Whistle-blower From NOAA Blows Open Global Warming Conspiracy

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

Bates John J

NOAA_logoA whistle-blower, Dr John Bates, who was a top NOAA scientist, has has come forward with hard evidence that the paper rushed out by the NOAA to influence the Paris Global Warming Conference was intended to be misleading using faked evidence. The scientists hired by the UN reported that there was indeed a ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming that began when the energy output of the sun began to decline starting in 1998.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The UN scientists reported that in 2013. The NOAA, to try to keep the Global Warming going, suddenly claimed that the UN scientists were wrong and there was no pause but in fact world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. They have continued to make claims that 2016 was the hottest year. To the average person, 2016 was not extraordinarily hot.

Real science has exposed the fact that the NOAA does not have the historical data they pretend to have, on top of the fact that the two satellites they claimed collected data were mysteriously destroyed when it became a question. One must wonder why government is becoming the least trustworthy organization within society.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
goofyfoot
goofyfoot
February 6, 2017 6:46 am

Stay away from nail guns and tall building Dr Bates. I wouldn’t fly on any aircraft for awhile either.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
February 6, 2017 7:54 am

As George Carlin stated some years before his death : “I never believe any thing my government tells me “NOTHING !”
I see little reason to question his reasoning to make such a broad critical statement ! From climate change to terror to drug issues legal and illegal and military intervention or unemployment and the general state of the economy ! Our previous president lied so much even about things he did not need to but old habits are hard to break !
Let’s hope President Trump will give a State of The Union Address with some hard facts and the truth ! Everything sucks it’s FUBAR and here is what we must come together to start to fix it and basicly UNFUCK it !

JIMSKI
JIMSKI
February 6, 2017 10:55 am

Do you think Trump could have run a successful business if every time he submitted a budget it ALWAYS got revised negatively 3 months later?

I sure wanna see what happens to BLS in a few months. He is going to need a threshing machine to process all the pink slips…….

john coster
john coster
February 6, 2017 2:41 pm

Sorry folks, I just went to NOAA’s website, and by following links, any fool can easily find mountains of data from a wide variety of sources, many of them NON-GOVERNMENTAL. Since I enjoy offending my conservative friends, almost as much as I like to upset my libtard pals, allow me to make some comments and wait expectantly for the attack of the shit flinging monkeys.

The “data” in question, on NOAA’s site, is not like a collection of balances in someone’s different bank accounts or a file containing Donald Trump’s tax returns. It is not NOAA’s data to conceal. It is comprised of a vast array of different studies from numerous academic and governmental sources from all over the world. Much of this kind of data appears in subscription journals that are available at universities only, but you can get open source access to many through an organisation called PNAS. Here is an example from NOAA’s website: http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2017/01/04/1606798114.DCSupplemental
So if you’re more interested in the climatic regulation of the neurotoxin domoic acid than Tom Brady’s passing stats, here you go. Such citations are all over NOAA’s website. This article’s claim about NOAA’s concealing data is bullshit.

Of course, in the climate debate, there are two separate issues: whether or not the planet is warming, and whether or not the warming is anthropogenic, assuming it does exist. Between ice cores and temperature records, not to mention disappearing glaciers and ice sheets, we know beyond a reasonable doubt that the planet is warming and has been doing so increasingly since the industrial revolution got underway, bringing with it dramatic increases in human population. We know from ice cores and other sources that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has been increasing. An increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases traps heat the way a greenhouse does. We’ve been dumping tonnes of these gases into the atmosphere from fossil fuel burning and diminishing much of the forest cover that sequesters CO2. It doesn’t take a rocket science to conclude that the effects of human activity are being seen in the rising temperature. If you think the earth is so big that our puny civilisation can’t have much of an impact, go outside on a starry night and look up. There isn’t much of anything between you and outer space, just a shallow atmosphere that covers the planet like a thin blanket. Jesus, if you just climb the tallest mountains you start running low on oxygen. Fly over the USA. Think human activity is of little effect? Look down. This has nothing to do with politics. Mother nature doesn’t give a shit who you voted for. If you want to turn the world over to cockroaches, fine. They already control Washington, and despite the hopes of many well-intended Trump supporters, they are not likely to appear on the endangered species list anytime soon.

I find much of the conservative whining about environmental regulations infantile. “I want to have my cake and eat it too, over and over.” You let big business pollute a river to save money on waste disposal and what happens to the property rights of individuals living along that river? Is it ok for me to come over to your house and dump my garbage in your yard so I don’t have to pay the collection service? I dislike big bureaucratic government for a host of reasons, but if a foreign power attacked the US, I would expect the government to react to the danger and people of different political philosophies to join together. Global warming is a real danger. This head in the sand crap from all the “conservative” climate change deniers is frankly absurd. If they have so little trust in accumulated scientific knowledge, they should save their health care dollars for a supply of leeches and various potions to balance out the four humors, of which bile seems to be the most dominant.

