America’s long-term challenge #3: destruction of the currency

Guest Post by Simon Black

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

On April 2, 1792, George Washington signed into law what’s commonly referred to as the Mint and Coinage Act.

It was one of the first major pieces of legislation in the young country’s history… and it was an important one, because it formally created the United States dollar.

Under the Act, the US dollar was defined as a particular amount of copper, silver, or gold. It wasn’t just a piece of paper.

A $10 “eagle” coin, for example, was 16.04 grams of pure gold, whereas a 1 cent coin was 17.1 grams of copper.

The ratios between gold, silver, and copper were all fixed back then.

But if we apply today’s gold price of $1292 per troy ounce, we can see that the current value of the original dollar as defined by the Mint and Coinage Act of 1792 is roughly $66.75.

In other words, the dollar has lost 98.5% of its value since 1792.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

What’s incredible about this constant, steady destruction of the currency is how subtle it is.

Few people seem to notice, because modern day central bankers try to “manage” inflation between 2% to 3% per year.

2% to 3% per year is pretty trivial. But it happens again the next year. And the year after that. And the year after that.

After a decade or so, it really starts to add up.

But there’s an important, other side of the equation: income.

Costs are clearly rising. And it’s fair to say that incomes have been rising too. But which one has risen more?

In 1982, back when I was a toddler, the price of a Ford Mustang was $6,572. Today the cheapest Mustang starts at $25,680 according to Ford’s website.

So a Mustang today is around 4x as expensive as it was 36 years ago.

US Labor Department data from 1982 shows that average earnings were $309 per week, or $16,086 per year. That was enough to buy 2.45 Mustangs.

Today’s earnings are $881 per week, or $45,812 per year. That’s only enough to buy 1.78 Mustangs.

So when denominated in Ford Mustangs, people’s incomes have fallen 27.3% since 1982.

More recently than that, say, back in 2005, an entry level Mustang cost $19,215 at a time when average wages were $40,664 per year– or 2.12 Mustangs per year.

So even since 2005, average income levels have fallen 16%.

Obviously this trend doesn’t just apply to Ford Mustangs.

If we look at housing in the United States, we can see that the median home price in 2003 was $186,000 (according to Federal Reserve data) at a time when the Labor Department reported average weekly wages of $620.

So that was roughly 0.173 houses per person per year.

Today the median home price is $328,000, with average wages of $881, or 0.139 houses per person per year.

That’s a decline in income of 19.6% over the last 15 years.

Again, it’s a slow, subtle destruction. But over time, inflation REALLY adds up. Over the long-term, the average person becomes poorer.

We can view this trend anecdotally as well. Back in the 1950s and 1960s, it was common for a man to go out into the work force and support his entire family.

On a single salary, the average American family could afford a home, a car, modern technology at the time, savings, and even a summer vacation.

Today it’s normal for both spouses in a family to have full-time jobs, just to make ends meet.

Data from Pew Research shows that 70% of American households (married couples with children) back in 1960 were single income, i.e. only the father worked.

Today, 60% of households have BOTH spouses working.

And given the other statistics we routinely see about how the average US household has very little savings and is loaded down with debt, they’re barely making it even with TWO incomes.

That’s because inflation has slowly robbed people’s livelihoods.

What’s truly bizarre is that this exact same inflation is actually OFFICIAL POLICY.

Both central bankers and politicians deliberately try to engineer inflation, and they formally disclose this to the public.

The Fed announces its “inflation targets”, and economists panic if inflation is too low… or even worse, if there’s “deflation” and prices fall.

The government actually has a vested interest in inflation. They like rising prices because the national debt is so obscenely large.

The idea is that, if the government borrows $10 billion today on a 30-year term, they want the value of that $10 billion to be as little as possible three decades from now.

So a slow, steady destruction of the currency is actually to their benefit; the government wants to be able to inflate the debt away.

But as consumers, we prefer falling (or at least stable) prices. Price stability ensures that people’s purchasing power remains the same.

Rising prices are destructive, rewarding those who go into debt (like the government) at the expense of anyone who has been responsibly saving.

Think about it– if you put $100 in a savings account 10 years ago, you wouldn’t be able to buy as much with it today as you could have back then. Saving money actually COSTS you purchasing power.

The month-to-month and year-to-year variations on inflation will be all over the board. But the long-term trend is pretty clear: prices continue to rise.

And it’s fair to say that no nation or empire in history has ever been able to prosper by slowly destroying the value of its currency and its middle class.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
BL
BL
May 22, 2018 7:53 pm

The current value of the coin today would be 667.50 for slightly over a half ounce of gold. Move your decimal over.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  BL
May 23, 2018 10:42 am

Gold is currently in the high $1200/oz. range.

