Liberals Are Shocked To Find We’re Starting To Hate Them Right Back

Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter

I know it’s theoretically wrong for a Republican candidate to smack around an annoying liberal journalist, but that still doesn’t mean that I care. Our ability to care is a finite resource, and, in the vast scheme of things, millions of us have chosen to devote exactly none of it toward caring enough to engage in fussy self-flagellation because of what happened to Slappy La Brokenshades.

Sorry, not sorry.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

And that’s not a good thing, not by any measure, but it is a real thing. Liberals have chosen to coarsen our culture. Their validation and encouragement of raw hate, their flouting of laws (Hi leakers! Hi Hillary!) and their utter refusal to accept democratic outcomes they disapprove of have consequences. What is itself so surprising is how liberals and their media rentboyz are so surprised to find that we normals are beginning to feel about them the way they feel about us – and that we’re starting to act on it. If you hate us, guess what?

We’re going to start hating you right back.

Cue the boring moralizing and sanctimonious whimpering of the femmy, bow-tied, submissive branch of conservatism whose obsolete members were shocked to find themselves left behind by the masses to whom these geeks’ sinecures were not the most important objective of the movement. This is where they sniff, “We’re better than that,” and one has to ask ,“Who’s we?” Because, by nature, people are not better than that. They are not designed to sit back and take it while they are abused, condescended to, and told by a classless ruling class that there are now two sets of rules and – guess what? –the old rules are only going to be enforced against them.

We don’t like the new rules – I’d sure prefer a society where no one was getting attacked, having walked through the ruins of a country that took that path – but we normals didn’t choose the new rules. The left did. It gave us Ferguson, Middlebury College, Berkeley, and “Punch a Nazi” – which, conveniently for the left, translates as “punch normals.” And many of us have had personal experiences with this New Hate – jobs lost, hassles, and worse. Some scumbags at an anti-Trump rally attacked my friend and horribly injured his dog. His freaking dog.

So when we start to adopt their rules, they’re shocked? Have they ever met human beings before? It’s not a surprise. It’s inevitable.

Team Fredocon, when they aren’t, “Oh well, I never!-ing” about Trump and his uncouth supporters, moan about the threat of “Whataboutism,” the tendency for people to explain their sub-optimal behavior by asking, “What about so-and-so? He did the same thing and you didn’t care.” But while “whataboutism” may be a logical fallacy, it’s still a devastatingly compelling argument.

Humans – especially normal Americans – won’t tolerate a double standard. But double standards apply all the time to liberals – they do it and it’s fine, but we do it and it’s Armageddon. The same jerks screaming for O‘Reilly’s scalp worship Bill Clinton and his drunken, perv-enabling pseudo-wife.

Or take the Trump-Russia black hole of idiocy – please. Remember how Obama whispered to the Russkies, “I’ll have more flexibility after election” and that was cool? But – according to an anonymous source reading a bar tab over the phone to some credulous WaPo hack – one of Trump’s relatives ordered a vodka once and it’s TREASON TREASON TREASON!!!!!!

It certainly applies to, “What about when they hit conservatives with a lock in a sock and the liberal media didn’t care?” Yeah, what about that? Where was the sackcloth and ashes act from Schumer, Pelosi, and Felonia von Pantsuit when our side was being bloodied and beaten? There wasn’t one, because the left supports us getting bloodied and beaten. It likes the zesty zing of violence. It makes them feel big and tough and edgy, except that it starts being a heck of a lot less fun when we right-wingers start adopting the same rules and punching back.

The left is shocked that the right has now stopped caring about the old rules, since for so long the left relied on the right to subordinate its human instincts and conform to those rules even when the left ignored them. We refused to stoop to their level, and for a long time, we were “better than that.” But you can only have one side being “better than that” for so long before people get sick of being the butt of the hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is poison not because it makes people stop knowing right from wrong, but because it makes its victims stop caring about right and wrong. Ben Jacobs got smacked around, and millions of us just don’t give a damn.

We all know it was wrong for Greg Gianforte to beat up Ben Jacobs. But we also know the general attitude of the media is that when we conservatives get beat-up by leftists it’s perfectly excusable – even laudable – and thanks to the fact that Twitter is forever, we now know that Ben Jacobs himself specifically thinks it’s A-OK to slug conservative kids. So can someone tell me why anyone should be shocked that we conservatives refuse to devote one iota of caring to poor Ben’s wedgie?

