The Left Has Its Pope

Pope Francis is part of a larger trend of the rise of the political left among Catholic intellectuals. He is, in a sense, the culmination of that trend.

There has long been a political left among Catholics, as among other Americans. Often they were part of the pragmatic left, as in the many old Irish-run, big city political machines that dispensed benefits to the poor in exchange for their votes, as somewhat romantically depicted in the movie classic, “The Last Hurrah.”

But there has also been a more ideological left. Where the Communists had their official newspaper, “The Daily Worker,” there was also “The Catholic Worker” published by Dorothy Day.

A landmark in the evolution of the ideological left among Catholics was a publication in the 1980s, by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, titled “Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy.”

Although this publication was said to be based on Catholic teachings, one of its principal contributors, Archbishop Rembert Weakland, said: “I think we should be up front and say that really we took this from the Enlightenment era.”

The specifics of the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter reflect far more of the secular Enlightenment of the 18th century than of Catholic traditions. Archbishop Weakland admitted that such an Enlightenment figure as Thomas Paine “is now coming back through a strange channel.”

Strange indeed. Paine rejected the teachings of “any church that I know of,” including “the Roman church.” He said: “My own mind is my own church.” Nor was Paine unusual among the leading figures of the 18th century Enlightenment.

To base social or moral principles on the philosophy of the 18th century Enlightenment, and then call the result “Catholic teachings” suggests something like bait-and-switch advertising.

But, putting aside religious or philosophical questions, we have more than two centuries of historical evidence of what has actually happened as the ideas of people like those Enlightenment figures were put into practice in the real world — beginning with the French Revolution and its disastrous aftermath.

Both the authors of the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter in the 1980s, and Pope Francis today, blithely throw around the phrase “the poor,” and blame poverty on what other people are doing or not doing to or for “the poor.”

Any serious look at the history of human beings over the millennia shows that the species began in poverty.

It is not poverty, but prosperity, that needs explaining. Poverty is automatic, but prosperity requires many things — none of which is equally distributed around the world or even within a given society.

Geographic settings are radically different, both among nations and within nations. So are demographic differences, with some nations and groups having a median age over 40 and others having a median age under 20. This means that some groups have several times as much adult work experience as others. Cultures are also radically different in many ways.

As distinguished economic historian David S. Landes put it, “The world has never been a level playing field.” But which has a better track record of helping the less fortunate — fighting for a bigger slice of the economic pie, or producing a bigger pie?

In 1900, only 3 percent of American homes had electric lights but more than 99 percent had them before the end of the century. Infant mortality rates were 165 per thousand in 1900 and 7 per thousand by 1997. By 2001, most Americans living below the official poverty line had central air conditioning, a motor vehicle, cable television with multiple TV sets, and other amenities.

A scholar specializing in the study of Latin America said that the official poverty level in the United States is the upper middle class in Mexico. The much criticized market economy of the United States has done far more for the poor than the ideology of the left.

Pope Francis’ own native Argentina was once among the leading economies of the world, before it was ruined by the kind of ideological notions he is now promoting around the world.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
September 22, 2015 9:13 am

I would like to ask the Pope a single question:

If Capitalism causes the problems of the poor, why do non Capitalist countries have so many more poor than Capitalist countries? (Venezuela might be a good example, having recently made the transition from Capitalist to Socialist)

Not that I, a Christian and common lower economic class but still fully self supporting self employed man, would ever get to ask the Pope or his close associates such a question.

kokoda
kokoda
September 22, 2015 10:28 am

The Pope and his church has turned Against the poor – no matter what they say.

besides anti-capitalism, the GloBull Warming political objective of much, much higher energy costs is a regressive tax and will completely fuck the poor.

Persnickety
Persnickety
September 22, 2015 10:40 am

I think that crazy-Ann Barnhardt’s rantings about this pope may have been fairly accurate.

But the papacy has been corrupt pretty much since its beginning.

bb
bb
September 22, 2015 11:48 am

Penn head , you show your asinine nonsense once again. The church and it pope didn’t start out corrupt it became corrupt do to human sin and evil.That being said no other institution on earth has done as much good for humans as the Catholic church. Read church history Penn head before you comment. I don’t like taking you to the woodshed this early in the morning.

Persnickety
Persnickety
September 22, 2015 11:53 am

Pb, if you want to believe that some asexual (or sometimes homosexual) guy in a big funny hat has the one and only direct line to God, go right ahead. If you want to ignore more than a millennium of history of popes abusing their office, getting into petty politics, violating all the tenets of their purported belief system, etc., go right ahead.

Edmond Dantes
Edmond Dantes
September 22, 2015 12:09 pm

After 55 years as a Roman Catholic, through all the scandals what with the cover up of the rampant pedophilia and random closing down of churches, (well not so random, they always tended to be the ones with the highest real estate value) putting up with arrogant and tyrannical priests, I had it when they hired a commie pope that was it for me I quit being a Roman Catholic and joined the LCMS Lutherans.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
September 22, 2015 12:13 pm

“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” Winston C. I’d like to add Capitalism too.

Satori
Satori
September 22, 2015 12:20 pm

I don’t think the Pope has a problem with capitalism

but we don’t have capitalism

we now have CRONY CAPITALISM

and it is a cancer that will destroy us

all except for the top 1% or so

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
September 22, 2015 12:42 pm

I was in Venezuela before the Venzians elected Chavez. 90% of the people were in poverty. The wealth (from the countries oil) was concentrated in the 10% [sound fam?] …so yeh they tossed out one corrupt bunch for another.

Anonymous
Anonymous
September 22, 2015 2:30 pm

bb,

John mentioned that the Antichrist was already working among us in spirit, do you think he would not devote his most strenuous efforts at the leaders of the first generation of the Church?

That is why we must always find and study the scripture behind we are being taught by our Church leaders and evangelizers.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
September 22, 2015 5:41 pm

Can’t believe you bead-squeezers go along with the crowd that instantly brands anyone who speaks out regarding the plight of the poor an “evil liberal”. OMFG!
Satori is right, we haven’t had capitalism in the U.S. since the Civil War, if even then. The crony capitalism overflows the pots of the rich with none left to drip down to the rabble.
Whether you republican neo-cons like it or not, the pendulum has swung to its’ max and now it’s natural to reverse course.

bb
bb
September 22, 2015 10:05 pm

Anonymous ,I know . Just yanking Penn Heads chain

Persnickety
Persnickety
September 23, 2015 9:03 am

So lemme get this straight: Pb and the other Cafeteria Catholics here can pick and choose which parts of the Bible to follow, know the current pope is a fraud, are able to determine which prior popes are good or bad or indifferent, can therefore decide what parts of church doctrine should and should not apply, yet they are still adherents to a globally managed top-down religion that denies the value of the judgment of lay individuals?