Crafting A Cartel, Part II

 

Originally posted at Dispatches from Reality, by Scipio Eruditusdfreality.substack.com


“The average person is handicapped when coming face to face with a CONSPIRACY so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.”

— J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director (1924-1972), 33° Freemason


Previous Entry

Crafting A Cartel, Part I

Crafting A Cartel, Part I


 

The lines between an intelligence agency, a secret society, and an organized criminal enterprise are almost distinctions without a difference at this point. As I have discussed in Part I, this relationship goes way beyond the practicalities of life on the edge. Indeed, the broader agenda of the Mystery religion has been knowingly advanced through the coordination of these powerful entities: one bloody hand washing the other. Each of these groups is so hopelessly entwined with the other at this point it is nearly impossible to truly discern the dividing line betwixt them.

The symbiotic relationship between the mafia, Masonry, the moneylenders, and the Mystery religion is at the heart of so many of societies true epidemics. From drug overdoses, to homosexuality, to illegal immigration, to pornography; you will continually find this nexus of evil men at the heart of these matters. Each assault upon our morality, our currency, and our country is explained away as the inevitable forces of societal progress. Yet, seemingly without fail, we find the same hidden hand orchestrating events at every turn. A select few deciding the fate of the pliant masses: that has largely been the rule of world events the last three centuries — not the exception.

In this war against self governance, against righteousness, against decency, we will almost always find organized crime leading the vanguard of debauchery and decay.

Continue reading “Crafting A Cartel, Part II”

Stucky QOTD: Hugh Hefner

Admin often posts R.I.P. announcements of various dead people, some of them not well known. Yet, he did not do so for one of the most iconic well-known figures of modern times? This can not stand!

Eating, sleeping, and sex are the most natural and necessary of human functions. We all do it, yea, we must. Show a picture of someone eating? No big deal. Show a picture of someone sleeping? No big deal. Show a picture of someone fucking?  OHMIGOD, WE’RE GOING TO HELL!! This makes no logical sense.

Q1: Have you watched Porn in the last year?

(Note: This is to establish a baseline. Failure to answer invalidates you subsequent commentary.)

—— Q1-A (optional) Did you choke the chicken or pacify the beaver?

Q2: What is Porn? (Consider that the above 50′s Playboy centerfold  was once considered pornography … and compare it to the very ads that are on TBP today.)

Q3: What’s wrong with Porn, anyway?


.

.

Stucky Q.O.T.D. —- Can You Be COMPLETELY Honest

R.I.P.  Penthouse Magazine.

“Effective immediately adult magazine Penthouse is to end its print edition after 50 years and go online-only. The closure of the print edition of the magazine, which was founded in 1965 by Bob Guccione, follows the announcement last year by Hugh Hefner’s rival Playboy that it will no longer feature naked women.  FriendFinder Networks, the magazine’s parent company, said that subscribers to the print edition will be converted to digital.”

I bought Playboy … just for the great articles.

I bought Penthouse … just for the great cartoons.  For example, here is a cartoon of Hillary Cuntham’s cat.  Fricken hilarious,no?

This question is for Men Only.  I am NOT going to ask if you watch porn from time to time.  There are 6.81 trillion Doing-The-Nasty vids out there …. and they’re all FREE!  I damn sure KNOW you watch porn! (Except Hardscrabble Farmer, who has a perfect life, and is very very happily married, and who sees much animal fornication on the farm … which will probably be his next blockbuster article.)  So, let’s keep the question very simple.

The Question:  Do you watch more than an hour of porn per month, or less?

Alternate Question For Religious Folks:  Is porn a sin?


DON’T PUT YOUR YAHOO ON YAHOO

Via The Guardian

Optic Nerve: millions of Yahoo webcam images intercepted by GCHQ

• 1.8m users targeted by UK agency in six-month period alone
• Optic Nerve program collected Yahoo webcam images in bulk
• Yahoo: ‘A whole new level of violation of our users’ privacy’
• Material included large quantity of sexually explicit images

Yahoo webcam image.
The GCHQ program saved one image every five minutes from the users’ feeds. Photograph: Chris Jackson/Getty Images

Spencer Ackerman and James Ball

Britain’s surveillance agency GCHQ, with aid from the US National Security Agency, intercepted and stored the webcam images of millions of internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, secret documents reveal.

GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not.

In one six-month period in 2008 alone, the agency collected webcam imagery – including substantial quantities of sexually explicit communications – from more than 1.8 million Yahoo user accounts globally.

Yahoo reacted furiously to the webcam interception when approached by the Guardian. The company denied any prior knowledge of the program, accusing the agencies of “a whole new level of violation of our users’ privacy”.

GCHQ does not have the technical means to make sure no images of UK or US citizens are collected and stored by the system, and there are no restrictions under UK law to prevent Americans’ images being accessed by British analysts without an individual warrant.

The documents also chronicle GCHQ’s sustained struggle to keep the large store of sexually explicit imagery collected by Optic Nerve away from the eyes of its staff, though there is little discussion about the privacy implications of storing this material in the first place.
NSA ragout 4

Optic Nerve, the documents provided by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden show, began as a prototype in 2008 and was still active in 2012, according to an internal GCHQ wiki page accessed that year.
Advertisement

The system, eerily reminiscent of the telescreens evoked in George Orwell’s 1984, was used for experiments in automated facial recognition, to monitor GCHQ’s existing targets, and to discover new targets of interest. Such searches could be used to try to find terror suspects or criminals making use of multiple, anonymous user IDs.

Rather than collecting webcam chats in their entirety, the program saved one image every five minutes from the users’ feeds, partly to comply with human rights legislation, and also to avoid overloading GCHQ’s servers. The documents describe these users as “unselected” – intelligence agency parlance for bulk rather than targeted collection.

One document even likened the program’s “bulk access to Yahoo webcam images/events” to a massive digital police mugbook of previously arrested individuals.

Continue reading “DON’T PUT YOUR YAHOO ON YAHOO”