Regenerative Farming Is More Important Now Than Ever Before

Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • A decades-old anticorporate-farming law in North Dakota makes it illegal for corporations and limited liability companies to purchase farmland
  • Bill Gates secured approval to purchase 2,100 acres in North Dakota via a loophole that allows individual trusts to own farmland as long as it’s leased to farmers
  • This amounts to modern-day feudalism and ensures the further deleterious industrialization and centralization of the food supply
  • Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures in Bluffton, Georgia, is among those who objects to Gates’ increasing ownership of farmland, which threatens human health and the environment
  • Harris’ farming methods represent the opposite of Gates’ industrialized approach, demonstrating how you can convert conventionally farmed land into a healthy, thriving farm based on regenerative methods

A decades-old anticorporate-farming law in North Dakota makes it illegal for corporations and limited liability companies to purchase farmland in the state. So when Bill Gates received legal approval to do just that, it did more than raise a few eyebrows.

Gates secured approval to purchase 2,100 acres from Campbell Farms, a potato grower in northeastern North Dakota, for $13.5 million.1 This, along with the 270,000 other acres of farmland he’s previously purchased in the U.S., makes him the largest private farmland owner in the country.2

Doug Goehring, North Dakota’s Agriculture Commissioner, told KFYR-TV that he’s gotten a lot of backlash since word got out. “I’ve gotten a big earful on this from clear across the state, it’s not even from that neighborhood. Those people are upset, but there are others that are just livid about this.”3

Moving Toward Modern-Day Feudalism

Gates was able to purchase the land legally via a loophole that allows individual trusts to own farmland as long as it’s leased to farmers.4 The law is meant to protect family farms because the farmland must be leased back to them.5 However, while this is Gates’ intention, it amounts to modern-day feudalism.

“If this was the game Risk, Bill Gates is closing in. He’s acquiring all of the territory. If this was Monopoly or any other board game, you’d think, ‘Uh-oh, Gates is up to something,” Russel Brand said, referring to data that Gates owns sizeable amounts of farmland in 18 states.6

Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures in Bluffton, Georgia, is among those who objects to Gates’ increasing ownership of farmland. First off, he states, Gates isn’t a farmer. He doesn’t know what to do with the land:7

“I have concerns about Gates controlling farmland. Just like I don’t want a child abuser controlling even one child, I don’t want him to control a single acre. First, land is precious. It may be more precious than anything.

I hate to see someone, who has no idea what to do with it, be put in a position to control it. How well do you think that I would do running a tech company or financial institution? It’s the same logic as letting a guy like Gates manage something as complex as an ecosystem. He lacks the understanding to steward it properly.”

The Secrecy Is Unsettling

What else is unsettling, Harris says, is the secrecy behind Gates’ land purchases, which are often made under the cover of investment firms. Eric O’Keefe’s magazine, The Land Report, puts out a list of the 100 biggest landowners in the U.S. each year. A 2020 purchase of 14,500 “prime” acres in Washington state caught O’Keefe’s attention, as he calls any sale of more than 1,000 acres “blue moon events.”

When he dug deeper, the purchaser of the 14,500 acres — in the heart of some of the most expensive acreage in America — was recorded as a small Louisiana company. “That immediately set off alarm bells,” O’Keefe told the New York Post.8 It turned out the company was acting on behalf of Cascade Investment, LLC for Bill Gates.

“Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, has an alter ego,” O’Keefe wrote. “Farmer Bill, the guy who owns more farmland than anyone else in America.”9 Clearly Gates has a big vision for all that land, but unfortunately it doesn’t involve organic, biodynamic or regenerative farming, which are needed to heal ecosystems and produce truly sustainable, nourishing food for future generations.

Instead, the acreage seems earmarked for even more genetically engineered (GE) corn and soy crops — the base foods for what will become an increasingly synthetic, ultra-processed food supply focused on fake meat. As Harris wrote on his blog:10

“An article that was dated May 4, 2021 informed us that Gates has purchased over 200,000 acres in 18 states. Georgia was not listed as one of the 18 states, but an acquaintance of mine sold his farm located in Georgia to Gates prior to that time. What else are they lying about?”

