Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
In 2009, the University of Illinois sent a survey online to about 10,000 scientists with the following two questions:
QUESTION #1
Do you agree that global temperatures have generally risen since the pre-1800s?
QUESTION #2
Do you think that human activity is a significant contributing factor?
Only 3146 responses were received of 10,000, and of that 31%, 90% said yes to the first question but 82% said yes to the second question.
This is how the fraud was carried out by people who have used this survey. They narrowed down the responses and found that among Meteorologists who responded, only 64% said yes to the second question, so about 1/3 said NO!
Then disregarding all the others of the 3146 responses, they focused on only 77 who described themselves as “climate experts” without any proof of their credentials and found that only 75 said yes to the second question.
Therefore, when we divide 75/77 we get to their claim of 97% of all scientists in the world say there is a climate emergency that warrants raising taxes and seizing property.
This was only 2.3% of those who bothered to respond and I doubt that they would agree with the solution which is COMMUNISM!
0.0075%
If we take the 75 responses of 10,000 scientists surveyed, that means that 0.0075% agreed that there is climate change with some human causality. Why are they lying to the entire world? Because behind this movement is the destruction of capitalism and the resurrection of communism. And people wonder why our computer has been forecasting that the financial capital of the world is moving to Asia? Climate Change Activists are trying to recreate the Marxist experiment all over again.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
97% of Greta Thunberg is retarded.
I dare anyone with enough spare time to pick up and read a book on historical geology and then talk with sanity about anthropogenic global warming.
The modern data used to construct these AGW argument are but 160 or so years out of millions of years in geologic time. And the data entered into these AGW models are selective – CO2 levels, temperature, but the sun’s radiative heat inputs remain constant as is the strength of the van Allen Belt. And the further one goes back in time the fewer the data point there are and these data points are distributed around the globe in fewer locations (e.g., where’s the temperature and humidity data from 1850 Central Africa, Tierra Del Fuego, Nauru, etc?). And not to mention the lack of uniformity in the measuring devices, or that the majority of these devices are placed in well paved urban ceters that absorb heat all day long and slowly release that heat at night, thus resulting in an average temperature increase over time the more devices that are installed.
“Proof” of a robust history matched model is that it can predict something forward, even if that something is based on an incorrect premise, but I would be interested to see what these AGW models predict BACKWARDS. One would think that “scientists”, before calling on you and I to pony up trillions that will just go into Wall Street and .gov fraud that they might just want to see if their “models” predict an earth that was -200 F about 5,000 years ago. As correlation is not causation, you’d think.
Good advice; easy to read, entertaining, and informative:
Inconvenient facts : the science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know / Gregory Wrightstone
Wrightstone, Gregory
Yes AGW is 100 percent bullshit, but 75 out of 10,000 is 0.75 percent. At least get the math right.
Amazing how many people who should know better fail to comprehend the computation of percentages.
Maybe someone in the field of so-called political science has the numbers regarding population versus political affiliation, but I can’t find any in regards to communists (yet, still looking), in part because so few Communist party members show up on ballots since, oh, WWII. Which makes sense because, since 1954
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954
Communism is actually illegal in the US. So my guess is that the actual number of Communists in the US is pretty low. A specific-term search on Google returns pages and pages and pages about socialism, but actual Communism, not so much (which is interesting that their algo considers them interchangeable, I guess – ?), and the CPUSA page on Wiki claims membership of 5-10,000 but I don’t believe them. Because . . . politics.
Anyway, IF a third of Millennials have a favorable view of communism
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/for-millennials-socialism-and-communism-are-hot-capitalism-is-not-2019-10-28
and IF, according to the Brookings Institute, Millenials number 75 million or so
https://www.brookings.edu/research/millennials/
then there are, in theory, 25 million people in the US who DO actually favor communism as a solution to EVERYTHING, not just global warming/climate-change/geo-engineering/whatever. So . . . 2.3 percent of respondents may not agree that communism is the solution, but MANY more non-respondents actually do.
Just sayin’
How is communism illegal in the U.S.?
Too late. The bankers are getting on board so expect a damned good fleecing.
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.” – Benjamin Disraeli (though also attributed to others).
It only gets worse when government gets involved.
100% of everyone should agree that government must NOT be given 1 penny or one additional ounce of power, to impose any sort of “solution.”
So the puppets at The Weather Channel are doing a special broadcast “2020 Race to Save the Planet” on Feb. 2, and now Bloomberg has come up with a site called “Bloomberg Green.” Looks like a central clearing house for all the bullshit that’s fit to print. Lot’s of money to be made on this.
100% of anyone who believes in the 97% is retarded.
Just like 97% of the impeachment trial is false
Would have been funnier with dirty Uncle Joe Biden behind her.