Moving that decimal over would make your value off by a huge amount plus or minus depending on which direction you moved it.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
May 22, 2018 8:27 pm

Simple solution….abolish the Federal Reserve and hang all the counterfeiters as federal law demands. Also abolish the fraudulent practice of fractional reserve banking.

Or as Ron Paul has suggested, simply abolish ALL taxes on gold/silver/platinum, abolish ALL legal tender laws that demand the use of the US dollar (Federal Reserve Note) for transactions, and let ALL currencies, gold, silver, etc. be used as money. Gresham’s law will naturally drive out the bad while the market embraces the good. A slightly more gentle transition than simply shutting down the criminal organization overnight.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 22, 2018 8:45 pm

Criminality to the highest degree.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 22, 2018 8:58 pm

667.5 value of coin. He’s talking value of dollar , which there are 10 in the coin. Move decimal back to where it was.

BL
BL
  Anonymous
May 23, 2018 1:02 am

It means the price of an ounce of gold was $19.36 in 1792 and the price of gold today is $1,292.00
The USD is not tied to or backed by gold. The 1792 $10 gold coin was tied to the price of 1 oz of gold so it was worth $10. By the same formula of 16.04 grams, today it is worth $667.50. If the USD of today were tied to an oz of gold, you would have $667.50 buying power for a ten dollar bill.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  BL
May 23, 2018 10:47 am

But you would have far fewer $10 bills, too many times people seem to think they would have as many of them as they do now but they would be much more valuable.

It comes out being a relative thing, you have to adjust for average incomes today and what average incomes today will buy compared to incomes then and what they bought then to get the overall relative picture.

Jake
Jake
May 22, 2018 10:54 pm

A Dollar is defined as 371.25 grains of pure silver or the market equivalent value in gold according to the Currency Act of 1792. The US merely copied the content of the Spanish Dollar in use at the time.
Fiat currency is theft.

Hollywood Rob
Hollywood Rob
May 23, 2018 12:30 am

I am a little confused. Why would anyone want to buy a mustang?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Hollywood Rob
May 23, 2018 12:25 pm

It’s not like Fiats are any better, but I guess this crowd only wants Fords–made out of gold and two decimal places off.

Neuday
Neuday
  Hollywood Rob
May 23, 2018 1:56 pm

Because they’re loud, a bit slow, not nimble, and their glory years are well behind them.

Dr. Doom
Dr. Doom
May 23, 2018 2:00 am

Fiat currency is debt disguised as money. The Rothschild Bank issues notes that have no value to purchase real assets. The real assets accrue to the bankers and you get ZERO VALUE. Worse, you have to pay interest. If interest rates are set at 2%, you have a – 2% in the economy. The debt is monetized by over the value of the currency put into the system. This has two effects. The previous effect of losing real assets I already mentioned. The further loss of all the interest by taking out the value of the monies already in the system removes even more value from the system depending on the percentages involved. this is compounded over time to accrue interest and devalue oppositional assets monetized in worthless fiat monies to be forced back to manage the debts you took at interest. They get it all and then some. The entire economy is sucked dry like a spider sucking a fly.

YOU END UP WITH NOTHING. A DRIED UP DEAD HUSK.

Gilnut
Gilnut
  Dr. Doom
May 23, 2018 7:39 am

Spot on DD, it’s called monetization. ‘They’ trade you worthless Fiat for your labor and goods.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dr. Doom
May 23, 2018 11:04 am

“Fiat currency is debt disguised as money.”

It doesn’t have to be The Treasury can simply issue debt free United Stated Dollars in place of the interest bearing debt of Federal Reserve Notes.

That, Treasury issued money, would be the only viable alternative to the Fed note money I can see (although I would certainly like to hear others and how they would work in practice if anyone has other viable ideas).

Dr. Doom
Dr. Doom
  Anonymous
May 23, 2018 7:04 pm

Yeah, Old Hickory Andy Jackson already told you that. That guy was probably the Best President America ever had really. He whipped Rothschild’s redcoats at New Orleans and crushed the Central Bankers when he drained the swamp when he was POTUS.
Andrew Jackson was probably the Second Best American in American History up to this point. Behind only General Robert E. Lee, a fine Christian Southron Gentleman. Lee’s only fault was being a gentleman on the battlefield. The Only Rule of War is WINNING.

Michael Keane
Michael Keane
May 23, 2018 7:05 am

1 8 6

diogenes
diogenes
May 23, 2018 8:15 am
marty
marty
May 23, 2018 12:01 pm

Went shopping today for groceries prices are exploding .