Our Interregnum

Guest Post by The Zman

One of the most remarkable things to happen in the West since the end of the Cold War has been the rise of identity politics over the last half decade. It is remarkable for a couple of reasons. One is that it has emerged in what economists consider to be a time of unrivaled prosperity. People should be happy and content, rather than angry, with post-national liberal democracy. A central tenet of liberal democracy is that the end point of human activity is to create a world of material plenty.

The other remarkable aspect is these movements are flourishing in the face of strong moral prohibition, often backed by force. It’s literally dangerous to be an identitarian in most of the West now. America is now a land that bans books and subjects dissenters to internal banishment. The titans of industry are studying China for ways to suppress internal dissent. Despite these efforts to anathematize identity politics, white people throughout the West are embracing identity politics.

The aggressive assault on dissidents is a direct result of the unpreparedness of the ruling classes. They really were convinced they had ushered in the post-historical moment as imagined by Francis Fukuyama. The great battles of political economy in the 20th century were settled. All the “isms” had been vanquished by liberalism and there was nothing left to discuss. The sudden reappearance of old cultures and old ideas about how people should organize themselves was like seeing a ghost.

Now, this is a good time to note that the phrase “identity politics” has been kicking around American political circles for decades. In the mouths of conservatives, it was always part of the grift they have been running on white people. It looks like an attack on left-wing tactics, but in reality it is an endorsement of Progressive morality. For the Left, it was always a cover for anti-white agitation. They could not come out directly in favor of anti-white polices, but non-white camp followers were free to do it.

The success of this game of good cop – bad cop played by the American political class is another reason they remain baffled by what’s happening. This game has worked for so long, its sudden failure is like the sun rising in the west all of a sudden. Perhaps a better metaphor is it seems as if all swans are now black. Everywhere political elites turn, the world is no longer as they imagined it. All the axioms upon which they based their world view are suddenly being called into question.

It turns out that Fukuyama was sort of right after all. The West had reached an endpoint after the Cold War. It was not the end of a great ideological battle, but the end point of the great multicultural project launched by the Frankfurt School following World War II. The West, particularly America, had become fully actualized as multicultural societies. They no longer possessed a core identity, based in biology, which informed their politics or restrained their politicians. It was just one big open marketplace.

The trouble is, you cannot have a nation without a sovereign identity and there can be no sovereign identity without a nation. This is the core insight of multiculturalism, which was never intended to strengthen the West but to destroy it. To have a multicultural society is to have no culture at all. Once the people’s sense of who they are is destroyed, the nation must follow with it. That is exactly what we see in the West as political classes struggle to perform their basic duties.

The reason for this, is that the people’s sense of who they are is what animates the political institutions of the state. That shared reality of a people is the soul of every nation, just as the soul animates the body. To kill it and simply try to artificially animate the body, is to create a Frankenstein’s monster. The modern Western state is now a collection of cultural parts robbed from graves around the world. It is neither organic nor natural, so it is always at war with normal human sensibilities.

Multicultural liberal democracy, when lying on the table, is ugly in appearance, but when animated it is truly horrifying. Multiculturalism becomes a monster that attacks everything around it, because at some level, like the mythical monster, it knows it is an abomination, a sin against creation. We have quickly moved from eradicating the people’s sense of identity to systemically eradicating the people. Instead of creating a new society, superior to the old, multiculturalism has destroyed the very essence of western society.

In addition to the end of the post-war cycle, we may also be at the end of a much longer cycle that began with the Enlightenment. The thinkers and philosophers who gave us liberal democracy had a mechanistic view of nature. This led them to see society as nothing but a collection of parts, like a watch. In order to make a better watch, the watchmaker simply had to improve its parts. Make a better spring or a better crystal and snap it into place. Liberal democracy is the full expression of this belief.

It turns out that human society is nothing like a watch and the people in it are not simply automata that can be tinkered with as necessary. Human society is the expression of the shared reality of the people. That shared reality is the result of actions, experiences and mating decisions made by their ancestors. Who they are is what they are. The Frenchman is French, because his ancestors were French, not because the map maker said he was born in France. The nation is the manifestation of this reality.

