WIP / Stucky QOTD: The Mark Of The Beast

WIP asked me to do a QOTD regarding the identification of the Mark of the Beast. Consider it asked.

I could give my answer immediately.  But, I won’t. Because, as in math, HOW I got there is just as important as the answer.

Please give your answer first, before reading my stuff below. I don’t want to influence your answer.  Then read the post. I’d be curious as to whether or not your answer changed. You could say, “I thought it was “A”, but now I think it’s “B”.  Or, “I thought it was “A”, and I’m sticking with it because you are full of shit.” (The most likely response from my arch nemesis Ditchner, AWB, and ilk. Ignore these people.)  I’ll wait ….

 

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7g7vq7oz8bE/TAKxqHtRusI/AAAAAAAADIY/w3G6KJfshPY/s1600/mark-of-the-beast1.gif


 “The second beast was empowered to give life to the image of the first beast so that it could speak, and could cause all those who did not worship the image of the beast to be killed. He also caused everyone (small and great, rich and poor, free and slave) to obtain a mark on their right hand or on their forehead. Thus no one was allowed to buy or sell things unless he bore the mark of the beast—that is, his name or his number. This calls for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the beast’s number, for it is man’s number, and his number is 666.”

——- Revelation 13:15-18 (New English Translation)

 

OK then, I’ll look at three key questions and the three corresponding principles, which lead to my conclusion identifying the Beast and his mark.

Key Question #1:  To whom directly was Rev 13 written?

The answer is in Rev 1:4; — “To the seven churches in the province of Asia.”. It wasn’t written to Americans living in the year 2017. It was written to a specific group of seven Christian churches around 90AD in what is now modern day Turkey.

This means that the messages given directly to them do not necessarily apply directly to us today. It just can’t!   For example, the church in Thyatira is condemned because they —  “ … tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and by her teaching deceives my servants to commit sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols”. — That’s a very specific named person of that very specific time period, which has zero counterpart to the American church today.

Don’t misunderstand me. Just because a book wasn’t written directly to us, does not mean there is no benefit to reading it. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have to bother reading any of the books in the Bible, for NONE of them were written directly to us.  We read Scripture because the principles that appear therein most certainly do apply to us. Principles matter.

So then, although there is in America no prophetess named Jezebel teaching sexual immorality (well, maybe Hillary), the principle of remaining sexually pure certainly applies.  Of course, to the church in Thyatira much more than just principle was at sake … they were under God’s direct command.

Now, the concept of principles works out great in many situations. Unfortunately, prophecy isn’t one of them, especially apocalyptic prophecy.  What principle can possibly be applied to the pale green horse, ridden by Death, who annihilates 25% of the world’s population? This is none.  Yet … it must MEAN something!

Yes, it did mean something …. to the people to whom Revelation was written directly. THEY understood the full meaning of Revelation because it applied to them directly. John was specifically writing to a real people (not us), living in a real time and place (not ours), with a really urgent message (not just principles) that the whole church MUST have understood in its entirety.

Otherwise, why write the letter at all, if it was all encoded with nearly unsolvable riddles and mysteries, correctly understood by only a few … and even then, only thousands of years later? To what benefit would that have been to the seven churches? None.

Now, some people believe that many prophecies, especially apocalyptic, have a dual nature; 1) an immediate fulfillment (to the people living at the time the prophecy is made) and, 2) a future fulfillment, whose time is only known by God.

—For example, when Isaiah prophesizes to King Ahab that as a sign of God’s judgement a virgin will give birth,  it was fulfilled in the short term when in actuality  “the prophetess conceived”, and also in the future, 800 years later, when Mary conceived.

Another example from prophecy; Daniel’s fourth beast “with large iron teeth and ten horns”, … about a thousand years later becomes Babylon in Revelation which is thought to be the Roman Empire, … which two thousand years later becomes the NWO, NATO, or whatever else seems fanciful.

Then, when the future fulfillment arrives (such as Mary’s conception) Christians will shout Halleluiahs and proclaim that fulfilled prophecy is proof of the inerrancy of Scripture.

There’s just one huge problem with that. The entire belief structure built around short/long term fulfillment (and its unusual bedfellows; secondary fulfillment, partial fulfillment, spanned fulfillment) is ALL a theological product of the last 150 years!  You would think that just once, somewhere, that when a prophecy was given that had two fulfillment dates, that God would have told us that. Fact of the matter is that nowhere in the seventh chapter of Isaiah does the text indicate a second fulfillment, or even the slightest hint of one.  All of these bizarre and esoteric ways or “rules” of interpreting prophecy were developed by men-with-an-agenda to solve theological problems, to shore up a particular related doctrine, or even to titillate the sheep … or scare the shit out of them.

You can get a massive migraine trying to understand it all, if even possible, and that’s a shame, because I can’t imagine that such complexity and confusion is what the original Bible authors had in mind. There has to be a better way.  There IS a better way!  It is Bedrock Principle #1 below.

Bedrock Principle #1:  Determine the meaning of a Scripture as AS THE PEOPLE LIVING AT THAT TIME WOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD IT.

———————————— –

Key Question #2: In what style is Revelation written, and why?

Revelation is Apocalyptic. The genre was popular in Jewish literature from the Diaspora (8th century BC) to when Revelation was written (90AD). “Apocalypse” in Greek means “revelation” — certain things are unveiled. It is not necessarily about the end of the world, — more often than not it is the unveiling about an end of an era, and a new one is about to begin.

