Sucking the Blood of a Declining Civilization

Sucking the Blood of a Declining Civilization

decliningcivilization

Civilization has to be transmitted from one generation to another. If it isn’t, processes break down and life becomes difficult. Soon there must be a painful reform, or else the civilization will be lost.

This is fundamentally the job of families (especially parents), but at the moment that’s not really possible: How many families can survive on one income? And if one of the parents can’t stay home and teach the fundamental lessons of civilization, who will pass them to the next generation?

Certainly the better daycare facilities try, but to think that someone watching a couple dozen kids is going to transmit civilization to them as effectively as a parent who’s with the child day and night is simply ridiculous. The blame for this rests almost solely at the feet of the state of course, but we’re getting ahead of ourselves.

I’ll begin by quoting the redoubtable Fred Reed on the current situation:

We live in a dying culture and, soon, a diminished country. It cannot be saved.

Not true? Add up the bits and pieces. We laugh in horror, some of us, primarily the older, at the decline of schooling, the courses like Batman and the Struggle for Gender Equity. Comic, yes. Yet in aggregate, these constitute an academic and civilizational collapse both profound and irreversible. Enstupidation does not happen in a healthy country. Who even wants to reverse this onrushing night? Not the universities, nor the teacher’s unions, nor a professoriat gone as daft as the “students,” nor the banks battening on student loans [sic].

I’m more optimistic than Fred in that I think our civilization can be saved. But what he writes is true, and the West’s big institutions are simply vampires sucking the blood of a declining civilization.

I think we can all admit that every major institution of the West, including the mega-corps, is engaged in stripping the Western populace of everything they possibly can. There is no virtue involved, no principle, no honor… there’s not even much consideration for the future. These outfits, under whatever excuses they’re trotting out this year, are strip-mining Western civilization, not building it.

That said, let’s look at some particular villains.

The Political Correctness Barbarians

When I first saw these people rising to power, decades ago now, I thought they were so ridiculous that they’d come and go quickly. Unfortunately I was wrong, and they subverted millions of children. The current insanity over “safe spaces” and such condemns them openly, and especially that it’s becoming acceptable to say “I hate white people.”

Anti-Religionists

It’s one thing to be a simple agnostic. It’s quite another to go out and try to dismember religion… which in nearly every case means Christianity. And to be honest about it, most people who do this are acting out their personal traumas: either in permanent rebellion to their parents or in anger at one church or another.

Slashing and burning things simply bears bad fruit, but here’s the core issue with attacking Christianity:

The people who pushed Christianity out of Western culture were arrogant and destructive – not that they pushed it away, but that they never bothered to replace it.

If you want to remove the moral core of a civilization, you have to replace it with something better. And the religion-haters did not. They sawed off the limb that held them and were too arrogant to consider the consequences.

Academia and the Education Vampires

The Enlightenment sits before us as a twisted wreckage. Its destruction followed the usual path: first setting up institutions, then monopolies and fiefdoms, and finally lording it over others as far and as long as they could.

Education has whored itself out to the state and treats its students as income-generating tools. Are there a few exceptions? I’m sure there are, but they are few. Academia, including most of scientific academia, has disgraced itself. Could any serious Enlightenment thinker have respected “scientific consensus”? Please! Science places experimentation above all and never ever sells itself to a page full of names and initials!

The scientific process has been subjugated by institutions that thrive on restricting access. Cronyism is massive, peer review is corrupted, and the uncredentialed are treated like lepers. These institutions sit atop the corpse of the Enlightenment.

Corporatized Art

The arts – music, film, painting, sculpture – are not widgets. They are immensely more important than that, forming minds and cultures in deep ways.

How to pay the artist (singer, writer, whatever) has long been a problem and remains one. Hopefully a good answer arises at some point. Until then, seeking profit by dumbing down every art form is simply degrading.

The corporations that now control music and film have bastardized art for money. I’m not ready to jail them and I certainly don’t think the state could do a better job, but I am willing to say that they have disgraced art. Have you ever wondered why elegance is gone? Why loudness and drunkenness are treated as virtues?

The State

Being that it forcibly skims half of the West’s production every year, given that it punishes all who do not obey it, and given that its laws are for sale to the highest bidders, the number one destroyer of Western civilization is the state. Hands down. Think of what people could do for their children and grandchildren with twice as much money.

And don’t get me started on enforced charity, the victim culture, “you didn’rsquo;t build that,” and “it takes a village.” I don’t like to swear in print.

A Final Point

I could go on, but this is a column, not a treatise. My final point is this:

None of the above are transmitting civilization, even if some of them once did. They are tools for reaping the masses, and we need to leave them behind. But far more importantly, we need to build methods and systems that will transmit Western civilization.

The authentic Western virtues – cooperation, initiative, creativity, curiosity, co-dominance, and real justice (not merely a form thereof) – are necessary for a prosperous humanity, and the institutions of our time have flamboyantly failed.

It’s time to start building afresh.

* * * * *

A book that generates comments like these, from actual readers, might be worth your time:

  • I just finished reading The Breaking Dawn and found it to be one of the most thought-provoking, amazing books I have ever read… It will be hard to read another book now that I’ve read this book… I want everyone to read it.
  • Such a tour de force, so many ideas. And I am amazed at the courage to write such a book, that challenges so many people’s conceptions.
  • There were so many points where it was hard to read, I was so choked up.
  • Holy moly! I was familiar with most of the themes presented in A Lodging of Wayfaring Men, but I am still trying to wrap my head around the concepts you presented at the end of this one.

