Wild Theories?

Submitted by Hardscrabble Farmer

So what would the plausible theories be?

It’s always illustrative to see the entire media/social network complex come together in lockstep to reassure the proles when one of their sweethearts gets themselves into a jam.

Via NYMag

How Jeffrey Epstein Made His Money: Four Wild Theories

Billionaire is a word that’s often thrown around when discussing Jeffrey Epstein, but unlike some of his other common modifiers — convicted sex offender, pedophile — there’s scant proof as to his financial bona fides. The bulk of Epstein’s wealth is believed to come from his money-management firm for ten-figure investors, although his only known client is Victoria’s Secret founder Les Wexner, who reportedly ditched Epstein over a decade ago.

After sex-trafficking charges were handed down on Monday, executive-suite financiers discussed how absent Epstein was from the field: “He’s supposed to run an enormous FX [foreign-exchange] trading firm,” said Enrique Diaz-Alvarez, chief risk officer at Ebury. “But I never once heard of him or his firm or anyone who worked or traded with him.” And as Forbes wrote in a 2010 blog post with a very direct title — “Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Is Not a Billionaire” — his money-management firm based in the U.S. Virgin Islands “generates no public records, nor has his client list ever been released.”

As we wait for more information to emerge in the investigation’s coming months, speculation is pouring out on how Epstein made his wealth. To make up for the lack of public information on his revenue stream, people are turning to unverified theories on how Epstein maintained such a sterling financial reputation in addition to his millions. But first we’ll start with the knowns.

Epstein’s mysterious career

According to a 2002 profile in New York — the one with the Trump quote — Epstein dropped out of Cooper Union and NYU’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences before finding a job teaching calculus and physics at the Dalton School in the mid-1970s. Epstein was hired at the prestigious Manhattan college-prep institution by the father of Attorney General William Barr, and his students included the son of Bear Stearns chairman Alan Greenberg. In 1976, Epstein joined Bear as a floor trader’s assistant, making partner in a mere four years. By 1981, he was out, setting up the J. Epstein & Co. money-management business the next year. New York described his business strategy in 2002:

He would take total control of the billion dollars, charge a flat fee, and assume power of attorney to do whatever he thought was necessary to advance his client’s financial cause. And he remained true to the $1 billion entry fee. According to people who know him, if you were worth $700 million and felt the need for the services of Epstein and Co., you would receive a not-so-polite no-thank-you from Epstein.

In Vicky Ward’s recent process piece on her reporting of an Epstein profile for Vanity Fair in 2003, she lays out some of her thoughts on the matter of a possible benefactor. In addition to a claim from a Ponzi schemer that Epstein was kicked out of Bear Stearns in 1981 for “getting into trouble,” Ward suggests that Wexner may have helped bankroll the financier. Ward writes: “While Epstein’s friends speculated that retailer Les Wexner was the real source of Epstein’s wealth, Wexner (who called him ‘my friend Jeffrey’) never commented on this, though he did send me an email praising Epstein’s ‘ability to see patterns in politics and financial markets.’”

No one knows how much he’s worth

According to his lawyers, around the time of his notorious plea deal in Florida in 2008, Epstein’s net worth was over nine figures. The figure was “a bone of contention with Epstein’s lawyers,” Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing three of Epstein’s alleged victims, told the Palm Beach Post in 2008. “In the litigation itself we were never able to get him to produce verified financial information. The ‘nine figures’ came by negotiation. It kept going up and up and up. They started at zero — they wouldn’t tell us at all.”

As Bloomberg states, “Today, so little is known about Epstein’s current business or clients that the only things that can be valued with any certainty are his properties.” According to a document submitted in advance of Epstein’s bail hearing, his Manhattan townhouse is estimated to be worth around $77 million. Then there are the properties in New Mexico, Paris, the U.S. Virgin Islands, his private jet, a fleet of 15 cars, and a Palm Beach compound estimated at $12 million.

