Why are they FINALLY “admitting” the Covid Vax could be harmful?

Guest Post by Kit Knightly

The mainstream narrative spinners – from politicians to the CDC to the media – have started reporting “possible harms” due to Covid “vaccines”.

This is a potentially seismic shift in the narrative, but as usual we need to ask  the perennial questions –

Why this?

Why now?

For almost two years, those of us expressing concern about the possible damage done by forcing untested and unnecessary gene therapies on billions of people have been either ignored by the noisy majority or slandered by them. And this includes both mainstream and “alt” media.

On the rare occasion an “anti-vaxxer” was given any kind of platform, it was usually either a hand-picked kook, or a minor celebrity making arguments from emotion.

The actual science – and the professionals communicating that science – were banished from the mainstream airwaves. Airbrushed out of sight and mind.

The vaccines were branded “safe and effective”, by everyone everywhere.

Until now.

Last week the UK’s BBC News invited Dr Aseem Malhotra to discuss prescriptions for statins to prevent heart disease (yeah – another issue, for another time).

During his seven-minute interview, he linked mRNA covid “vaccines” to potential cardiac disease:

This, as far as I know, marks the first time a medical professional has been allowed to make these facts known in the mainstream media.

But why did it happen?

And why did it happen now?

The “official” story is it was an oopsy moment.  That somehow Dr Malhotra just “slipped through the net”, had been invited on to discuss statins, not Covid and  just cleverly flipped the script and used his temporary platform to broadcast the truth.

Let’s unpack this idea and see what we have.

First thing to note is Dr Malhotra is by no means a closet vaccine-sceptic.

He has a Twitter account with substantial numbers of followers, on which he regularly questions the mRNA vaccines.

He has appeared on GB News questioning the vaccines multiple times.

It seems vanishingly unlikely any BBC researcher would fail to discover what his opinions of the vaccine were.

And even supposing he did “slip through the net”, once he started talking about the vaccines, why did the anchor let him continue?

We have seen in the past how mainstream outlets treat people who start saying things they shouldn’t say:

He’s going off-topic, and as an interviewer, she would have every right to nudge him back toward the question. But if you watch the interview she barely even attempts to do this. In fact rather than changing the subject, blasting him for being an “anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist”, or simply cutting the feed…the anchor actively pursues the subject, asking him further questions to draw him out.

Why would she do this if he was “slipping through the net”?

And here’s the kicker: the very same day this “accident” happened Reuters reported the US CDC and FDA are investigating a possible link between Pfizer shots and strokes, under the headline:

U.S. FDA, CDC see early signal of possible Pfizer bivalent COVID shot link to stroke

This really should put the final nail in the coffin of the “accident” argument for anyone who understands how narrative-creation works.

What we can deduce from this is there is a deliberate ongoing move to shift the narrative and allow some partial, limited discussion of vaccine harms.

The pressing question is why.

I trust anyone reading this is well aware we can rule out any idea that the BBC, CDC et al have suddenly realized they made a huge mistake.

The entirety of the global establishment hasn’t been ignoring the risks of the vaccines because they didn’t understand, ok. It wasn’t one big supranational brain fart.

They were lying, actively and deliberately, for years.

It’s just that for some reason they have stopped, very briefly and in the tiniest way possible.

Secondly, however reassuring it might be to think so, they have not been forced to admit the truth by sheer weight of evidence.

That’s not how the psychopathic world of politics and narrative-creation works. There’s nothing so true the agenda-setters and their tame media are forced to report it. On the contrary, they routinely deny the undeniably obvious every day, for year after year, for as long as they need or want to.

The truth has no relevance in their lexicon unless it also serves some other purpose. They tell stories of convenience, they report only what is of service to those stories.

And let’s not forget –  they haven’t admitted the truth.

They haven’t even begun to do that and almost certainly never will.

They’ve just stopped actively suppressing one part of the suppressed reality.

However, even that tiny nano-grain of honesty potentially poses a direct threat to the mainstream narrative, in the way a single pebble rolling down a hill can potentially kick off a landslide – and they clearly know this because they immediately surrounded their “admission” with walkbacks and caveats – just in case.

Within a few hours of Dr Malhotra’s appearance on the news, the BBC had invited “senior doctors” on to counter his claims, and the Guardian was running a piece quoting various “outraged” doctors criticising the BBC for even letting him on.