Gates’ Influence Worsened Hunger in Africa

Gates won’t be implementing the restorative farming methods that Harris embraces on his farm. Instead, biotechnology will be king. Harris points to the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), an organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,11 as a sobering harbinger of what’s to come.

AGRA was launched in 2006 with funding from Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. It’s essentially a Gates Foundation subsidiary and most of its goals are centered on promoting biotechnology and chemical fertilizers.

After more than a decade, AGRA’s influence has significantly worsened the situation in the 18 African nations targeted by this “philanthropic” endeavor. Hunger under AGRA’s direction increased by 30% and rural poverty rose dramatically.12 “Ask the farmers of India and Africa how beneficial Gates’ influence was to their agricultural systems,” Harris said.13

“If you research the failed AGRA … program, you’ll get a sneak peek on the repercussions of letting a businessman make farming decisions. That billionaire-leopard ain’t gonna change the spots that made him the most powerful man in the world.”14

Risks of Food Production Based on Efficiency, Not Resiliency

The technologies that industrial agriculture relies on to “improve” food production are destructive. Yet, they’re the technologies that Gates embraces. “Pesticides, chemical fertilizers, GMOs, sub-therapeutic antibiotics, and hormone implants … These technologies result in horrible, unintended consequences that adversely affect our land, water, climate, and livestock,” Harris said.15

Further, they’ve allowed agriculture to become scalable to the point that a limited number of multinational corporations control most of the food supply. A centralized food system benefits no one but those who control it, and puts consumers at risk. Harris explained:16

“The centralization of food production impoverishes our rural communities as it creates an oligopoly. This centralization of food production is also bad for consumers. This system lacks resilience.

When mega-production facilities that are focused on efficiency break down, consumers’ access to food can become limited, which causes panic. This state of panic allows multinational companies to increase their profits exponentially. When the driving goal of our food production system is efficiency, as opposed to resiliency, consumers suffer.”

Harris’ farming methods represent the opposite of Gates’ industrialized approach, demonstrating how you can convert conventionally farmed land into a healthy, thriving farm based on regenerative methods. At White Oak Pastures, they’ve:17

  • De-commoditized — Instead of relying on commodities, they produce five types of pastured red meats, five types of pastured poultry, pastured eggs and organic vegetables.
  • De-industrialized — Instead of operating as a monoculture that grows one destructive crop, like GE soy, they’ve created a living ecosystem that includes 10 species of humanely treated animals that live in a symbiotic relationship. All of their land is managed using holistic principles.
  • De-centralized — They were able to break away from the centralized food processing system, building their own abattoirs to retain control of the quality of their products.

Going Beyond Sustainable to Regeneration

White Oak Pastures wasn’t always the picture of regeneration. From 1946 — when his father was still running the farm — to 1995, the farm used industrial farming methods and chemicals. Harris had just one focus — how many pounds of beef he could produce at the lowest price possible. Now, in addition to a focus on animal welfare, Harris is focused on going beyond sustainable farming to land regeneration.

“We believe farming must not only be sustainable, it has to be regenerative to rebuild our soil,” White Oak Pastures’ website reads.18 At White Oak Pastures:19

  • Holistic planned grazing methods naturally sequester carbon, control erosion and increase organic matter in soil
  • A life cycle assessment found that their farm is storing more carbon in the soil than their grass fed cows emit during their lifetime
  • Former commodity crop land is acquired and regenerated into perennial pasture every year
  • They’ve partnered with a nearby 2,400-acre solar farm to provide planned livestock grazing and regenerative land management

Rather than reverting to regenerative agriculture, in which livestock and crops are integrated into a symbiotic, complementary system that mimics the way nature works, Gates and agrochemical companies are using gene editing, genetic engineering, chemicals and other “technologies” to create hybrid seed lines, crops resistant to winds, flooding and droughts and other lab-created agricultural elements. As Harris noted:20

“The likelihood of the further misapplication of technology is the reason that I am opposed to our land being managed by Bill Gates and anyone else who does not understand how to harvest the abundance of Nature. The proper land steward must respect the cycles of Nature.

… The technocrat’s answer to all of our food production problems has been the integration of linear, siloed, reductionist-science-based scalable technology. This approach has proven to be highly effective for complicated linear systems (think computers and machines).

