Will Grigg with more on the pigfuks that got away with murder as well as the ex-pigfuk defending his life after being assaulted with noise and popcorn.
Remember, the copfuks are out there to serve and protect you.
Original HERE.
I, like Slavo, am against the idea of them. If I own the firearm and I own my person then whose permission do I need to conceal carry (or open carry) in a public place. A crime cannot occur until someone is harmed or threatened, but that does not stop the government from “outlawing” things at worst or requiring you bow at their altar to receive a permission slip at best.
I am sure there will be detractors that says this is “necessary” and that the Md pigfuk doing this is only an isolated incident or that he was just doing his job or better safe than sorry. But the problem with people who use that rationale is that they have shit for brains.
It’s a crock of shit; this is my CCW:
Original HERE.
The US News and World Report recently released their report on the best and worst diets. Apparently eating animal protein and fresh vegetables, fruit and whole foods in general is your least healthy option while gimmicky diets that focus on processed foods in which sugar is the main ingredient are superior. Couple this with type of propaganda with the median level of stupidity of the populace and the availability of processed food; no one should be surprised that this nation is filled with tons of people (literally) that are nothing but fat sacks of crap.
I found a link to the post below on MDA, there is no realm that the Lame Stream Media won’t get wrong and their propaganda won’t infect.
Original HERE.
So it goes in the Land of The Meek and Home of the Copsucker. I was already in a copfuk hating mood before I read that these pigfuks got off.
Some of the stupid dipshit pigfuk apologists I get into it with must have been jurors that found these honorable defenders of justice non-guilty.
Kelly Thomas died as a result of being beaten, tasered, and suffocated by a thugswarm of police on the July 5, 2011. A jury in Orange County, California — an authoritarian conservative community in which the “Support Your Local Police” movement took root and flourished in the mid-1960s — has acquitted the two ringleaders of that police gang, Manuel Ramos and Ken Cincinelli, of all charges arising from that atrocity.
Full Video of the assault. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6yaeD-E_MY)Original HERE.
Ron Paul went on Glenn Beck’s show.
This glimmer of hope was just what I needed after reading about public schools banning kids from bringing lunch from home. It’s a pretty good listen.
http://youtu.be/-xA57Eswb0A
This author is an amazingly disgusting cheerleader. The moral duty of America, my fat ass…
He simply has B. Hussein’s balls on his chin (and it is easy to guess where the shaft is).
This is about our owners appeasing their campaign contributing MIC, their Saudi owners and increasing their own power. How is it the moral duty of America to aid terrorists of the same affiliation that killed thousands of Americans 12 years ago today?
Answer that you mutha-fucker…
Rand Paul tells it how it is.
As a long ago White House speechwriter (Jimmy Carter) and a devoted student of presidential rhetoric, I have spent the past 24 hours searching for a historical parallel to Barack Obama’s address to the nation on Syria.
We are used to presidential speeches on war (Vietnam, the Gulf War, the 9/11 horrors, Afghanistan, Iraq and the many smaller struggles along the way). Occasionally, we have reveled in presidents announcing breakthroughs for peace, whether it was the end of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis or the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian accords.
But never has a president — down in the polls and stymied in Congress — spoken to the nation in prime time about an unpopular attack that he may not launch against a nation that is not a direct security threat to the United States. Just to add to the degree of rhetorical difficulty, this punitive bombing lacks the support of the United Nations, NATO or even our most loyal ally, Great Britain.
But Tuesday night — after a day of diplomatic flurries that may have averted the immediate crisis — Obama delivered the clearest, the most concise and the most morally compelling foreign-policy address of his presidency.
This observation is not designed as cheerleading for Obama. The president blundered into the crisis with ill-thought-out threats about “red lines” over chemical weapons; he waited too long to go to Congress; and may have only been rescued when the Russians — up to now, Bashar Assad’s enabler — seized on what may have been an accidental comment by Secretary of State John Kerry.
In short, misjudgments by the Obama national security team have made the selling of an air war over Syria even more difficult than it otherwise would have been.
But in many ways, Obama redeemed himself Tuesday night with a powerful invocation of American exceptionalism. “When, with modest effort and risk,” the president said, “we can stop children from being gassed to death and thereby make our own children safer in the long run, I believe we should act. That’s what makes America different. That’s what makes America exceptional.”
Critics have suggested that since Obama has postponed congressional votes that he appeared likely to lose, the speech was a wasted interruption of prime-time programming. That interpretation is simply wrong. Ever since Obama decided to go to Congress for approval of what he regards as the least-bad policy in Syria, we have been treated to a fascinating preview of foreign policy debates in the age of social media.
