The Thucydides Trap or the Coming War with China

Athenian historian, political philosopher and general Thucydides (c. 460 – 395 BC). He authored The History of the Peloponnesian War, which recounts the war in the 5th century BC between Sparta and Athens. Today Thucydides is considered the father of scientific history (he was the first historian to focus on meticulously gathering evidence and leaving intervention by the gods out of historical accounts) as well as the father of the school of political realism, who was the first to study relations between nations on the basis of their relative economic and military power.

 

Thucydides

Bust of Thucydides (c. 460 – 395 BC)

 

From Hegemon to Also-Ran

Somehow, like it or not, the world turns. Today’s hegemon becomes tomorrow’s also-ran. Today’s reserve currency becomes tomorrow’s toilet paper. Today’s cock o’ the walk becomes tomorrow’s dinner.

Hey, we didn’t create this system. We don’t even especially like it. But that’s just the way it is.

Whether you already have made a fortune, or are trying to build one, you need to be very careful about what currency … or currencies … your wealth is denominated in.

 

The End of History?

Governments were set up to take control. Ruling elites – by force of arms – established laws, protocols and armies to try to prevent anyone from taking their place. Their wealth, power and status were to be preserved at all costs. But in the 18th and 19th centuries, firearms started to become ubiquitous. It was harder for elites to maintain their authority over the masses.

Every farmer on the American frontier had a rifle. A ragtag band of insurgents in the American colonies (with the help of the French Navy) could defeat the best army in the world. An out-of-work actor could buy a handgun and pop off a president.

Unable to stay in control by force alone, governments had to resort to fraud. Ordinary citizens were allowed to vote on who would rule over them. They were also promised the fruits of others’ labors, if they voted the right way.

For a time, it looked as though this new model – social democracies run by flaming politicians and professional functionaries – had defeated all rivals. The Soviet Union – which relied on more old-fashioned blunt force to run its slave-driven economy – fell in about 1991.

Maoist China had thrown in the towel, more or less, 10 years earlier when the country’s “paramount leader,” Deng Xiaoping, announced, “To get rich is glorious.” (Historians now claim he never uttered those words. But they accurately captured his vision for China.)

And Francis Fukuyama – hallucinating – wondered if the “end of history” was at hand. If the end of history were at hand, the dollar, the Fed and federal finances would have nothing to worry about. But between history and the greenback, if we were taking bets, we’d put our money on history.

Most likely, history will trundle forward. And the dollar will be knocked off its perch as the world’s leading currency sometime before the 21st century comes to a close. But how exactly will that happen?

No one knows. But few imperial elites give up the No. 1 position without a fight. As they see their power, their status and their wealth challenged, they typically find a casus belli, hoping to stomp the newcomer before it is too late.

 

fukuyama1After the fall of the Soviet Union and its communist system, Francis Fukuyama had an epiphany (perhaps “Weltgeist” whispered in his ear as well?) which he published in book form. He concluded that “history had ended” and that democracy and with it Western power and values had triumphed for all times to come. There would no longer be any change in the field of politics or in power relations. This seems to have been a severe case of wishful thinking.

Image credit: i-g-t.org

 

The Thucydides Trap and a Mountain of Liabilities

The phenomenon is known to historians as the “Thucydides Trap.” Political scientist Graham Allison explains:

 

When a rapidly rising power rivals an established ruling power, trouble ensues. In 11 of 15 cases in which this has occurred in the past 500 years, the result was war.

The great Greek historian Thucydides identified these structural stresses as the primary cause of the war between Athens and Sparta in ancient Greece.

In his oft-quoted insight, “It was the rise of Athens and the fear that this inspired in Sparta that made war inevitable.”

 

Note that Thucydides identified two factors: a rising rival and fear of that rise. China is rising. The US power elite fears its rise. And for good reason: Having the world’s reserve currency is an “exorbitant privilege,” as former French president Charles de Gaulle described it.

It allows Americans to buy things from overseas without ever really paying for them. Instead, we send over pieces of paper that we create ex nihilo. That paper is then sent back to the US to buy Treasury bonds and other dollar-denominated assets. From an economic point of view, the system (established by Richard Nixon in 1971) is loopy.