The most important aspect of Apocalypse (for purposes of this article) is its heavy use of coded symbolic language. Why use code? Because the author was writing to Christians, who were under persecution by Rome.  Revelation was written after the Romans utterly destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD. John was a Jewish-Christian who still loved his fellow Jews, and his hatred for the Romans (Babylon) should be openly visible to most readers. He wanted their total and utter destruction. John was trying to encourage the followers of Jesus at a time when their entire world seemed doomed. But, how could he do it?

To speak and write openly about such things would have ensured his death, and many others. So, John wrote in code. Not a secret goofy nearly impossible to decipher Bible Code. He wrote in a code that Christians of the day would have immediately understood. They would not have had to ponder and wonder and try to figure out the meaning of ‘666’. They knew!

Again, as mentioned above, if they wouldn’t have known, why would John have written it to them in the first place? Just for fun? Or for people two thousand years later? The beauty of the code is that THEY knew …. but, the Romans did not! They operated from a totally different framework. and a different level of spiritual understanding.

In other words, the code enabled John to hide in plain sight.

Bedrock Principle #2:  The mark is only a symbol of something. It is not an actual thing.

———————————— –

Key Question #3:  How does one determine True Worship?

Jesus answers the question in response to the Samaritan woman at the well; —-  Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.

It’s not about singing songs, or going to church on Sundays and prayer meetings on Wednesdays, or any myriad of other outward signs. In fact Jesus had a lot of contempt for those who specialized in outward external signs of worship. He tells us to ”beware of the experts  in the law” who like to “walk around in long robes”  and how they love “elaborate greetings in the marketplaces and the best seats in the synagogues” and he closes his long diatribe of such worshippers in Matthew 23 by calling them “snakes and the children of snakes” who won’t escape going to hell.

Jesus seeks worshippers in Spirit and in truth. It’s an internal thing. Whatever “in Spirit and truth” means, how can it possibly refer to tattoo or mark of some sort?  That is purely an external thing—a matter of skin, not of heart.  It is the very thing God loathes, and it makes no sense that such a thing now suddenly becomes an indicator of true worship.

Does the arm tattoo of your wife’s name framed in a heart mean you love her?  No, it’s just a mark. Does saying “I love you, honey!” mean you love her?  No, it’s just words. On the other hand, I truly cannot recall either of my parents ever telling each other “I love you.”.  But, when I arrived at the hospital bed after mom fell down the stairs, and I saw my dad’s head in his hands, and crying … I knew he did.  When dad plowed through a fence, a yard, and some trees and he was unconscious in the hospital bed, and mom was holding his hand, and doing her best to suppress a gusher of tears … I knew. Their love is deep deep in their heart, just as true worship is.

Besides all that, the idea of tattooing everyone makes no sense. John states that pretty much the whole world will follow the Antichrist/Beast combo-pack, and just a remnant of true believers remain. Why in the world tattoo 7 Billion … when all you really would need to do is tattoo a few thousand? (Doesn’t the picture at the beginning of this article look just ridiculous.)

Bedrock Principle #3:  You can’t determine a True Worshipper from a mark

————————————- –

————————————- –

OK, with the bedrock principles established, let’s see if we can whittle it all down to some actual identification.

1)- The refusal to worship the beast will bring serious economic consequences for — “No one could buy or sell unless he had the mark”.  No one the world over is exempt from this harsh economic repression; small, great, rich, poor, free, or slave. Governments and religious authorities love to shut out undesirables, those whom it cannot control, via economic control.

This brings me to another Bedrock Principle. Whatever John is talking about, that thing must have been achievable at the time it was written. So, when John talks about a ‘mark’, whereby everyone must have it in order to eat and survive … then that prophecy MUST have been achievable in AD90. Once again I must pose the question; why would John write to those seven churches about a certain thing – if that thing wasn’t even possible when he wrote it?  The whole world must must have been able to be controlled economically in AD90, not 2017.

What I’m saying here is that we’re on to something here involving economic repression and control …. but, that control could NOT involve modern technology such as computer chips. Unless, Apple had an outlet back then in Jerusalem.

2) Revelation gives some hints of the beast’s mark.

— First, it’s “the name of the beast or the number of his name

— The number “is a man’s number,” and it is 666

Many are convinced the number translates into an actual name. This is because of the fact that in those times letters also represented numbers. Folks who do this letter-to-number conversion often come up with Nero as the Beast. Of course, hundreds of names over the centuries have been thusly identified one way or another — if I recall correctly, even Henry Kissinger was a candidate. Whoever it was, I will once again emphasize that John’s readers knew precisely who, or what, it was.

3) A most curious comment!! And THE key question.

John says “This calls for wisdom”. Now, if my premise is correct – that the people via coded messages knew exactly who the beast was — then the obvious question becomes; WISDOM TO UNDERSTAND WHAT??

Eugene Boring, a distinguished professor and recognized author of many theological books has this to say;

When Revelation was read forth in the worship of the Asian churches, the call for wisdom to calculate the number of the beast was not a challenge to identify who the beast, the persecuting authority was – they knew that well enough already – but to recognize WHAT it was, that it was in fact the beast empowered by Satan, not the cultural savior it claimed to be”

Another distinguished commentary writer, Robert W. Wall, says that the number did not identify a particular individual at all. Rather, the number itself has a meaning;

The cryptographic 666 falls short of the number 777, which symbolizes divine perfection. The beast or Antichrist does not measure up to the perfection of Christ, though he claims to do so.

4) Warmer. Warmer. Warmer. HOT!

—– John says 666 “is man’s number” Man, is fallen and sinful.

—– seven is the number of completeness, and always refers to God and his work

If the meaning of “666” is in the number itself, then we have our answer!

The beast is nothing more than human government under demonic control. The “beast” has always been with us, it always will be, and one day the Beast will destroy all humanity … unless God intervenes.

