Trump’s Tax Reduction Follows John F. Kennedy Approach

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

Martin Armstrong Steve Forbes Jim Florio

Of course, the left is focusing on how much the “rich” pay while ignoring the entire issue of taxes. When I debated Steve Forbes and Governor James Florio at Princeton University, it was the Democrat Florio who I turned. I simply said that the tax code borrowed from the poor and middle class, handed them refund checks at the end of the year, and was borrowing from them without paying any interest. I then added that Social Security was just a tax that denied the average person the RIGHT to prepare for their future by investing that money, yet they argue that the stock market rises and ONLY the rich get richer. The left are brilliant conman because they always point at how the rich don’t pay enough, but they NEVER look closely what government does to them.

RELATED CONTENT

Trump Just Shared These 11 Words of Warning for the USD and Gold

Trump Just Shared These 11 Words of Warning for the USD and Gold

 

Barack Just Lost It Over Alan Greenspan's Warning for Owning Gold

Barack Just Lost It Over Alan Greenspan’s Warning for Owning Gold

 

Move Your IRA or 401k to Gold

IRS Tax “Loophole”: Move Your IRA or 401(k) to Gold
Get this No-Cost Info Kit

Already, all we hear is how Trump is trying to lower taxes for himself and friends. The stupidity of those who even say this is beyond belief. They are so brainwashed that you have to wonder if they are capable of independent thoughts. Trump’s tax plan involves collapsing the current seven-tier bracket system into just three brackets. The lower bracket, those who make less than $75,000, would pay only 12%. The next tier would be those who earn $75,000-$225,000, who would then pay 25%. Those in the third-tier are workers with incomes of more than $225,000 who would pay 33%. This boils down to expanding the net disposable income for taxpayers making between $48,000 and $88,000 annually, as they would save between $1,174 and $7,052, according to the Tax Foundation.

The top rate proposed by the new administration (33%) is substantially lower than the maximum rate under President Obama (43.8%). Furthermore, a standard deduction of $12,000 means, on average, the middle class will get an additional $12k worth of tax-exempt income. Economic growth comes from CONSUMER spending. Increase the net disposable income and that will jump-start the economy. Of course, the Democrats will oppose this because they never saw a dollar they did not want to get their hands on. They tend to forget their history; the FIRST tax cut after World War II was implemented by John F. Kennedy.

 

“It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now … Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, president’s news conference

“Lower rates of taxation will stimulate economic activity and so raise the levels of personal and corporate income as to yield within a few years an increased – not a reduced – flow of revenues to the federal government.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 17, 1963, annual budget message to the Congress, fiscal year 1964

“In today’s economy, fiscal prudence and responsibility call for tax reduction even if it temporarily enlarges the federal deficit – why reducing taxes is the best way open to us to increase revenues.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 21, 1963, annual message to the Congress: “The Economic Report Of The President”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
January 26, 2017 8:29 am

Eliminate many of the tax deductions allowed ( net affect on wealthy ), reduce tax rate at all levels, ( stimulate and increase job growth and base economic growth ), place restrictions and RESPONSIBILITTIES on entitlement programs, oh yeah,,term limits!

joan
joan
January 26, 2017 9:53 am

So if you make $75,000 with a $12K deduction your federal tax is $ 7,560.00.
If you make $ 75,001 with a $ 12k deduction your federal tax is $ 15,750.25.
I don’t think it is worth making the extra $ 1.00 as you will have approx $7700 LESS to spend. There have to more structured categories.

TPC
TPC
  joan
January 26, 2017 11:37 am

Thats not how it works. The 25% is on the single dollar over, not the entire block of income.

So in your example it would not be 15k, it would be $7,560.75

Everything would be the same for the first 75k, subsequent funds up to 225k would be taxed at 25%, with all dollars above 225k being taxed at 33%.

Ag
Ag
January 26, 2017 10:05 am

While it would be nice to see a change in the tax code,
but the politikers have been using that line for decades.

We already know the IRS is staffed with political operatives, maybe Trump can at least clean out the trash.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 26, 2017 10:14 am

“Of course, the left is focusing on how much the “rich” pay while ignoring the entire issue of taxes.”

And of course, they aim that focus at those who pay very little or no actual taxes.

Strange how easy it is to appeal to peoples greed, jealousy and covetousness to keep them thinking they’re someone’s victim and their lot in life is someone else’s fault instead of the result of the choices they made and the effort they put into it.

CCRider
CCRider
January 26, 2017 10:16 am

So you cut taxes with $20 trillion in debt, growing at $1.7 trillion per year and with contingent liabilities maybe 8 or 10 times that level, while you propose a massive infrastructure spending bill?

One of us is nucking futs.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
January 26, 2017 11:08 am

I doubt it’s Trump.

But if your net worth is as high as his, indicating your understanding of finance and tax issues is at least equal, I’ll listen to your ideas for comparison as well.

Edwitness
Edwitness
  CCRider
January 26, 2017 12:55 pm

And that’s only if the fed keeps interest rates at almost zero, CC.
Blessings:-}

CCRider
CCRider
  Edwitness
January 26, 2017 1:42 pm

Not likely Edw. They’ve announced rate hikes for this year. The Fed has been itching to raise rates for years. Now with the Trump (sucker’s) market rally they have the green light. For those of us that like to use our own heads (unlike Anonymous) it looks like the Fed will crash the economy with hikes and blame it on Trump. The same old story: Problem, reaction, solution.
Blessings to you as well.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  CCRider
January 26, 2017 1:24 pm

I’m not sure Trump’s proposed cut in tax rates is a net cut in taxes. I’m not talking about some supply-side, magic money bullshit. I’m saying that he’s also proposed eliminating almost all deductions including state & local taxes, which itself could offset a reduction in rates (and incent blue states to cut local taxes). The big infrastructure plans he’s talked about – I thought I heard it was $1 trillion over ten years. $100 billion per year isn’t bad – and $100 billion spent by Trump would probably buy as much infrastructure as $500 bil spent by an Obama – especially if we don’t pay “prevailing wages”. I hope that by “strengthening defense” he means spending less, but smarter and not wasting money by getting bogged down in stupid wars.