In prior crises, the president’s meetings with leading figures in Congress have been shrouded in secrecy. Now there are endless live interviews and immediate Twitter feeds summarizing closed sessions. There has, in fact, been more transparency on Syria than on, say, the Obama-John Boehner budget negotiations.
Maybe what we are seeing here is how foreign policy gets made in a post-Iraq environment. Even as the polling turned against Obama, the American people also expressed comfort with the notion that a president has to go to Congress for permission to bomb another country when American lives are not on the line. A recent Pew Research Center/USA Today poll found that 61 percent of Americans believe that Congress — not the president — needs to authorize air strikes over Damascus.
This is as it should be. Even though Obama has repeatedly said that he believes that he has the authority to act on his own, most constitutional experts from both the right and left say that it would be a dangerous over-assertion of presidential power.
Obama acknowledged the historic belittling of Congress’ constitutional powers in Tuesday night’s speech when he talked about “a decade that put more and more war-making power in the hands of the president … while sidelining the people’s representatives from critical decisions about when we use force.” Of course, Obama himself contributed to this dangerous growth of the Imperial Presidency when he declined to go to Congress for authorization to wage the 2011 air campaign over Libya.
But Obama now has turned to Congress — and set an important precedent for the future. As he put it, “I believed it was right, in the absence of a direct or imminent threat to our security, to take the debate to Congress.”
As a result, we are discussing Syria in the open with all the messiness that comes with democracy. Advocates of unbridled presidential power may not like it, but this approach comes a lot closer to what the framers of the Constitution had in mind.
We have also learned in recent days that the American people are rightly skeptical of military operations solely designed to make a point. That’s why the hardest argument for Obama to make is explaining the national security benefits that would flow from an air strike designed “to deter Assad from using chemical weapons” and “to degrade his regime’s ability to use them.”
“Deter” and “degrade” are not normally fighting words. And once again Tuesday night, Obama repeated his promise, “I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria.” In fact, the pledge of no boots on the ground has been made so often by administration officials that it almost seems that we are more likely to invade Denmark than Syria.
Hypotheticals are always tricky, but I wonder how the American people might have reacted if Obama had ever followed through on his initial resolve that Bashar Assad must go. There was a hopeful moment, back in 2011, when Islamic militants represented only a small portion of the uprising against Assad. Even then our aversion to foreign military operations probably would have prevented majority support for actively aiding the Syrian rebels. But that goal would have, at least, given a strategic coherence to what Obama and Company were trying to achieve.
But no American should minimize the barbarism of chemical weapons. In a world where civil wars are raging and terrorism is an ongoing threat, it may seem prissy to talk about the rules of war. But the horrors of a chemical warfare attack are a century old. Wilfred Owen, the British poet who died in the final week of World War I, captured the soldier’s-eye memories of a gas attack:
“Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! — An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling and stumbling,
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime…”
The truth is that we are by choice and by fate the only nation in the world that can enforce the rules of war and, yes, take steps to prevent atrocities. It was our decision as a people to remain the greatest military power on the face of the earth both after World War II and the American victory in the Cold War. We have become the indispensable nation, and the other countries of the world are free riders when we offer to take the risks and bear the burden of preventing a dictator from gassing his own people.
After Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, Americans are understandably war weary and gimlet-eyed realists about what can happen when the pronouncements of politicians collide with the realities of 21st-century combat. There are no slam-dunks and not everything that starts “limited” ends up “limited.”
But we also can go too far in the other direction as we flee from any course of action that has even the flicker of military risks. Syria is a charnel house, an inferno of despair — and America is the only nation on the face of the earth that can do anything significant to limit the suffering.
After our history of ill-fated wars and hyperbolic claims, we may not choose to take up that burden. We may decide that our problems are too grave at home for another bout of international altruism. We may decide that the evidence of Syrian chemical attacks is too ambiguous, or we may distrust Obama too much to believe that a military operation would change things for the better.
But no American should be blind to the reality that we have made a choice. We have decided to stay on the sidelines and hope for the best. Hope that maybe a United Nations resolution or Russian intervention or Syrian fears can succeed in eliminating Assad’s chemical arsenal.
As Obama declared Tuesday night, “When dictators commit atrocities, they depend on the world to look the other way until those horrifying pictures fade from memory.”
This is the choice facing America this morning: Do we avert our eyes or do we sadly and grimly accept our moral duty?
Original HERE.
One of the amazing things I have witnessed over the last few weeks is the thunderous silence from the NeoDems who were supposedly anti-war.
