You don’t need an undercover video to know it’s true. Anyone who thinks Hillary will fight to protect their God-given right to self defense, a right acknowledged by the 2nd Amendment, has giant rocks in their head.
The 2nd amendment is more about the peoples right to raise their own army independent of government than it is about personal self defense.
The people being able to raise their own army allows them to secure a free state no matter what the status of the official military, even a traitorous surrender to a foreign power by a treasonous President.
It is mean so that the people have the right and ability to continue the fight if the government fails in its duty to do so for some reason, so that we the people can protect our freedom and independence as a nation if the government cannot.
Self defense would be covered as a natural right retained by the people apart from government under both the 9th and 10th amendments (as would the right to posses weapons intended for personal defense and sporting purposes).
Iska Waran
July 26, 2016 5:35 pm
I have no doubt that Clinton would ban all guns. I don’t trust the editing of that video, however. The Clinton delegate was cut off in mid-sentence twice.
The Modern Chronicler
July 26, 2016 5:48 pm
I was about to link that here, but the moderators were agile enough to do that, and to inform the regulars. Great job, mods.
Odd how she ran away and cried for help from the LEOs when confronted.
David
July 26, 2016 7:42 pm
What do you expect, their lives matter, ours don’t.
monger
July 27, 2016 12:51 pm
Do progressives ever leave lala land ? I could easily give ten examples/scenaios of guns remaining in the hands of the determined, no matter whatever law was passed. The jinn has left the bottle short of putting every human being in this country under armed guard in a “prison” camp, which still would not work, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/inmates-smuggle-gun-sue-prison-system_n_5514955.html, that its ludicrus, delusional and outright demented to think it could be accomplished.
Well I take that back, there is one way to do it, but do they have the stomach for an extermination ? As the dead would have no desire or need for guns.
yahsure
July 27, 2016 2:19 pm
All tyrants want an unarmed populace.
Be Prepared
July 28, 2016 11:05 pm
In the end, the best way to kill your right to bear arms will be to tax “ammo” into oblivion. Just like cigarettes, they will call it some violence deterrent fund and ammo will start costing $5 per round…then $10… then $20. A firearm is useless without ammo. The “gov” already did away with allowing the military’s spent brass from being purchased by the private sector for reloading.
This is going to happen because where California goes… the rest of the nation of libertards follow…
In the latest assault on gun ownership, California passes an ammo permit fee where residents must pay $50 and submit to a background check.
If the check is passed, their name is placed on an electronic list of those eligible to purchase ammunition. If a person’s name is not on the list, they can’t buy ammo.
You can see where this is heading…
This direction will gain traction and it will be very effective. My recommendation is to buy as much ammo with cash as you can possibly afford… reloading equipment.. powder…. brass and lead. It could be a very long time before this gets reversed again…if ever. Hillary will most certainly put the hammer down hard every place she can smack her cankles down.
There it is. All out in the open.
You don’t need an undercover video to know it’s true. Anyone who thinks Hillary will fight to protect their God-given right to self defense, a right acknowledged by the 2nd Amendment, has giant rocks in their head.
The 2nd amendment is more about the peoples right to raise their own army independent of government than it is about personal self defense.
The people being able to raise their own army allows them to secure a free state no matter what the status of the official military, even a traitorous surrender to a foreign power by a treasonous President.
It is mean so that the people have the right and ability to continue the fight if the government fails in its duty to do so for some reason, so that we the people can protect our freedom and independence as a nation if the government cannot.
Self defense would be covered as a natural right retained by the people apart from government under both the 9th and 10th amendments (as would the right to posses weapons intended for personal defense and sporting purposes).
I have no doubt that Clinton would ban all guns. I don’t trust the editing of that video, however. The Clinton delegate was cut off in mid-sentence twice.
I was about to link that here, but the moderators were agile enough to do that, and to inform the regulars. Great job, mods.
Odd how she ran away and cried for help from the LEOs when confronted.
What do you expect, their lives matter, ours don’t.
Do progressives ever leave lala land ? I could easily give ten examples/scenaios of guns remaining in the hands of the determined, no matter whatever law was passed. The jinn has left the bottle short of putting every human being in this country under armed guard in a “prison” camp, which still would not work, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/inmates-smuggle-gun-sue-prison-system_n_5514955.html, that its ludicrus, delusional and outright demented to think it could be accomplished.
Well I take that back, there is one way to do it, but do they have the stomach for an extermination ? As the dead would have no desire or need for guns.
All tyrants want an unarmed populace.
In the end, the best way to kill your right to bear arms will be to tax “ammo” into oblivion. Just like cigarettes, they will call it some violence deterrent fund and ammo will start costing $5 per round…then $10… then $20. A firearm is useless without ammo. The “gov” already did away with allowing the military’s spent brass from being purchased by the private sector for reloading.
This is going to happen because where California goes… the rest of the nation of libertards follow…
In the latest assault on gun ownership, California passes an ammo permit fee where residents must pay $50 and submit to a background check.
If the check is passed, their name is placed on an electronic list of those eligible to purchase ammunition. If a person’s name is not on the list, they can’t buy ammo.
You can see where this is heading…
This direction will gain traction and it will be very effective. My recommendation is to buy as much ammo with cash as you can possibly afford… reloading equipment.. powder…. brass and lead. It could be a very long time before this gets reversed again…if ever. Hillary will most certainly put the hammer down hard every place she can smack her cankles down.