Facing The (Horrible) Future

Authored by Chris Martenson via PeakProsperity.com,

I’d like to tell you a short story based on a movie that has had a profound impact on me.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/climate-change-choice_0.png?itok=zU1Ao_G9

I’ll get to the story in a moment, but first, a little background on the movie…

It’s called Griefwalker (by Tim Wilson) and it focuses on the life and wisdom of Stephen Jenkinson, a theologian and philosopher who worked as an end-of-life specialist for many years.  Because we all must face death in our lives, inevitably our own someday, I highly recommend this movie and Stephen’s work to everyone.

After sitting at the death beds of a thousand individuals, Stephen has accumulated a wisdom regarding the process of dying that is perhaps unmatched in our modern times. His views and insights are extraordinarily powerful and extremely well-delivered in the movie.

Stephen is a blunt yet thoughtful man, and my own interview with him (Living with Meaning) remains one of my all-time favorites.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

At one point in Griefwalker, Stephen was lobbed what I’m sure the interviewer thought was a soft-ball question.  From memory, and I last watched the movie a few years ago so I’m certain to have this inexactly recalled, it was along the lines of “So, Stephen, you’ve learned how to ease people through the process of dying. How is that done?”  I guess the idea was that after being so steeped and skilled at shepherding people through the process of dying, Stephen had arrived at some tidy formula for making it as gentle as possible.

Without blinking Stephen said, “Oh no. Dying for most people these days is horrible.”  After a few shocked fumbly moments by the interviewer, and I confess to having been shocked too, Stephen continued, explaining that the physical process of dying can certainly be managed easily and well with palliative care, but the emotional journey can be quite terrifying (at first).

The reason why is because most people spend their entire lives pretending as if death is somehow avoidable. So when they find themselves dying, they suddenly have to confront the fact that they may have forgotten to fully ‘live’ during their one and only shot at life.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Aurelius-on-death-2018-06-08.jpg?itok=6-iekrPC

To suddenly realize the most precious thing you had was barely treasured along the way, never to be recovered, can indeed be a horrible moment.

As far as we know, we’ve only got one life to live — and facing our end puts that into sharp focus. As Stephen says in his book Money and the Soul’s Desires“Not success. Not growth. Not happiness. The cradle of your love of life … is death.”

To look back on one’s time on Earth and realize how much of it was spent not really being alive, not loving, not noticing, not being present with what is, is to realize that your one glorious ride was largely spent without reflection, depth or meaning. It was squandered. And there’s no undoing that fact. Again, that moment of realization is a bad moment.

I’m not writing this to push you to ponder your own demise, though that may be a healthy pursuit for many of us. Rather, I want to direct your attention towards a moment of horror that I think is coming – for all of us.

Where We’re Headed

Travel with me to the future. Imagine that the year is now 2040.

If we suddenly woke in that year, what would we see in the world?  More importantly, what would we not see? Which species would be missing? Which ecosystems will have utterly collapsed?

By extrapolating trends already in place (many of which are accelerating) we can easily predict a future world where there are no large animals left. Perhaps the last giraffe was killed and eaten by a hungry mob back in 2033, joining the White Rhino which was lost back in 2018.

Lions and tigers can no longer be found in the wild; their genetic stock hopelessly compressed into a few zoos and frozen test-tubes, should humans ever rally to justify the expense of trying to resurrect those species.

There are no coral reefs anywhere in the oceans, and essentially no diversity of life left in the seas at all. Acidification has upset and mostly ruined the ocean ecology from the bottom up.

First, we noticed that the oysters no longer successfully made it out of the larval stage. But by the time the scientists delivered a loud enough warning for all of the missing copepods and other vital zooplankton, it was already too late. The jellyfish had taken over. Nobody has a clue how to get the ecology to return to one that can support tuna, rockfish, dolphins, whales, seals and seabirds. Those are all gone — starved, fished or hunted to extinction.

Worse, the ubiquitous jellyfish are entirely too efficient. In addition to decimating the zooplankton, the jellyfish are eating the phytoplankton responsible for generating most of the world’s oxygen — their levels too low to continue being a positive force for oxygen release into the atmosphere. “Don’t worry!” scream the Tweets, “Scientists have found a new and better way in the lab to harness the sun to split water. We can make our own oxygen!”  However, after the past 1,000+ lab ‘miracle breakthroughs’ that proved to be duds when attempted at scale, few have hope that this time will prove any different.