This isn’t a good thing. This is nothing to be proud of. We should not be happy that our society is heading toward the lowest common denominator, which itself is in freefall. But the alternative is worse. Should we allow ourselves to continue to be figuratively and literally beaten up while smiling at our own purity, secure in the knowledge that even though our dignity and freedom are stripped from us, we have not fought back? Not happening. Letting these bastards play by their own rules, and thereby crush us, seems a pretty high price to pay just to gain the approval of the smug and sanctimonious David Frums and John Kasichs of the world.

We conservatives have been warning for a long time that liberals are not going to like it when everyone plays by the new rules, and – surprise! – they don’t. But guess what? Most of us don’t like the new rules either. Yet it’s ridiculous to expect human beings to remain in perpetual denial about the situation they face, and to forever live under a double standard that results in their faces getting pressed into the dirt.

The hypocrisy has become intolerable, and we have stopped tolerating it. This is just the beginning of the reaction, and – make no mistake – this entire situation is a bad thing. Our society is making choices that can lead only to ruin (and my new novel describing the consequences drops later this week).

Lincoln mentioned “the better angels of our nature” – also at a time when Democrats were rejecting the rule of law in order to promote their subjugation of those they considered lesser beings – and the important thing to note is that “angels” is plural. You need two angels, not one angel and one demon. But that’s what we have, and if it doesn’t change we’ll have two demons, and everyone should care about that.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Gayle
Gayle
May 29, 2017 2:07 pm

“Ben Jacobs got smacked around, and millions of us don’t give a damn.”

Yes we do. We silently gave a standing O to Gianforte. It was such a pleasure, and not even a guilty one.

rhs jr
rhs jr
May 29, 2017 2:43 pm

Let me be perfectly clear (speaking as a White Male): I have been crapped on by liberals since the 1964 Civil Riots Laws and the volcano’s cap is ready to blow; more Sensitivity “Training” won’t help; I’m ready for payback time.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
May 29, 2017 3:38 pm

IMHO, the thing to keep in mind is that our owners have us, left and right, exactly where they want us.

FORWARD——>to The Great Regression!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 29, 2017 3:49 pm

“I know it’s theoretically wrong for a Republican candidate to smack around an annoying liberal journalist ………….”

Why?

Why is that wrong?

The Left has set the standard as violence with its press supported violence against conservatives and Trump supporters, shouldn’t turnabout be considered fair play?

Wip
Wip
  Anonymous
May 29, 2017 4:00 pm

Yes.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
May 29, 2017 5:08 pm

Having mentioned that a neighbor of mine should sell the Hillary for President sign on her lawn on LET GO .
The bitch claimed I was a threat . My dog won’t even piss on their lawn , but I would really love to piss on that sign but I won’t !

Miles Long
Miles Long
  Boat Guy
May 29, 2017 5:45 pm

Be careful Boat Guy it might be electrified.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
  Miles Long
May 29, 2017 9:56 pm

No way that would require mechanical / electrical know how . No liberal could handle that ! Remember these are the people that put a warning label on peanuts ” May Contain Nuts”

Realist
Realist
May 29, 2017 6:39 pm

And then you have Portland. A crazy lunatic yells hateful things to a couple of girls on the train and proceeds to stab those trying to help. Now all Trump supporters are being painted as evil and potential murderers because this one lunatic attended an alt right march. The mayor is even pleading with the federal government to deny the permit for an alt right rally scheduled for June 4. It would be so dangerous! Yet in this same city, anarchists start fires, destroy businesses, attack bystanders and cause all kinds of mayhem yet have the red carpet rolled out for them every time they feel the need to protest. So you’re damn right we are mad….one side’s freedom of speech is rapidly becoming dead and buried and the hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.

Brian
Brian
  Realist
May 30, 2017 6:08 am

The I-5 corridor main cities are mostly populated by these assholes. Problem is they are surrounded by more traditional thinkers and red necks.

Get 30 miles or so away from I-5 and the attitude changes immensely.

BTW that fuckstick who stabbed those people on the MAX was a Bernie supporter.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
  Brian
May 30, 2017 4:10 pm

Brian, thanks for stating ” The I-5 corridor cities are MOSTLY populated by these assholes….”.