They spoke out vehemently when the war criminal GW was in office but who has been trotted out by both parties since Iraq/Afghan?
2004: Bush II and Kerry
2008: McCain and Obama
2012: Romney and Obama
Every single R & D presidential candidate (except Romney) is actively and vocally supporting the US(S)A committing an Act of War in Syria. Only Romney isn’t vocally supporting it but that’s because he has all but disappeared from the face of the Earth (which is a good thing) but I have no doubts if he was prezzy he would be in favor of committing further US war crimes. The truth is there is no such thing as a successful government official against war.
It has been said “War is the health of the State” and at the moment the State is not well, the people are not happy because of the bombardment of scandals, spying, lying, taxes and economic despair. The State needs medicine and that comes in the form of dropping bombs on innocent brown people and supporting terrorists.
Can anyone with a brain capable of critical thinking look at the list above and not come to the conclusion that our government that is run by the likes of Obama, McCain and Kerry (and formerly Bush II) is not a terrorist organization?
We all had a chance to elect a game changer but the majority failed to recognize the golden opportunity when it was staring them down.
The system is not designed for people like RP who embrace liberty and peace, it is designed for the owners and those who relish the use of aggressive violence.
I am still holding out a sliver of hope that CONgress votes down the Act of War against Syria and B. Hussein adheres. But I consider that very unlikely so I am left with the perspective that at this point, anyone who thinks the US government works for you, represents you and that voting matters is either insane, has a single digit IQ or is a criminal themselves.
I would like to add a word to our vocabulary (I have even submitted it to Urban Dictionary and it’s currently under review):
tyra-nanny (noun) (tee-ruh-nahn-nee): a tyrannical fascist governing body that commits its atrocities under the falsely altruistic auspices of security and protection, i.e. A fascist nanny state. (adj): tyra-nannical
Each 4th of July is more empty than the last. I will spend this day of mourning with a few family and friends, likely wearing a shirt with a RP, TJ, or BF quote across it and explaining it to people who are inquisitive. I refuse to fly the US Flag, this nation is barely a shell of itself. When you see signs like this how can a person think they are free?
In protest we should be waiving the Gadsden Flag.
Today we live in a seemingly constant state of government surveillance and control. The alphabet agencies such as the EPA and FDA are regulating and making rulings on what we can and can’t do with our property. The FBI, NSA, TSA, DHS and ATF operate under the pretense of violence and the threat of violence so that you won’t do things deemed “naughty.” They know what is best for all of us, and will harm and threaten to harm us for our own good.
The purpose of the USA government as it was created was to protect liberty. My definition of liberty is aligned with TJ’s.
“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.”
~Thomas Jefferson~
Does that sound the US of A today? What does Jefferson know, he was just a slave-owning Founding Father? (sic) But ignore the name of the quotee and examine the idea within the statement. Liberty is not being able to collect SSDI, welfare checks, SNAP cards, send your lil monsters to a parasitic Public School System and using the threat of violence and force to make people pay for you to live. Liberty is not legislating the type of food we are allowed to eat and/or how much trans-fats or sugar are in said food. Government wasn’t put in place to teach our children. It isn’t meant to be the pseudo-parents and guardians of all the adult citizens. We are supposed to be our own guardians. We are supposed to be free and sovereign beings and our children are supposed to be taught by their parents and families.
Ammendments like the 1st, 2nd and 4th mean exactly what they say. When verbage from the 2nd ammendment is ignored but the Commerce Clause it used to regulate every possible human function and action, the government is not the custodian of freedom, it is the destroyer of it.
Edward Snowden is being hunted and chastised by our criminal government because he told us the crimes they were committing and rights they were routinely violating. Those who scream the loudest that he is a traitor are the ones with treasonous blood on their hands. Finding the perpetrator of treason is similar to finding the person who farted in a crowded room. The Feinsteins, Boners, Grahams, Schumers and Kings are the ones spewing shit from their mouths.
Our owners have been at war with us. The criticial thinking members of the populace are the enemy of the state. RP sums it up well in his recent quote:
“My understanding is that espionage means giving secret or classified information to the enemy. Since Snowden shared information with the American people, his indictment for espionage could reveal (or confirm) that the US Government views you and me as the enemy.”
~Ron Paul~
There are plain clothes ABC agents running and yelling at 20 year old girls with guns in hand because she bought a case of bottled water that they suspected was alcohol. Six agents staking out the area around a convenient store in Virgina terrorized a college student buying water. She saw people yelling, waving guns, pounding on her windows and jumping on her car so she did the only rational thing. She quickly got the fuck outta there. After escaping, she then called 911 to report she had been attacked. Her attackers promptly showed up to arrest her and charge her with assaulting law enforcement officers (Read the story HERE). All this because a 20 year old college student might be drinking alcohol. To supposedly protect the children from alcohol we allow gun waving sociopathic baboons terrorize us and our children. This is insanity.
