Trump Considers Mobilizing 100,000 National Guard Troops To “Round Up” Illegal Aliens

Tyler Durden's picture

In what was shaping up to be a relatively drama-free day, moments ago the AP reported that the Trump administration is considering the mobilization of as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants. The move is part of an alleged “surge” in detention of illegal immigrants, as discussed last weekend.

A draft memo obtained by The Associated Press outlines a Trump administration proposal under consideration to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border. If implemented, the impact could be significant. Nearly one-half of the 11.1 million people residing in the U.S. without authorization live in the 11 states, according to Pew Research Center estimates based on 2014 Census data.

Assuing it will be the most discussed topic over the coming long weekend, the 11-page document calls for the “unprecedented militarization” of immigration enforcement as far north as Portland, Oregon, and as far east as New Orleans, Louisiana. Four states that border on Mexico are included in the proposal – California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas – but it also encompasses seven states contiguous to those four – Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.

According to the AP, “governors in the 11 states would have a choice whether to have their guard troops participate, according to the memo, written by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general. While National Guard personnel have been used to assist with immigration-related missions on the U.S.-Mexico border before, they have never been used as broadly or as far north.”

The memo is addressed to the then-acting heads of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It would serve as guidance to implement the wide-ranging executive order on immigration and border security that President Donald Trump signed Jan. 25. Such memos are routinely issued to supplement executive orders.

 

Also dated Jan. 25, the draft memo says participating troops would be authorized “to perform the functions of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension and detention of aliens in the United States.” It describes how the troops would be activated under a revived state-federal partnership program, and states that personnel would be authorized to conduct searches and identify and arrest any unauthorized immigrants.

 

Requests to the White House and the Department of Homeland Security for comment and a status report on the proposal were not answered. The draft document has circulated among DHS staff over the last two weeks. As recently as Friday, staffers in several different offices reported discussions were underway.

Use of National Guard troops would greatly increase the number of immigrants targeted in one of Trump’s executive orders last month, which expanded the definition of who could be considered a criminal and therefore a potential target for deportation. That order also allows immigration agents to prioritize removing anyone who has “committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense.”

* * *

Under current rules, even if the proposal is implemented, there would not be immediate mass deportations. Those with existing deportation orders could be sent back to their countries of origin without additional court proceedings. But deportation orders generally would be needed for most other unauthorized immigrants. According to AP, the troops would not be nationalized, remaining under state control.

When contacted by AP, spokespeople for the governors of Arizona, Utah, Nevada, California, Colorado, Oklahoma, Oregon and New Mexico said they were unaware of the proposal, and either declined to comment or said it was premature to discuss whether they would participate.  The proposal would extend the federal-local partnership program that President Barack Obama’s administration began scaling back in 2012 to address complaints that it promoted racial profiling.

The 287(g) program, which Trump included in his immigration executive order, gives local police, sheriff’s deputies and state troopers the authority to assist in the detection of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally as a regular part of their law enforcement duties on the streets and in jails.

The draft memo also mentions other items included in Trump’s executive order, including the hiring of an additional 5,000 border agents, which needs financing from Congress, and his campaign promise to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico.

The signed order contained no mention of the possible use of state National Guard troops.

According to the draft memo, the militarization effort would be proactive, specifically empowering Guard troops to solely carry out immigration enforcement, not as an add-on the way local law enforcement is used in the program.

We are confident, however, that most liberal Americans will not see it that way.

Allowing Guard troops to operate inside non-border states also would go far beyond past deployments. In addition to responding to natural or man-made disasters or for military protection of the population or critical infrastructure, state Guard forces have been used to assist with immigration-related tasks on the U.S.-Mexico border, including the construction of fences.

In the mid-2000s, President George W. Bush twice deployed Guard troops on the border to focus on non-law enforcement duties to help augment the Border Patrol as it bolstered its ranks. And in 2010, then-Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer announced a border security plan that included Guard reconnaissance, aerial patrolling and military exercises. In July 2014, then-Texas Gov. Rick Perry ordered 1,000 National Guard troops to the border when the surge of migrant children fleeing violence in Central America overwhelmed U.S. officials responsible for their care. The Guard troops’ stated role on the border at the time was to provide extra sets of eyes but not make arrests.