But even the real-estate holdings have an air of mystery to them. Epstein purchased, or received, the Manhattan townhouse from Wexner around 1998. But there were no property records on the mansion’s transfer until 2011, when the company Wexner used to buy the place transferred it to an Epstein-owned company for $0. Epstein signed the document for both sides.

Financial Conspiracy Theory #1: Ponzi scheme

A Ponzi scheme has been floated as a possible source of Epstein’s wealth since as early as 2009, when Business Insider noted that multiple red flags pointed to a possible Madoff-like fraud. The secrecy of his client list; the “administrative” nature of all 150 of his employees in 2002; the absolute control over investors’ money, and the $1 billion basement investment required — all signs could point to Ponzi, although there’s no concrete evidence. In the story, finance writer John Carney raised a vital question, considering Epstein’s (limited) time in jail during the 2008 financial crisis: “How could Epstein’s one-man show not fall apart while he was in jail during one of the most volatile years in history?”

In addition, one of his early employers in finance, Steve Hoffenberg, was convicted of running one of the largest pre-Madoff Ponzi schemes in U.S. history. According to journalist Vicky Ward, Hoffenberg brought on Epstein in 1981 after he left Bear Stearns. “He has a way of getting under your skin,” he told Ward. Hoffenberg paid Epstein $25,000 per month for his work as a consultant for Towers Financial, though Epstein had left well before Hoffenberg pleaded guilty in 1994 to defrauding investors to the tune of $450 million. For years, it appeared Epstein had no exposure in the Towers Financial case, until 2018, when shareholders filed a putative class action suit against him for his alleged role in the Ponzi scheme. In a separate New York state case in 2018, Hoffenberg reportedly detailed Epstein’s alleged involvement in the scam.

Theory #2: Blackmail

As the Intercept D.C. bureau chief Ryan Grim noted, a piece of evidence detailed in the SDNY’s detention memo could hold a great deal of blackmail potential:

And in a 2015 court filing, alleged Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre claims that U.S. authorities were in possession of footage of her having sex with members of Epstein’s elite friend group. “Based on my knowledge of Epstein and his organization, as well as discussions with the FBI, it is my belief that federal prosecutors likely possess videotapes and photographic images of me as an underage girl having sex with Epstein and some of his powerful friends,” she said. Giuffre claimed that Epstein “debriefed her” after she was forced into sexual encounters so that he could possess “intimate and potentially embarrassing information” to blackmail friends into parking their money with him.

Theory #3: Epstein “Belonged to Intelligence”

One of the more mysterious quotes of this whole conspiracy-adjacent mess comes from Alexander Acosta, the current Labor secretary, who arranged for Epstein to get off with just a wrist-slap in 2007, when he was a U.S. attorney. According to Vicky Ward, when Acosta was being interviewed for the Labor secretary job, he was asked if his involvement in the Epstein case would be a problem during his confirmation hearings.

Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers …

Whether that’s the American intelligence community, the greater point-one-percent brain trust, or just a garbage excuse, the answer was good enough for the Trump administration to go forward with Acosta’s nomination.

Theory #4: Offshore Tax Schemes / Money Laundering

Because Epstein’s wealth is held offshore and is shrouded in mystery, some speculate that he may have made his money in tax schemes or money laundering. According to a well-developed, if factually void, pan-conspiracist take from finance Twitter’s Quantian, Epstein could have blackmailed his social circle into investing with him, then dumped the cash in an offshore account to avoid taxes. Or, similar to the Ponzi scheme conspiracy — and, again, without basis in fact — there is so little paperwork on the funds that the whole thing could just be a rig for money laundering.

What could the coming investigation reveal?