Annie
Annie
  Realist
May 30, 2017 4:58 pm

Realist, they aren’t reporting the whole story about Portland. Yes, the guy was a lunatic. Yes, he was yelling hateful things at a couple of people who apparently self identify as female one of whom was wearing a scarf that appeared to be a hijab who might self identify as muslim. But: He was also yelling a bunch of other things including hateful things about Christians, government, and life in general. In the previous election he supported a Sanders/Stein ticket and he claimed that he did NOT vote for Trump.

The other thing “they” keep saying is that the three men who were stabbed were trying to calm down or reason with the lunatic. But, one of the two women was interviewed and she clearly stated that there was an altercation between the men with lots of yelling before the lunatic pulled out the knife. So who exactly started the violence? If the three men physically accosted the lunatic or even verbally threatened him then he was defending himself against three attackers rather than attacking three innocent people, wasn’t he? Doesn’t make him any less of a lunatic, but there’s a big difference between a harmless lunatic and a murderous lunatic and we’re not being given sufficient correct information to make that determination.

Desertrat
Desertrat
May 29, 2017 7:11 pm

Realist, the stabber is a Sanders supporter. He babbled a lot on Fakebook.

Realist
Realist
  Desertrat
May 29, 2017 9:31 pm

Even more reason Trump supporters should be furious. As usual, being blamed for everything.

Ed
Ed
May 29, 2017 7:55 pm

Kurt is one of those brain dead assholes who equates the democrats of the 1860s with the democrats of today. There’s no resemblance at all. In the 1860s, the republicans were the same as the modern day democrats, delusional socialists whose main currency was violence.

Fuck Kurt Schlichter.

Llpoh
Llpoh
May 30, 2017 1:03 am

He lost me at the first sentence. Theoretically wrong to slap a reporter around, who he had already told, by my memory, to leave him alone?

If someone is bothering me, I tell them to leave me alone, generally focefully but nicely, more or less. If they continue, I tell them, calmly with generally no screaming or raised voice, if they do not shut up and leave me alone they are going to get their asses kicked forthwith. Something in my manner conveys to them that I am serious (and make no mistake, I am indeed serious) and so it has been a very long time since anyone has kept screwing with me. My wife has seen this happen a few times, and now is used to it. She still does not understand how I get these assholes to instantly shut up and walk away.

If someone screws with you, and keeps it up, why is it wrong to kick their asses? It seems to me to be natural justice. Why should reporters be immune?

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
May 30, 2017 6:40 am

Dittos Gayle. Except I wish Gianforte had put that puke in the hospital.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
May 30, 2017 8:48 am

I’ll save my hate for something worthwhile.

The people he’s talking about are only worth indifference.

Robert Blake
Robert Blake
May 30, 2017 9:05 am

Gianforte won, btw.

Relevant (Rolling Stone says Gianforte incident proves Democrats need a new message, that they’re not resonating):
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taibbi-the-democrats-need-a-new-message-w484569

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
May 30, 2017 12:37 pm

Greetings,

The only mistake this politician made was that he apologized. I hate that. If you are going to bodyslam a reporter then stand behind it.

John Angelo
John Angelo
May 31, 2017 11:21 am

It’s time for Kameranacht: Night of Broken Cameras.

Capndiesalot
Capndiesalot
May 31, 2017 12:15 pm

I’ve been saying for years, the collectivists better hope that their “vision” for the world never be realized, because people like me will hunt people like them. I’ve developed a new Non-tolerance for the other side, their ideas are bankrupt, their minds ONLY operate illogically. It’s madness to attempt to argue with total idiots. Liberal Jews I know, and am friends with, have FAILED to learn the lessons of history, as have all those who profess socialism as an economic “alternative” to Free Market Capitalism. I get highly paid for my advice, and unless that “liberal” idiot is a client, I am no longer going to subject myself to their blather.

artbyjoe
artbyjoe
June 6, 2017 11:40 am

the author got something backwards at his conclusion.

“– also at a time when Democrats were rejecting the rule of law in order to promote their subjugation of those they considered lesser beings”

in reality, the rule of law was that slavery was legal thru-out the United States. there fore they were not rejecting the rule of law, but demanding that the laws that existed be enforced, including the law that states were and are sovereign, that association was voluntary.

i am not saying that i believe in Slavery. far from it. but it was the law of the land. why did the party of Lincoln wait to free the slaves in the north until after the war was over? if the north thought the war was over slavery, why didn’t they free the slaves in the north at the beginning of the war?