The Real SUV We Can’t Have

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

Nissan just announced a new SUV they’re not going to sell here.

It’s called the Terra – and the Chinese (and other foreign markets) will get it beginning next spring. Nissan’s Ashwani Gupta says there is growing demand in China for “go anywhere SUVs built like the rugged SUVs old” – which apparently are no longer in demand here.

This, of course, is claptrap. There is plenty of demand.

The problem is Uncle.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

It is becoming extremely difficult to sell “go anywhere SUVs built like the rugged SUVs of old” because they are heavy and heavy means big engines and that means a hearty appetite for gas. This however isn’t a problem for the people who buy such vehicles; they are – presumably – ok with paying more for gas in exchange for  the ruggedness and go-anywhere capabilities.

Else they would not buy them.

Just as people sometimes buy a bigger house rather than a small apartment – knowing the carrying cost is higher. So what? It’s their choice. And more to the point, it is their money paying the mortgage and the utilities. Just as the SUV buyer’s money – not the government’s money or anyone else’s money – is paying for the fuel that goes in the tank.

The market takes care of itself.

If a thing is burdensomely expensive for natural (market) reasons, then that thing becomes rare as a commodity for just that reason.

But never mind. Uncle – acting in loco parentis – believes we are using “too much” gas.

He therefore imposes taxes and other disincentives to artificially curb market demand for “rugged, go anywhere SUVs” – punishing you for daring to want what he thinks you ought not to have. As a result, “rugged, go anywhere SUVs” are already very few in number and mostly expensive models such as high-end Land Rovers.

Medium-small SUVs under $30k like the soon-to-be-here (well, soon-to-be-there) 2019 Terra are all but extinct in the United States.

We get crossover SUVs – which aren’t really SUVs because they are basically just jacked-up cars styled to look like SUVs. They are defined by not having rugged underthings, such as a four-wheel-drive system with a two-speed transfer case and low range gearing. They have all-wheel-drive (without the transfer case and low-range gearing) meant for light snow on paved roads; maybe wet grass.

Most of all, they are defined by not having their drivetrains and suspensions cradled by rugged and so heavy steel frames, onto which their bodies are bolted – as real SUVs do.

Instead they have car-ish unibodies. Frame and body welded together. It’s much lighter – which makes it feasible to use small engines in these things. Which in turn means they use less less gas.

But they are much less rugged – and you can’t “go anywhere” in these things – as a result.

It is also harder – and more expensive – to repair these unibodied crossovers when they are damaged. Including in particular lightly damaged, as occurs when a fender is bent.

You can unbolt most of the exterior sheetmetal bolted to the frame of a body-on-frame SUV. You have to cut – and weld – most of the panels on a unibody crossover, if it gets bent.

Also, the body of a body-on-frame SUV isn’t structural; if you hit a deer, you bend a fender – not the frame.

Because of this design difference, the real-deal SUV is much more able to take a hit without taking functional damage. If the frame’s not bent – and it is hard to bend the girder-like frame of a body-on-frame SUV – the thing isn’t broken. Just bruised. You can still drive it with a crinkled fender or a smashed-in grill. The damage is cosmetic. But if you bend the frame of a unibodied crossover, the thing is no longer drivable.

At least, it’s no longer safe to drive.

It’ll pull to one side, handle like a drunk staggers down the street. Not good – and not cheap to fix, either. And not fixable by you. It takes frame-straightening equipment and welding.

With a body-on-frame SUV, it takes a come-along.

If you don’t know what that is, you probably don’t know why SUVs differ from crossovers. A come-along is a heavy strap with a ratcheting mechanism. One end wrapped around a big tree. Hook the other to the bent fender. Now, pull it back into shape – more or less. Or just put the transmission in reverse and back up. It’s not body shop perfect, but its serviceable – and doable by you, for free.

Real SUVs also last longer because they are built tougher. A V8 that makes power (and torque) by dint of displacement and without much effort is an engine that will almost always outlast a turbocharged four that’s subjected to greater stress (being pressurized) and which has to work harder, more often, just to keep up.

And, of course, rust.

So long as the frame isn’t rusted, the body of the body-on-frame SUV is both expendable and repairable. The frame will rust through, eventually. Just as a railroad track will eventually rust into dust. But the thickness of the metal makes that a long-term proposition. The much thinner frame of a unibody rusts sooner – another hidden cost of Uncle’s interferences.

The question is – why do we allow Uncle to interfere?

This isn’t a criminal matter. No one is victimized by someone else’s decision to spend his money on a “rugged” SUV – or the gas which goes in its tank.

It’s very interesting that so few people seem to object to the fact that the government is now in the business of punishing people who’ve not harmed anyone but only on account of some decision of theirs which others do not like.

And that’s something even the Chinese aren’t doing.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Foot in the Forest
Foot in the Forest
March 20, 2018 8:12 pm

My suv? 1965 ford F-250 High Boy. Shen has 750,000 plus miles and is currently powered by a 390cu. V-8. She sucks gas like a pig compared to something modern and does not have a strait panel on her but she will haul 2 tons up a cliff. Besides you cant loose her in a parking lot.

Aquapura
Aquapura
March 20, 2018 9:33 pm

I don’t disagree that a BOF SUV has pluses vs the CUV’s we see commonplace but make no mistake, the SUV’s of the 1990’s were not rugged go-anywhere machines. Being they were essentially trucks people complained about the ride quality. Ford in their infinite wisdom told owners of Explorers to deflate the tires with disastrous results.

Again I say, the consumer has asked for the vehicle you see on the lots today far more than the gov’t mandated. If Eric were right in the desire for a BOF SUV the 4 Runner would be outselling the Highlander 10:1. Also, check the prices, the 4 Runner is not a luxe vehicle yet costs far more. Nissan had the Xterra here but never sold well. Face it, people like their CUV’s.

Oilman2
Oilman2
  Aquapura
March 20, 2018 11:14 pm

Let’s be really clear here – CITY DWELLERS like their CUV’s, just as they like their $60,000 Ford F-150’s with the electric butt warmers. The CUV does not survive rural roads in Texas, let alone in Louisiana, Arkansas, Michigan, Minnesota. Neither does the F-150 unless you never use it for anything except groceries.

My son bought a Highlander to commute to work in the city, 95 miles away. The roads are paved, but can get potholed easily. We have 40 acres with 4 changes in elevation of 60′ within our parcel. The Highlander was toast after 18 months from just the potholes, carrying seed and feed every now and then, and having to be winched out of the mud multiple times – the subframe actually bent when I hooked my FJ Cruiser winch to it and got it out.

The F-150 was next, but since it was technically a truck, he used it harder. It failed sooner, making 14 months before the front suspension needed new tie rods, bushings and steering box.

My FJ Cruiser and the F-250 are still going .

What Eric laments is indeed lamentable, but it will take another decade or so and the roads to degrade further before people begin to understand. Planned obsolescence has taken the car guys by storm years back, and it shows.

It’s also going to be quite a hoot to see anything “self-driving” winding down my road amidst deer, hogs and tractors without the benefit of side striping or any lane striping at all for that matter…

Roberto de Medici
Roberto de Medici
March 21, 2018 12:20 am

I OWNED A DOTSON 300 ZX, A 4X4 JEEP AND A 4X4 DODGE RAM FOR GO ANYWHERE VEHICLES, COULD CARE LESS WHAT NISSAN NOT GOING TO SELL ME.

nkit
nkit
  Roberto de Medici
March 21, 2018 12:34 am

Couldn’t care less. If you can still care less, then you probably should…I forgot the capital shift, sorry.

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
March 21, 2018 4:06 am

Fiat made a really cool little 4×4, the Panda. Why can’t I buy a tough, small, stripped-down 4×4 just to get over the dirt roads?

[imgcomment image&f=1[/img]

To some degree, the heavier the vehicle, the less well it does off-road.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  Chubby Bubbles
March 21, 2018 8:51 am

I remember Fiat from the time when I was real young. My very alcoholic uncle had one (he was always buying weird cars) and one day he was going around a gentle curve and rolled that sucker!
FIAT= Fix It Again Tony

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Coalclinker
March 21, 2018 10:15 am

That could possibly be more the fault of “alcoholic” that “Fiat”.

bob
bob
March 21, 2018 7:22 am

SUV’s that are best suited to the freeway and the costco parking lot. Food that is neither nutritious nor delicious. Country music that ain’t . 200 chanels a’ cable and not one thing worth watching. At every turn we are nudged to live lives that are odorless, tasteless, thrill-less, uninteresting and largely undisguishable in characteristics from the lives of our neighbors. Why is subpar, mediocre, unsatisfying the rule of the day?

Martin brundlefly
Martin brundlefly
March 21, 2018 8:36 am

Lol gas mileage. Everyone with motorized recreational vehicles churns through gas. I pay 4 bucks a gallon for ‘on trail’ 91 octane ethanol free for my toys, and 12.50$ in two stroke oil per ten gallon tankful. Thats 52.50$ for 100 miles of riding. Thats for the sleds. The wheelers are 4 stroke, so no oil, but they get 6 to 7 miles per gallon instead of ten. So the wife and i burn 100 bucks in fuel per day on the toys. How worried am i about vehicle fuel mileage? Our trucks get twice that. Do liberals know offroad vehicles and toys exist?

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 21, 2018 11:12 am

“Let the great unwashed in the flyover states, with their pickup trucks complete with gun racks, burn what’s left of the gasoline while overdosing on synthetic opiates while the salaried elites and individuals of high net worth, ensconced in their campuses and gated communities, will create a different future for themselves, replete with wind turbines, solar panels and electric cars (until they all get shot by all those they have disenfranchised). ”

http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2016/10/for-purely-technical-reasons.html