This Isn’t A Joke! The IRS Just Hired Equifax To Safeguard Taxpayer Data

Tyler Durden's picture

 

Just hours after Equifax CEO Rick Smith wrapped up his testimony before the House Energy and Commerce committee – the first in a series of Congressional “fact-finding missions” about the hack – Politico reported that the IRS last week awarded the disgraced credit monitoring bureau with a $7.25 no-bid contract even as the company struggled to address suspicions that it mislead investors and customers by withholding information about one of the most damaging data breaches in US history.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Equifax famously waited more than a month to disclose that hackers had infiltrated its servers and absconded with the sensitive financial information of more than 140 million customers, sparking widespread outrage that only intensified after reporters discovered that several of the company’s senior executives – including its CFO – cashed out of shares and options in the weeks before the company came clean about the hack.

According to the terms of the IRS contract, Equifax would be responsible for verifying taxpayer identities and help prevent fraud under a no-bid contract issued last week.

As if the IRS’s decision to entrust the disgraced credit bureau with sensitive taxpayer data wasn’t galling enough, the agency seemingly fast-tracked the contract by classifying it as a “sole source order” – a designation that allows the agency to circumvent the bidding process by claiming a given vendor is the only one capable of executing the contract. However, the agency’s justification for this designation is baffling, considering that there are two other credit bureaus in the US that offer a nearly identical suite of services.

The notice describes the contract as a “sole source order,” meaning Equifax is the only company deemed capable of providing the service. It says the order was issued to prevent a lapse in identity checks while officials resolve a dispute over a separate contract.

Lawmakers from both parties demanded an explanation from the agency, which has endured several memorable data-security lapses – including a 2015 breach that exposed the sensitive financial information of more than 100,000 taxpayers.

Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) and Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) separately penned letters to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen demanding he explain the agency’s rationale for awarding the contract to Equifax and provide information on any alternatives the agency considered. “I was initially under the impression that my staff was sharing a copy of the Onion, until I realized this story was, in fact, true,” Blumenauer wrote.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch criticized the agency’s decision as “irresponsible.”

“In the wake of one of the most massive data breaches in a decade, it’s irresponsible for the IRS to turn over millions in taxpayer dollars to a company that has yet to offer a succinct answer on how at least 145 million Americans had personally identifiable information exposed,” Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) told POLITICO in a statement.

Hatch raised concerns about the IRS’s cybersecurity practices in a letter sent to the agency’s head last month. To help the agency improve its data-security safeguards, Congress recently allocated $106.4 million to bolster the agency’s identity theft protections.

Hatch questioned the agency’s security systems in a letter to Koskinen last month. Hatch said he was concerned that the IRS lacked the technology necessary “to safeguard the integrity of our tax administration system.”

Ron Wyden said the Finance Committee would seek to verify whether Equifax was really the only company capable of executing the contract, as the agency insisted.

The committee’s ranking member, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), piled on: “The Finance Committee will be looking into why Equifax was the only company to apply for and be rewarded with this. I will continue to take every measure possible to prevent taxpayer data from being compromised as this arrangement moves forward.”

In defending its decision, the IRS claimed that Equifax said that none of its data was involved in the data breach.

The IRS defended its decision, saying Equifax has told the agency that none of its data was affected by the breach. The agency also noted that Equifax already provides “similar services” to the agency under a different contract.

 

“Following an internal review and an on-site visit with Equifax, the IRS believes the service Equifax provided does not pose a risk to IRS data or systems,” the statement reads. “At this time, we have seen no indications of tax fraud related to the Equifax breach, but we will continue to closely monitor the situation.”

Given that Equifax waited more than a month to disclose the hack to the public – and has bungled seemingly every step in its response to the hack – the fact that the IRS justified its decision by, in effect, saying “they told me everything is fine” is hardly reassuring. As Yahoo demonstrated just last night, the true scope of cyber-security intrusions sometimes takes years to uncover, which is precisely why sticking with Equifax is a risky. Yahoo, of course, revealed yesterday that a 2013 data breach impact all 3 billion of the company’s user accounts – three times the one billion accounts previously reported by the company.

As lawmakers have suggested, when determining which companies should be trusted to safeguard tax payers’ most sensitive financial data, the agency should’ve erred on the side of caution.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
JIMSKI
JIMSKI
October 4, 2017 7:05 pm

Fake news.

I mean this shit better be fake news!

O fuckit I need more ammo.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
October 4, 2017 7:39 pm

you can’t make this stuff up! ‘sarc/’

James
James
  Crawfisher
October 4, 2017 8:15 pm

You have got to be fucking kidding?!I think we are really in free fall/anything goes time or very soon will be!

