UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava brought up the issue with N-antibodies in November of 2021. People have been too quick to dismiss her concern.
In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report” (published 21 October 2021), the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that “recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.”
What does this mean? It means that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection against other parts of the virus.
In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is an important part of the response in unvaccinated people. The observation may explain why the vaccines actually produce negative efficacy as was shown in the Denmark study, for example.
Reuters did a “fact check” on this concerning observation and, as expected, found nothing wrong. Who’d have guessed? They said that since the S-protein response was so robust, your body had no need to mount a robust N-antibody response.
Not so fast… this is hardly a “known effect.” This seems more like a hand-waving argument to me.
In checking with the experts I knew, nobody was aware of this being something to simply ignore.
This is why Professor Bhargava voiced her concerns in her blog on November 3, 2021:
New studies from the British Health Ministry suggests that COVID vaccines might interfere with the ability of our immune system to produce antibodies against other parts of the virus, crucial aspect for developing cross protection
The data agrees with her: it is showing the vaccines are producing negative efficacy and making our bodies more susceptible to being infected with other diseases including cancers and shingles (see Incriminating Evidence for references).
She also said in that same article, “Ideally, no one should be tested unless they have symptoms.” I couldn’t agree more with that statement.
I value her insights and I thank her for speaking openly and honestly about the dangers of these vaccines.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
“Reuters did a “fact check” on this concerning observation and, as expected, found nothing wrong.”
Whoa, whoa, WHOA! No sir, that is not expected.
If Joe Rogan said today that the sky is blue multiple “fact checkers” would have thousands of words to type to explain why Rogan is a dirty misinformation spreading liar liar pantsonfire doodoohead.
Just sayin’. A mainstream “fact check” that comports with reality is never expected.
On a more serious note, this is original antigenic sin and a lack of sterilizing immunity by the “vaccines”. We’ve known this, but it doesn’t hurt to have more reporting and more reputable doctors backing up what should have been reported all along and been backed up by all doctors from the begining of the scamdemic.
Your body knows best. It economizes. You put a toxin in your body or your body made. It doesn’t need N anti bodies for that. Nor for a virus that doesn’t exist. Now if you should snif some glue or have fecal mater in your food those N antibodies could come in handy.
Except…viruses are a fraud. People get sick with ‘viruses’ because their own bodies are cleansing. If your immune system is depressed then the exosomes your cells expel will lead to sickness. It seems these poison shots with all of their various ingredients disarm natural immunity, so exosomes will have their way with the host. The cabal of the 300 or so are in NO WAY GETTING ANY SHOTS…their immune systems will remain intact, while those billions they wish to systematically kill off are left susceptible to their targeted annihilation.
Here’s Bhargava’s discussion with Malone from a month or so ago:
Here’s her discussion with Malone on Rumble. The host kid is unfortunately annoying as hell as wastes time.
Death jabs….plain and simple.
VAIDS – Vaccine Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome.
It is just aid’s not hiv but aid’s
The medical profession worldwide gave up the principle of robust long term scrutiny of this experimental drug. Now millions will either needlessly die or face needless long term poor health. Most doctors are now an albatross to good health.
Now if only someone could isolate and purify the virus. So far sars-cov-2 cannot be shown to exist. The flu does though.
“Reuters is a global information and news provider headquartered in London, England, that serves professionals in the financial, media, and corporate markets.”
I’ve argued with so many of my liberal drone brain-dead friends and relatives, asking why they rely on a Financial, Media, Corporate Markets website for fact checking Medical information, do they go to WebMD for Corporate Market forecasting?
Fucktards.