With a Clothespin Affixed to My Nose…

Guest Post by Eric Peters

I just voted – not for anything, but against everything the political Left is determined to impose on everyone. From forcing everyone to tithe to the insurance mafia (or the government, it makes no difference to the person being mulcted) to the intellectual AIDS of elevating certain infantile, disturbed and dangerous people’s feelings to the same stature as facts.

Genug, already.

It is enough.

Where to start?

Like a lot of white guys, I like women – all kinds. And I have no issue with guys (all kinds) who like other guys. Or women who like other women. Or both. Whatever you’re into is cool with me – and I think also with most white guys – provided you leave us (and our wallets) out of it. That you don’t insist we avow to you that it’s all just fabulous and you don’t point guns at us and expect us to pay for your aberrations.

I certainly don’t expect anyone else to pay for mine.

Genug already with all the “racist” shaming over disagreeing with you, too.

Most white guys do not wear white robes – nor do they want to, either. They have no secret desire to keep anyone down. They just object to having their pockets emptied, their motives maligned –  and their freedom to be left the hell alone assaulted.

This includes being free to not associate – for whatever reason; it’s really no one else’s business unless you take the position that you have the right to force other people to deal with you when they’d rather not – which is a very odd concept, especially for Leftists to espouse given that they insist straight white men must only deal with women at their pleasure, on their terms and only when they have explicit (written, even) permission.

Otherwise, they are – says the Leftie – to bugger off.

White heterosexual men men are portrayed as villains for things they’ve never done, by people determined to do lots of villainous things to them.

Genug with this noxious, hypocritical cognitive dissonance.

The Left doesn’t like walls – or guns – except when the walls and guns are protecting them. There is a wall of guns around every Leftward politician, so clearly it is neither thing the Left actually objects to; rather, their objection is to people other than those on the Left (the leadership of the Left) having or using such things.

Genug, again.

I have no issue with immigration. As a Libertarian, I accept – and endorse, liberty of movement. But it is not liberty of movement which the Left is literally screaming about.

Rather, it is the expansion of their client base.

As Monty used to say, let’s make a deal. Would the Left agree to a policy that opened the borders but closed the spigot? Zero tax increases to fund any further expansion of the entitlements now richly available to all who apply, immigrants included? Would the Left – all of them – agree that any needs which arise – for example, multi-lingual teachers or just more teachers at government schools – will be met entirely by themselves, since they want the border opened? And claim there will no effect on the taxpayer’s pocket?

This would not be technically difficult. A plebiscite could be held. Those who vote yes would have their names appended to a special tax registry – to be called upon in the event a need arises.

No me gusta?

Interesting . . .

There is also this noxious business of the electric car – being literally crammed down our gullets when there is no need, because there is no market. The Left may just be dull enough to accept at face value the various idiocies about how EVs will save the planet but others not as dull have come to realize it is a shibboleth and the real agenda is to restrict and control mobility.

Ours, that is.

The various Left office-seekers will not be riding in armored electric Teslas.

Besides which, I have come to a somewhat initially begrudged but now open affection for The Orange One, who has done more to drive the Left to carpet-chewing hysteria than a six-pack of Richard Nixons. The show alone is worth it and I’d like for it to go on for as long as possible.

Which is why I roused myself to vote.

I hope it counts.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
November 7, 2018 10:01 am

If it means a Speaker Jordan in two years I can deal with the shitheads making fools of themselves for two years.
I wonder what it is going to be like for the commieass low IQ committee chairs we will now have to try to deal in front of the cameras with far more intelligent opposition needling and questioning their motives, making long speeches mocking them while delaying every move.
I know many would like to make Aunty Maxine the face of the Democrat Party. I think it would be far more profitable to make ultra creepy looking pencil neck Adam Schiff the face.

22winmag - PFC Frank reporting for duty
22winmag - PFC Frank reporting for duty
  Harrington Richardson
November 7, 2018 10:12 am

Spot on as usual, even in fatwah land.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Harrington Richardson
November 7, 2018 7:24 pm

good idea about schiff being the face of the party–
an additional advantage to this is that ridiculing waters would be considered racist & sexist,with schiff it’s open season–

Hollywood Rob
Hollywood Rob
November 7, 2018 11:09 am

Oh, and no, your vote didn’t count. But you can pretend that it did.

Bob P
Bob P
November 7, 2018 11:41 am

I fully concur with Mr. Peters. If a man wants to cornhole another man or dress as a woman, so what? Their business; just leave me the hell out of it. But the left insists we consider these perversions normal and presumes to degrade us or demand punishment if we don’t. Busybody governments (e.g., Canada’s) are compelling us to accept whatever someone chooses to identify as regardless of biology or there’ll be consequences. Are you shitting me? It’s bad enough we have to see these kooks, but now we’re ordered to accept their delusions or the jackboots will come down on our heads? That’s what most normal, straight white men object to.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  Bob P
November 7, 2018 12:02 pm

Can we self identify as Vermeer Chippers?

thetruthonly
thetruthonly
November 7, 2018 11:41 am

Voting made little difference here in Santa Cruz. DEMS swept every important seat everywhere, and at
the city council level a “progressive” whose agenda is soaking/opposing the rich, expanding aid and drug rehab to non-residents, (homeless) won, i.e. finally landed, as far as I can tell, his first job. Listing no education, no jobs, no accomplishments, only vague “supports” every leftist SJW agenda, wins easy. I’m going back to bed and pull the covers over head for awhile.

Social Credits
Social Credits
November 7, 2018 5:44 pm

“We hold our noses and vote for the people we hate the least”- A newspaper editorial I read.

Funny pic of the kid.