The confluence of these two end cycles, plus others forces like demographics and technology has brought us to this interregnum. The reason the ruling elites helplessly lash out at the gnats whirling about them is they are built for an age that is fading into the past. Their weapons are crude and destructive, but ultimately ineffective at halting the march into the abyss. The weird nostalgia of American politics is just another aspect of that effort to halt the momentum. It’s an effort to stop the clock.

Similarly, the incoherence and confusion among dissidents is due to the inability to break free from the Enlightenment ideas of liberal democracy. Those looking for an alternative, rummage around in the past for prior rejections. First it was the neo-reaction trying to revive the age of kings. Then it was the alt-right trying to revive 20th century fascism. Like clothes from a prior era, they were a poor fit and made the wearer look odd. They are answers to questions no one remembers, not the questions of today.

That’s why the on-going efforts to put Buckley Conservatism back together will fail. It was an answer to an old question. Similarly, libertarianism is in crisis, because it was a set of tools made for a tradesman who is no longer needed. Whether it is an effort to impose the old forms on the new opposition or re-brand the old stuff as a new form of nationalism, the effort must fail as it is an artifact of the past. The emerging opposition to the prevailing orthodoxy will be rooted in a rejection of its core principles, not an embrace of them.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Jacklegs And Gophers
Jacklegs And Gophers
June 24, 2019 11:23 pm

Unproven assumptions, false assertions and worst of all, contradictions call an authors subject knowledge and intent into question:

For just one example:

“The reason the ruling elites helplessly lash out at the gnats whirling about them is they are built for an age that is fading into the past.”

(Riiiiight, because running a zoo full of different animals (identities) has no benefit to elites. And helplessly lashing? Have you been watching what elites are doing – far from helpless.)

Then, in direct contradiction we get this statement:

“Similarly, libertarianism is in crisis, because it was a set of tools made for a tradesman who is no longer needed.”

First, the statement about libertarianism is complete bullshit and just shows that Zman has no idea what libertarianism is (but throws at least one fabricated line of bullshit about it into EVERY SINGLE PIECE HE WRITES). Libertarian thought is NOT a “set of tools made for a tradesman who is no longer needed” – Good God, where does that tripe even come from? A very minimal perusal of Rothbard, Mencken, Mises, Lew Rockwell, Garet Garrett and so many others disproves Z’s claim.

Libertarianism is about 2 main ideas/concepts:

1.) Property Rights
2.) Non-Aggression Principle

They could be applied to a “tradesman who is no longer needed” (like a Journeyman Plumber – Guess those aren’t needed anymore in Z-World) AND to just about every other human being on the planet. The concepts don’t rise and fall because buggy-whip makers no longer have jobs or trade shows – they are timeless concepts. Again, Z’s assertions/definitions show complete mis-representation and zero understanding of basic concepts of libertarian thought.

Second – the Ruling Elites are fading AND Liberty is fading? That is a contradiction.

How does that work, exactly? Those things do not rise/fall in tandem with each other. Less liberty equals more Elites using force and stealing property – more liberty equals less Elites using force to steal less property.

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
June 25, 2019 12:57 am

“The thinkers and philosophers who gave us liberal democracy had a mechanistic view of nature.”

Read… Godless.

Mygirl...maybe
Mygirl...maybe
  grace country pastor
June 25, 2019 10:16 am

Yet another name for communism

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Mygirl...maybe
June 25, 2019 11:06 am

Have you read Acts 4:32-35 (KJB)? That Jewish Pentecostal church which Peter led was communist through and through, but Divinely so. Not Godless at all.

They followed Christ in the flesh. Paul says…

2 Corinthians 5:16 KJB… “Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more.”

We follow the risen and glorified Christ, as Paul instructs.

2 Thessalonians 3:10 KJB… “For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.”

Quite the different set of instructions, no? This explains so much…

TC
TC
June 25, 2019 9:13 am

The elites aren’t passively standing by while the nation deconstructs – they’re the ones intentionally destroying it! Libertarianism can’t (and won’t) solve this problem, but Propertarianism could.