Modified Hügelkultur Mounds for Fruit Trees

Following the same theme as my previous permaculture articles on blueberry beds and living fences, I’m going to provide some reasonably copious notes on my current process of constructing modified hügelkultur mounds for our fruit tree orchard. It will not include my efforts on the mini-gardens in between each tree (i.e. either in-row or between rows), nor will it include detailed information on the tree cultivars and rootstocks. However, this time around I will embed some accompanying images to serve as layman’s helpers. Hopefully my efforts will serve the reader well enough to facilitate the printing of a how-to guide.

Please keep in mind that the orchard site itself is so dynamic, and the topography so intensely variable, that I’ll have to present the average fruit tree mound as the “standard of measure”. I am also making the assumption that the reader is familiar enough with both permaculture and hügelkultur methods of sustainable farming that I can eschew the freshman level college courses and jump right into a senior syllabus, if you will. Even so, I’ll touch on the companion planting guilds for my pear, peach, plum, and apple trees.

Overview

I imagine the first question the reader would like answered is, “Why build mounds for fruit trees?” In my situation, the reasons are several. A couple of the reasons (enumerated below) require more detailed explanation, while others will be addressed in the description of the actual mound construction.

  • Poorly draining soil due to heavy clay (encourages Phytophthora root and/or crown rot)
  • Shallow depth to bedrock
  • Highly alkaline cedar glade (see this chart for ideal pH of various fruiting species)
  • Vastly increased surface area on which to plant a tree guild
  • Increased water retention
  • No mechanical damage to irrigation lines and emitters
  • Easier maintenance (weeding, harvesting, planting)

First, the ideal depth to bedrock varies primarily on the rootstock, but also on soil conditions, climate, precipitation, and so on. Standard and semi-standard sized rootstocks inherently increase vigor, so they necessarily take advantage of deeper soil. These “traditionally rooted” trees are what we fondly recollect from the old homesteads of 150 years ago. Even so, please refer to this 1916 report from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station to see that most of the root systems of the trees of study still lay within the top 2.5’, but ultimately a few extended to depths approaching 5-9’.

High density, dwarfing rootstocks – the standard in the orchard industry today – require far less soil depth and generally require permanent staking. That is, the trees aren’t meant to be productive for more than, perhaps, a decade or so. Based on my anecdotal experimentation, they typically magnify the “run” (horizontal spread) more than the “dig” (vertical spread) over a shorter period of time, and to depths no greater than 2’, hence the stakes and/or trellises. (In my not so humble opinion, it’s Franken Orcharding meant to generate a considerable sum of money while simultaneously strip mining the soil. If you’ve never visited a commercial orchard, envision never ending rows of twiggy-looking apple scarecrows that reach heights of highbush blueberries. But I digress.)

Our orchard is planted in a semi-dwarf, semi-traditional format. Without going into the nitty gritty of semi-dwarf rootstocks, suffice it to say that anywhere from 95-100% of the root system is contained within the top 3’ (90-100 cm) of soil. See page 14, slide 85 of this presentation given by Mississippi State University’s Horticultural Department for a good visualization, and this research publication authored by Cristian Paltineanu at Romania’s National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environmental Protection. The latter research particularly applies to my westerly sloping orchard.

Second, it is widely known that organic content naturally increases soil tilth while also increasing water retention. Consider. If the permaculture farmer increases his soil’s organic content by just 1% over 1 acre, he will have enabled his soil to retain an extra 20,000 gallons of water. That is tremendous, in that you’d have less runoff, less erosion, less wood chips and logs headed to the landfill, and less irrigation requirements. To say that my orchard is a biodegradable dumping ground would be the understatement of the year.

Mound Construction

On average, each of my fruit tree mounds is 10’ in diameter x 2’ high, with a plateaued apex around 3’ in diameter (see Figure A). Before construction, I measure the distances between trees and rows (15’ and 20’, respectively), and use yellow flags like these (purchasable in unicolor, 10 flag bundles at Lowe’s) to mark the centroid. I then measure about 2’ square from the centroid, which allows me to lay three sides of the square with logs (see Figure B). Note that the fourth side – the side at the lowest point of the mound – is left open, so as to facilitate drainage.

My personal preference is to choose hardwood logs around 12” or greater in diameter, and ones that are fresh if possible. However, logs of any age or diameter will do fine; one would just have to be more conscientious when one adds the topsoil. The reasoning here is that the more freshly cut they are, the longer they will be around to store water reserves and slowly release their nutrients – 10-20 years, depending on the type of wood. (Indeed, I have found that aged mounds appear to store about three weeks’ worth of water needs for young trees.) Any soil within ⅛” – ¼” will be nitrogen-starved due to the decomposition process. It is for this very reason that I provide a 2’ cushion between each log and the centroid, which is the ultimate planting site of the fruit tree. An important note here is that one never, ever wants to plant a permanent fixture directly on top of a rotting log. Think about it. Hügelkultur is ideally suited to serve annual and perennial plantings. Planting a tree on a mound that constantly shifts is going to cause heartbreak down the road.