Because so little is known about Epstein’s wealth and his ambiguous-to-the-point-of-suspicious Financial Trust Company, pretty much any revelation would help shed light on the financial black hole. But because the Southern District of New York’s Public Corruption Unit is handling the case, the likelihood of a financial or tax-related charge is much higher than if another arm of the mother court were in charge. Gene Rossi, a trial analyst for Law & Crime, suggested that the PCU could provide more flexibility on charges, including money laundering, corruption, or tax-related crimes: “The sky’s the limit.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
34 Comments
MrLiberty
MrLiberty
July 14, 2019 3:02 pm

I vote for “All of the Above.” Add in possible money laundering for a cut of the proceeds.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  MrLiberty
July 14, 2019 4:43 pm

Maybe he earned his money the “old fashioned way;” he stole it.

Epic Cinema (EC)
Epic Cinema (EC)
July 14, 2019 3:27 pm

Drug trafficking?
Pimping?
Kidnapping?
Murder?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Epic Cinema (EC)
July 14, 2019 3:44 pm

As Homer Simpson once said, “All of them?”
You might be able to include bribery and espionage as well I imagine.
Harrington R.

Steve C
Steve C
July 14, 2019 3:41 pm

It’s really very simple. He saved his money in a little tin box.

I’m betting on the ‘up your honor bit by bit’ giving up his lunches for a week method.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
July 14, 2019 3:41 pm

For the first time, this morning I heard people on Fox News Sunday discussing the likelihood that Epstein was involved in some kind of activity that would cause many in high places to try to cover for him. None of it could be good, decent, moral, or anything that in a happier time we might have described as “American.”

Pequiste
Pequiste
  Harrington Richardson
July 14, 2019 4:26 pm

As a sneak preview or teaser for their audience?

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer
July 14, 2019 3:45 pm

Anybody who has ever been on a trading floor, been to a hedge fund, etc will tell you that Epstein did not make billions…..impossible with an army of analysts, traders and “balance sheet”….hedge funds use massive amounts of financial leverage to generate impressive returns and equally devastating losses on the assets they are trading. Usually, they will have a prime broker who also extends credit allowing the hedge fund to trade larger volumes. Derivatives also scale up the trading activity…..Epstein was doing none of those things….so whatever amount of money he has was not made as a hedge fund operator. That means the blackmail and/or the intelligence angle are more likely.

22winmag - Yankee by birth - Southerner by choice
22winmag - Yankee by birth - Southerner by choice
  Martel's Hammer
July 14, 2019 4:49 pm

This was smoked out at least 4 years ago, but yes…

Martel's Hammer
Martel's Hammer

Sounds like you have a strong interest in pedo’s….can’t say I am surprised.

AC
AC
July 14, 2019 3:47 pm
MTD
MTD
July 14, 2019 4:03 pm

So why is all this coming out now? Is it just the next attempt to take down Trump, by making some kind of connection to this guy’s creepy activities? Like maybe a few people get dragged through the mud and sacrificed in order to get Trump, while the vast majority of big sneeze bags (Clinton, etc) that had a connection to Epstein still remain shielded from any real investigation by law enforcement and media? Either way, it’s obvious that this guy’s whole setup was primed for the blackmail of other rich and powerful people.

razzle
razzle
  MTD
July 14, 2019 6:33 pm

Consider the possibility that the people above the Clintons would be fine throwing the Clintons into the pile if it demoralized the cultural shift that Trump is the biggest (American) face for right now. Perhaps they’re all ready to fall on their sword (outward appearance wise) to drop all the tent poles with Trump swept along even if it’s via lies… leaving the public utterly blind under the canvas scrambling for anything solid to hold onto.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  razzle
July 14, 2019 9:06 pm

That sounds like distinct possibility, a Samson Option.

AC
AC
  MTD
July 14, 2019 7:14 pm

Mueller was set to testilie before Congress on the Trump-Russia fiction. This stuff comes up . . . I’d be shocked if Mueller and Mukasey were not instrumental in making Acosta’s shitty plea deal with Epstein happen.

Mueller testimony was delayed.