Now, this is not necessarily my personal belief. But, my personal beliefs are totally irrelevant. I do believe that considering the above bedrock principles, and other guidelines and commentary, that the above conclusion that human government could be the ultimate source of our demise … well, it just makes the most sense biblically, and without jumping through a series of complex theological interpretive rules. Not to mention it avoids any number of fantastical scenarios.

In closing, I want you to consider that America could become the Beast — that particular human government under which nearly all humanity is under economic control. If that’s the case, then our demise is probably a longer way off than most people think. We’ll continue to amass more and more power until almost the whole world is under our control. This jives well with Revelation as many already believe that such is the goal of the Deep State. Who truly knows … but isn’t it at least possible that this is what is behind MAGA? Too bad for other counties but, we all ought to be in good shape. That’s the good news. The bad news is that God eventually gets tired of our shit. Then he utterly destroys America.

.

.

 

https://jewsforjudaism.org/

Author: Stucky

I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
355 Comments
Bugged
Bugged
September 17, 2017 5:08 am

I like your logic Stucky!
Have you read the Sibylline Oracles Written in 510 BC? Why did the Church of Universal Romanism order the burning of all her works they could find? Could it be because one of the oracles reads almost word for word with the “Revelation”?
On another note – Why is it that everyone (christians) believe their (actually their particular church’s) interpretations of Peter, Paul, John etc. etc. ad infinitum but none that I have met or know (including myself in my past life as a christian) live and do Jesus’ words?
Oh! And the Mark is what Germany will re-invent on the demise of the Euro . Maybe it will be the only currency recognised in place of the US $ as the world reserve and thus all buying and selling will be done via the Mark. Or is the mighty $ already the mark of the beast. LOL

Edwitness
Edwitness
  Bugged
September 17, 2017 3:42 pm

//On another note – Why is it that everyone (christians) believe their (actually their particular church’s) interpretations of Peter, Paul, John etc. etc. ad infinitum but none that I have met or know (including myself in my past life as a christian) live and do Jesus’ words?//
Jesus was a Jew born under the law, that’s why. Gal.4:4. His instructions were to those who were under the law. Mt.15:24. As a Jew He had to obey the law. We are under grace. Rom.6:15. Which means we live by the grace of God and not the law of God. Rom.8:1,2. In the New Testament by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. Gal.2:16
Blessings:-}

RiNS
RiNS
September 17, 2017 9:29 am

You’re no different from any other who reject the truth of God’s word…..

Read thru the whole thread. That comment above stood out.
AWB wrote that, I think.

It shines in its self serving arrogance of all things mystical. Gotta say it sure must be a mighty heavy burden travelling thru life knowing with the 100% certainty all the answers to life’s great questions.

Reject the truth based on what?

I learned something today. That something being that I am a Preterist. It makes the most sense to me that those men were writing themselves rather speaking to little old me or the great self-appointed prophets of our age.

The New Testament was a first century Libertarian attempt to overturn the petty and spiteful Jewish God that roamed the pages of the old Testament. It worked for a while being the Occupy Wall Street/Teaparty of its day. Shame it didn’t last.

In an ideal world, spirituality would be a personal relationship between a soul and the light. But ideals are no match for reality. Especially when authority views instinctively that this Libertarian view is a threat to their continued control.

What doesn’t buy cars or build cathedrals has to be destroyed.

It is no wonder Gnostism faded away.

As for the MOTB, could it finally be in use. Maybe. Cell phones are ubiquitous and essential in tracking every minutiae of the citizens walking this earth.

Might be why I refuse to have a cell phone.

Yours in Odin,
RiNS

Edwitness
Edwitness
  RiNS
September 17, 2017 3:52 pm

It may make sense with partial information. But, when you read further the preterist view falls apart.
Like this statement Paul makes concerning what God is to do with Israel after the culmination of an event. The fulness of the Gentiles.
“For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.” This is kryptonite to the preterist view because it shows that God will finish His work with Israel described in Daniel9:24-27 after a time in the future. And that time is yet future because Gentiles are still being saved. They have not come to their fulness yet.
This is just one example of why the preterist view is wrong.
Blessings:-}

BL
BL
September 17, 2017 10:49 am

Bueller……..Bueller……….Bueller……………Stucky

Waiting for your historical proof of a time when all humans around the world were forced to take a mark or were unable to buy or sell if they did not. (The Preterest Position)

If this all happened in the past there should be something, was it 1500 years ago, 1000 years ago, when?

Llpoh says, ” The digitization of money”, so he is a Futurist.

TampaRed
TampaRed
September 17, 2017 11:04 am

Iris DeMent,Let The Mystery Be

RiNS
RiNS
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 11:12 am

What a great song Red! Put a smile on my face and a chuckle in my soul….

Maggie
Maggie
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 11:14 am

Video is unavailable…

RiNS
RiNS
  Maggie
September 17, 2017 11:20 am

try this Maggie..

that song could have been written for me….
but I’d rather let the mystery be

TampaRed
TampaRed
  RiNS
September 17, 2017 12:13 pm

why is it that sometimes i post a song and it’s fine but other times it grays out and says unavailable?
btw maggie,iris is from your neck of the woods,n east arkansas–

Maggie
Maggie
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 1:02 pm

Near Blytheville? I’m an hour from Poplar Bluff. By the back roads.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Maggie
September 17, 2017 2:58 pm

This is all I know Maggie–

[img]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZpdiY01WBY[/img]

BL
BL
September 17, 2017 12:53 pm

Does anyone here know Trump’s real name? And how does that relate to this thread?