It has also been proven that these technologies are equally disastrous when applied to complex cyclable systems (think farm, eco-system, your body) … If Mr. Gates wants to come to White Oak Pastures or to send someone, come on, I’ll show you how I manage my land.”

USDA Wants to Keep Tabs on Your Home Garden

It wasn’t long ago when “victory gardens” could be found in nearly every backyard. During the pandemic, home gardening made a comeback,21 but now even this wholesome pastime may become the target of surveillance and regulation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has released “People’s Garden Registration Form” where you can register your garden to be displayed on their online map.

Provided your garden meets their criteria, which includes benefiting the community, collaborating with others, sustainable practices and public education, the USDA will sed you a “People’s Garden” sign to display and let your garden be tracked on their map. While it sounds innocent enough, this is another surveillance tool, one that will follow what you plant and whether or not your garden is “sustainable.” While it’s now voluntary, this could change at any time.

Yet, this type of farming, from diverse vegetable plants in your backyard to farms embracing regenerative and organic methods, is what’s needed now more than ever. It’s a common misconception that regenerative farming cannot be done on a large-scale. Harris proves this isn’t the case. While farming conventionally, he had about 700 heads of cattle on the farm.

Today, the land supports 100,000 individual animals of several species, made possible because they support each other rather than compete for limited resources. As Brand explained and Harris exemplifies, decentralized, regenerative farming is better for the animals, better for the environment and better for the people:22

“Will Harris makes the perfect points. That there’s a requirement for entrenched, generations-deep local knowledge that includes experiential understanding of soil and climate and crops and growth patterns, and the impact on climate, water supplies, irrigation …

Bill Gates’ model is a reductive technocratic and technological model … this centralized tech model, when it hits nature and when it hits human beings and when it hits democracy, creates real problems … perhaps those problems further benefit centralized power … they’re rushing to solutions that lead to the centralization of power rather than accepting that power needs to be … decentralized to better serve the people and better understand nature …”

 

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 8:06 am

He’s right you know.

I’m glad there are people like Will Harris out there with far more experience and reach when it comes to getting this message out. It shouldn’t even need to be explained but that’s how far we’ve gone off the path.

If you haven’t already decided to move back to the land and become a homesteader, then at least find a local farmer who is on board with this style of agriculture and become a patron. They only exist if there are enough loyal customers willing to buy what they produce and the only way to ensure there is a steady supply of good food for families is to keep these kinds of family farms in business.

Peter Horry
Peter Horry
  hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 9:30 am

White Oak pork is frequently available in Lowcountry grocery stores in the Charleston area. It is delicious, and we seek it out especially for their bacon. Highly recommend it.

GNL
GNL
November 30, 2022 8:07 am

Yet there’s people on this very blog who think limitless wealth is not a problem.

Yes, yes it is. G.R.E.E.D knows NO BOUNDS.

Just for sh*ts & giggles
Just for sh*ts & giggles
  GNL
November 30, 2022 9:38 am

Who’s the troll that down voted GNL for speaking the truth?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Just for sh*ts & giggles
November 30, 2022 10:06 am

Down votes let you know you’re on the right track.

Red River D
Red River D
  hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 11:22 am

That one was me, Farmer. I was agreeing with you!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Red River D
November 30, 2022 7:05 pm

If we had free markets, plus 100% property rights and no government, every currency unit in anyone’s possession would be a metric of service to humanity. No amount of money would give an individual power over others. In fact, the only power a billionaire (or a hundredaire) would have, would be continued service for more money (or direct trade of commodities, if acceptable to both parties).

Billionaires, and millions of much poorer people (who add up to billionaires via political faction) currently manipulate governments. What if there were no governments, but only genuinely free markets with actual price discovery, as opposed to artificially state-set prices or other cartels, plus no coercion, no artificial scarcity, no bar to entry, etc., but only 100% voluntary buying and selling?

Greed is not so much the problem as is the state acting as leverage and amplification for the overly ambitious greedheads and seekers of undue power over others. If the lowest has the right of refusal and also the right of participation, AND owns himself equally to the billionaire (assuming the billionaire’s wealth was legitimately earned by ten million poorer customers happily and voluntarily giving him a hundred bucks for his product), it would be fine and unlike now.