The police and DHS are becoming the domestic military force that our rulers need to keep us “in line” and make sure we don’t get too uppity. A man saw a situation where there were police, he was told to turn down the music in his car. He did and then exited his car and while walking his dog he started to film what was going on to “make sure no one’s civil rights were being violated.” After the situation settled down the man returned to his vehicle and put his dog in the car. The police, who hate being filmed approached him, questioned him and started to arrest him. His dog (a 3yo 130lb rottweiler) leaped out of the car and ran towards its owner. In the name of “officer safety” the cops then fired upon and killed this man’s dog in front of him. Would I feel threatened if I saw a 130lb rott running towards me. Abso-fucking-lutely, but if I was a worthless cop fuckwad arresting someone because they were filming me I would deserve to be attacked by this protective companion. The dog understands the Constiution better than these pigs. Story can be read HERE (of course this article is in a UK paper because you have to leave the US to get any truthful news). If that isn’t enough to turn your stomach, read this story posted on The Burning Platform titled THIS IS YOUR STANDARD LEO where an animal control officer (and former pigfuck) executed kittens. Yes, you read that right, he shot 8-10 week old kittens on a private resident’s property while children were watching from a window. Don’t for one second believe that the cops won’t summary execute you if they are ordered to do so or is deemed necessary for their or the states’ safety.
Protect everyone from drugs, alcohols, guns, violence, poverty, etc… ad infinitum. But how is this done? By empowering the State to use violence and terrorism against us and our fellow man. And what’s the outcome? We are turning into a society of dependent, pansy-ass whining dipshits that are dumber than a bag full of doorknobs being protected at gunpoint by our owners, a bunch of aristocratic sociopaths.
I wish people would wake up and not swallow the crock of shit spouted by the RA-RA cheerleaders of the MSM’s presstitutes on I-SeeBS and FUX News.
Here is a Quiz:
What are acceptable names of this monument?
Choices:
A. “Lady Liberty”, “Statue of Liberty”
B. Hot French Lady in Toga
C. “Nanny Security”, “Statue of Serfdom”
Answer: A (and B) should be the answers but they aren’t true in today’s Amerika. If you live in the USSA and have been presented the truth and didn’t answer C, then you are a hypocrite and/or a moron. They should start a construction project, the preliminary blueprints are below.
The government has declared that we are their property. Our livelihood and fruits of our labor and literally our lives are theirs to barter with at the bargaining table that includes the Military Industrial Complex, Banksters, Big Pharma, Big GMO Food and Big Insurance. And what does an owner do with their property? They protect it for as long as it is profitable to do so. We are all milk cows being plucked of our resources by our owners day in and day out, our tags (SS#, DL# and soon E-Verify) mark all of us so everyone knows who owns us. The only choice we really have is to remain a milk cow or refuse and become a beef cow.
“The owners of this country know the truth: It’s called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.”
~George Carlin~
They are continually sacrificing a portion of the populace through the meat grinder in the War on Terror. More warzones are a certainly with these insane megalomaniacs at the helm. It has been said that War is the health of the State and with the War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Browns (throughout the world), War on the Middle Class, War on Guns, War on Obesity and the War on the US Constitution; the State has never been healthier. But when the State is healthy, Liberty is dying.
And all this atrophy of liberty is being conducted in the name of safety. Safety for the children, safety for the environment, safety for the stupid. The way the hoi polloi think the world should work makes me sick. If the government did something that actually enhanced liberty (like repealing the PATRIOT Act) these people would expect the world to stop spinning.
“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”
~Thomas Jefferson~
I don’t have TJ’s way with words so I will simply say: Fuck Safety! I demand Freedom along with all its greatness and chaos and I will be taking it back piece by piece.
http://youtu.be/XTCHoLhozIY
” None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
JW von Goethe
Next Thursday is the 4th of July. This day used to commemorate America’s Independence, now it is a mournful reminder that exemplifies the United States’ tyranny.
Turn Your Back This Fourth of July
We can turn our backs on the flag. Decline to participate when urged to cheer and sing.
No fireworks. No barbeques.
We can sit down – and bow our heads.
We can mention the unmentionable: That there is no longer any meaningful limit to the power of the government over our lives. No line beyond which it may not tread. That it lies, spies and tyrannizes.