TampaRed
TampaRed
  BL
September 17, 2017 1:06 pm

drumpf–catholic or lutherean?
how does it relate bl?

BL
BL
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 1:08 pm

Full name TRed.

Maggie
Maggie
  BL
September 17, 2017 1:12 pm

It appears to be Donald J. Trump. What are you suggesting? Trumpet nonsense from the wannabe prophets?

BL
BL
  Maggie
September 17, 2017 1:15 pm

Maggie, surely you know that Donald John Trump is not his real name.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  BL
September 17, 2017 3:10 pm

tell us bl,what is the significance?we’re holding our breath here waiting 4 your revelation,no disrespect intended john–
was a blocklayer?an unilluminated?still loyal to the kaiser after 3 generations?a joo?
please,we’re on our knees begging 4 you to enlighten us–

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/us/politics/donald-drumpf-a-funny-label-but-is-it-fair.html?mcubz=1

BL
BL
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 4:02 pm

Sorry TRed, I ran out of power and had to take a time out.

When you run for president, you must fill out many forms of disclosure. One of these forms are about listing any alias names that you have used. (Like it matters) I doubt Trump bothered just as he did not bother with his tax information but point is that Donald John Trump would not be the name he would have applied under. His real German given name doesn’t have the appeal of his alias.

His real middle name is said to be Johann ( shortened to John) and last name Drumph. Many people know about the Drumph sir name, many do not. So if his real name is Donald Johann Drumph, can you figure how that relates to this thread?

TampaRed
TampaRed
  BL
September 17, 2017 4:08 pm

he was born with the name donald john trump–
even if he was still drumpf,there are so many possibilities of what you are hinting at that i will not even take a guess-

BL
BL
  TampaRed
September 17, 2017 4:19 pm

TRed-Just as the British Royals changed their name after WWI to hide their GERMAN name of Saxe- Coburg Gotha, it does not change the fact that that is their REAL name.

dilligaf
dilligaf
September 17, 2017 1:54 pm

I have handed Stucky his ass on more then one occasion but when it comes to Biblical, I am even wise enough to bow out. Seriously though, check out michael heiser.

dilligaf
dilligaf
September 17, 2017 2:04 pm

Revelation 9:6

“And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it.

The mark will alter dna.

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 3:06 pm

BL… Stucky is unable to grant the capacity of skill toward the writers of content that has survived thousands of years… the same capacity that your mundane anonymous forum poster who knows they are writing for both their current and future audience has without any training or divine insight.

I never write for Stucky. I always write TO Stucky FOR Stucky’s decedents.

This is apparently, as far as Stucky is concerned, a skill far beyond John’s comprehension.

GG, Stucky.

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 4:49 pm

— “Yea. Right. That thought never occurred to me. Me dumb. You smart.”

Correct.

— “even though none of them were written DIRECTLY to us (do you understand what the word “directly” means, you ignorant twat?).”

Yes. Let me be direct.

When I write directly to you today, I am also communicating directly to the generations in the future in a direct way so that they will know how to recognize and address someone such as yourself.

Furthermore, I’m communicating directly to them, but not you, the importance of comprehending the circumstance they will be faced with. You will not comprehend this because the message is not directed straight at you, but straight at a future reader who specifically knows who and when they are.

Ya dig?

Not asking you, Stucky.

BL
BL
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 3:45 pm

Then according to you Stucky, there is no real meaning to the BOR as it is all purely symbolic and the mark of the beast is just theater. So why ask, but then Gayle already pegged you on that point. It was good for a shitfest.

I have a request for you as a QOTD that would follow this thread nicely, would you do it? Do I get a crack at this like WIP?

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 3:32 pm

—1) Blame it on WIP. He asked me to make it a QOTD.

Don’t be Pilate. You are responsible for you regardless of external triggers.

—4) I knew AWB would bust a vein. I like that I’m in his head. It needed refueling.

Hey Stucky, I’m refueling your head. Mmmm yeah…

——–4A) Everyone knows all the good attributes about God; God is love. Kind. Merciful. Etc. But, is that all there is?

Of course not. God also doesn’t like anal sex, it’s gross. This includes straight people licking each other’s butt holes. WTF. God’s wrath will actually be a relief for many who have been behaving in ways they really would rather not but aren’t comfortable defying the horde.

——– You are a very smart lady with computer skills. I’m sure you can find some good introductory Preterist books and/or articles on the web.

Can probably also find anal sex guides on the web. What’s your point? Can you make the argument yourself to her or not? If not, can you accept someone saying no to your point of view without getting ass blasted about it?

Wip
Wip
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 4:12 pm

Stuck,

Thank you taking on the huge task of posting my QOTD. I do appreciate it. Unfortunately I do not have the biblical knowledge to pick up the sword and fight the good fight with you. Not that you need me but, I do appreciate your efforts.

I still think the MOTB is the cellphone.

WIP
WIP
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 4:42 pm

I have to admit, it’s kinda cool to see my username in lights. My parents would be so proud.

See mom and dad, I’m somebody!!

My sister is a fire-breathing 7th Day Adventist. I went to visit her last night and did all I could to get her to join the fun here. I haven’t seen her on here yet. Oh well, she’s a real hoot when it comes to religion. Especially the end times. 7th Day Adventists are enamored with The End Times. I think I’m traumatized by growing up believing God was coming TOMORROW!!! Always TOMORROW!!!

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 4:40 pm

— “How many times over the years have I addressed you directly?”

Several times, at least once in a thread description itself. I didn’t consider any of them important.

— “How many times have I asked you anything?”

Besides the 3 or 4 times in the post you just made? Possibly about a half dozen maybe. Give or take.