The vast systems offered by Nature — more accurately, that were offered by Nature — once taken for granted, are now fully appreciated by the people left on Earth. But it’s too late.

The insects are mostly gone, at least in terms of diversity. The terrestrial ecosystem balance that people knew and loved back in “the twenty teens” is gone and has been replaced by something far simpler and painfully less interesting. The failure to block neonicotinoid pesticides in time, as well as their more morally repugnant (yet legal!) derivations that outpaced activist’s ability to fight them, meant that entire classes of pollinators were lost.

With those, entire species of plants disappeared because they were utterly dependent on highly-specific pollinator services. Mankind’s few lame attempts at creating “drone pollinators” were so utterly unfit for the task that the term became a profoundly disparaging insult, most frequently applied to ineffective politicians.  “Looks like another useless bill being put up by the drone pollinator from New York.”

A few hardy bugs and roaches, lots and lots of ants (where are they all coming from?), and very few flying insects remain. No more large moths in the temperate climates, with such splendid examples as the Luna and Hawk moths now only existing as dead specimens in a few museums, right next to the dodo and African elephant displays.

And it’s been over 15 years since “the dawn chorus of birds” was a phrase that had any meaning. Nearly all of the migratory birds are gone, along with all of the insect eating species.  It’s eerily silent outside in the morning. The sight of a single bumblebee, or a flash of colorful plumage, is cause for a quickening of your pulse — the same physical reaction people once had when as noticing a movie star at a café.

Life, where it now exists in pockets, is revered.  In nearly every place it remains, human guardians quickly dispatch any poachers or defilers, burying the bodies without remorse.  Non-human life has become more valuable than human life.

Fossil fuels began peaking in 2030 in terms of total BTUs from all sources: oil, gas and coal. And while not crashing, they’ve unable to provide more, which exposed the ‘continuous growth’ model as being a cruelly-attractive mirage. Its handmaiden, debt-based money, was also revealed to be an artifact of the surplus energy from fossil fuels. Both models have failed.

As has retirement, a several-generation luxury never to be repeated again in human history. Everyone left alive has to work, if they want to eat.

With the loss of those fantasies, everything is now a difficult trade-off. Not surprising, many people are unable to cope with the consequences.  Suicides are a leading cause of death, especially among those born during earlier and more abundant times.

Worst of all, food is now increasingly scarce due to a horrid combination of ruined soils and ever more frequent and destructive climate disruptions. Rains fall where they shouldn’t and fail increasingly to fall where they should.  Or they fall too hard, and too fast.   Summers with temperatures of over 50C baked crops compounding water shortages, with several years’ harvests lost entirely because the overnight temperatures did not cool sufficiently to allow for the open-air pollination of corn. Who knew?

How did we ever get to 9 billion people on Earth without considering that this moment might have arrived?

How did we allow ourselves to pretend that it wouldn’t?

Why did we let the fantasy of relocating to Mars capture such a broad swath of our imagination and focus?  Sure, we put an outpost there for a few years in the 2020’s, but – guess what? – it turns out that Mars is a hostile planet to life. It’s utterly lacking in resources, it’s much farther from the sun than the Earth, and managing a high-tech existence there was a colossal struggle.  Of course we should have realized that going in and not placed so much of our species’ odds on that hope. We spent hundreds of billions getting to Mars at the same time we were spending trillions to destroy Earth.  What a horrible idea that was.  In retrospect, it’s all so terribly obvious.

Another forlorn diversion was vertical farming, which posited that we’d just grow salad greens in container boxes.  Of course, with some simple math and logic, we should have been able to realize that plants are calorie conversion machines, turning light energy into food energy.  The idea that we were going to meaningfully replace the sun’s free and intense full-spectrum light with our own manufactured lighting, at scale and in sufficient quantities to meaningfully address the caloric needs of 9 billion people was…not very well thought through.  Actually, in retrospect, that’s being too kind.  We were deluding ourselves.

And so, out here in 2040, looking back, we humans have suddenly come to our collective moment of horrible realization. Because we could not face the idea that our specie’s pursuit of collective growth had a predictable end, we forgot to properly care for the one planet we have.