Brian
Brian
January 26, 2017 10:20 am

You are paid for your time given to your employer correct? $/hr

Your time is your property correct? hrs

So the $$ you receive in compensation for your time (now extinguished/gone) are taxed away.

Does the government have a first right claim against your time? Time = $$

If yes then slavery is in fact still real. If no, then something else is going on.

The $$ are the target, not the time. The $$ paid out in bank credit. This falls under congresses plenary right to control the money supply. They can’t control the Federal reserves ability to issue FRN’s directly. So they control the quantity by taxing the issuance and use of them at the end user….you.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Brian
January 26, 2017 11:12 am

The 16th Amendment was a mistake, but unless or until it is repealed we’re stuck with this kind of taxation as long as Congress institutes it.

And Congress is and has always been more than willing to institute it.

Brian
Brian
  Anonymous
January 26, 2017 10:00 pm

Wrong wrong wrong! The 16th amendment has NOTHING to do with the taxation of your wages.

When the IRS extorts people on wages they cite Springer v. United States 102 U.S. 586 (1881) as their authority.

Eighteen Hundred and eighty one (1881). That is 32 years PRIOR to the enactment of the 16th amendment.

However buried deep in the references in Springer is the reference to Veazie Bank v. Fenno 75 U.S. 533 (1869). Which was decided 12 years prior to Springer.

The Veazie Bank case is THE KEY to understanding income taxes on wages.

The 16th amendment applies to income (incoming money) DERIVED from property. Derived = Separated
Derived income where the property (stocks, houses, land) that generated it remains whole is taxable under the 16th. Example are rents, dividends, et al.

Dixie
Dixie
January 26, 2017 11:44 am

Those I read posting here seem to be pretty well informed. What amazes me, though, is how few really know the facts.
First:
Residents of Puerto Rico (Guam, USVI) don’t have to file with the irs. They reside in territories, not States, yet they are still uS citizens.
The main office of the irs is in San Juan, PR. (Gee, I wonder why?)
The Federal Reserve Bank was founded in 1913.
It is not federal and there is no reserve. It is a privately owned bank.
The irs was founded in 1913.
If you ever write a check to the irs it comes back endorsed by (deposited in) the Federal Reserve Bank, NOT the uS Treasury.
Every penny collected by the irs goes to pay interest on the money that the FRB prints and loans to the uS government. This means the irs IS NOT a government agency. It is a debt collection agency.
Second:
Wealthy executives don’t “own” anything. They get a dollar a year or some small token amount. The company they govern owns the house(s) they live in. The company they oversee owns the cars they drive. They have an expense account for groceries, clothes, etc. All write offs for the big company. And no expense for the executive.
The drivers, house cleaners, painters, lawn service, etc. all get paid by the company.
Don’t take my word for it, look it up.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dixie
January 26, 2017 12:35 pm

I looked it up.

You’re wrong on almost everything.

Edwitness
Edwitness
  Dixie
January 26, 2017 12:50 pm

Thank you Dixie for the info:-)
Blessings:-}

Brian
Brian
  Dixie
January 26, 2017 10:02 pm

If you try this argument you WILL go to jail

Edwitness
Edwitness
  Brian
January 26, 2017 11:08 pm

I’m pretty sure that if you try any argument against paying taxes with the IRS you will go to jail.

KaD
KaD
January 26, 2017 11:48 am

The 4 Horsemen of the US Debt Apocalypse: 80 percent of federal government operation costs go to four areas in Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Veterans Affairs, and Department of Defense.

Edwitness
Edwitness
January 26, 2017 12:46 pm

My hope is that Trump and this Congress would overturn the unConstitutional taxes and rid us of the fed res bank the Wilson administration and that Congress unlawfully forced on Americans. Anything short of that is like a bandaid on a malignant tumor.
Blessings:-}

Middle-aged Mad Gnome
Middle-aged Mad Gnome
January 26, 2017 2:46 pm

Just had this conversation with my son a couple of days ago. Dems and Repubs both know the real money to be had (from tax revenue) is the working poor and the middle class. (Not the rich or super rich). Just do the numbers. Like any good businessman, Trump knows that if you help your customer prosper, your customer is happy to pay you. So Trump is intent on helping the real source of govt revenue (to truly increase govt revenue). The game in the past by both parties was to claim you were after the ultra rich, but there was always the unpublished increase of taxes on the working poor (i.e. fed gas taxes, alcohol taxes, ssi taxes, etc.). Politicians watched out for the super rich (incl. big corporations) and did NOT safeguard the working class. So Trump clearly intends to grow govt revenues by helping the huge no. of working stiffs prosper. He will no doubt also address the expenditure side of the balance sheet and intends to make the U.S. govt profitable, just like a legitimate business. I’m pretty sure lefties, ignorants and the political class will scream.

General
General
January 26, 2017 11:40 pm

Keep it simple:

1. Abolish the personal income tax

2. End the Federal Reserve