— “How many times have I ever said “nice post, razzle”?”

More than you realize.

Oh… you require it to be under the razzle name? Possibly never since razzle is openly hot for your butt.

— “There’s a reason for that. Can you guess what it is?”

You’re an easily triggered little girl? Let me know if I’m getting warm.

— “So, why are you following me around on my own authored thread?”

Because you kind of like it and get off on it. /tug tug

— “Because you think I give a flying fuck about what you say? Think again.”

No, I actually expected you to not reply at all. This degree of response confirms I came in your head more than I intended to. Let me pull out… sec… just… oh.. oh… well… I’m sure we can clean that up with a nappy.

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 6:25 pm

Generally I only seek to make you and others around here laugh. Occasionally at your specific expense.

Usually I’m the real punchline if you give it time to reach its future audience.

It’s easy to survive a barrage of cognitive howizitzozertainitzers when you already consider yourself dead until a later date.

razzle
razzle
  razzle
September 18, 2017 10:09 am

At no time does it hurt my feelings when you, or El Cilantro etc., fling poo my way. Especially if you’re repackaging the poo I flung first!

Would kind of defeat the point of what makes this place awesome to attach too much emotion or ego to anything that is said. Good ideas survive the food for thought fights.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  razzle
September 18, 2017 10:16 am

EL Cilantro? I’m offended, razzinga!

razzle
razzle
  razzle
September 18, 2017 10:33 am
Maggie
Maggie
September 17, 2017 3:51 pm

Wow. I was gonna comment but razzle is a hard act to follow. As is Bea who knows very well EC does not know what he thinks he knows.

I was going to post on this comment line today. However a late summer storm is watering my little paradise on earth. This is posted from a phone who is not reliable.

BL
BL
  Maggie
September 17, 2017 4:31 pm

Maggie- did you lose your internet?
All of us don’t know what we think we know if you boil it all down and that’s da truff. EC is very clever don’t you think?
Do you know why he hides out under the Anon moniker lately? That is not like him, he changes names faster than WTC7 falling in it’s footprint but Anon is unusual. He appears to be suffering from an identity problem.

Maggie
Maggie
  BL
September 17, 2017 4:43 pm

Zee internet here iz kaput. Zee phone is a cricket plan that seems to provide unlimited data for $40 monthly. I hate being connected to a demanding phone so I have almost no APPS. Thus a cloudburst surprised me and His Smugness knew it was coming via his app loaded cricket phone.

razzle
razzle
  BL
September 17, 2017 4:59 pm

— “Do you know why he hides out under the Anon moniker lately?”

He’s trying to hide from Boston, but it doesn’t work that way. 🙁

EL Cibernetico
EL Cibernetico
  Maggie
September 18, 2017 12:50 am

Maggie, I have never claimed to know anything. If I knew anything, I would say it, share it. You don’t know what I think I know. I don’t know anything, all I have is faith to fall back on. And love, of course, because if you ain’t got love you ain’t got squat. (razzie, I’m paraphrasing 1 COR 13, don’t attack me, man.)

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 5:03 pm

You’re definitely more worked up than I am.

Stucky, do you think witches are real and if so, do they use their craft to manipulate people?

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 5:36 pm

— “Why bring up witches out of the clear blue?”

You brought them up.

— “OK … now reveal how you’re gonna trap me.”

You think I’m pretty cool and I make you laugh in ways that make you feel guilty.

BL
BL
September 17, 2017 4:50 pm

DON’T YELL AT ME STUCKY, YOU ARE GIVING ME A NERVOUS CONDITION.

First, all that you say about the BOR is real nice and all BUT things are certainly shaping up to fulfill the whole MOTB thing perfectly. I am not butthurt about anything you say or believe and you may be right with the (preterist) doctrine. I am however NOT apologetic about holding the (futurist) view and will watch with great anticipation over the years to see how you react to events as they unfold. Gives me something to look forward to as I dribble pablum on myself.

You are on your own with ABS, ditchner and razzle as I am not getting in the middle of that. Now as far as Christianity in today’s America, I can only say that I feel shame and disgust for the things that I see daily. As WIP would say, things are fucked up and bullshit. I am old school and was born in the Old South/Bible belt which should give you a clue as to why I react as I do.

I am still your biggest fan and admire all of your biblical knowledge but alas, we will never agree on many things.

So, what is your answer about my above request?

Edit: No, preterist did not win…….yet.

Lucifer
Lucifer
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 5:57 pm

Do you wear the mark today, Stucky?

BL
BL
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 10:46 am

“We’ve been right for 2000 years…” ____Stucky

Says you. Where is your historical proof? AHhhha! You don’t have any.

razzle
razzle
  BL
September 18, 2017 10:57 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

BL
BL
  razzle
September 18, 2017 11:01 am

razzle- Thanks, I think.

razzle
razzle
  BL
September 18, 2017 11:30 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

BL
BL
  Stucky
September 17, 2017 7:55 pm

Stucky- Give it a fews days so not to wear this topic out (or longer) but I am dying to know which choice these peeps would make if faced with a real MOTB moment. By that I mean, in a future time, TPTB have done away with all currency worldwide and there is only digital money and you can ONLY access your money if you take this mark (which is satanic). Facing starvation, homelessness, deprivations of all kinds and/or FEMA camps ask them,what would you choose? Save your soul or sign on to the satanic order.

I’m betting some of these folks would go to the dark side and that truly bothers me. Is that too dark of a question to ask? It will separate the wheat from the chaff so to speak. If you think it is not a good idea, I’m good with that.