Now that life on Earth is dying, the regret comes pouring out.  Oh, how much we’d give to once again be able to hear a cacophony of birds in the morning! Or to swim over a thriving coral reef!  Or to boat over an ocean teeming with fishes, whales and sea birds.  Instead, the waters are now blank, sterile and depressing.

Remorse and regret.  How could we have been so utterly stupid?  How could we not have rallied in response to the warning signs, the endless string of increasingly desperate red flashing warning lights any one of which could have — and should have — been sufficient to motivate us?

Oh, what we would give to get one more chance!  To go back in time and do things differently, protecting and preserving the Earth’s treasures as if…as if we were deeply in love with all of them.

Our Last Chance

In Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, Scrooge is given the chance to return to his present and get another shot at life. If the 2040 vision I’ve painted terrifies you on a fundamental level as it does me, just know that there’s still the chance to wake up and positively alter the course of events.

Yes, the trends are very bad, but they can be changed. As I am fond of saying, we already have all the knowledge and technology we need to be agents of regeneration and abundance instead of extraction and degeneration. We simply lack the right narrative to mobilize our society productively.

Go outside and rejoice in what nature has still to offer.  Really see the next bird or mammal or insect you encounter.  Each one is pure magic.  Take a good hard look at the individual before you, not a robin, but that robin. Not a squirrel, but that squirrel. That bumblebee.  Each is an individual, same as you.  Each has a role, a life, and is busy making decisions and contributing to the story exactly how it is supposed to.

This world we have is the only one we’ll ever have. It’s the one we evolved on and to which our DNA blueprints are exquisitely crafted. And it’s not dying, it’s being killed. We might as well be honest about that and use the active verb.

Killed actively and on purpose, but also by negligence.  We’re neglecting to notice what’s true: that humans are a part of, not apart from nature.  We are one with the larger world.  It’s time to wake up and live into that story. It’s not a new one, but something we forgot in our hasty failing efforts to escape its limits — limits that disappointed our fragile egos which wanted, needed, to be special and different.

Life ends, and life begins. There’s an evolutionary impulse underway that has given this brief moment of geological history both humans and elephants.  We cannot know where evolution is going or why, but we can feel the potential of it all.

Elephants, as well as all of life, should be revered and cared for not because children’s books need real-life examples, or zoos need fresh breeding stock, or even because Kenya needs tourist dollars. But simply because they are here. With us. In this time.

A certain humility needs to be adopted along the lines of We simply don’t know what role the special and peculiar sentience of elephants is playing, so we’d better protect it. Because we don’t know. If we remove that species from the web of life, what cascade may we create?

A Call To Action

I could dredge up all the perilous ecological data I publish often on this site, noting the decline in virtually every species — with many being lost every day and many more on the brink. But I won’t.

There’s no need. You already know in your gut that something is very badly wrong in this story. Something even worse than killing the life on the planet, including our own.

No, what’s worse is that we can do better but we’re not.  We can have immense empathy, and bond with both humans and non-humans alike.  We are capable of dimly grasping our own role on this planet and yet we’re collectively continuing to act as if….we’ll live forever.  If there are problems with that approach, we’re assuming we’ll figure them out as they arise.

But as Stephen Jenkinson pointed out, when the stakes are too high that leads to a horrible moment. To get serious about saving other species after they are already gone is a wildly immature idea.

But it is still in our power to avoid that horrible moment. That’s where the idea of a ‘movement’ comes in.  Look, I have little clue about how to actually start a self-sustaining global movement, but I do suspect that it has to involve (1) the right idea at (2) the right time and (3) involve the right people.

We have to do this. I know the time is right because so many people are already deeply unhappy with suicide rates up 30%, opioid addictions and death skyrocketing, and levels of depression (more accurately termed demoralization in most cases) at never before seen levels.

Those are all expressions of people who have lost their will to engage with life, or even to continue living.  That means a loss of meaning and purpose, a devastating loss. Adam’s recent report gives a hard-hitting breakdown of the mental health epidemic our disconnected and unfulfilling modern way of life has created. Be sure to read it if you haven’t already.

To truly “save the planet” is to actually undertake the harder proposition of “saving ourselves.”  The planet will be fine … but humans?  Maybe not so much.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Change-2018-06-08.jpg?itok=6QS2sUW8

Changing any of this will begin with each of us as individuals.  We have to become the change we wish to see.  We have to shift the narrative away from the old bankrupt idea of infinite growth on a finite planet, or that humans are apart from (rather than a part of) Nature, and towards a better narrative that aligns better with the world as it actually is.