Less than 24 hours after the CDC/FDA admitted they were reviewing the vaccine’s possible link to strokes…they reported their results and announced they hadn’t found anything.

The entire exercise was clearly carefully controlled. The smallest possible shift in the narrative, under very strict conditions.

After all, the lethal dose of truth is surprisingly small.

So back to our initial question: Why this? Why now?

Why do it at all? Why put two years of “safe and effective” brainwashing at risk? What is going on behind the scenes here?

Well, here are a few possible explanations:

  • Power struggle – Internal political struggle between the Great Reset supporters and those more traditional political factions who want to discredit the “new normal”.
  • “Vaccine wars” – Big pharma infighting, nothing but corporate greed winning out over narrative cohesion (they all pointedly question only the mRNA vaccines at this point, after all).
  • More fear – If the aim of the game is to scare people, then telling the 4 billion vaccinated individuals you might have poisoned them is a powerful move.
  • “new and improved vaccines” – Maybe a push to corral the unvaccinated by “admitting” a (tiny) problem, then “fixing it” in the next updated booster.

We can’t completely rule out sabotage, of course. It’s possible that some people within the establishment harbour genuine doubts about the course of events since 2020 and are trying to covertly get information out. Although the coordinated nature of the release makes that unlikely, it’s not impossible.

Regardless, we still need to keep our eyes open. It might be a victory, but it might be something else.

The old mantra applies: Always be sceptical of the media, even when – especially when – they tell you what you want to hear.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
January 20, 2023 7:52 am

‘Cause they’ve had a change of heart – they’ve had hearts installed, and now they’re sorry and want amnesty? Or maybe:
.

Pandemic: follow the real money, the unthinkable amount of money

&

COVID: Three men who own corporate America

mongoose
mongoose
January 20, 2023 7:59 am

Malhotra’s truth bomb on BBC was awesome. Got invited to talk about poor efficacy of statins on live TV, and wedged in how his Dad died of a heart attack after the ambulance in the UK took more than a half an hour to get to him, only to pivot toward the vaccines being his cause of death. Brilliant.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  mongoose
January 20, 2023 9:19 am

Malhotra is C.O. for the purposes of a limited hangout in re myocarditis (and that’s all).

Just Thinking
Just Thinking
January 20, 2023 8:15 am

I caught that this morning when Liz Bonis, an NBC “medical correspondent”, who Sinclair broadcasting pays to lie to it’s viewers, had a piece on how even after 4 jabs, you can still get the newest strain of the wuflu. Shocking! But then some “medical expert” in a white coat that had “MD” on it, said you should still get the Bivalent jab, as it COULD (?) reduce the severity of illness.

Yep.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
January 20, 2023 8:35 am

It’s called a “script flip” and it’s written right into the 2nd Act of this Kabuki Theater.

They’re now telling you it’s dangerous for the same reason they told you everything else was dangerous…to illicit fear and create compliance from the herd.

When you’re good and terrified, a “cure” will magically appear (for a yuge sum). It’ll turn out to be another kill shot, but knowing will not curtail your compliance.

Why? Because false hope is the ONLY thing that’s easier to extract from a sheep than compliance!

BabbleOn
BabbleOn
  The Central Scrutinizer
January 20, 2023 9:30 am

The First series of shots was to “save” your job.
The Next series of shots is to “save” your life.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  BabbleOn
January 20, 2023 9:34 am

And the Final Solution will be administered upon 1st suspicion of non-compliance.

They take you behind the tool shed for that one.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Central Scrutinizer
January 21, 2023 3:00 am

They’ll twist the science around again so that it’s the unvaccinated causing the deaths of the vaccinated. ‘Only 100% compliance can save us all now’. I am not convinced TPTB accept that they’ve already lost this battle.

Walt
Walt
January 20, 2023 8:38 am

Why now?

Because at this point, what difference does it make?…

BabbleOn
BabbleOn
  Walt
January 20, 2023 8:43 am

It’s a win win for the WEF. Let the info out to help getting rid of the lower level accomplices. These lower level accomplices have nothing left to offer. It’s a Teeny club and a lot of low level members are going to find out they aren’t really in the Teeny Club. I bet Higher WEF members are getting a little Paranoid. More paranoid than Jimmy Conway. They are at the real “Davos” meeting not this lower level one they are televising.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  BabbleOn
January 20, 2023 9:02 am

“There can be only One!” – Highlander

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
January 20, 2023 8:47 am

Greetings,
Ever see those videos where some on-the-scene news reporter pretends to be buffeted by “epic” hurricane winds all the while people are casually strolling along in the background? What happened on the BBC was just that and nothing more.

