“hero” Says “Suspicion is a Misdemeanor”

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Here’s a video taken of another “hero” law enforcer who makes up “the law” on the spot!

A guy is filming the publicly visible exterior of a police station from a public sidewalk – which is (for the moment) abundantly legal – when he is approached by two confrontational “heroes” who – of course – demand his ID, Soviet-style.

Not because the man is committing a crime – but because he is challenging the authority of the “heroes.” It is time, therefore, for a Dominance Display.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The fact that this sort of thing is has become routine in the United States says a lot about the state of the United States, which is no longer even plausibly a “free” country. It is a country in which lawless law enforcers do as they please – insolently – because they are confident that there will be no meaningful repercussions, no matter what they do.

The guy taking the video politely asks what crime he’s committed, or is suspected of committing. This used to be the probable cause standard for detaining a person; that is, armed government workers were once-upon-a-time legally required to have a specific reason for suspecting a criminal act had been committed or was about to be committed before they could lawfully prevent a citizen from peaceably going about his business.

It is no longer required.

Technically, perhaps – but that is as irrelevant as the Fourth Amendment’s defunct guarantee that we are to be left unmolested absent probable cause and the Fifth Amendment’s similarly defunct injunction that we are not to be made to provide evidence that can and will be used against us in a criminal proceeding (see, for example, your 1099 form).

So.

The “heroes” reply that he is “suspicious” – and he is informed that this is a “misdemeanor.”

The reality is, the “heroes” want to show who is Boss – and will use any device, legal or otherwise, to establish this fact. In a free country- if we still had one – this citizen would be free to go.

Of course, we do not live in a free country. And so he isn’t free to go.

These “hero” law enforcers” are brazenly acting well outside their lawful authority – which fact ought to result in their being fired and charged with abuse of authority under color of law – but it doesn’t.

They are free to go. To continue assaulting people under color of law.

As a matter of routine.

And, worse.

Consider, for instance, the fate of the Salt Lake City “hero” who brutally assaulted a nurse who declined to perform an illegal blood draw. He has been fired and his victim awarded a $500,000 settlement.

But he is not in a cage. He has not been charged with the criminal assault under color of law he is flagrantly guilty of.

Those familiar with this case know the basic story.

An unconscious car wreck victim was taken to the hospital to be treated for his injuries. A thug with a badge shows up and – like the thug he is – demands immediate submission and cooperation from the nurse, whom he orders to draw blood from the unconscious victim, despite the nurse very calmly pointing out that it is not legal for her to do this – nor for him to demand it.

In response, the thug with the badge and the government-issued gun physically attacks the nurse, assaulting her for the grievous offense of not obeying an armed government worker’s commands. Even though those commands had no basis in law.

So, what happens?

The taxpayers end up paying $500,000 for the damages caused by the violent, out-of-control and criminal “hero.”

The “hero” himself is merely fired. Not even a fine.

As a thought experiment, imagine the consequences if the nurse had jabbed her finger into the body-armored chest of the “hero,” to make a point. It goes without saying she would have been caged and charged with felony assault upon a “hero.”

She would have faced prison time – not merely the loss of her job.

This double standard is so routinized it might as well be codified – made official.

Isn’t he – whoops! she – handsome?

“Heroes” also feel entitled to shove their porcine snouts into every nook and cranny of our lives. To surveil us using every means available to them (e.g., automated license plate readers, random checkpoints, devices that hack into our cell phones). They demand that we submit to searches of our persons and property – in order to establish we’re not guilty of something.

They seize our money simply because we have “too much” of it.

Etc. Etc.

They wear opaque sunglasses – and tint the windows of their cars opaque – but we are not permitted to tint the windows of our cars  much at all. For “their safety,” we are told; in reality, so that it is easier for them to look inside our cars and so conduct visual searches at random.

Yet these same “heroes” get their backs up when a citizen so much as points a video camera their way.

It is hardly necessary to elaborate. It is like pointing out that the sun has come up – or that it is dark at night.