BL
BL
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 9:09 am

Stucky- You are probably right, most would give a noble answer. Scratch that request but could you reserve a QOTD spot for me in the future? I am still very interested as to how people will choose if that day comes and I believe it will (which may negate the preterist view).

So, can I ask you how would you choose? Would you go to the dark side Stucky? Starvation is a powerful motivator. The BOR says that the good guys win in the end over Babylon so do I ease my mind that people will choose good over evil? Light over dark?

BL
BL
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 11:47 am

Thank you Stucky for your honest answer, it is good to know. But thou shalt not kill?
Back when I was a kid I pondered that (at least in the south) 99% would not pick the dark side. A lot has changed over the decades and Satan is “winning” to the point that I would cut that 99% waaaaaay down. The second fall of man?

The BOR has haunted me most of my life.

RiNS
RiNS
September 17, 2017 8:06 pm

@Ed(to what?)witness

Kryptonite… too funny.

Yet here we are Ed 2000 years or so later and for the endtimers it has been one swing and a miss after another. Pathetic really. All you guys have as a comeback is wait till tomorrow. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that you, Ditch and AWB are such uptight cunts. Must be tuff heading out to batting cage each day with an average of 0.000!

Whatta bunch of Maroons!

The futurist view and all its supposed promises in the Bible are like cum shots on the wall in a whorehouse. They have missed so often nobody bothers to even count anymore.

sláinte mhaith,

RiNS

[imgcomment image[/img]

Batter up!

Edwitness
Edwitness
  RiNS
September 17, 2017 10:26 pm

Never believed in any date setters. Those who know their Bible know better than that. So batting average remains 1000. And I’m with Jesus. Since He thinks it’s better to wait then so do I. His longsuffering brings more in that otherwise would not have. And after all, that’s the reason He has sent His people out into the world. So I will be about my Father’s business until He comes to take us home. Soon I hope:-D
And definitely before the AC comes to power.
Blessings:-}

RiNS
RiNS
  Edwitness
September 18, 2017 6:27 am

Soon I hope… how sad!

Why would anyone want to go thru life with that mindset. Yearning for the next dish rather than enjoying the one that is here.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Edwitness
Edwitness
  RiNS
September 18, 2017 2:44 pm

Answer;
For those who do not know Jesus, no matter how awful their life here may be, it’s the very best they will ever have it. And for those of us that do know Jesus, no matter how well they may have it here, it’s the worst they will ever have it. Heaven is just that great. This is why Paul said that what he knew about righteousness through the law was “dung” and “loss” compared to knowing Jesus. And why he said that he wanted so much more to be with Christ than to remain here. If you knew Him you would know why Christians make such a fuss about heaven And wanting to be there instead of here. But, we stay because He wants us to continue taking the gospel to lost people for now.
Blessings:-}

Hershel
Hershel
September 17, 2017 8:23 pm

About 2000 there was a book ‘Jesus of the apocalypse’ by Barbara Thierring, that uses something called the pescher code to interpret the meaning of all the communication in revelation and other new testament books of the bible. I only read the start of it then put it aside. Basically they claim there was a double meaning in all of it as they were under observation and could not state a lot of their business plainly at the time.

My own thoughts on the main points or questions in this discussion are:

Jesus isnt coming back a second time because he never left the first time. Thats what appearing after the crucifixion that he survived was about. He was an adept who had healing powers but that couldnt stop romans inflicting pain on him. So he had to lay low, but did return. Meeting him on the clouds is a fairytale as is praying to him or his forgiving your sins if you do. If he would appear now I would believe it and convert. That doesnt happen no matter how much you ask him. Hes gone and didnt want a religion that crusades and killed or raped all the heathen native and aboriginal peoples for him.

Im persuaded by the 666 fitting both nero at the contemporary time and the pope by the roman numerals in the above replies. If they didnt do everything like sit in the temple, then maybe john didnt know everything and is guessing and fallible.

Im not persuaded at all by the idea the mark is just symbolic like being ‘sealed’. No it is very specific about buying and selling. If no such thing happened under nero then it is perfectly fitting today. People are already being chipped in the hand now. Of course u can steal somebodys hand or remove your hand if you believe the loving God will send you to hell for doing what u do already if u use a card to pay for things. So put it in the forehead would be next security measure.

TampaRed
TampaRed
September 17, 2017 10:58 pm

stucky,
we’re almost to 300 comments-keep it going–
there have been quite a few comments regarding nero–
there is a line of history that says nero was actually not such a bad guy–
if you’re interested,i bet you could turn that into a good article–

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 12:32 am

Per “The Book of Revelation Made Easy,” the number of the beast is six hundred-sixty-six. It is not six, six, six.

Hebrew is the base language to seek the meaning of the Beast’s number. A first century Hebrew spelling of Nero’s name is Nrwn Qsr (pronounced Neron Kaiser.) Archaeologists have documented this Hebrew spelling, which provides us with precisely the value of 666. Jastrow’s lexicon of the Talmud contains this very spelling.

N=50, R=200, W=6, N=50, Q=100, S=60, R=200, giving a value of 666.

The name “Nero Caesar” not only fits numerically, but the person of Nero fits contextually in John’s drama.

Pertaining to the mark of the beast: In answering this question, we must recall the symbolic nature of Revelation and parallel images within Revelation that seem to be based on an Old Testament practice. (Rev 13: 16-17)

First, marking men in the service of the Beast is no more a literal mark than marking the servants of the Lamb in the very next scene. (Rev 14: 1)

Second, such marking appears to be a metaphor for dominion and control exerted by the source of the mark. In Revelation 13, no one may buy or sell without a mark. This is, all subjects of the Roman Empire are under the dominion of the emperor who effectively holds their livelihoods in his hands.

