Submitted by @ZeroPointNow, originally published at iBankCoin.com
Loretta Lynch has been busted using an alias to communicate with DOJ officials, per a tweet by Kim Dotcom last night. The revelation comes after internet sleuths sifted through a new release of emails obtained via FOIA request by the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) last week (link here to PDF) and found an email from “Elizabeth Carlisle” to colleagues, thanking “to all who worked on this.”
BREAKING: Did Loretta Lynch use an alias to communicate with DOJ officials and why? Who is Elizabeth Carlisle? Dear Internet, investigate! pic.twitter.com/oqngTKDhLY
— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 5, 2017
And as Jim Hoft reported last night, users in Reddit’s “The_Donald” forum discovered that “Lizzie Carlisle” was Lynch’s grandmother’s name – Lizzie Carlisle Harris!
The hunt begins for all communications with Loretta “Elizabeth Carlisle” Lynch…
Sneaky
This isn’t the first case of a high level Democrat using an alias. Contained within leaked emails released by Wikileaks during the 2016 election is an email from then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to “Dianne Reynolds” – later identified as daughter Chelsea Clinton, from the night of the Benghazi attack. Of note, Hillary tells Chelsea that the attack was conducted by an ‘Al Queda-Like’ group, and not an ‘angry mob’ protesting over an anti-Islam YouTube video, as the Obama administration told the American Public.
Not only was this top-secret information that Chelsea wasn’t cleared to know, it suggests that high level Democrats and/or their families employed aliases in order to covertly communicate.
What was Chelsea’s security clearance when Hillary told her Chris Stevens was killed by an “Al Queda-like” group? Surely this was top secret pic.twitter.com/7u81hMgQpt
— ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) July 10, 2017
Which begs a few questions
Why are top Democrats using aliases to communicate with each other? How many other former government officials or their family members have done so? And what does this mean for any current investigations into the previous administration?
Tarmac Meeting
Another bombshell revealed in ACLJ’s release concerns several of the emails obtained address the secretive “tarmac” meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, which happened right around the time the Obama administration began issuing FOIA requests to unmask the Trump team.
Per ACLJ:
One with the subject line “FLAG”was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.
Another email to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”
On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.
Lynch had previously said that the tarmac meeting was ‘unscheduled’ described as ann ‘ambush’ by former President Bill Clinton, and that she ‘wouldn’t do it again.’ The ACLJ’s document dump suggests otherwise, as the FBI and DOJ scrambled to do damage control.
Between the tarmac meeting and new evidence that Lynch’s meeting with Clinton was scheduled and coordinated, it appears a cadre of former high ranking Democrats have some explaining to do, again.
h/t Cuchulian
Unless CNN covers this, and late night comedians makes jokes that watchers take as facts, this is not news.
You mean the Obama adminastration and his Secretary of State and his attorney generals collude lie twist and otherwise mis inform the American people regarding everything that our nation has committed to under their collective responsibility and accountability .
And my friends wonder why I always say what ever news or information you hear released by our government the safe bet is it is false . And it is actually the exact polar opposite of what the information released describes .
I see very little change with one exception , TRUMP TWEETS . Let’s hope they are truthful ??? Question everything , accept nothing at face value and refuse and resist .
I remember when Ted Kennedy was staggering about the halls of congress looking for a ride home , I would say if Ted thinks it’s bad for the country we should totally commit to it and see that every American has a copy . If Ted thinks it should be banned stock up we should all have 10 or more ….
I see no change in policies just the noise about it !
To bad people like the Clinton’s and Obamas and Comey , Lynch , Holder , Sessions and on and on left right no matter will be paraded as some sort of honorable charecter when their death arrives . I hope I can remain in a a drunken stopper till the news fades away
For a year it has been, Russia this and Putin that. The Talking Heads in Mainstream lecturing the deplorables about fake news and collusion. Promising that if folks just wait till tomorrow they will have the keystone piece of evidence proving once and for all that Trump is in Kremlin’s pocket. Then tomorrow never comes. Yet Wolf, Cooper, Burnett and Maddow continue the daily Buzzfeed. Whatta fucken’ joke!
Will this revelation get any play on Sunday Talk Show Circle-Jerk
Why isn’t Elizabeth being dragged in front of Grand Jury or Congressional Committee to answer a simple Yes or No question about whether she used an alias while working as AG. This should get play and be talked about today.
But this Sunday will be like all the rest.
[img
[/img]
All buns and very little meat.
C’mon Assange. Drop the big one instead of waiting for us to find it naturally. It’s taking too long.
The fact that there has been no special prosecutor looking into the DNC, the Clintons and the Obama administration is all the proof you need that “America” as the founders envisioned cannot and will not be restored without bloodshed.
You would like to think that the elites would sacrifice a Clinton or two or a cabinet head in order to keep the illusion going, but their arrogance will be their downfall.
We can’t be bothered with investigating this, the Trump collusion with Russia is taking all the resources we have available to investigate it.
And someday we may even find something we can pretend supports it if we just ignore all the things that point out it doesn’t.
Is it illegal to use an alias or several aliases? Even if it is, NOTHING will be done to Lowrenta .
I don’t know why democrats even bother with things like aliases or denying criminality. Unless you’re from a reliably democrat district (meaning you’re easily replaceable) and are caught with $90,000 cash in your freezer, you’ll never be prosecuted.