We have become subjects – and are no longer citizens.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
anarchyst
anarchyst
November 7, 2017 9:36 am

The seeds of distrust were planted with the second “Drug War” instituted in the late 1960s and 1970s. Trust was replaced with mandatory “drug testing”, getting around Constitutional prohibitions by relegating (and encouraging) employers to act as government agents. Since suspicionless searches (yes, this includes urine and blood tests) were Constitutionally impermissable, employers were tasked with the job, receiving “federal funds” in order to “encourage” them to comply with government “drug testing” requirements. These requirements were a condition of receiving government contracts, thereby “roping in” the private sector into providing

suspicionless drug testing. Employees risked job loss for not complying with these government-backed and enforced mandates.
The pervasiveness of this mistrust filtered into “law enforcement”, along with the “supreme court” rendering an opinion that there was a “drug exception” to the Constitution, especially when it came to “warrantless searches and seizures”. SWAT teams, once only used for hostage rescue situations were being used for routine “drug busts”, and have since, been used for any reason that prosecutors can think up. “Dynamic entry” techniques were (and are) routinely used against the citizenry, smashing everything in sight “just because they can”, while police blame it on “adrenaline.
“Asset forfeiture” is “the elephant in the room”, being a “legalized” form of highway robbery, (actually robbery “under color of authority”) which is totally unconstitutional.
The “us vs. them” attitude is pervasive and has made the ordinary citizenry no better than a serf. I guess “we are all Palestinians, now”…

Stucky
Stucky
November 7, 2017 9:37 am

“See something, arrest someone!”

The new copfuk motto.

Anonymous
Anonymous
November 7, 2017 9:47 am

Just cooperate and sue.

razzle
razzle
  Anonymous
November 7, 2017 12:13 pm

Only hurts the taxpayers.

popcornguy
popcornguy
November 7, 2017 9:53 am

How did that work out for the jews?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  popcornguy
November 7, 2017 10:45 am

They didn’t sue.

They didn’t have that option.

Edwitness
Edwitness
November 7, 2017 11:07 am

Peace officer to law enforcement officer shows the gradual evolution of the thug mentality that has brought us to this point.
comment image

popcornguy
popcornguy
November 7, 2017 11:22 am

And what makes you think lawsuits won’t be an option at some point in the near future….

Our rights are disposed of on a daily basis….the future is very clear if you have a brain and the courage to see it….but 97% of Americans can’t see the danger right in front of them….

Anonymous
Anonymous
  popcornguy
November 7, 2017 12:02 pm

Lawsuits won’t be an option if we don’t use them, same as with all other rights we don’t use and defend.

razzle
razzle
  Anonymous
November 7, 2017 12:14 pm

Just like banks don’t give a shit if they are sued cause they can pass on the costs, law enforcement doesn’t either. Not the entity itself, and the consequences to the individuals doing the actions is minor.

Capn Mike
Capn Mike
November 7, 2017 11:33 am

Vets fresh from the Iraq nonsense are given priority for cop recruitment. We’re all hajis now.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Capn Mike
November 7, 2017 12:03 pm

I was thinking it was Somali migrants.

thetruthonly
thetruthonly
November 7, 2017 12:47 pm

I have little contact with the police. My only contact in years was trying to get parking enforcement to tow an abandoned vehicle from in front of my nieghbors house. It was almost a new car, almost empty car, and suspicious out of state plates. I admit I waited a month, then inquired of the neighbors, then starting calling parking enforement once a week. After 3 such calls, someone put a scary notice on the car, and chalked the tires. Then nothing happened for more weeks, now 4 months parked there. Then I emailed and continued calling once a week (my neighbors also called). I can’t believe I never tried the passenger door, but my wife eventually did and it was open! After locating a checkbook and doing some investigating I hooked up with the owner (car was owned by J+J at a nonexistant address in Idaho). It was stolen. I informed the police and awhile later they came out. The cop never did answer any questions about WHY they never did anything about this car, why they didn’t tow the car. Oh well, at least I wasn’t arrested for tresspassing the cars interior (ha!). It was a company car stolen after only 3 days. The only other recent event was officers responding to my call of a tresspasser jumping over back fences. They did get the guy and he was a burgler. So take yer pick. Sometimes they do some good, sometimes not, and apparently from this video, also sometimes bad. The paradox of the use of force is something I have pondered and it’s a bit boring, complex and long, but my take on it is this https://thetruthonlydementia.blogspot.com/2017/05/no-moral-authority.html

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
November 7, 2017 2:25 pm

Don’t get me started about vigilantes with authority.

My best male friend, classmate and fellow son of a SAC pilot was detained in Iran in the 70’s for taking a photo.
They were loaded for bear before the Shah fled.