It’s Trump’s Party, Now

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

Before the largest audience of his political career, save perhaps his inaugural, Donald Trump delivered the speech of his life.

And though Tuesday’s address may be called moderate, even inclusive, Trump’s total mastery of his party was on full display.

Congressional Republicans who once professed “free-trade” as dogmatic truth rose again and again to cheer economic nationalism.

“We’ve lost more than one-fourth of our manufacturing jobs since NAFTA was approved,” thundered Trump, “and we’ve lost 60,000 factories since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Yet a Republican party that embraced NAFTA and voted MFN for China every time it came up gave Trump standing ovations.

“(W)e have inherited a series of tragic foreign policy disasters,” said Trump, “America has spent approximately six trillion dollars in the Middle East — all the while our infrastructure at home is crumbling.”

And from Congressional Republicans who backed every Bush-Obama war — Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen — not a peep of protest, as their foreign policy legacy was being consigned to the dumpster.

Watching Republicans rise again and again to hail Trump called to mind the Frankish King Clovis who, believing his wife’s Christian God had interceded to give him victory over the Alemanni, saw his army converted by the battalions and baptized by the platoons.

One had thought the free-trade beliefs of Republicans were more deeply rooted than this.

“We have withdrawn the United States from the job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership,” Trump exulted, having just tossed into the trash that mammoth trade deal beloved of Bush Republicans.

GOP champions of the TPP, if there are any left, sat mute.

Trump cited the first Republican president, Lincoln, as having got it right when he warned, “abandonment of the protective policy by the American Government (will) produce want and ruin among our people.”

Celebrating protectionism, hailing “America First!” in a virtual State of the Union address — it doesn’t get any better than this.

To open-borders Republicans who backed amnesty for 11 million illegal immigrants, Trump had this message, “We will soon begin the construction of a great wall along our southern border.”

And the cheering did not stop.

Have something to say about this column?
Visit Pat’s FaceBook page and post your comments….

The president invoked Eisenhower’s Interstate Highway System, the greatest public works project of the 20th century, as a model.

Yet Ike was opposed by the Taft wing of his party and Ike’s republicanism gave birth to the modern conservative movement.

Yet, in leading Republicans away from globalism to economic nationalism, Trump is not writing a new gospel. He is leading a lost party away from a modernist heresy — back to the Old-Time Religion.

In restating his commitment to the issues that separated him from the other Republicans and won him Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, however, Trump reaffirmed aspects of conservatism dear to his audience.

He committed himself to regulatory reform, freeing up the private sector, rolling back the administrative state. The Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines are on the way to completion. And Trump is all behind school choice.

While the speech was unifying and aspirational, the president set goals and laid down markers by which his presidency will be judged.

And none will be easy of attainment.

“Dying industries will come roaring back to life. … Crumbling infrastructure will be replaced with new roads, bridges, tunnels, airports and railways … Our terrible drug epidemic will slow down and, ultimately, stop. … Our neglected inner cities will see a rebirth of hope, safety and opportunity.”

As some of these domestic crises are rooted in the character, or lack of it, of people, they have proven, since Great Society days, to be beyond the capacity of government to solve.

Ronald Reagan was not wrong when he said, “Government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem.”

And while the president’s speech astonished critics as much as it reassured friends, it leaves large questions unanswered.

How does one leave Social Security and Medicare untouched, grow defense by more than $50 billion, slash taxes, launch a $1 trillion infrastructure program — and not explode the deficit and national debt?

Now that we are ensnared in wars all over the Middle East, how do we extricate ourselves and come home without our enemies filling the vacuum?

How does the GOP repeal and replace Obamacare without cutting the benefits upon which millions of Americans have come to rely?

How do you eliminate an $800 billion merchandise trade deficit without tariffs that raise the price of cheap imports from abroad — on which Trump’s working-class voters have come to depend?

The Republican establishment today bends the knee to Caesar.

But how long before K Street lobbyists for transnational cartels persuade the GOP elite, with campaign contributions, to slow-walk the president’s America First agenda?

Tuesday’s speech established Trump as the man in charge.

But how loyal to him and his program will be the “deep state,” which dominates this city that gave Trump only 4 percent of its votes and, paranoically, believes him to be an agent of Vladimir Putin?

The Trump-Beltway wars have only just begun.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
March 3, 2017 7:46 am

Trump’s biggest obstacle is going to the Republicans.

They’ll pretend to support him while doing absolutely everything they can to prevent his agenda from being successful, distorting and weakening it everywhere they can and using whatever excuse for it they think the voters will find plausible.

The establishment is not going to let the people regain control of their government.

IMO.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 3, 2017 7:56 am

If we don’t drain the whole swamp and rout out the traitors it’s going to be the same old same old. The back stabbing republicans are the first ones that should go. It’s all over but the crying anyway but it sure is fun to watch.
[imgcomment image[/img]

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 3, 2017 8:30 am

Imo NAFTA was about saving mexico which may have been a wise decision.
In other words do you want a hopeless third world country right next to a first world country?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
March 3, 2017 8:52 am

Better have it, and keep it, there than import it here as we seem to be doing.

Mexico is not our ally, and it really isn’t a friendly country beyond what it has to be to get our dollars.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
March 3, 2017 9:05 am

Trump’s speech is already almost forgotten in the latest swirl of fake news (Sessions, Franken, Russia, blah, blah, blah). The only lasting impression from the speech is that Trump can actually read a good speech well – which scares the Dems and upset the media caricature.

Now we’re down to math: debt ceiling, tax rates, proposed spending, proposed cuts, etc. Trump’s proposals don’t appear to remotely add up. The only way they could would be if they don’t end up being what he implied they were: if leaving Social Security alone really meant leaving it alone for lower incomes but paring it back for higher incomes, if increasing defense spending meant increasing it on such-and-such but cutting it over there, if cutting taxes meant cutting rates but eliminating deductions so it’s revenue neutral and if a big infrastructure spending push meant a small increase in infrastructure spending. Then there’s the big medical monopoly elephant in the room. Trump campaigned on ending fake medical invoices and allowing pharmaceutical reimportation. He seems to have abandoned both. Maybe he’ll surprise on that. And maybe I’ll win Olympic gold in the high jump.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Iska Waran
March 3, 2017 11:06 am

It’s the Republicans in Congress that will have to do those things, legislation cannot be passed or repealed (legally and legitimately) by a President unless he is Black, and Trump isn’t Black.

All Trump can really do other than calling for it is to sign or veto the legislation sent to him, legislation that Obama would have (and did) surely veto.

Suzanna
Suzanna
March 3, 2017 9:22 am

Iska,
I feel your despair.
The abandoning of all decorum and the open treason
by the Dems/Libs has to be the face of their fear.
What are they trying to suppress? The depth of the
corruption must monumental. Obviously, Trump wasn’t
supposed to become president.

lmorris
lmorris
March 3, 2017 11:10 am

he may mean well but they will fight to the end, they would rather the country fail then say they were wrong. if i have 100$ and you make me give a dollar to 99 people then we are all broke

Rob
Rob
March 3, 2017 1:19 pm

chose your sides ladies.

ssgconway
ssgconway
March 3, 2017 3:26 pm

The question that comes to my mind after watching President Trump’s address to Congress is, will he succeed in turning the tide, or is his Presidency a one-off, a Julian the Apostate in reverse, a last hurrah before the end of the old order is cemented for all time?

I wish him well. I also wish that there would be enough shame left in the souls of the purveyors of moral outrage to make at least a few of the more honest ones stop and ask themselves if they’d be conducting an anti-Russian witch hunt if Hillary (plutonium deal/Clinton Foundation donation) or Bernie (honeymooned in the USSR) were in the White House. On this latter point I am not holding my breath.