In so far as a shift in the narrative, I just do not see it. Remember, something like 70% of the funding of these news outlets comes from Big Pharma and they are only going to allow a tiny fraction of the truth to come out so as to instantly debunk it with their paid shills.

The people that have poisoned themselves and their children are going to cling to any bit of hope given to them by people that have been proven to be paid liars. After all, once you are on the train to Treblinka, there is no point in discussing what happens when the train reaches its destination.

Fuck-my-name
Fuck-my-name
  NickelthroweR
January 20, 2023 9:17 am

When you reach Treblinka, your clothes get deloused and you wait out the war in relative safety, or die because of lack of resources from the allies carpet bombing everything

Fuck-my-name
Fuck-my-name
January 20, 2023 9:14 am

Or, this: they’re talking about the BIVALENT vaccine, the one most people didn’t take. The old ones (who killed and fucked up a lot of people) were/are safe and effective, it’s the new bivalent that might be problematic. They’ll admit to it, take it off the shelf and people will be “see? When a vaxx ain’t safe, they remove it. They would have done the same with the first shots”.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
January 20, 2023 9:19 am

Like I’ve been saying, the media WANTS you to see these sudden deaths & injuries.

Why? Because they’re mind-fucking you.

Can’t get all emotional & crazy over every piece of news that comes out and seems to support what we’ve been saying all along.

Keep your minds strong. This is intense psychological warfare.

Guest
Guest
  Abigail Adams
January 20, 2023 9:58 am

Also they say in their books what comes next. This author, and others, want to ignore this stuff. Remember that French doctor video from the 90’s saying that this very thing was being perpetrated?
Why don’t they have that video (and others) front and center?

Maybe some just want to be ‘taken seriously’ and Alex Jones talked about their plan long ago. Did Alex ‘do his job’ well in de-legitimizing this topic?

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
  Guest
January 20, 2023 10:28 am

Guest…not sure which doctor. Do you have a link or video?

B_MC
B_MC
January 20, 2023 10:14 am

Britain: NHS Director Confirms Hospitals Lied About Cause of Death to Create Illusion of COVID Pandemic

On Saturday, Sai, a former NHS Director of End-of-Life Care, wrote a Twitter thread which, amongst other things, gave a personal account of the changes to the system of reporting deaths implemented in the NHS…

“Patients being admitted and dying with very common conditions such as old age, myocardial infarctions, end-stage kidney failure, haemorrhages, strokes, COPD and cancer etc. were all now being certified as covid-19 via the Medical Examiner System.

“Hospitals were switching to and from the Medical Examiner System and the pre-pandemic system as [and] when they pleased. When covid-19 deaths needed to be increased, the hospital would switch to the Medical Examiner System.”

In addition, “hospitals were incentivised to report covid-19 deaths over normal deaths, as the government was paying hospitals additional money for every covid-19 death that was being reported,” Sai said. “I have no doubt in my mind, that the Government has planned the entire pandemic since 2016 when they first proposed the change to medical death certification.”

BREAKING: NHS Director confirms Hospitals lied about Cause of Death to create illusion of COVID Pandemic

Dangerous Variant
Dangerous Variant
January 20, 2023 11:22 am

I’m not allowed to talk about it, but I can say that my work in this project is far from complete. See you soon!
Sincerely,
Dangerous Variant

anon a moos
anon a moos
January 20, 2023 2:01 pm

Forget the covid, we’re in even bigger danger now… WE’RE ALL GONNA DIIIEEEE
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massachusetts-concerning-new-drug-resistant-gonorrhea-strain/

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
  anon a moos
January 20, 2023 2:46 pm

Gonorrhea outbreak in Massachusetts?? Good to know.

Ze Bugs
Ze Bugs
January 20, 2023 2:27 pm

The same reason you show your cards in poker…..you think you won.

tony
tony
January 20, 2023 6:54 pm

they are admitting it now because nothing can be done about it. and they see that the victims have no will or morality to oppose it and take vengeance.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 21, 2023 2:44 am

This interview gives the BBC evidence to point to and say they covered both sides of the story, so there can’t be any bias or coverup on thier part. Sneaky rats. Coincidentally BBC were named in the anti trust law suit filed in Texas this week, regarding the Trusted News Initiative censoring of the vaccine discussion.