Third, the Beast demands worship, thereby showring his divine pretensions. John presents his pretentious claim to sovereignty against an Old Testament backdrop. This very Old Testament-oriented book is using the mark on the right hand and forehead as a negative image of God’s requiring his Law on his people. (Deut 6: 6,8)

This is understood by the previously noted fact that the next verse presents the servants of the Lamb with marks on their foreheads.

Fourth, any present-day marks go against the Revelation’s near-time time-frame, (Rev. 1:1, 3; 22:6, 10), relevance for persecuted first-century Christians (Rev. 1:9; 3:10; 6:9-11; 12:4-6, 17), theme of judgment on Israel (Rev 1:7), and the text’s clear link between the beast and the first seven emperors of Rome (Rev 17:9-10).

Consequently, by this marking imagery, John is teaching that the Beast (Nero) will act out his divine pretensions, acting as an absolute sovereign over the lives and fortunes of his subjects. He will no more impose a literal mark upon his subjects than Christ does his. This is dramatic imagery, not literal reality.

Hershel
Hershel
  Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 5:58 am

In that case vixen vic, if we have equivalence between gods mark and the beasts mark, it seems like it should be also stated elsewhere that you cant buy or sell without Gods mark on your hand and forehead. Especially if it just means following.

Doesnt John the Revelator also describe imagery that fits modern warfare much better than Roman times? I remember something about giant locusts which would be the best word if ‘helicopter’ isnt around yet.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 12:38 am

And to top it all off, Nero is the first Roman emperor to persecute Christians.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 12:49 am

Stucky, I have a suggestion for QOTD. How about how Christians deal with self defense and war. I’m asking this because, as far as war goes, I don’t believe Christians should do so. But I have no answer on self defense. This early Christians didn’t fight back when persecuted, and we’re supposed to pray and put our trust in God for protection. But others say God does allow self defense. So that I’m definitely confused on.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 2:58 am

Flashback from the past. The Osmond Brothers – The Plan.
The Osmonds are Mormons so they believe in a futuristic Revelation.
This is a medley of their album “The Plan” on that future. (/Though Mormon religion differs from other Christians, this follows other Christian Futurists on Revelation actually)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6EG_HfLAI0

The whole album is here if you’re interested.

It was a really good album with great songs exactly right for that music time period.

BL
BL
  Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 10:50 am

Vic – Read up on the “White Horse Prophecy”. The Mormons are to save Merica, who knows stranger things have happened.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
September 18, 2017 4:27 am

By the way, regarding anti-Christ, Paul says there are multiple anti-Christs and they are present during his time.

Bugged
Bugged
September 18, 2017 8:38 am

Edwitness says “Jesus was a Jew born under the law, that’s why.” as the reason he (christians?) will follow anything except Jesus. He then quotes other jews born under the law as the law he obeys or not! He thereby proves my point that christians do anything except follow Jesus’ words and example. Notice the contortions he must go thru’ to ignore what I wrote – I never brought jewish law into the issue as to what christians chose to follow, although that is exactly what the majority fall back on as what to “believe” should rule their lives and actions.
Yes, Jesus was born under jewish law but, for example, was the sermon on the mount him laying down more jewish law? Was his injunction to call no-one father just for the jews? (that one is for those who follow Universal Romanism [or is it Roman Universalism?[).
Someone brought up witchcraft. Witchcraft is simply using words to control the minds of it’s targets. All religion uses word magick to control the minds of it’s adherents – you don’t believe me! – just ponder on the word “pastors” – it appears once and once only in all the entire english bibles I have researched, however it’s root word in hebrew and greek appears many times and is translated into the english as something else. And it is a transliteration of a latin word – not a translation of the original. So -word magick! Why is the word “deacon” used as a transliteration of the original word when applied to a male but is translated honestly when the word applies to a female? Hmmm, perhaps to give meaning where it is not in the original – word magick?
There are too many examples of this word magick to go into here but you can start your own research with the 4th word of the bible. hint “In the beginning ____”.
Yes I have heard many contortions to explain away what the Hebrew word states. Most rely on circular thinking.
Here’s a question to ponder – Does one use circular reasoning to work out that a circle is a logical entity? Sorry, couldn’t resist that!

AWB
AWB
  Stucky
September 19, 2017 6:23 am

I really don’t give shit whether you read my comments or not. The sum total of your bible knowledge amounts to a big fat zero, and frankly, is an embarrassment to those of us who believe the truth. Do you deny the bible is the standard for truth, against which all else is judged? Guess what? It doesn’t matter, because whether you believe it or deny it, it still is.

Because you fail on point number one, you fail on all else.

RiNS
RiNS
  AWB
September 19, 2017 6:44 am

sez you…

RiNS
RiNS
September 18, 2017 12:54 pm

AWB somewhere right now…

[imgcomment image[/img]

Bugged
Bugged
September 18, 2017 1:21 pm

@Stuck
Who is AWB? Certainly not me, but if your comment of 12:09pm was aimed at me let me say I couldn’t give a fuck if no-one reads my comment, but it appears a certain Edwitness did so the reply was for his benefit. I guess you are 18 years old, at least in your head, seeing as you know everything and can learn nothing from anything longer than 2 sentences. Projection seems to be a special murican thing these days – go look in the mirror for a maroon.
But if you were really talking to AWB I apologise for the above and will look in the mirror myself.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
September 18, 2017 1:55 pm

Good grief! Over 300 comments and still going..maybe?
Not sure I will have time to read the other 200, I think I commented at about 100. Had a really busy weekend and still trying to catch up.

