Jeff Sessions has already packed up his things and left the DOJ for the last time, and it’s likely that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross will be next to go given Trump’s well-documented frustrations with Ross’s job performance and the percolating scandals surrounding possible ethics violations.
And to the list of likely Trump administration post-midterm departures, we can now add Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, whom Trump has reportedly decided to remove after months of explosive outbursts over what he has perceived as her “poor performance” on immigration – an issue that Trump sees (with some reason, as the midterms showed) as crucial to his political survival, according to the Washington Post.
The report surfaced after Trump canceled a planned trip with Nielsen to visit US troops at the border in South Texas earlier this week. Trump reportedly told aides over the weekend that he wants Nielsen out ASAP, though the secretary is desperately trying to hang on until Dec. 6, which would mark her one-year anniversary in the job. Trump, who has complained about Nielsen for months, is looking for a replacement who will do a better job of implementing his immigration agenda.
Notably, a DHS spokesman refused to confirm or deny the report.
DHS officials who work with Nielsen declined to address her potential departure Monday. “The Secretary is honored to lead the men and women of DHS and is committed to implementing the President’s security-focused agenda to protect Americans from all threats and will continue to do so,” spokesman Tyler Q. Houlton said in a statement.
As early as May, reports surfaced suggesting that Nielsen had borne the brunt of President Trump’s anger over a rebound in illegal border crossings (after crossings dropped to multiyear lows following Trump’s 2016 election). That anger has only intensified by her resistance to Trump’s rhetoric about the migrant caravans, as well as his order to send thousands of US troops to the border. Trump has also reportedly berated her during cabinet meetings, criticized her to other administration officials and tagged her as a “Bushie” due to her service in the Bush administration.
Trump became incensed last month when Nielsen tried to explain during the runup to the midterm vote why the president couldn’t close the Southern border with Mexico or drastically limit immigration.
But despite her obvious reservations, Nielsen has stood up and defended controversial Trump Administration policies like the administration’s “zero tolerance” policy for illegal aliens traveling with children. The border separations triggered widespread outrage toward the administration last spring, and Trump eventually caved and reversed the policy under pressure. However, before he did that, Nielsen stood up and delivered a convincing defense of the administration’s measures.
At the peak of controversy over the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” family-separation initiative, Nielsen nonetheless stood at the White House lectern and delivered a vigorous defense of the measures. The president loved her performance — especially when she said there was no administration policy on separations. Days later, under withering criticism, the president changed his mind and ordered an end to the separations.
But if Nielsen is swept out during Trump’s second significant cabinet shakeup, all eyes will turn to Chief of Staff John Kelly, who has long been Nielsen’s biggest champion. He has previously stuck his neck out to defend her to the president, and her dismissal will inevitably revive speculation that Kelly’s name might also be on Trump’s “naughty” list. As WaPo reported, though Kelly has tried his hardest to stop Trump from firing Nielsen, his future in the administration is also “shaky”.
good. She needs to go. She’s worthless. Not only that, she was supposed to be in charge of election integrity.
Star – yes, I suspect she fucked up Florida, maybe others, which the article doesn’t even mention.
I’ll be glad to see Nielsen go, but we need the Wall, and the only way we were ever going to get Wall funding out of congress was for Trump to allow the government to shut down until het got that funding. Now it’ll be that much harder. Some argue that he can just build it without congressional authorization as commander in chief, robbing from Peter to pay Paul. I hope that’s true. The wall is not looking likely and that’s not Nielsen’s fault.
In his capacity as Commander-in-Chief all Trump needs to do is to order the Army Corps of Engineers to build the Wall with all deliberate speed.
Waseem, the phrase “with all deliberate speed” was understood to mean the authorities should drag their feet integrating the schools.
Iska, the phrase “robbing from Peter to pay Paul” is also known as a Ponzi scheme. They robbed the SS fund to pay for other stuff, you would be guilty of that fuck up since you think the ends justifies the means. Typical “I want my wall now!” screamer.
And the entire “Christian” world robs Paul entirely, depriving themselves of the fellowship of the mystery Christ revealed to him, in order to pay respect to Peter, an Apostle to the Jews.
Funny, that… even colloquiums lead people away from Bible truth.
Paul don’t get paid at all.
I don’t get why they’re not using DHS money for wall construction. Just shift it from buying all top of the line stuff. You could pay for it in savings.
Better would be to abolish the agency completely. Bring back freedom.