Also, in such free markets, no one would be able to artificially keep on top by legislation and bailouts, etc., but only through competence in pleasing customers; and no one small would be prevented from competing with the market whales. Best of all, the littlest guy would be king, with those seeking wealth being their servants.

GNL
GNL
  Just for sh*ts & giggles
November 30, 2022 10:07 am

Many here believe it’s all about control. I don’t disagree, it’s just that I believe control and G.R.E.E.D are the same. What good is control if not so you can have everything?

Red River D
Red River D
  GNL
November 30, 2022 7:45 pm

“…I believe control and G.R.E.E.D are the same…”

It’s lust, Glock. Lust for power and lust for money are kind of the same thing. The will to dominate the other guy comes directly out of the Darkness. It’s a hallmark of the Enemy of God.

Like father like son.

GNL
GNL
  Red River D
November 30, 2022 8:14 pm

I’ve been saying G.R.E.E.D. for years now. Should I change it to L.U.S.T now?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Just for sh*ts & giggles
November 30, 2022 10:57 am

I downvoted you.
Where would you like the wealth cap to be? Please be specific.
For whatever number you chose, please give your rationale for that number and not a lower or higher number.
Alternatively, give a rationale for an income cap, and at what level.
TIA for your socialist butt-hurt.

The Duke of New York
The Duke of New York
  Anonymous
November 30, 2022 11:07 am

if you think folks on this site are butt-hurt socialists, you might need new glasses or something

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Anonymous
November 30, 2022 11:10 am

That’s a strawman, i.e. logical fallacy.

He didn’t speak of a wealth cap or an income cap, you did.

He said that limitless wealth was problematic.

He pointed out a problem, you accused him of presenting a solution.

The best way to make a point is to be knowledgeable, to be concise, and to stick closely to the matter at hand by paying attention to the specifics. You got into the weeds because you imagined his solution would be some sort of regulatory restriction.

Red River D
Red River D
  hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 11:24 am

Right AGAIN!!!

– 1

goat
goat
  hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 1:05 pm

There is only two ways to solve the problem, 1 is regulation, and the other is to fight when or before they come to evict you by death, when your servitude is no longer required.

goat
goat
  hardscrabble farmer
November 30, 2022 4:50 pm

BTW, we are in this problem to begin with precisely because of deregulation that prevented the unnatural accumulation of such vast wealth / land ownership, as well the accumulation of power in the hands of our would be masters, when they deregulated the lawful money system and allowed the creation of wealth out of thin air.
Hard money was a limit on not only wealth, but the power of individuals and more importantly perhaps the state and governments. Now with such deregulated, as we have seen, the ability to create wealth from nothing equates to near infinite power and riches.

GNL
GNL
  Anonymous
November 30, 2022 12:16 pm

The system is already completely FUBAR. Really.

Anyone who has worked for something is aghast at the thought of someone else taking it from them (it’s already happening btw). No, I am not advocating to take your deep shekels (hat tip to flash).

This is a fight between the rich and everyone else. Soros, Yuval Harari and Buffet have alluded to this many times. IMO, there is no bigger fight. This fight is freedom vs. slavery. Really, the biggest problem is the fiat money system. The elite control it and they are using to do endless terrible things. Just think what could not be done if money could not be conjured out of thin air.

What changes would you support in order to ensure your and your progeny’s freedom? Me? I would like to see the end of…
1. “Government and Corporate partnerships”
2. Monopoly. Is Google a monopoly? Sure seems so.
3. End of corporations.Yes, we fought as much against the Kings corporations as any other reason.
4. Maybe limit the number of employees a business can have? I’m certainly willing to have a conversation on how to end centralization. There needs to be some kind of conversation. Buuuuuuut, the elite will NEVER have that conversation because what do they REALLY care about? J.O.B.S.
Fuck jobs, we need an army of small businesses in America again. You know what the modern day farmer is? Entrepreneurs.

Here’s something I just discovered (may not be news to you)…a person can create a trust and whatever money is made inside that trust can be distributed tax free to the fund owners(?). How? The trust recipients((?) I’m not sure I’m using the correct terms here. That’s why the question marks) can borrow 100k and have the trust pay the loan. Also, why is income taxed higher than investment income?