So, Stucky, I don’t follow directions well and I read the whole post first:D

However I can be honest in saying I think we are thinking somewhat along similar lines. This is a belief I have just recently embraced.

I have not a clue who the anti-christ is. There have been many anti-christs, in fact, I think technically, you are either for Christ or against him, right? Therefore, if you are against him, you are an anti-christ, wouldn’t you agree?

Is the Anti-christ and actual person? At one time in the not so distant past I would have said yes. But I have an open mind and will consider anything that seems logical. I love logic, which is why I have become so taken with Dr. Hieser. He approaches scripture using as much logic as possible, based on actual text, including extra biblical texts. Semantics are everything, it seems.

As you said, scripture was written TO the authors contemporaries. It was written FOR us as believers, until the end of our time, whenever that is. The people John wrote the letter to probably understood much of what he was talking about. I would be willing to bet they didn’t understand the prophecy well at all. I could be wrong in that assumption, though.
While it’ true he was writing to existing churches, scholars believe that we have lived through all seven types in the linear history of the church age. We are now living in the Laodicean age, they believe.

My idea about the Anti-christ is still evolving but I think that it’s impossible to figure it out until we are right in the middle of tribulation, if we are going to go through what most people believe is a classical tribulation. I’m not even sure about that anymore. I don’t think the U.S. is the Anti-christ. I am kinda leaning towards the U.S. being mystery Babylon, which is what I think you are describing.

At this point, I’m really leaning towards the “eschatology is a waste of time” thing.

Hieser has given some really good reasons in his book Reversing Hermon why it’s not easy to figure out. If you think about how almost all the religious leaders had the whole Messiah thing wrong when Jesus was walking the earth, it would make sense that God would not reveal exactly what he was going to do when he confronts the powers of darkness at the end.

He gives clues, like he did in Isaiah 53 which, looking back, is obviously a messianic prophecy! Not to mention all the other prophecies throughout the OT that are obviously messianic to us but were not obvious to them. Virtually all of the scholars back then missed it completely! Even the disciples were always confused and they had Jesus right there with them almost 24/7 for 3 years!

I’m starting to question the whole 7 year tribulation thing, as well. I think we are living in end times, I just don’t have a clue as to when the end will come, and no one else does either. Things aren’t really worse than they were in the latter parts of the Roman empire. People are not different, they had an LGBQRSTLMNOP type of culture, they tolerated those people and even celebrated them in a way. It was rife with sexual deviancy of all kinds, they just didn’t have the technology to try to physically change their sex. I don’t need to list all the cultural similarities but it’s pretty striking. I’m sure the believers thought they were living in the end times then.

Some people think the anti-christ will be a world wide technocracy. Interesting idea, I think. Think about how Apple uses the apple with bite out of it as their..whatcha callit? My brain is hurting. That was intentional according to the founder..what’s his name? Jeebers! No more anesthesia for me!

I was raised a Catholic, went to a parochial elementary school, the whole 9 yards. We were never taught about the end times, just that there would be a resurrection when Jesus came back.
So I guess it just never quite sat right with me, the whole Left Behind thing. I did read the books as a new Christian. (No I was raised a Catholic, I was not a Christian until 2002, that’s another story) I keep thinking, “if it sounds like it’s too good to be true, it probably is”.

I just figure if there really is a rapture, then, that’s cool! But I believe “prepare for the worst, hope for the best”!

Blessings;)

RiNS
RiNS
  Mary Christine
September 18, 2017 2:41 pm

Mary

You can’t be against something that doesn’t exist. Not possible! Anyways keep playing.

Dreams make for Great Songs.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
  RiNS
September 18, 2017 3:31 pm

Well, that’s your opinion. Opinions are not truth. But that’s off topic.

The original post is not about whether God exists.

I gotta go. I got things to do.

RiNS
RiNS
  Mary Christine
September 18, 2017 3:50 pm

No Mary, you are mistaken. Big shocker for me!

You can study the Bible and not believe in God. It ain’t no Pre-requisite.

Mary I said it earlier I’ll say it again.

Opinions speak to facts.
Faith talks out of an ass.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Mary Christine
September 18, 2017 4:00 pm

Spoken like a true coward, Anonymous. You should identify yourself so we can know whose playing without balls.

RiNS
RiNS
  Anonymous
September 18, 2017 5:19 pm

Mary Mary quite contrary, aptly named for an immaculate reception. I must have missed her thoughts on abortion. I wonder how she plans on splaining that one to the big guy.

I wanna be there for that…

I could be convinced to believe in Gawd just to see that…

Gayle
Gayle
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 6:55 pm

Stucky

Just to clarify, many Christians who are futurists do not believe in the pre-tribulation rapture dreamt up by Darby. I am one of these.

Honestly, there is so much more to eschatology it can’t be handled well in a forum such as this. But thank you for trying!

Gayle
Gayle
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 6:59 pm

Anon/NotAFetus

You are creepy and evil.

AWB
AWB
  Stucky
September 19, 2017 6:27 am

Stukfuk sez, you harbor a lot of animosity for God, don’t you?

AWB
AWB
  Stucky
September 20, 2017 10:09 am

You mean never EVER listen to Stukfuk, who denies the inerrant truth of God’s word.

FIFY

razzle
razzle
  Stucky
September 18, 2017 5:36 pm

Stop faking it! You are cheapening the true event.

AWB
AWB
September 19, 2017 6:29 am

Stukfuk will not have the last word.

AWB
AWB
September 19, 2017 6:30 am

Stukfuk, thanks for the tip about the dashboard! Now I know how to fuk with you.

AWB
AWB
September 19, 2017 6:32 am

Stukfuk, how does it feel? I’m in your head!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA