, but I found this one interesting… or at least the comments that continued on for a day or so after the original posting.
I do have one trait my son accurately observed about me this visit. I do not seem to give a rat’s ass about what other people think about my opinion. So, if Stucky gets excited about disagreeing with me, I won’t even have a real clue about it for more than a month when I come back and read the comments all at once rather than off and on when trying to respond to readers of interest. And I still do not give a rat’s ass.
One phenomenon that got little mention in the comments after the original post was the incredible capitulation of the media to the “official” narrative of Islamic terrorists with box cutters, etc.
What we’ve been witnessing since that time is the obvious cooperation between media and power to steal a national election and, thus, maintain the status quo. Back in 2001 it was still not obvious to the man on the street that media was nothing more than a whore for the elite. Now that they have had their “New Pearl Harbor” they are so firmly entrenched in power they don’t even have to try and hide their deceit and corruption any longer. Today they flaunt it in front of our faces and it’s so blatant that even people who get their news from television can see it.
But, I think growing numbers are getting their news from alternate sources. Or are at least, highly skeptical of the MSM.