Jimski,yes,you need more ammo if any of the following applies:
1.You can see the top of your closet ceiling,you need more ammo.
2.The amount of ammo you have will not come close to sinking your boat,you need more ammo.
3.The amount of ammo you have will not come close to preventing your plane taking off,you need more ammo.
4.You do not have caches of ammo at friends homes/vacation spots/perhaps a wilderness store times get very tough,you need more ammo.
5..You plan on hunting/target practice ect.,you need more ammo.
6.The hollow garden gnome in your background not full of ammo/weather secured,you need more ammo.

Side note on #6,said gnome could be filled and sealed with tannerite ect. for zombie invasion of your garden instead of a emergency cache.

Brian
Brian
October 4, 2017 9:07 pm

Government logic 101. Poor performance? Compromising customer data? Fraud…insider trading? NO PROBLEM! Here’s 2 or 3 hundred million peoples data records to compromise!

TC
TC
October 4, 2017 9:13 pm

This just about has to be someone at IRS wanting to make Trump look bad.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
October 4, 2017 11:50 pm

Meh! Nothing to see here. Several recent articles here relating to the Vegas mindfuk have talked about how violence carried out by da goobermint begets violence carried out by it’s citizens. Same thing going on here. Individuals and corporations see da goobermint perpetrating acts of fraud, waste and abuse and so they join in. What’s good for the goose and all that.

For the rest of yous honest types……..contact each credit reporting agency and put a permanent freeze on your credit. This may cost $5-$10 or be free depending on where you live but it will prevent anyone from looking up your credit info unless you go into each credit reporting agency and unlock it via a PIN number you are issued. This puts you in control over who can see your credit info (to some degree anyway). Should be the default option IMO. While you are there put your name on the list to stop all unsolicited credit offers by mail.

Stucky
Stucky
  IndenturedServant
October 5, 2017 5:22 am

Excellent advice. Couple quick points … going from memory here ….

1. It is NOT 100% foolproof … a small percentage (probably under 5%) of folks who freeze their credit still have new accounts opened under their names. That’s why you should continue to check your credit report monthly.

2. Freezing credit does NOT prevent the most common identity theft … accessing EXISTING accounts. Credit freezes only prevent opening NEW accounts. That’s why you should continue to check your credit report monthly.

3. If you lose your pin number, it can be hell getting the agencies to reset it. I know this from personal experience.

4. Cost varies by state … generally $2 – $10. Some states are more. Some are free. Many states waive fees .. some if you can prove identity theft via a police report, some if you’re active military, some if you’re a student …. Best thing to do is to go to their websites and check their “freeze guidelines” … it’s easy to find

5. When you need to unfreeze your credit … to open a new account … there’s almost always a fee for that also.

6. Unfreezing credit is usually not instantaneous. Often takes a week, or more.

7. Be careful if you’re looking for a new job. Many employers will reject candidates whose credit is frozen … they don’t like the hassle of follow-up phone calls, inconvenience, and waiting for you to unfreeze your data.

8. An alternative choice, although not quite as effective is a “fraud alert”. You only need to place it with one agency, and the other two will pick it up. I believe it’s free. A fraud alert requires lenders to verify your identity before opening a new account, usually by calling the phone number that you supply with the alert. The system breaks down with lazy assed vendors who won’t make that call.

9. Freezing credit does NOT affect your credit score.

Fjord
Fjord
October 5, 2017 6:09 am

Gee, you know what would solve this problem?
A chip, unique to each individual. Maybe inserted under the skin of your hand, that will be necessary for all financial transactions…

James
James
  Fjord
October 5, 2017 9:04 am

Fjord,”A chip, unique to each individual. Maybe inserted under the skin of your hand, that will be necessary for all financial transactions…”,hah!Sure ,maybe in a perfect future world,we just do not have the tech to fulfill that dream of yours now!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Fjord
October 5, 2017 9:10 am

But what would someone who has lost their hands do?

(BTW, we actually do have the tech, it isn’t even new.)

James
James
  Anonymous
October 5, 2017 9:44 am

Why,their foot of course!Lost both hands and feet(damn!)guess an ear would work.I do realize we have the tech,of course,given history that tech can be played with also.Tis the only reason would like to see a cashless society,would crack and go under in months at most unless you for most part shut down the tech,then,of course you need some form of cash/barter.

JIMSKI
JIMSKI
  Fjord
October 5, 2017 9:22 am

That’s some revelations shit right there bro…….

It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads
so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
October 5, 2017 9:24 am

The kleptocracy strikes again!

Suzanna
Suzanna
October 5, 2017 10:50 am

We, Americans, are stuck in a giant vat of bullshit.

Disengage.