Get it at Amazon ($18.95) or on Kindle: ($5.99)

TheBreakingDawn

* * * * *

Paul Rosenberg

[Editor’s Note: Paul Rosenberg is the outside-the-Matrix author of FreemansPerspective.com, a site dedicated to economic freedom, personal independence and privacy. He is also the author of The Great Calendar, a report that breaks down our complex world into an easy-to-understand model. Click here to get your free copy.]

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
james the deplorable wanderer
james the deplorable wanderer
November 8, 2016 1:20 pm

Yes.

KaD
KaD
November 8, 2016 1:31 pm

One of the things I see that bothers me the most is women stuffing their toddlers, even babies in day cares and hiring nannies. There are tons of these ads for child care help in my area, most pay minimum wage to ten an hours, and they expect you to have a car. FFS, if it’s more important to be a cube slave than stay home with your kids for a few short years until they can walk, talk, and are potty trained you should probably not have had them.

Peaknic
Peaknic
November 8, 2016 1:46 pm

I agree with most of what he’s saying here, but religion is NOT necessary to teach morality, at least for people who do not make all their decisions base on FEELZ. I am an atheist but still consider myself moral because I was taught the Golden Rule (the real one). If you teach perspective (being able to see an issue from another’s point of view) and the libertarian adage of “anything goes as long as you are not injuring any other person”, then that can be the basis for all morality.

Don’t give me any BS about my actions going against your interpretation of what “GOD” wants me to do. If I choose to engage in a freely entered polyamorous sexual relationship with 20 others at a time, that can still be a moral act. The key is “freely entered” for all of the participants. Any act, especially those perpetrated by self-righteous God-fearing a**holes, can be completely immoral if you are FORCING someone else to act as you (or your God) wants them to act, under threat of punishment (including deferred punishment in Hell).

However, I agree completely that our civilization is failing to teach morality to our children.

Dutchman
Dutchman
  Peaknic
November 8, 2016 2:49 pm

“It’s one thing to be a simple agnostic. It’s quite another to go out and try to dismember religion…”

As a life long atheist, I’m in complete agreement. I will tell you my story with the American Atheist’s group.

When we moved to Minneapolis (almost 40 years ago) our next door neighbors were our ‘adopted’ grandparents. This couple, although 75+ were really sharp. John, was a independent thinker, and subscribed to the American Atheist magazine (that’s how things were in 1980). He had never gone to a meeting – so I agreed that we would go together.

What we found was a group of angry, wack-o, eccentric, people. Many were ex-Catholics that were pissed off at their church. Others wanted to talk about what was wrong about religion. One spent his time crossing out ‘In God We Trust’ on dollar bills.

John and I got the hell out of there, and went to a dive bar for a couple of stiff ones.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Peaknic
November 8, 2016 7:08 pm

“I am an atheist but still consider myself moral because I was taught the Golden Rule (the real one). ”

The “Golden Rule” (the only one) is a Christian teaching.

Matthew 7:12 (ERV)  “Do for others what you would want them to do for you. This is the meaning of the Law of Moses and the teaching of the prophets.”

You may want to consider this, Atheism has no ultimate all encompassing authority to establish any morality beyond human desire.

Dutchman
Dutchman
November 8, 2016 2:34 pm

“There is no virtue involved, no principle, no honor… there’s not even much consideration for the future. These outfits, under whatever excuses they’re trotting out this year, are strip-mining Western civilization, not building it.”

I have witnessed this evolving in the last 30 years. The “corporations” have figured out how to control people. Used to be you submitted a resume, you were considered a good person… now days: spend an hour answering questions on a web site, do you have the EXACT experience we need, what is your salary requirement (must complete – I usually say $100), background check, drug check, you may never receive a reply, not even a ‘fuck you’, it is man’s inhumanity to man.

Falling Down – Hamburger Scene:

BB
BB
November 8, 2016 2:42 pm

Peakki ,in reality your just a dressed up pagan .You claim to be an atheist ” the fool has said in his heart,there is no God.They are corrupt.They do abominable
ble works”(Having sex with 20 different people) Psalms 14-1 Fool in the Bible doesn’t mean stupid.It is God’s judgement upon your soul because of your Pride.?

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
November 8, 2016 8:55 pm

There is no morality that has not been established by authority. That authority is God. Everything else is just someone’s opinion. Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one and they put out a lot of shit.

Chubby Bubbles
Chubby Bubbles
November 9, 2016 2:32 am

“Authority” is to whom you ascribe authorship of your life.

Atheists are just normal people who don’t happen to think that some made-up “god” character -whether Thor or Zeus or Allah or Krishna- is the “author” of life on earth. Being skeptical of these claims, we generally tend to be skeptical of secular “authorities”, too, which is why Seneca said, “Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.”

How you treat the people you live with in community is not predicated on there being omnipotent supernatural fantasy creatures. It’s the wacky stories about gods that are mere opinions, and wildly conflicting ones, to boot. The nonsensical shit we have had to put up with comes from religionists. If they can make you believe in talking snakes and bushes, and flying horses, or that God lives on planet Kolob and wants you to wear magic underwear, or that crackers turn into baby jeebus… There really isn’t anything they can’t convince you of, is there? Getting you softened up to the concept that being spied on all the time is normal is also particularly useful, don’t you agree?