This is a tough sell, for sure. Ultimately, it requires us to find a way past our instinctual drive for comfort and more ‘stuff’.  Waking up to the realities involved is not easy nor pain-free. It’s emotionally devastating at first. And who wants to go through that?

“Inattention to the world’s ecological state is well advised. Because attention to it mitigates against your happiness, contentment, and your sense of well-being.”

“Having a conscience now is a grief-soaked proposition”

― Stephen Jenkinson

I do, for one. Why? Because to do so is to pass through the tunnel that brings me back to living fully into the one life that I have.  I’m here to live, to make a difference, and to help usher new ideas into the world. The alternative is to face a bitter end-of-life moment that was unavoidable in the first place.

What needs to happen is to somehow awaken the people of the world to the actual nature of the predicaments we face, recognize their inevitability, and go through the wrenching adjustments necessary to realign our collective narrative with the objective truths of our times.

But how?

In some ways I’m encouraged, because so many people seem to be waking up.  I know this terrifies The Powers That Be, who so desperately want to cling to their authority at any and all costs, because I track their efforts towards shaping the narrative.  There’s nothing subtle about the ways that Wikipedia constantly degrades and disparages the pages devoted to anti-war activists while grotesquely supporting the neocon and war party efforts and related sympathetic journalists.

Twitter and Facebook are constantly stifling various views while elevating those that fall under the umbrella of promoting business as usual and protecting the ideas of those already in power.  In other words: more war, more unfairness, and maybe some barely-passable lip-service to the idea that maybe we should devote a percent or two of our resources towards rear-guard actions to protect the environment.  None of which are actually effective, of course, or else they would be immediately marginalized as the work of terrorists or malcontents.

All of which is to say that any revolution of thought won’t be televised, as they once said., Perhaps in today’s age we should amend this to: The revolution won’t be posted to FB and then successfully re-Tweeted.

In other words, please don’t wait for this to appear on your radar before you take it seriously.  It will only ever appear long after it’s far too late.

The revolution underway is already being conducted in places like our own site Peak Prosperity, as well as Charles Eisenstein’sCharles Hugh Smith’sZerohedgeJim Kunstler, and Craig Murray’s as well as countless others not named here.  Each of these sites is committed to telling narratives that run counter to what the guardians in the MSM would like you to hear.

Each of these alternative websites is saying, in its own way, Hey the old way doesn’t even make sense anymore, is shot through with logical inconsistencies, and in many cases lacks even basic morality. Collectively, they’re offering an invitation to see things differently, and to begin acting differently.

Our challenge is to remain focused, to promote the new ideas, and to be the leaders that are needed in these changing and difficult times.  Our adversaries are those peddling fantasies that serve only to pacify our growing inner discomfort as the world dies around us, as well as those who seek to diffuse, distort and decay the new messages either for corporate or political ends.

Our various social media platforms are a slithering mess of ever-changing algorithms (making it hard to know who you are or aren’t reaching with any given post), paid trolls, and bots programmed to deceive, slide, and/or derail any given conversation.

Which means we’ll need to be alert to those tactics and find other ways of remaining in touch.  You’ll need to trust your own instincts, and avoid the numerous and sophisticated ways that we are being made to feel powerless, isolated, and even a bit crazy for thinking the things we do.

My personal strategy is to (severely) limit my time on Facebook, use Twitter only for data and never opinions, and then comment at sites like Peak Prosperity where the moderation is heavy and bots and trolls are quickly booted.

This movement will consist of good people taking right action.  People who are willing to lead because they know it falls to them and they are not afraid to stand out and be different for a while.  People who can read the data and know that it is correct because they can feel it in their bones.

The time for infinite growth is over. It’s increasingly obvious that the benefits of pursuing growth have nosed over, and that the human rocket is now pointed towards the Earth.

We still have time to right this ship, but it’s going to take heroic efforts by a lot of people.  We need to be willing to give much and possibly lose even more.  However, it won’t be futile sacrifice, because this is just how things are sometimes.  You were born here and now, into these times, and your gifts are desperately needed.

We need each other. And you know what?  Along they way we may just discover unity, purpose, meaning and our true individual gifts to bring forth.