We can admit to ourselves the shoddy – and frightening – reality bubbling up all around us.
By so doing, we can shatter the illusion that this government operates with anything remotely approximating our consent. This is absolutely essential. The 4th of July pantomime requires that we deny the obvious – that we instead pretend we’re free people living in a free country; one in which the government is accountable to the people, one in which the government is limited by law. One in which people can’t simply be dragooned into prisons without due process, held incommunicado, tortured. A country with a president who doesn’t have kill lists – or use the instruments of state power to punish and intimidate his political opponents. One in which citizens must be suspected of a crime before their personal correspondence is filched through and recorded for later use against them. One in which a traveler is free from arbitrary and random searches of his person and effects.
One in which the attorney general of the United States isn’t able to get away with providing guns to gangs or brazenly lie about his use of the power of his office to go after political “enemies” rather than pursue justice.
All these things are everyday realities. And the reality is that the America we once celebrated on the Fourth of July is gone, replaced by something dark and ominous.
It is painfully obvious – so why pretend otherwise?
More to the point, why should we celebrate this ugly transformation?
Mourning is what’s called for.
If we decline to play along – and we still have this option, for the moment – we can shatter the idea that all of the foregoing loathsomeness is done with our approval. We can redefine the relationship between ourselves and the government in an honest way. No more pretending we’re free. No more pretending we’re protected by the rule of law – and not ruled over by a thug caste – a mafia – that does literally whatever it wants, to anyone, at any time – without any real consequences whatsoever. None of this requires elaboration. Everyone knows it to be true. The Constitution is no longer even payed lip service to. It is a sick joke.
We are in the position of a battered spouse who is expected to rouge her bruises and tell her friends that – whoops! – she fell down the stairs. But hubby is a swell guy.
I say, to hell with that.
I say, let’s not give them the cover they still apparently crave. I say, let’s out them – by openly displaying our bruises and no longer denying how we got them. Let the world see the true nature of the relationship between us and those who rule us.
China had its Tiananmen Moment – when one brave man stood up to a column of tanks and changed history by the simple act of refusing to play along. By peacefully forcing the thugocracy’s hand. It faced a hard choice: Either it could either run that man down in full view of live TV, crush him under the treads of a T-72 and thereby give real-life and incontrovertible evidence of the true nature of the relationship of the Chinese government vis-a-vis the average Chinese. Or it could back down – and thereby be compelled to alter the relationship in a way at least somewhat more favorable to the average Chinese.
We have a similar opportunity coming up. A chance to confront the police state by refusing to pretend it’s not a police state. By coming to grips with what it is.
And what it is is nothing to celebrate.
I urge you to join me this July 4th in turning your back on the flag – on all grotesque homilies to a country that no longer exists, because of the government which does exist – and which desperately wants us to keep on playing patty cake and pretending that it doesn’t.
Throw it in the Woods?
Original HERE.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, so now it’s official, the Cowboys really do suck
Cowboys.com now gay dating site, due to Dallas goof
By Peter Mucha
Inquirer Staff Writer
A Web domain let slip by America’s Team is now dedicated to (mostly) gay dating.
Welcome to the new Cowboys.com, a “online dating community for men.”
“As many states continue to pass gay marriage laws with the support of President Barack Obama, Cowboys.com will be well positioned to take advantage of the continued growth in the gay dating sector,” declared the Baltimore-based owners group in a news release last week.
“We will also serve the needs of straight daters as well,” said Darren Cleveland, head of City Advertising, a Florida-based ad agency that’s part of the owners group.
The National Football League’s Dallas Cowboys had a winning bid of $275,000 on the domain name back in 2007, but, according to the news release and a Domain Name News report, a mixup kept the deal from being completed.
Sort of like some fourth-quarter Tony Romo passes.
Previously, the site sold western apparel and rustic decorations.
The site basically lay dormant for the last five years before emerging with its current theme.
Cleveland pooh-poohed the idea the site was a strategy to extract a handsome price from the football team.
“That’s definitely not our intention,” he said.
The ownership group operates thousands of websites with all sorts of themes, and the direction of Cowboys.com grew from research into what people searching for “cowboys” online were looking for.
It wasn’t all football.
The division rival New York Giants, by the way, do own Giants.com, and ditto for Washington and Redskins.com.
Eagles.com, however, owned by the Ginn Computer Company of Marmora, N.J., is still “under construction.” The registered owner did not immediately return a phone call to say if he’s planning to feature raptor birds, Eagle scouts, silver dollars or football chatter – or to just hold out for the highest bidder.
original article here.
