President Trump: Toss Your Generals’ War Escalation Plans In the Trash

undefined

By the end of this month, Defense Secretary James Mattis and National Security Advisor HR McMaster will deliver to President Trump their plans for military escalations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. President Trump would be wise to rip the plans up and send his national security team back to the drawing board – or replace them. There is no way another “surge” in Afghanistan and Iraq (plus a new one in Syria) puts America first. There is no way doing the same thing over again will succeed any better than it did the last time.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Near the tenth anniversary of the US war on Afghanistan – seven years ago – I went to the Floor of Congress to point out that the war makes no sense. The original authorization had little to do with eliminating the Taliban. It was a resolution to retaliate against those who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. From what we know now, the government of Saudi Arabia had far more to do with the financing and planning of 9/11 than did the Taliban. But we’re still pumping money into that lost cause. We are still killing Afghanis and in so doing creating the next generation of terrorists.

The war against ISIS will not end with its defeat in Mosul and Raqqa. We will not pack up and go home. Instead, the Pentagon and State Department have both said that US troops would remain in Iraq after ISIS is defeated. The continued presence of US troops in Iraq will provide all the recruiting needed for more ISIS or ISIS-like resistance groups to arise, which will in turn lead to a permanent US occupation of Iraq. The US “experts” have completely misdiagnosed the problem so it no surprise that their solutions will not work. They have claimed that al-Qaeda and ISIS arose in Iraq because we left, when actually they arose because we invaded in the first place.

General David Petraeus is said to have a lot of influence over HR McMaster, and in Syria he is pushing for the kind of US troop “surge” that he still believes was successful in Iraq. The two are said to favor thousands of US troops to fight ISIS in eastern Syria instead of relying on the US-sponsored and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces to do the job. This “surge” into Syria would also lead to a lengthy US occupation of a large part of that country, as it is unlikely that the US would return the territory to the Syrian government. Would it remain an outpost of armed rebels that could be unleashed on Assad at the US President’s will? It’s hard to know from week to week whether “regime change” in Syria is a US priority or not. But we do know that a long-term US occupation of half of Syria would be illegal, dangerous, and enormously expensive.

President Trump’s Generals all seem to be pushing for a major US military escalation in the Middle East and south Asia. The President goes back and forth, one minute saying “we’re not going into Syria,” while the next seeming to favor another surge. He has given the military much decision-making latitude and may be persuaded by his Generals that the only solution is to go in big. If he follows such advice, it is likely his presidency itself will be buried in that graveyard of empires.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
I. Naugtrump
I. Naugtrump
May 15, 2017 7:31 am

Ron, the problem with your solution is that all that people hear is that the other option (faced with an imminent threat by Isis or Isis look-alikes) is to do NOTHING!

Since the battles (right now) are NIMBY, this is not an acceptable option to the “silent majority”, of whom some live in the woods.

flash
flash
  I. Naugtrump
May 15, 2017 7:49 am

You read but you don’t comprehend. How unfortunate.

[imgcomment image[/img]

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
May 15, 2017 8:33 am

Well,…….I support finishing the job in Mosul and then get out; also, support Kurds in Syria to fight ISIS and then get out. ISIS, which the US created, needs to be crushed.
Petraeus is war hawk.

Get out means completely out.

flash
flash
  kokoda - the most deplorable
May 15, 2017 8:50 am

And what would that job in Mosul be, pray tell ? And , whats the timeline ending support for the Turds in Syria …one month , one year . five years , ten years ? And at what cost?

kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
  flash
May 15, 2017 9:10 am

The job in Mosul is Killing the ISIS members – not letting them go to Syria.
Mosul would take 3 months; Syuria max 1 year with US, Russia, SAA, and Iran forces working together.

Gator
Gator
  kokoda - the most deplorable
May 15, 2017 10:54 am

Sounds so familiar, those optimistic timelines. Reminds me of dick Cheney proclaiming our Iraq adventure would cost less than 100b from start to finish.

Get out, leave those people to their own devices. We may well have caused these problems, but our solutions just create more problems. Nothing will be gained by our continued presence in that region.

Gay Veteran
Gay Veteran
  kokoda - the most deplorable
May 16, 2017 5:30 pm

sounds like you need to march down to your local army recruiting center and SIGN UP

Jouska
Jouska
  flash
May 15, 2017 11:57 am

Gator – Spot on!
Kokoda – Get a brain!

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
  kokoda - the most deplorable
May 15, 2017 8:24 pm

What was the “job” exactly?

monger
monger
May 15, 2017 10:07 am

but paul…. there would be no money in not surging…. and that is the bottom line, not victory or security

artbyjoe
artbyjoe
May 16, 2017 12:24 pm

bring them home, alive. oil profits are a poor payback for American blood. Personally, i don’t care who controls middle eastern oil, or any foreign oil for that matter.