My personal invitation is to support the mission of Peak Prosperity (“Creating a World Worth Inheriting”) by becoming an active premium subscriber so that Adam and I can continue to bring these messages to the world, along with promising models for a sustainable future.  If not that, then please use your time and money to support others working in these areas, not least of which would be the important works of the individuals writing the blogs listed above.

It’s only by facing the true nature of our predicaments that we can avoid a truly horrible future moment of deep and profound regret.

Time still remains, but it is running short.

We are open to any and all ideas about how to build, join or support a movement of like-minded people who are ready and able to shuck the old conventions and start anew which begins by facing the data as we know it today.

None of the former splitting/sorting functions of old apply here.  So please don’t offer up one political party over the other, or any one country or system as being better, or ways we might vote new and better scoundrels into office, or tweaks to the existing exponential debt-based fiat money system that might extend things a bit longer.  None of those hold any merit.

We need a new narrative and even if it cannot lay claim to “the truth” it cannot be based on obvious falsehoods.  How do we create that new narrative in a way that it can be shared broadly?  What needs to be done?  Who should be involved?

Perhaps nothing needs doing, and this will all unfold of its own accord when its ready, but for those with an active “do” gene, like us, there are things to be done and efforts to be made.

So let’s get going.  Either we do this on our own terms now, or we all face the horror of profound regret later.

The really good news? If we do this right, we reclaim our lives, our sense of meaning, our connection to each other and the sacred, and we fulfill our potential as creative stewards of planet Earth.

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
37 Comments
Bob P
Bob P
June 10, 2018 9:18 am

. . . and no more rainbows, and puppy dogs will cease to frolic, and pretty girls will suddenly get ugly. Jeez, Martinson, lighten up. We certainly face serious challenges, but nature is resilient and humans can be as ingenious as they are destructive, so surely there is more hope than envisaged here.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
June 10, 2018 9:24 am

As long as we have billions of City Slickers consuming meat, farmers will have to use fertilizer (which is OK), and GMOs and pesticides that kill insects and wildlife (to produce the quantities of food the Slickers buy with their printed fiat money). Given present technology and morality, there is no other way to feed them. However, I believe Nature has begun to break the cycle as prophesied by Jesus in Matt 24 with the Modern Grand Solar Minimum and the City Slicker’s Reign of Terror is within months of coming full circle.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  robert h siddell jr
June 10, 2018 1:20 pm

I won’t agree to ‘within months,’ but a limit is out there … IMHO not too far away. But, it’s kinda like predicting the next market crash … someday.

22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
  robert h siddell jr
June 10, 2018 1:52 pm

You throw a big blanket over the City Slickers, 98% of whom are innocent bystanders and/or victims of the culture war.

I have no love for city folks (suburban sprawlers would be more accurate), but blame the “city” and the forces behind centralization, not the folks.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr

The shoe fits. The godless cities voted for Harpy and usually drug their whole state down; they are not my neighbors/folks. There are good people therein just as there were in Sodom and Nineveh and I pray they get out (Rev 15:4 & Matt 24:16) before Mystery Babylon becomes rubble (in one hour Rev 18:10). I am sympathetic to those good people but I doubt 2% of the population can feed 50% of the city people for a year. I hope you have an ideological, spiritual, and physical solution to offer.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  robert h siddell jr
June 10, 2018 4:19 pm

Blaming and hoping doesn’t put beans on the table.

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 10, 2018 9:28 am

“There are no coral reefs anywhere in the oceans, and essentially no diversity of life left in the seas at all. Acidification has upset and mostly ruined the ocean ecology from the bottom up.”

EDIT: Just to add; getting extremely tired of people writing the ‘End is Near’ crap just to get our attention to read the crap.

SmallerGovNow
SmallerGovNow
June 10, 2018 9:42 am

Gloom and doom scenario’s have been predicted all of my life (going on six decades now). Here are some whoppers from the first earth day circa 1970…

Examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started:

1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment.
3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
6. Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”
7. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.
8. Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

Our greatest danger comes from politicians, bankers, and a corrupt media. The population and resource problems will be dealt with one way or another. We certainly don’t need any centrally planned “global” solutions imposed on us like the Californian’s are voting for with their 55 gallons of water per day per person BS… Chip

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
  SmallerGovNow
June 10, 2018 11:41 am

Yep! That was the precise reaction I had when I read through this as well. This is recycled claptrap from the 1970’s. You will also note that the proposed “solutions” also comes from the 1970’s as well: big government, big religion, and all kinds of other restrictions on our personal and economic liberties. There is only one medium term threat on the horizon and that is debt, mostly government debt. In the longer run, say over the next 100 years, dysgenics starts to become a problem.

22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
  SmallerGovNow
June 10, 2018 1:53 pm

Your post goes hand in hand with…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wlNey9t7hQ

K Vizzle
K Vizzle
June 10, 2018 10:15 am

I made it half way through and then slit my wrists. How depressing.

Not Sure
Not Sure
June 10, 2018 11:00 am

I have spent most of my life hearing the global warming then climate change BS that when another jumps up to say we are dooommmed, I react in disbelief.

The problem is with all the scientific community being railroaded into globull warming, a true effort of environmentalists to accurately measure the actual conditions of the earths ability to regenerate is lacking. Add to the the nuclear meltdown in Japan and the loss of our reefs is really a concern to be followed; I just don’t know who to believe, now the most of the worlds scientists have proven to be government grant whores.

QuantitativeSeizing
QuantitativeSeizing
June 10, 2018 11:08 am

It is easy to focus on the details—especially the ones that don’t resonate with you. Maybe nature and the planet aren’t your thing. They aren’t really mine other than a place to work and play. I do concede though that more and more hiking through the woods to the deer stand or waiting at the starting line for my time trial class to start I do feel a connection to the land and am aware of the amazing beauty of nature. We bought a small piece of land some years ago and taking care of it has been a labor of love for me. I feel free when there and hate to leave at the end of the weekend.

Chris is running a business. I get that, but I believe he is also sincere in what he is doing. He is on a journey as we all are and he has chosen to communicate about and monetize it. I liked this article though it is a bit dark. As soon as I end this sentence, I’m going to go hang out with some of my children and give them some hugs.

Maggie
Maggie
June 10, 2018 11:14 am

I believe it might have been Chris Martenson whose story convinced me this little alternative reality was possible for Nick and I. There’ve been peaks and troughs along the way, but it appears we made it to the simpler life.

And, I wear purple whenever I want to and don’t just talk about it.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Wip
Wip
  Maggie
June 10, 2018 11:47 am

You rock girl. And I mean that.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Maggie
June 10, 2018 12:13 pm

What happened to Bee Bee?

Maggie
Maggie
  Anonymous
June 11, 2018 10:29 am

Bee Bee has not been seen for a week. I think Bee Bee visited one too many country homes in the area and has gone Bye Bye.

At least I don’t have it on my conscience and I asked Nick to NOT TELL ME if something were to happen I would not want to know.

Because I have no problem with putting my knee on a chicken’s chest and slicing the jugular to bleed her out fast and I have no problem calming a rabbit with my left hand while I position Thumper for a quick, merciful end, but those are animals with whom I have a contract. I am not a murderer of other people’s annoying dogs.

Dave
Dave
June 10, 2018 11:17 am

Where are the cartoons, People of Walmart and Friday Fails?

Fjord
Fjord
June 10, 2018 11:22 am

We’re in a fourth turning.
That 9B population will be dealt with shortly.

Another world war possibly also civil coinciding when the music stops.