Bush initiated the federal 287(g) program – named for a section of a 1996 immigration law – to allow specially trained local law enforcement officials to participate in immigration enforcement on the streets and check whether people held in local jails were in the country illegally. ICE trained and certified roughly 1,600 officers to carry out those checks from 2006 to 2015.

The memo describes the program as a “highly successful force multiplier” that identified more than 402,000 “removable aliens.” But federal watchdogs were critical of how DHS ran the program, saying it was poorly supervised and provided insufficient training to officers, including on civil rights law. Obama phased out all the arrest power agreements in 2013 to instead focus on deporting recent border crossers and immigrants in the country illegally who posed a safety or national security threat.

Trump’s immigration strategy emerges as detentions at the nation’s southern border are down significantly from levels seen in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Last year, the arrest tally was the fifth-lowest since 1972. Deportations of people living in the U.S. illegally also increased under the Obama administration, though Republicans criticized Obama for setting prosecution guidelines that spared some groups from the threat of deportation, including those brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

As reported last week, according to initial reports, ICE officers arrested more than 680 people around the country in what Kelly said were routine, targeted operations; advocates called the actions stepped-up enforcement under Trump.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
29 Comments
Crat
Crat
February 17, 2017 10:54 am

White House has denied the report.

Persnickety
Persnickety
  Crat
February 17, 2017 11:39 am

Latest rumor is that this “news” was given to selected insiders to identify who is leaking to the press. If true, it likely has worked.

RiNS
RiNS
  Persnickety
February 17, 2017 12:50 pm

Let’s hope that this is what is going on. Kinda makes sense. Hopefully somebody is getting fired right now.

kokoda the deplorable
kokoda the deplorable
February 17, 2017 11:37 am

Is AP a Fake News dealer?

Hard to believe there are 100,000 MPP’s in National Guard. I don’t believe they would use MOS’s like Mortar or Administrative.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  kokoda the deplorable
February 17, 2017 1:53 pm

If they weren’t they would have verified the validity of the report before publishing it.

It’s hard to believe anything coming from either side anymore without some way of verifying it first.

lmorris
lmorris
February 17, 2017 11:48 am

well add kansas to that list, even when we have no money left they will fight saying we have to have them here. a lot of the factory’s here hire them can’t talk english. so how do they get the job. as a country we are not going to make it the left thinks that this will go on forever a big surprise is coming.

MuckAbout
MuckAbout
February 17, 2017 12:13 pm

Why doesn’t anyone acknowledge that illegal immigrants have no “rights” under the Constitution or anything else? They are lawless people, having entered the country illegally, regardless if they are adults or “poor widdle children” and none of them have the legal right to remain here short of starting – and finishing – the path to citizenship laid out quite clearly under existing laws of the United States.

Since they have no rights, they can be rounded up – and I must laugh out loud at the idea of racial profiling – put on trucks and shipped to the border, put out there and marched back into their country of origin.

The reason I laugh at “racial profiling” is that if you are racially profiled, stopped and asked for proof of citizenship and can’t furnish it, you are still an illegal alien, have no rights in this country, including the so called “right” not to be racially profiled!

This whole bundle of facts (consisting of one fact – illegal immigrants have no rights whatsoever in the country they’ve entered illegally) doesn’t sit well with your modern (as opposed to classic) liberals. To which I reply, tough shit.

This whole thing of borders like swiss cheese, anyone can come here regardless of whether they intend to love this country and what made it great or intend to blow up cars in shopping centers is completely out of hand, beyond belief and far beyond common sense. It needs to be stopped. Now.. Secure borders are required for an orderly, peaceful nation to exist. Make it so..

muck

Suzanna
Suzanna
  MuckAbout
February 17, 2017 12:23 pm

I think this is fake news.

Muck is entirely correct on the “rights” issue.
Consider all the people that came to the US legally,
and waited and paid. They must be annoyed to the
max.

We have worried about attacks from without. We are
realizing the attacks from within, are the real danger.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  MuckAbout
February 17, 2017 12:40 pm

Right on Mr. Muck. Everything that they have done since they crossed the border illegally, including having children, is illegal. What’s not to understand?