Montefrío
Montefrío
July 14, 2019 4:08 pm

Many years ago I was in the “financial management” business myself and it shames me to confess that by and large it’s as dirty a business as there is. The case of Mr E is simply an egregious example compounded by what appears to be an open and shut case of sexual perversion as the icing on the cake. The sprinkles on top are the political sociopaths whom naive and gullible citizens permitted to come to power.

Epic Cinema (EC)
Epic Cinema (EC)
  Montefrío
July 14, 2019 4:43 pm

Shouldn’t that be – The jimmies on top…?

Montefrío
Montefrío
  Epic Cinema (EC)
July 14, 2019 5:07 pm

Jimmies?

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Montefrío
July 14, 2019 7:13 pm

Ice cream sprinkles…

Montefrío
Montefrío
  grace country pastor
July 14, 2019 7:40 pm

Thanks! Guess I’ve been gone too long, because that’s a new one for me.

SeeBee
SeeBee
  Epic Cinema (EC)
July 14, 2019 5:43 pm

Only if they’re colored…I’m told.

22winmag - Yankee by birth - Southerner by choice
22winmag - Yankee by birth - Southerner by choice
July 14, 2019 4:44 pm

BS

The money itself is partially hoaxed, it’s just a bunch of 1s and 0s in a computer- and it was handed to him by (duh) intelligence, just like Musk’s money, Bezos’s money, and so on.

SeeBee
SeeBee
July 14, 2019 5:50 pm

There seems to be more evidence than there is pigeon poop in St Mark’s Square….yet, the poor schmo who hasn’t paid a couple of parking tickets, gets his car towed and a warrant out for his arrest. Just doesn’t seem right.

Unsurprising
Unsurprising
July 14, 2019 7:03 pm

In a New York Times article yesterday about how Epstein cavorted with “the powerful”, I did a search page for “Clinton” and got one hit that said Epstein donated to the Clinton campaign

So, I just tried on this article and I got three (3) hits for Clinton so far. All of them were in the comment section. One by MTD and two by Razzle (& now another 3 with this comment).

Vodka
Vodka
July 14, 2019 7:57 pm

This is interesting:

REPORT: Trump Plotted Clinton-Epstein Takedown For Years, Knew About Clinton ISLAND PHOTOS

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Vodka
July 14, 2019 10:30 pm

That was an interesting article.

TC
TC
July 14, 2019 8:41 pm
Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  TC
July 14, 2019 9:19 pm

I was very interested so I gave a listen but had to quit at 3:33 Whoever the narrator is, he should work from a script. His extemporaneous riff was about as coherent as a coke head halfway through an 8-ball.

Is there any way you could summarize what he was getting at? I’m not a big Cernovich fan, but I thought that this whole thing hung on his lawsuit to unseal the records.

Couple of other things that make you wonder- did any of these girls have parents and where were they when their tween daughters were jet-setting to and fro, prostituting themselves to the rich and powerful and why haven’t we heard from one of them since? And for as many connected elite progressives whose names I’ve seen on the lists of his associates, they sure didn’t seem very “inclusive” when they were selecting their victims. Apparently they weren’t celebrating diversity on the Lolita Express.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  Hardscrabble Farmer
July 14, 2019 10:04 pm

Maybe not diversity, but you know those Members of the Malignancy, participants in this evil program of debauchery , were all about celebrating LBGTQIPPIBN+ frolics and more. Much more.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
  Hardscrabble Farmer
July 15, 2019 7:59 am

From what I’ve heard/read about the girls is they were poor and either in the foster system already ( which is a story in itself) or they were skirting the edge if it. They almost universally were fatherless and the mothers were either loser druggies or otherwise useless for various reasons. So they are not going to be around now.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Mary Christine
July 15, 2019 2:18 pm

They also recruited from poor countries (Ukraine, etc.).

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 17, 2019 12:25 am

But how to take out the slime without exposing how naïve and gullible the people are, and destroying whatever remaining misguided affection for the nation and its leadership remains.