anarchyst
anarchyst
June 10, 2018 11:32 am

If environmentalism restricted itself to truly caring for our natural resources, I would have no problem with it. However, with the “secret science” and questionable funding that these environmental groups possess taints the whole barrel. It turns out that many claims that environmentalists make have no basis in fact and are not based on good, honest, scientific investigation. This is why “environmental scientists” have to hide their data, as it does not fit their agenda. A good example of this is the so-called “global warming” crap, now renamed “climate change”. For one, the climate is always changing. The East Anglia emails in which data was purposely falsified by “climate scientists” comes to mind. Not only that, the “climate scientists” purposely installed temperature monitoring sensors in cities, contrary to manufacturers recommendations and good scientific practices, in asphalt-covered parking lots, and other “heat sink” areas in order to “prove” their (faulty) hypothesis. This is scientific dishonesty at its worst.
It turns out that the solar system is in a “cooling cycle” due to decreased solar activity. There are two long-term solar cycles that reinforce themselves when in phase and cancel themselves out when out-of-phase”. Look up the “Maunder minimum”. There are no SUVs on Mars or other planets, yet they are also experiencing the same solar variaability.
Environmentalism has been the method used to impose communist principles on western society–especially in the USA.
Environmentalists are not content with promoting clean water, air and land, but are hell-bent on controlling human behavior, and yes, promoting extermination plans for much of humanity as these “anointed” types consider mankind to be a pestilence (except for themselves) to be reduced in population “by any means necessary”.
Environmentalists HATE the God-given concept of private property and have imposed government-backed and enforced “land use controls” on private property owners without compensation–clearly an unconstitutional “taking” of private property. If environmentalists want to control land use, let them purchase it themselves–not by government force. Today the only method of negating government-imposed land use restrictions is “shoot, shovel, and shut up”.
If environmentalists had their way, the earth’s human population would be reduced by approximately 90%, with the remainder to (be forced) to live in cities, in soviet-style high rise apartments, utilizing bicycles, buses and trains for transportation. The use of automobiles and access to “pristine wilderness (rural) areas” would be off-limits to us mere mortals, and would only be available for these “anointed” environmentalists.
The “endangered species act” is another abuse of environmentalism. Species are always changing, to adapt to their environments–”survival if the fittest”. In fact, the hoopla over the “spotted owl” (that placed much northwest timber land “off-limits” to logging) turned out to be nothing but scientific misconduct and arrogance. There are virtually identical species in other parts of the northwest.
More scientific malpractice occurred when government biologists attempted to “plant” lynx fur in certain areas to provide an excuse for making those areas “off-limits” for logging or development. Fortunately, these “scientists” were caught–however, no punishment was given.
In a nutshell, today’s environmentalism IS communism… like watermelon…”green” on the outside and “red” (communist) on the inside…
It is interesting to note that communist and third-world countries have the WORST environmental conditions on the planet. Instead of the USA and other developed countries spending billions to get rid of that last half-percent of pollution, it would behoove the communist countries to improve their conditions first. Here is a question for you environmentalists: Why is there a push for restrictive environmental regulations, but only on the developed first-world countries, and not the “gross polluters” such as India and China?

RiNS
RiNS
June 10, 2018 11:48 am

Geeze that was a bit depressing. Imagine what it will be like in 2040. That scenario is a tired old horse that been whipped and put away wet. In 2040 a large portion of boomers will be gone. A generation that has gone to great pains to deny their mortality. Chris is asking his audience to imagine something that most have spent their entire lives not thinking about. I guess that was the point. Still life will go on. That is what I see whether I am alive or dust in the wind. It might be the Boomer last chance but this world is gonna get along just fine without.

U2’s Bono
CBc’s David Suzuki
and little ole me..

Anonymous
Anonymous
June 10, 2018 11:55 am

Liberal buzz words: “wake up”, “A Call To Action”, “engage”…phooey!

Darrell Dullnig
Darrell Dullnig
June 10, 2018 1:04 pm

The column is technically accurate, I believe, notwithstanding the dating, which is always chancy. That is not the point; most of the people who are not of the zombie class, which includes most of the commenters here are at least marginally aware that if something is not infinitely sustainable, it will not be sustained. What difference does it make whether Martenson’s dates are accurate according to your brilliant lights? You want to add thirty or forty years, maybe a hundred? How about five hundred or a thousand? At the end of that time, you have what he said.

Martenson says we have time yet to change, and while you have no real argument to offer, many of you scoff — over trivialities! Perhaps you think Malthus was a fool for predicting the population explosion, eh? I think the author is being overly optimistic. I do not think there are nearly enough people who qualify as bonefide Homo sapiens on the planet. There might have been at one time, but no more.

The truth as I see it is the human race is going to soon enough be reduced to a very small remnant, and perhaps become entirely extinct. Does it matter, after all? Only to each of us individually, as we depart, hence Jenkinson’s work. Otherwise, does it matter? Of course not, except that other, hardier species may not have to fear our obnoxious presence. Look on the bright side — without us they will be able to fully enjoy their lives.

BB
BB
June 10, 2018 1:14 pm

From What I have been reading this is all one big trap .The planned take down of the world economy is to put this planet in total chaos then ban cash,guns and get us chipped.

Oldtoad of Green Acres
Oldtoad of Green Acres
June 10, 2018 1:23 pm

Biggest problem(s) in the world can be traced back to man turning away from God.
With Jesus’s mercy the future is looking bright.
To leave this world with God in my heart, I would be ok with that.
Suggest saying prayers and living one day at a time.
A good dog is a blessing, in my opinion.

22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
June 10, 2018 1:44 pm

Keyword- Most People.

I’ve lived a good life (like I’m on vacation) and I don’t fear death.

If I die a clean, honorable death in a pile of spent brass with a smoking hot rifle in my hands, then all the better.

Jake
Jake

Even better, to die with there no longer being any need or possibility of dying in a pile of smoking brass, surrounded by family and loved ones. We have a good bit of work to do to get there.

22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
  Jake
June 10, 2018 4:09 pm

In other words-

“The pioneers get an arrow in the back, the settlers get to move in.”

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  Jake
June 10, 2018 4:57 pm

Jake: That is the understatement of the Century.

Uncola
Uncola
June 10, 2018 2:34 pm

In my last “Orwellian West” piece, I ended by saying: “hope has become a luxury we can no longer afford”.

Although some may have perceived that as fatalism, I was merely stating a fact.

The above piece almost seems written as a rejoinder to that declaration; a “call to action” if you will.

Mr. Martensen appears to be challenging the “right” people to begin discussing a new way that transcends traditional partisan politics and the polarization of narratives.

Personally, I enjoyed how he most eloquently stated his case here and have no problem with man’s stewardship of the earth; as long as it is not idolized into a form of pantheistic worship by progressives seeking political control via mandated orthodoxy.

In short, this piece is advocating the former in order to avoid the latter: a “third way” of global cooperation instead of Capitalism’s rape of the earth or global depopulation by way of the Marxists.

Perhaps Mr. Martensen is correct: We can’t win if we don’t play.

But what remains to be determined, however, is if compromise is even possible. If not, our progeny will never be awakened by songbirds in a grey world.

22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
22winmag - when you ask someone which floor they'd like, and they respond with "ladies lingerie"- they're referencing the AEROSMITH SONG!!!
  Uncola
June 10, 2018 4:10 pm

“Hope is not a strategy”

-Strategist Extraordinare Killary Klinton

Thunderbird
Thunderbird
June 10, 2018 2:57 pm

Live your life like you only have a short time to go. It really makes a difference.

As for doom & gloom we will always have chicken little. It would be nice though if we would stop trashing the earth and begin to reverse our damage to it. But this would take a collective change in consciousness. We could accomplish big feats like reforestation, canals bringing fresh water from the arctic to the deserts, stop putting our waste water into the oceans, move commerce over land instead of the oceans, convert to hydrogen power, and much more.

The advancement of human thought in technology has given us the ability to accomplish these feats. Our form of digital money and how it is distributed on the global level has given us the power, and our system of distribution of goods has given us the means. Only thing lacking is the desire to be of service to the planet. Isn’t it time we give something back to the planet that has served us so well?

Gerold
Gerold
June 10, 2018 4:06 pm

Not to worry; the Georgia Guidestones’ solution will solve all our problems except for the unwilling 90% who need to be exterminated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

The end of the Fourth Turning’s final World War should do the trick.

curtmilr
curtmilr
June 10, 2018 5:36 pm

I unsubscribed to his newsletter because he is boringly anti-human. Unless you live HIS way, of course.

Still, a stopped clock is right twice a day!!

Don Scott
Don Scott
June 10, 2018 8:57 pm

Date your articles.

JustTruth
JustTruth
June 10, 2018 9:35 pm

4th turning is heating up folks. Its pretty clear to me we are entering the zone of terminal velocity. Unipolar world is now history. Things are going to accelerate dramatically because they have to. Chaos will bring destruction, which will enable rebirth. and a new order

The world is being re-ordered. Trump will move rapidly east now, as he has no other choice. Russia and China are waiting. Trump move with Kim on NK/SK re-unification is step in that direction. Germany will have to leave Euro, and has no choice but to move east.
Israel will need new leadership to find common ground and find peace with its neighbors. It has no choice.

No, there is no free ride for us USA citizens. We as a society are going to re-learn what responsibility, truth, and personal integrity are, and what it means to earn your way through life as a society are all about. Morality will re-awaken.

Robert (QSL)
Robert (QSL)
June 11, 2018 10:20 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

Robert (QSLV)