PatrioTEA
PatrioTEA
  Anonymous
February 17, 2017 4:34 pm

And using the National Guard to capture or fight these invaders seems like the Government’s primary responsibility. Maybe we can make GOOD use of those FEMA camps after all.

xrugger
xrugger
  MuckAbout
February 17, 2017 10:47 pm

How about this approach (none of which will happen by the way): End birthright citizenship. Halt all legal immigration-for any reason and from anywhere-for the next 25 to 50 years. Tax remittances to Mexico at the same rate as the highest income tax rate and use the money to build this f***ing wall we’ve been hearing about forever. Abolish the departments of Energy, Education, HHS, HUD, etc. and use that money to round up every illegal that can be found. Fire the remaining government drones and use that money to compensate every family that has been victimized by an illegal, every rancher whose property has been violated, every school that has been overrun, etc.
Let’s see…what else…oh yes, draft and pass a quartering act that requires every registered Democrat in California to house and feed at least one illegal until they can be properly deported (ok, that one would be just for fun).

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 17, 2017 12:36 pm

We can only hope that this is true. I doubt it.

prusmc
prusmc
  Anonymous
February 17, 2017 1:50 pm

Wrong approach. Federalize NG and USAR engineer bns both Combat Engineers 12 B’s and the more generalized construction bns. Rent additional equipment locally. Move active duty engineer bns and equipment to border. Supliment with local rental equipment to replace deadlined equipment. Bring active duty and reserve Seabee bns to border. Start with fenses while building wall 24/7/12. We did it in the 1st Gulf War and in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan recently. Now do it where it counts. Bring selected units on duty to help CBP and call up individual volunteers who will be given time limited AD tours and will receive particularized training prior to going into enforcement roles. To quote Senator McCain a few years back “build the damn fence.”

PatrioTEA
PatrioTEA
  prusmc
February 17, 2017 4:36 pm

But i don’t think he says that now.

Hershel
Hershel
  prusmc
February 17, 2017 9:39 pm

Prusmc, One of the reasons for Americans dumbing down is it is the only country where you can use acronyms without writing what it is in full the first time. If they stand for some specialised jargon and u use about a dozen like that, it all means WTF to anyone who wasnt in your unit.

TrickleUpPolitics
TrickleUpPolitics
February 17, 2017 12:55 pm

What Rights Does an Immigrant Facing Removal Have?

Non-citizens have the right to a lawyer, as well as other rights under the U.S. Constitution. The immigration authorities cannot simply deport someone without providing a chance to be heard.
Of course, the authorities often try to make the process go quickly, by asking the immigrant to sign something agreeing to depart without a hearing. In some cases, when the immigrant really is in the U.S. illegally with no defense to removal, leaving voluntarily can be the best way to go, because it avoids having an order of deportation on one’s record.
But anyone who believes they might have a right to remain in the U.S. should insist on their right to a lawyer (which they will, unfortunately, have to pay for on their own) and to a hearing on the merits of their case.
A non-citizen who hasn’t yet entered the U.S. does not have the same rights, and is subject to expedited removal. In other words, the person can simply be refused entry unless he or she has a legitimate fear of persecution if forced to return to his or her home country. In the latter case, the immigration officials must allow the person’s asylum claim to be heard.
Immigration court proceedings are administrative, meaning they’re less formal than ordinary court proceedings, and the usual rules of evidence don’t apply. USCIS will be represented by an attorney. The judge as well as both attorneys may ask questions of the immigrant, and either attorney may bring in witnesses to testify.
The hearing will last as long as is needed to present and hear all the evidence. The judge may issue a decision at the end of the hearing, or later. If it’s a negative decision, the judget will issue an order of removal, which becomes final as soon as the allotted time for appeal is over. Negative decisions can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and then through the federal court system.

P.S. They’ve all been told to say when asked “I am afraid of persecution were I to return to my country” which automatically lets in/stay in and get a hearing. They are given a notice to appear and most never show up.

TrickleUpPolitics
TrickleUpPolitics
February 17, 2017 12:56 pm

Let’s just hope the rumor causes a bunch of them to self-deport.

Stucky
Stucky
February 17, 2017 12:59 pm

I hope they don’t take El Coyote.

WIP
WIP
  Stucky
February 17, 2017 1:14 pm

Why? Hababababa

Barnum Bailey
Barnum Bailey
February 17, 2017 1:32 pm

“You have to go home. You’re no longer welcome here, and don’t listen to those clowns who tell you otherwise. Both you and they are outnumbered by people who find your presence an intolerable irritant.”

A country can afford a few oddballs. It cannot afford millions and millions of them.

