I recall one the first times I thought to myself — “We don’t crap about human history”.  I read about a map dating to somewhere around the 1500’s that showed the coastline of Greenland perfectly. Only thing is … that coastline is now under thousands of feet of ice, and the map was verified as accurate only with the use of high-tech ground-penetrating radar!  Global Warming …. that didn’t wipe out humanity or the animal kingdom!!  Are you listening Algore?

So, now we have this article;  http://www.maltanow.com.mt/?p=2927

It’s about the “Ooparts” phenomena …. aka, Out of Place Artifacts. These are artifacts which shouldn’t exist based upon currently accepted beliefs regarding our origins and history. Hence, they are “out of place” in the orthodox timeline of human history. Let me give you the author’s conclusion;

“Everything we have been taught in our schools and universities about our origin and history, is based upon nothing more than speculation and hypothesis. There is not a single provable fact out there that conclusively answers the question ‘where do we come from‘”

So, let’s look at some amazing Ooparts:

“In June 1936 Max Hahn and his wife Emma were on a walk beside a waterfall near to London, Texas, when they noticed a rock with wood protruding from its core. They decided to take the oddity home and later cracked it open with a hammer and a chisel. What they found within shocked the archaeological and scientific community. Embedded in the rock was what appeared to be some type of ancient man made hammer.

“A team of archaeologists analyzed and dated it. The rock encasing the hammer was dated to more than 400 million years old. The hammer itself turned out to be more than 500 million years old. Additionally, a section of the wooden handle had begun the metamorphosis into coal.  The hammer’s head, made of more than 96% iron, is far more pure than anything nature could have achieved without assistance from relatively modern smelting methods.”

===============================

“In 1889 near Nampa, Idaho, whilst workers were boring an artesian well, a small figurine made of baked clay was extracted from a depth of 320 feet. To reach this depth the workers had to cut through fifteen feet of basalt lava and many other strata below that. That in itself does not seem remarkable, until one considers that the very top layer of lava has been dated to at least 15 million years old!

“It is currently accepted by science and geology that coal is a by-product of decaying vegetation. The vegetation becomes buried over time and is covered with sediment. That sediment eventually fossilizes and becomes rock. This natural process of coal formation takes up to 400 million years to accomplish.

“Anything that is found in lumps of coal or in coal seams during mining, had to have been placed or dropped into the vegetation before it was buried in sediment.”

===============================

“In 1944, as a ten year old boy, Newton Anderson, dropped a lump of coal in his basement and it broke in half as it hit the floor. What he discovered inside defies explanation based upon current scientific orthodoxy.

“Inside the coal was a hand crafted brass alloy bell with an iron clapper and sculptured handle.

“When an analysis was carried out it was discovered that the bell was made from an unusual mix of metals, different from any known modern alloy production (including copper, zinc, tin, arsenic, iodine, and selenium).

“The seam from whence this lump of coal was mined is estimated to be 300,000,000 years old!”

===============================

“The Salzburg Cube is yet another ancient puzzle found by a worker named Reidl, in an Austrian foundry in 1885. Like the others, this man broke open a block of coal and found a metal cube embedded inside. Recent analysis established the object was of forged iron and obviously hand crafted. The coal it was found in was millions of years old.”

===============================

“One needs to consider another find discovered in 100 million year old cretaceous limestone. A fossilized human finger, which was found along with a child’s tooth and human hair. This finger has been subjected to numerous scientific tests and analysis. Sectioning revealed the typical porous bone structure expected in a human finger. Additionally a Cat-scan and MRI scan identified joints and traced tendons throughout the length of the fossil. This is one find that science cannot explain away as a hoax.”

===============================

“In 1968 a palaeontologist named Stan Taylor began excavations of fossilized dinosaur footprints, discovered in the bed of the Paluxy river near Glen Rose, Texas. What he unearthed shocked and dumbfounded the scientific community. Alongside the dinosaur tracks, in exactly the same cretaceous fossilized strata, were well preserved human footprints.

“The immediate reaction of evolutionists, archaeologists, and science in general, was to debunk the find as a hoax. “They were carved into the rock by hoaxers” or “They are not human footprints, but more dinosaur footprints that have been eroded to look human” were the arguments most commonly proposed.