The Chinese pretend they have good customers. Americans pretend they have good credit. And everyone pretends to get richer… based on promises to settle up sometime in the future. In practice, nobody wants the day of reckoning to come. Because they all know that there are vastly more claims on tomorrow’s output than tomorrow can satisfy.

Between 1971 and today, roughly $10 trillion more has been received by Americans in goods from overseas than has been shipped to foreigners. That money is an outstanding claim on US existing wealth and future output. There is also (with some overlap) about $17 trillion worth of US government debt – also a claim on future American output. And this is just part of the total credit market debt of $55 trillion [Note by PT: by now government debt is well over $18 trillion and total credit market debt is rapidly approaching $60 trillion].

And that’s not to mention Washington’s unfunded liabilities…

 

Editor’s note: Boston University professor Laurence Kotlikoff recently told Bonner & Partners Investor Network subscribers that America’s “fiscal gap” – the difference between Washington’s projected financial obligations and the present value of all its projected future tax income – is a mind-boggling $210 trillion. That’s about 211% of US GDP. (You can find out more about this shocking situation here.)

 

To honor these claims, the US would have to run a budget surplus. (When? How?) But instead of running a surplus, we run deficit after deficit.

 

Nixon_and_de_Gaulle_30-0166aRichard Nixon visits French president General de Gaulle in 1969, one month before de Gaulle’s retirement. De Gaulle’s insistence that the US honor the gold exchange clause established at Bretton Woods by presenting dollars France had accumulated for exchange likely contributed greatly to Nixon’s eventual decision to default on US gold obligation. It was an example of a selective default that only hit foreigners. However, it also was the start of a decade of monetary and economic chaos and laid the groundwork for the Great Credit Bubble, the era we are in at present, and which is currently in its final pre-collapse stage.

Photo credit: White House Photo Office Collection

 

Edging Toward a Reckoning

Instead of edging toward a reckoning, all major governments seem to want to make the situation worse. The US stimulates its people to buy more Chinese-made goods. And China stimulates its manufacturers to make more stuff for people who can’t really afford it. Both are heading for trouble.

Americans are hooked on spending. They consume their wealth… and more. China is hooked on producing. As it adds productive know-how and capacity, it becomes more and more competitive. Not only can it produce more consumer gadgets at lower prices, but also it can produce the latest in military hardware.

 

china party congressXi Jinping (middle) and the rest of the politburo at the opening meeting of the third session of the National People’s Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. China has shown fairly little appetite for military expansionism, preferring to rely on deepening and widening economic ties all over the world instead. For quite some time, China has been and continues to be a beneficiary of the “Pax Americana” imposed after WW2. However, as it becomes more powerful economically and militarily, history suggests that there will eventually be a confrontation with the current global hegemon.

Photo credit: Xinhua / Zuma Press

 

It’s a matter of time before that fighting gear comes out. At least, that’s what history suggests. If there is a military conflict, how will it turn out?

The US spends three times more than China on “defense.” Advantage: Pentagon. But as the Persians discovered in their wars with the Greeks, having the biggest, best-funded army does not necessarily give you an edge. Instead, it can invite sluggishness, complacency and overreaching.

The US military is the fattest, most zombie-infested bureaucracy in the world. It suffers from an overabundance of resources. It supports troops (at a cost of $1 million per soldier per year) all over the globe. It builds weapons systems that are often obsolete before they are put into service. It coddles armies of lobbyists, contractors, consultants, retirees, hangers-on and malingerers.

Like all bureaucracies, it looks out first and foremost for itself. Looking out for the security of the nation is a distant second. America’s 10 huge aircraft carriers, for example, may be marvelous ways to generate contracts, fees and expenses. They may also be great ways to throw US military muscle into two-bit conflicts around the world.

But put them up against a modern, electronically sophisticated enemy … Then what? We will probably find out …

 

800px-US_Navy_050322-N-4308O-171_The_Nimitz-class_aircraft_carrier_USS_Harry_S._Truman_(CVN_75)_navigates_the_open_waters_of_the_Persian_Gulf

For many decades, aircraft carriers have been the major instrument for the projection of military power across the world. However, these behemoths could one day well become a liability rather than an asset. In modern-day warfare, they may eventually turn out to be sitting ducks for a sufficiently creative and well-equipped enemy.