Now that the easiest part is done, it’s time to fill up the entire area between the logs with good topsoil and overflow it about 6”, for an approximate total of 18” depth within the center of the mound. One could even use fully (key word: fully) composted horse manure if desired; I have done so with no adverse effects. I tamp it down by foot so that it’s firm but not “walking trail compacted”. There’s no point in fretting about the final depth yet, because I rework it once Billy Gibbons, my neighbor, has dumped a solid 3 yds.3 of wood chips over the entire 10’ diameter circle, with extra as needed.

Next, I compact (by foot) the wood chips around the entire perimeter of the mound (i.e. outside and on top of the logs) and attempt to get a slope of about 30-40%, but never to exceed 45% for the purposes of erosion. (It will ultimately be immaterial what the slope is for two sides of the mound, as I eventually fill these with 12-18” of wood chips for future cultivation between each tree. But that is left for a future installment as time permits.) At this point I dig out any mulch within the 2’ square around the planting site and toss it around the mound so as to make it symmetrical and “pretty”.

This is about the time when I plant a bare root fruit tree on semi-dwarf rootstock. Its root system has been pruned to such a degree that all of its roots should comfortably rest on top of, or lightly buried in (perhaps 2”), the previously prepared topsoil. Then I fill in the area with more rich topsoil (again, lightly compacted by foot, and fully burying the tree roots in 5” of soil or thereabouts), and about a 1” layer of wood chips for the purposes of water retention and weed inhibition.

Most importantly, I always ensure the graft union is 2” above the soil line, and there’s approximately 4’ x 4’ x 2’ of topsoil in which the tree can immediately establish. Matt Moser recommends 3-4” above ground, which is perfectly fine. I tend to prefer a larger semi-dwarf tree than most orchardists, and the less of the rootstock that is exposed to the sun, the larger the tree will be. (See Hrotko and Magyar’s excellent explanation of auxin transport loss and decomposition due to solar radiation exposure.) When all is said and done, I should have a mound that resembles Figure C, a newly reconstructed mound during the Second Bermuda Grass War, where its height is actually around 2.5’.

Companion Planting

Planting the tree guild is arguably the most fun for me. The process of husbandry really seems to “bond” me to the tree, such that you develop a nurturing relationship with it. If the reader is unfamiliar with the concept of fruit tree guilds, please read this introduction to companion planting, courtesy of Walden Labs. They also link to a very handy chart that provides a good matrix for gardeners and orchardists to reference. I personally prefer their presentation to that of Wikipedia because it presents the basic logic behind a food forest. Yet more crucial information to digest is available at Regenerative’s 7 parts of an apple tree guild.

Until the mound is aged enough to provide the necessary water requirements for the tree guild, it’ll have to be irrigated. Without going into extraneous details on my setup (again, that would have to be a future article), I’ve chosen to use ¾” HDPE tubing as my trunk lines, available at any decent irrigation supply store. I purchased my tubing in 250’ and 500’ rolls at The Drip Store and Drip Depot. Once in place, each mound then receives two drip emitter lassos: One for the tree, and one for the companion plants. The tree lasso consists of ¼” drip line at 6” spacing, with each lasso consisting of 8-9 emitters. The guild lasso consists of ¼” drip line at 9” spacing with 22-23 emitters. Figure A provides a pretty good visual as to how they are configured once hooked into the trunk lines.

Last but not least, please see below for a breakdown of my tree guilds for apple, peach, pear, and plum, along with some brief notes. Hopefully all of the information in this article will provide a good starting point for a permaculture orchard!

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
cz
cz
July 13, 2020 11:56 am

e.d. ott
e.d. ott
July 13, 2020 12:09 pm

Billy Gibbons … (laughs)
Some of us know that name from back in the day of sowing wild oats.

Ginger
Ginger
  e.d. ott
July 13, 2020 1:58 pm

Had the greatest of good fortune to go and see that Billy Gibbons way back in early 1973. Stood at what would be considered today’s social distancing , with he being about three feet higher than myself as he was standing at the edge of the stage, and heard him play the opening of my all time favorite rock song “Just Got Paid”.
It sure was great to be an eighteen year old Southern boy back in the 1970s.