Of course, my libtard friends have also found convenient places to stick their heads when it becomes too discomforting to observe the dangers we face. Many of the disasters looming on the horizon have been exacerbated by our dramatically increasing population. T Rumpus has a point about all this immigration. We have twice as many people in this country as we did just back in the sixties. D’ya think twice as many cars might increase the amount of CO2 released on the highways of America? I don’t like the idea of using the USA as a shelter for displaced populations. I like even less the idea of blowing up various countries so that millions of refugees are roaming the planet, all for the stockholders of Lockheed Martin. I wish my conservative friends, who rightly fear the intrusions of big government, would grow up and face the music rather than acting like a bunch of welfare queens. They may disdain handouts from the state but they seem to expect a free lunch from the ecosystem. The personal freedoms traditionally valued by Americans were nurtured by an abundant unspoiled environment. They will disappear without a healthy ecosystem. When droughts and floods raise the price of decent food beyond the reach of average folks, the police will be out in full force.

Hagar
Hagar
  john coster
February 6, 2017 3:21 pm

Climate change…of course. Global warming…nah. The sources, or 97% of ‘scientists’, are mostly funded by government sources. Thus, I’ll side with Carlin and not trust the data. Granted we humans are not good stewards of the earth’s resources. Lots of damage done by a variety of practices and chemicals. CO2 is not a problem, carbon tax is just a another means of control. Ole Sol, magnetic pole shift, galactic radiation, and maybe Planet X are having effect on global climate. It is just as likely, maybe more likely, that we are in for a mini ice age. We’ve put in a substantial store of warm weather gear and home insulation for just an occasion.
Just saying…

Suzanna
Suzanna
  john coster
February 6, 2017 3:26 pm

Mr Costa,
your overall tone and some of what you are saying
is just perfect. Excellent. However, I take issue with
Global Warming, as defined by ambient temps, that
can be enjoyed and that would promote food and plant
production.
I see smoldering fires of toxins rather than warming.
I understand aluminum production residue is being
sold to water system managers for “strong bones
and teeth.” I understand coal slurry pits are expensive
to maintain so the material is sprayed across the skies.
I understand most ships that manufacture on board dump
all waste into the seas. We have over 100 nuke plants
and they are mostly past due/replacement time. They
LEAK. I could go on. Okay, I will. Municians are created
with depleted nuke material. Bombs and bomb delivery
systems are being tested everyday to see how well “they
work.” This is to allow the bigger bomber the advantage
over the lesser to take his land and resources and murder
the resisters. Big agra sprays poison on our soil ruining the
food and the land. Everywhere companies are puncturing the
earth and pulling material out. Everything is getting toxic,
including the greedy glutenous people, and the power brokers
that are making the “profits.” Let’s not even mention Fukushima.
The ecosystem in the Pacific Ocean is shot. That and more!
Is this what you are talking about? HAARP? CERN? ESL/EFL?

I think you are really talking about pollution and Global Warming
was “created” for corporations to avoid responsibility and extract
austerity/moar $$$ from the people. Companies abroad dump
industrial waste into people’s water, and get to walk away. Basturds.
eg, “18 international oil companies operating in Nigeria,” look that up.
All those cars being manufactured, and given away “free” (no interest) &
(double the price for the car) probably aren’t helping either.

Philip Arlington
Philip Arlington
  john coster
February 6, 2017 6:54 pm

You miss out the third and most important issue: whether global warming is net harmful. I don’t have time for a long post, but it is pretty clear that overall it is beneficial for people who don’t live at sea level. Cold kills more people than heat and the world was far warmer and lusher when the dinosaurs were around.

The global food crisis is constantly just around the corner of the green fundamentalist’s lurid imaginations. In reality the world is getting greener and we keep having record harvests and on average people consume more calories than is good for them even in quite poor countries.

PS. I am a naturally frugal, turning-off-the-lights sort of person, I have been recycling since the 1970s, I don’t drive, and I am not American.

Alice Leyva
Alice Leyva
  Philip Arlington
February 7, 2017 1:05 pm

So – do you walk everywhere? I knew a guy who bragged that he never polluted by driving, but he would ask others to make a trip eight miles out to pick him up from the house that he was housesitting for free so he could shop for organic food and check his mail. Oh – and he smoked. But only organic tobacco. HaHaHaHaHaHa

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
February 6, 2017 5:52 pm

I have never doubted that industry and technology have caused environmental issues and I also believe reasearch and development in industry and technology is our only hope to restore and repair the damage done ! What I do not believe is a bunch of limosene liberals jet setting about telling the bulk of the population to live a subsistance existance while their little enclaves go undistribed is an example of a good fix for our global issues !

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
February 7, 2017 5:19 am

One good sized, well placed meteor and it’s a moot point.

And who gives a shit if two satellites were “mysteriously destroyed”? It’s not like we don’t have the data they collected.

Come on ELE Meteor!

Bob
Bob
February 7, 2017 4:20 pm

Of course humans cause pollution! Lots of it! And we owe it to posterity to clean up after ourselves. But collectively, everything we do to the planet doesn’t rise to the level of changing planetary cycles, and is dwarfed by natural effects of various kinds. Most of this debate is driven by people with desires for money and control over others, such as would be provided by a carbon tax.