How can you not see the problem with limitless $$ = cotrol/slavery over you? $$ is a claim on resources. Our labor is a resource = you are owned.

goat
goat
  GNL
November 30, 2022 1:07 pm

Ah, someone who can think outside their dogmatic confines. Excellent.

Billy the Kid
Billy the Kid
  GNL
November 30, 2022 6:25 pm

Bingo, we are slaves from birth in this rat race maze with no cheese at the end. We must wake everyone we can to this fact. If you leave the reservation, they hunt you to either deport you or murder you if you resist being thrown from the land you were born into but want no part in the government enforced slavery thereof. We are stateless if we renounce our 14th amendment citizen slavery with no dual citizenship, they’ve seen to it,and that the stateless have no humanrights. Tell me again how free you are in Amerika? It hasn’t been America in along mfking time.

goat
goat
  GNL
November 30, 2022 12:59 pm

Yes, he will fight for the right for the few to own the whole world? The fact is that this country was born from telling the king that he couldn’t own all the land here. It is likely why Jefferson used happiness instead of the word property, which would have made them look like hypocrites since they had just justified the largest land transfer probably to date at that time to the people (not that it lasted long).
I’m an absolutist (Allodial title) when it comes to land on the micro, but if you believe such on the macro then you should have no problem with being a serf / slave or evicted by death. since there is nowhere for you to be evicted to, as even the commons, i.e. public ride aways, i.e. roads and such, are want to be turned over (stolen) to private interest.
Even Locke acknowledged a limit to property rights when he said of it “within the bounds of nature.”

Billy the Kid
Billy the Kid
  goat
November 30, 2022 6:32 pm

Thebanks out of the city of london own our government and the land under it’s jurisdiction. Hence why you pay endless taxes and fees on it and your income,profits,etc. We’ve been sold out to be slaves from birth along time ago.

bidenTouchesKids
bidenTouchesKids
November 30, 2022 10:02 am

Speaking of ol’ Bill
comment image

comment image

Colorado Artist
Colorado Artist
  bidenTouchesKids
November 30, 2022 7:13 pm

When my pop first started practicing medicine, it was like any
other service. People paid out of pocket and it was reasonable.
my birth in 1959 cost $120. My eldest son’s birth in NYC in 1990
cost $7800 because the wife had corporate insurance. We paid nothing.
But someone did.
The next 3 we paid out of pocket because of the insurance deductible
after she became a full time mother and it was about $1000 per.
In adjusted dollars, about right for specialized care for both mother and baby.

The Duke of New York
The Duke of New York
November 30, 2022 11:02 am

With limited supplies of fertilizer, it only makes more sense to move to regenerative practices. Moderns industrial scale agriculture has been based on the schilling of inputs (fertilizer, pesticides, special crops to go with the pesticides), not on efficacy.

People like Gabe Brown and Masanobu Fukuoka have proved that regenerative techniques can match or exceed input based farming, while being safer and producing more nutritive crops, and building soil organism ecosystems instead of destroying them.

Fuck Monsanto and Bayer. If even 30% of farmers worldwide went to regenerative farming, they would be bankrupt (as they deserve to be).

brian
brian
  The Duke of New York
November 30, 2022 7:37 pm

I’ve mentioned this a few times before on TBP that our relatives in Sask have farmed there over a hundred fifty odd years on the same patch of ground. The soil was black as the ace of spades back when I was a kid spending summers there.

Today, the soils are bleached to a dull grey. The ‘modern’ farming methods have, like ALL corporate and govt meddling, made tons of money for corps and destroyed the soil biome making the need for chemical fertilizers essential. Just like junkies giving new customers a free ride first couple times, then they become steady customers until dead.

Old school farming or ‘regenerative’ farming, whatever you want to label it as, can more than compete with ANY modern farming. The upside to old school farming is that the soils remain healthy and product from these soils is FAR tastier and nutritious than the factory farmed rubbish fed to the dumbed down masses.

IMO, most farmers are going to be moving back to that methodology when TSHTF. Everything will collapse at first down to whats manageable. Then as the soils are rebuilt and animal husbandry gets reintroduced, source of fertilizer, then they will grow back to where they are again producing quality food stuffs and not the watered cardboard being sold in todays grocery stores. But there will also be a lot of relearning old farming methods too…