cz
cz
July 13, 2020 12:16 pm

hmm, i can’t seem to get photos to upload. Just trying to show our first hugelbeet attempt.
we trenched an area approx 9′ x 3′ x 12″ deep (removed sod, topsoil layer down to clay), filled the trench with 5 basically dead oak logs that were about 16″ dia , and varied in length from 5′ to 3′. Smaller scandinavian maple logs made up the remainder of the base “pyramid”.
filled gaps with wood chips, soaked completely with water, topped with all the cut grass I could get, then mounded with a crapload of big sticks, leaves, dirt, topped it all with patches and rolls of sod/sod side down, topped all with good topsoil.
Mound ended up about 5′ tall, 10′ long, 4′ wide, then i topped with straw to help stop rain erosion. It’s created a surprisingly large planting area.
We’ve planted sunflowers, potatoes, cucumbers, zinnias, and I’m getting ready to plant some late/quick maturing watermelon and maybe more sunflowers as space permits.
This mound is in close proximity (5′)to a georgia belle (i believe) peach tree: slightly uphill from it.
I’m looking forward to another chip drop soon, and if good logs are included, I’ll most likely build another mound with the more careful and detailed instructions you’ve included, but in the end using what we’ve got.

If you’re talking about “that” Billy Gibbons, please ask him if he’s got a telecaster in his collection that he wouldn’t mind parting with cheap for a fan/lover of tele’s. I’m not kidding.

I really appreciate these articles you’re putting up. The info is intense. It’s easy to see you’ve done your homework and enjoy this. thanks!!

TC
TC
July 13, 2020 1:05 pm

Thanks for another great post. Would be great to have some pictures of the stages of construction or diagrams to go along with it.

cz
cz
  Articles of Confederation
July 13, 2020 1:27 pm

https://imgflip.com/i/484zuy
link to hugelbeet base image

mark
mark
July 13, 2020 1:26 pm

Outstanding article AoC.

I will defiantly consider some of your outstanding tips and tactics. Thanks!

The oldest of my 60 fruit and nut trees, and 22 black and blue berry mini arbors are 7.5 years old, and this is an amazingly abundant summer so far.

Many lessons learned the hard way, overall much success.

PS: The reflective bird tape has worked better than I ever dreamed (so far) on keeping birds away, and may also be freaking out the deer. Have five scarecrows I move every dusk, and the battery operated red wolf eyes, and solar motion lights.

So far almost no animal theft this season!

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 13, 2020 1:41 pm

Regarding your log geometry, may I suggest a 3D approach? If you tilt each log say 30° along the z-axis you can overlap the ends while still allowing for radial drainage. Furthermore, this allows for incorporating more logs or adjusting the diameter similar to a camera aperture. Also radial symmetry because symmetry.

Jaz
Jaz
July 13, 2020 1:51 pm

Our Hugelkulture garden has done well. The only downside: it is a skunk magnet. The skunks love the grubs that are feasting on the decomposing Sycamore and Cottonwood logs we used. Great article!

Richo
Richo
July 13, 2020 3:07 pm

For Northern Climates, Standard Fruit Trees are the Best Choice

This from St Lawrence Nurseries

It is the rootstock that determines the ultimate size of the tree. There are “standard,” “dwarf” and “semi-dwarf” rootstocks.“Dwarf” trees are made by grafting a cultivar onto an inherently weak rootstock, which stunts the growth of the tree. Dwarfing rootstocks were originally developed in England, where long, cool, damp growing seasons can cause apple trees to produce an excessive amount of foliage instead of producing fruit. These rootstocks were chosen precisely because they lacked normal vigor. Grafting cultivars onto such roots is like putting a tourniquet around the stem; the tree simply cannot get as many nutrients, and so does not waste energy on excessive vegetative growth.

A dwarf or semi-dwarf tree, because of its subnormal vigor, cannot put out the spurt of growth necessary to thrive in the short season of a northern climate. The result is often poor growth and equally poor fruiting, even for varieties which would otherwise do well in northern regions. In fact, dwarf and semi-dwarf trees have so little vigor that they cannot compete with sod (grass and weeds) for available nutrients.

Your standard tree might well be producing fruit for your great-grandchildren, while dwarf trees must be replanted every 10-20 years. Finally, the crop yielded by your mature standard tree will be many times greater than that of a dwarf or semi-dwarf tree. They can be kept small by annual pruning.

SeeBee
SeeBee
July 13, 2020 6:39 pm

Fantastic information! Thank you, AOC. Hügelkultur has me fascinated!

David
David
July 13, 2020 9:31 pm

Any thoughts on non chemical control of brown rot on stone fruit. I am trying the new bacillus treatments along with sulfer

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 14, 2020 5:56 am

Great information. We stumbled into hugelkulture about five or six years ago and it changed the way we plant. On poor soils it sets you up not only for an immediate place to plant, but leaves behind it deep loam after decomposition.

Glock 1911 M1A .308
Glock 1911 M1A .308
July 15, 2020 3:50 am

Growing food…consuming, rewarding, maddening, satisfying, providing a measure of self sufficiency, never lacking in things to learn. More dynamic even than meat cutting, and nearly as much a pleasure. 🙂