Photo credit: Ryan O’Connor

 

The above article is taken from the Diary of a Rogue Economist originally written for Bonner & Partners. Bill Bonner founded Agora, Inc in 1978. It has since grown into one of the largest independent newsletter publishing companies in the world. He has also written three New York Times bestselling books, Financial Reckoning Day, Empire of Debt and Mobs, Messiahs and Markets.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
bluestem
bluestem
April 4, 2015 10:36 am

A very thought provoking read for a Saturday morning, thanks Admin, John

Homer
Homer
April 4, 2015 8:00 pm

The US couldn’t put together a fighting force like they did in the 1940s. We will rely if war comes on a first strike nuclear offense. But that doesn’t win the war. It is boots on the ground that wins the war and there will be obvious reprisals.

We have a good first rate standing army, but when they are decimated there is no one capable to take their place. It will be like the Japanese during the second world war. Once their trained first line pilots were destroyed, they were rendered impotent.

The next war is it happens maybe over in less than 90 days or a year. Not enough time to train competent replacements. As a people we are overweight and stupid, how’s that going to work out for you. They have even suspended P.E. because the kids can’t deal with it.

The best hope for humanity in a nuclear age is the avoidance of out right conflict. Diplomacy is the best course for all concerned. We just have to face facts, were not numero uno in the world any more and we should just get over it.

Homer
Homer
April 4, 2015 8:26 pm

Already, other European nations see the handwriting on the wall and are forming closer ties with the new kids on the block. The US is becoming isolated. An isolated country can sure and hell start a war, but an isolated country can never win a war.

Reality will deal appropriately with a people who think they are exceptional and indispensable. That is a philosophy of exclusionism. The truth is we are others and others are us. The new world order that follows this failed paradigm is going to be inclusiveness. Nuclear war and nuclear winter demands it. Any alternative is unacceptable. But stupid leaders of stupid governments do stupid things, so maybe in my next life, I’ll come back as a cockroach.

bb
bb
April 5, 2015 12:24 am

Homer Simpson, the new order will be satanic to the core.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
April 5, 2015 12:36 am

Fukuyama is a shill, like most neocons, for the MIC.

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
April 5, 2015 12:50 am

I read Thucydides years ago. My recollection of the main cause of the war between athens and sparta is that after the persian wars, a fund was set up by the Delian league, to rebuild the city states that were damaged during the wars with persia. But pericles, the ruler of athens, absconded with the funds and used it to build the acropolis in athens. Maybe my memory is failing me.

P.M.Lawrence
P.M.Lawrence
April 5, 2015 5:15 am

A ragtag band of insurgents in the American colonies (with the help of the French Navy) could defeat the best army in the world.

No, it couldn’t – and didn’t. It defeated the British Army, with the help of the French Navy and units of of the French Army – and that was the best army in the world (overall – Prussia’s was probably better per head, but was smaller). For constitutional and financial reasons, Britain deliberately kept its army weak by continental European standards. Holland probably had about as strong an army.

TE
TE
April 6, 2015 11:06 am

If the average man understood the supply line differences between 1770, 1860, 1940 and today, they would stop supporting our aggression, and global trade.

Due to laws like the “Buy American” dictate of the armed forces, I’ll bet most military and civilians think that we have capabilities like we did in 1940.

What struck me while reading the piece, was that if you strike out China, and swap it with “US” and it could have published in Europe sometime during the late 1800s/early 1900s. Our slave immigrant labor – and I’m not talking plantations – was churning out products cheaper than other more regulated and involved in the cost of Empire parts of the world.

History is circular, the center just moves.

Contrary to the propaganda, we are NOT the productive powerhouse that we think we are. There is barely a “Made In America” product that isn’t truly made by global supply chains.

Those chains fail, and we are screwed. If China repatriates their businesses and money, we lose mines, pork processors, solar energy plants, battery plants, and probably a large – and needed – part of nearly every single thing our war, and lives, depends on.

No one, that I see, is viewing the world through that lens. Supply chain disruption will starve and kill us, both within our borders and in any bullshit theater of war overseas.