America 1.0 was the founding generation, largely WASPs. That’s the country in our history books.
America 2.0 was adding millions of Irish, Scottish, Italian and other non-WASP Europeans, along with more Germans. This altered the character of the country, notable when JFK (a Roman Catholic) was elected POTUS (as unprecedented then as when Obummer was elected the first mulatto.)

America 2.0 enabled America 3.0, the flooding of the country with culturally alien peoples who would be counted upon to put the Democrat Party in permanent power by overwhelming the remaining WASP stock.

Don’t talk to me about assimilation. The turn-of-the-century immivasion 120 years ago set up the disaster of the last 50 years. The people flooding the country come from places saturated with public corruption. This is why America’s political system is now a cesspool.

Nothing good lasts forever.

gammer
gammer
February 17, 2017 1:35 pm

The only thing that will stop this is the 100% eVerify for any job. Then no other help or assistance by any social program, period. Anyone providing assistance or jobs faces BIG fines and prison…then without jobs, or free stuff they will all self deport.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  gammer
February 17, 2017 1:37 pm

Exactly.

James
James
  gammer
February 17, 2017 1:46 pm

Gammer,the only fence this country needs is e-verify/absolutely no services for illegals.Sure,a few still do ok in the underground(and growing)economy but at best perhaps 4-5%,the rest will leave or starve.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 17, 2017 1:59 pm

When you start having anti Trump foreign Presidential candidates conducting their campaigns in L.A. you know you’ve got a problem.

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/02/16/mexican-presidential-candidate-holds-political-rally-los-angeles-slam-donald-trump/

nkit
nkit
February 17, 2017 2:44 pm

So, it was all just an eleven page unsigned draft….C’est domage…

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-17/ap-releases-leaked-memo-calling-mobilization-national-guard

Rob
Rob
February 17, 2017 3:17 pm

OK OK this is really a great idea. My wife just came up with it this morning over yogurt and tea.

You don’t boot all of the 11 million illegal immigrants out of the country. At least 6 million of them are perfectly trained day laborers who could be paid to build the wall. Round them up. Give them a job for a year or two. And then, when they are done building the wall you just leave them on the other side of it. The cost of any project is 1/3 labor and you get this labor for next to nothing. Of course, you would have to watch them because they would build steps and tunnels into the wall but guard jobs are better than sweaty labor jobs. Give those jobs to the out of work Americans. It’s a win win win.

Rob

Tom
Tom
February 17, 2017 3:33 pm

I think a better use of the National Guard would be to deploy them along our border to deter illegals from coming into the US. They could quickly turn around anyone attempting to enter. I think we need to cut off the flow of illegals at the same time US law enforcement agencies can begin to detain, arrest and begin the deportation of illegal immigrants within the US. The first group would obviously be those who have committed crimes other than the one they committed by entering and remaining within the country in violation of US Immigration Law.

Get E-verify going and crack down on those businesses that hire illegals. Once that occurs, many illegals will self-deport.

We need Congress to step up as well. We need a real border fence and system put in place. Fencing, electronic surveillance, border patrol agents/National Guard troops, drones, and aircraft all need to be utilized. The 1965 Immigration Act and The Refugee Act of 1980 need to be overhauled to strip out taxpayer funds that are given away. Language that prohibits the exclusion of varous nationalities and groups from entering the US needs to be changed. Emphasis on national and economic security of America must come first.

Gerold
Gerold
February 17, 2017 4:29 pm

There seems to be deliberate confusion to confound us into believing these are all the same.
– Legal immigrants
– Refugees
– Illegal immigrants

“Boston-area museum removes all art created by immigrants”

Boston-area museum removes all art created by immigrants

Stucky
Stucky
February 17, 2017 4:50 pm

The movers came today. 3 guys. Worked their little asses off. Getting the 400-500 pound piano to the new place, up a flight of stairs with two 90 degree turns …. UNBELIEVABLE!! Oh … only two guys could go up the stairs. I watched them, and I still don’t know how they did it. They were immigrants … maybe even illegal, I didn’t ask …. from Guatemala. After they got the piano upstairs I told them (really) — “I’m making a mental note. Don’t fuck with small Guatemalans!”. Both got a big laugh out of that.

==============

The fucking hit parade continues.

I think I have an idea why shitfuk scamming Select Portfolio Servicing isn’t returning my phone calls.

TODAY I got a big package in the mail. SPS no longer has my mortgage! It’s now with some outfit I never heard of … Bayview Servicing. Jeebus Effing Krist!!!