Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts
The claims that the Russian government hacked US voting machines are absurd. Voting machines are not connected to the Internet. To hack a voting machine you have to be physically in proximity to the machine and use a hand held device. The machines can be programmed to throw the vote count to one candidate or the other, and there are other ways to interfere with elections. Possibly if a foreign power had server presence in the US, some precinct reports of results could be intercepted and altered, although a voice check over the telephone is an easy way to verify the electronic transmission. What is clear is that Russia cannot hack the voting machines.
What about the claims that Russia hacked Hillary’s emails and used a network of 200 Internet websites to convince the American people to vote for Trump? Wikileaks, which released the emails, said they were a leak, not a hack, and that they did not come from Russians. The FBI and the Director of National Intelligence do not support the CIA’s claims. Or should we say claims attributed to the CIA as apparently the source of the claims, like the source of PropOrNot, is unknown.
And look at the size of the alleged conspiracy—the Kremlin and 200 websites. Surely someone would have talked!
John McCain says he is sure Russia did something and we need a congressional investigation to find out what.
Why not start with an investigation of PropOrNot and what they are up to? We also need an investigation why Americans living in big cities on the NE and West coasts were immune to Russian fake news, whereas the geographical bulk of the country succumbed to the Russian fake news instead of to the presstitute fake news that conquered the NE and West coasts.
The FBI says that the claims attributed to the CIA would not stand up in court. So what are the claims all about? Who is behind them? Are there elements within the CIA committing treason by working against president-elect Trump? Are there elements in the US Congress committing treason by trying to sway electors with fake news resting on unattributed claims that the Russians, not the American people, elected Trump? Why these claims in the absence of proof?
What we are experiencing in the delegitimization of Donald Trump is an extraordinary rejection of democracy by elements in the government and by the presstitutes.
It appears that the hack was an inside job by a disgusted DNC operative(s).
http://hardnoxandfriends.com/2016/12/15/hacks-an-inside-job-conducted-by-disgusted-whistleblowers/
Don’t you love it when the same people who mock and ridicule conspiracy theories trot one out when it suits them and discover no one believes it?
You could not write the current script if you wanted to.
[img
[/img]
Trump needs to investigate the Clinton Foundation as well as Obammas use of a fake name in connection with discussing classified information on a knowingly unsecured server.
The DNC (and frankly the RNC) could have conceeded gracefully and let Trump take the helm, but all this bullshit in the media, the electoral college, etc. is becoming a headache. Trump offered them the olive branch, at the great risk of pissing off his base. But the opposition didn’t take the deal. Stupid, arrogant motherfuckers. I hope Trump burns that festering hellhole to the ground once he gets in.
Yes. They are trying to delegitimize him in front of their retard voter base. Those who already believe all the shit fed to them in spite of the sometimes obvious contradictions. I’m not a Trump apologist by any means, however, when you see the extent of the shit you can’t but wonder who would believe it. In other words, they, whoever they are, are creating division. That seems to be one of their primary objectives. To what ultimate end?…
I suppose this is part of the “Fundamental transformation” we were told about some time ago…