“However, their line of reasoning falls somewhat flat when one asks why only the human prints were eroded and not also the 3 toed dinosaur prints? Additionally one has to consider, if the human prints were carved as a hoax, how did the hoaxers manage to carve further human footprints that continued under bedrock that was later removed from the side of the river bed?

“Since the initial discovery, hundreds more human footprints have been discovered and unearthed, both in Paluxy and in many other places around the globe. Either those hoaxers have unlimited time and budget – or someone is telling porkies!

===============================

“There is however another find of recent years that blows all of the others into a cocked hat regarding age.

“Over the past few decades, miners near the little town of Ottosdal in Western Transvaal, South Africa, have been digging up hundreds of mysterious metal spheres. These spheres measure between 25 and 100 mm in diameter, and some are etched with three parallel grooves running completely around the equator. Two types of spheres have been found. One is composed of a solid bluish metal with flecks of white, the other is hollowed out and filled with a spongy white substance.

“These spheres are reportedly so delicately balanced that even with modern technology, they would need to be made in a zero gravity environment to attain these characteristics. These objects have become known as the Klerksdorp spheres.

“Geologists have attempted to debunk these artefacts as natural formations or “limonite concretions”. They fail to explain sufficiently how these formations occurred naturally with perfectly straight and perfectly spaced grooves around the centres.

“Perhaps the real reason for such fervent attempted debunking by the scientific community, is that the rock in which these spheres where found is Precambrian – and dated to 2.8 billion years old!”

RESPONSE FROM SCIENTISTS AND CREATIONISTS

Creationists will totally and completely disregard every established dating method, and will declare every known geological process as of the devil, and stick their heads in the sand regardless of whatever  archaeological artifact is put before them.  The earth is no more than 10,000 years old … AND THAT’S FINAL!

Scientists fare no better in their obtuse stubbornness, and may even be worse. They will ALWAYS explain away every single out-of-place artifact. They have no choice; their existence as scientists, their credibility, and their funding depends on it.  Scientists WILL lie, they WILL falsify data, they WILL fabricate crazy new theories as an act of self preservation.  One need look no further than the Global Cooling hoax (1970s) and man-made Global Warming nonsense (today).

Ooparts essentially destroy the theory of evolution. First, they have yet to explain how intelligent sentient beings sprung up from a primordial blob of goo and miraculously brought to life by an electrical storm billions of years ago. Life requires life! Non-life does not produce life.  Have scientists — with all of humanity’s knowledge and technology — been able to produce even one living and reproductive capable cell? Of course, not.  Evolutionist want us to believe modern humans evolved about 200,000 years ago. Man-made artifacts found in substrata originating millions of years ago completely obliterates that theory.  They wouldn’t have to rewrite their textbooks … they would have to burn them, and start all over.  It’ll be a cold day in hell before they do that!

In Summary;

—- Both groups can’t accept these out-of-place artifacts as genuine because it totally upsets their world-view applecart.

—- Both would have to completely reevaluate and overhaul their belief systems. They are simply not up to it. 

—- Therefore, both will continue to discredit each and every one of these Ooparts via ridicule, fake science, ad hominem attacks, illogical and fanciful “alternative” explanations, and when all else fails … just ignore these artifacts, and pretend they don’t exist.

—- There are no two groups with a deeper stubborn FAITH than Religonists and Scientists. Only the object of their faith differs. The former have faith in God, the latter have faith in themselves.  Both lead to blindness.

—- Hopefully, you, dear reader, haven’t fallen into either trap.  A good place to start is to understand that when it comes to human origins … we don’t even know what we don’t know.

The other possibility is that I am;  1) nuts,  2) easily fooled, and 3) a tin-foil hat conspiracy wacko. 

“If a single, well verified mammal skull were to turn up in 500 million year old rocks, our whole modern theory of evolution would be utterly destroyed”: — Richard Dawkins

 Sources:

Pictures in this thread and the text in italics; — http://www.maltanow.com.mt/?p=2927

Website: “The Modern Past: Ancient High Tech Evidences” — extensive list of many other Ooparts. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_hitech.htm#menu

Article: “1o Insane Ancient Inventions Science Can’t Explain” — http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/10-insane-ancient-achievements-that-science-cant-explain/

In the interest of fair play, these two web site REFUTE out-of-place artifacts, including most listed in this article.  Decide for yourself which is fact, and what is fiction! —

http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/ooparts.htm  and this one http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/oopart

Author: Stucky

I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it. View all posts by Stucky