GOVERNMENT IS THE PROBLEM

Here are two charts that show how successful, government solutions are for the citizens of this country. First off, even according to the manipulated and under-reported CPI figures, you have lost 65% of your purchasing power since 1978. Using a real measure of inflation, its closer to 85%, but why quibble. You are slowly but surely being impoverished by the Federal Reserve (aka Wall Street bankers) and the corrupt politicians you elected to represent your interests.

Doug Short presents the cost of college tuition, medical care and new cars over the last 38 years. One of these things is not like the other. The second chart shows the growth in Federal loans to students since 1995. You may notice that prior to the Federal government getting involved in college education, college tuition rose steeper than overall inflation but only by a moderate amount. My tuition at Drexel University in the mid-1980s was in the mid $5,000 range. I was able to work and pay the majority of my tuition, with only a couple thousand dollars in loans.

Inflation Markers

If you are perceptive (that leaves out all libs and government employees) you will notice that as the Federal government has doled out more loans, the cost of college tuition has skyrocketed. You see, just like welfare, you get more of what you subsidize. If the federal government is willing to give your tax dollars to every Tom, Muhammed, or Laquesha to go to college, demand will rise. Since the supply is limited, colleges can raise prices dramatically as they know the Feds are supplying the paper.

The truth is that more than 50% of the dolts matriculating into college using government debt are intellectually incapable of college level studies. If the Federal government kept their hands out of higher education and stopped loaning money they don’t have to idiots who can’t add, subtract, or multiply, the fly by night for profit diploma mills would collapse overnight. Without an endless stream of government debt, only kids who really wanted and were capable of getting a college education, would enroll. Tuition costs would plummet as the demand dried up and institutions had to compete on price.

Medical care costs have risen at more than twice the level of general inflation over the last 38 years. Again, the Federal government is the cause. The Great Society Medicare and Medicaid programs are a major factor. The massive level of government regulations, bureaucracy, and corruption does not allow a free market in medical care. Obamacare is a national clusterfuck or rules, regulations, fines, and incentives to drive up costs. The government colludes with mega-insurance companies to destroy any competition based on prices. Prior to 1964 sick people dealt directly with doctors and hospitals. Inserting the government and insurance companies between patients and doctors has destroyed free market competition and driven prices higher.

The proof that industries without major Federal government intervention keep prices low is seen in the new car data since 1978. The cost of a new car has risen at about one-third the rate of overall inflation and far lower than medical care or college tuition. Despite the GM and Chrysler bailouts by the Feds, there has been cut throat competition between automakers from around the world. They must compete on quality and price. Americans have a multitude of choices when buying a new car. They also have a choice to buy a used car. This truly free market keeps prices down.

Despite the fact that competition keeps prices low, the socialists think they can run education, health care, and the entire economy better than the free market. That’s why we’re $20 trillion in debt, with $200 trillion of unfunded liabilities. And the solution is to elect Crooked Hillary? WTF???


 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
TC
TC
August 5, 2016 3:36 pm

Colleges aren’t so much about learning anymore. It’s more like a 4 year luxury country club vacation where you’re being sold on the fantasy timeshare of liberal dogma. Kids get a nice vacation, liberal profs and admins get paid 3x what they’d make in the real world, and taxpayers will ultimately end up with the bill.

Don Levit
Don Levit
August 5, 2016 3:45 pm

The government share of consumer credit growth since Obama took over is downright scary
Could the subsidies from the ACA directly to insurers have any correlation to the increases in premiums?

phoolish
phoolish
August 5, 2016 8:04 pm

… mmm, in 1980 you could buy a mid-size sedan for much less than $10k. Econo-cars for less than $3k. Don’t think the prices for those have only doubled. That said, I will admit the cars today are much better quality than 35 years ago.

No Ho
No Ho
August 6, 2016 4:29 pm

No bankruptcy option for student loans either. Check it out… thx to Hillary and Bill deal making

Neil
Neil
August 7, 2016 1:25 am

I don’t disagree with this column in principle. However, I do take exception to the part about who should receive student loans in this country. I went to school throughout the 90’s (both undergrad and doctorate programs) and had to assume student loans for the latter (which I paid off within 5 years of graduation). The author himself admits that he, too, took out modest student loans to afford his college education. This begs the question: who, exactly, in the authors opinion, should have access to a student loan? What criteria would you establish to separate the wheat from the chaff, as it were?

JJ
JJ
  Neil
August 7, 2016 3:57 am

@Neil, Before govt takeover of medicine, healthcare was cheap too. We had mutual societies (and a host of other organisations of varying degrees of grants and/or debt products).

These were all driven out of the market due to regulation but primarily via cronies through transfer of power (via regulations, barriers of entry etc) and lastly by making the govt the underwriter (fannie/freddie/medicare/medicaid etc etc).

The govt or sovereign can do that because the issuing authority of fiat and the primary consumer of debt is one and the same, i.e. currency and debt issued by a sovereign. Having a reserve bank and treasury does not change much, left hand vs right hand. Issuing in a different currency certainly does make the sovereign accountable, e.g. Argentina issued debt in USD, or US issuing debt redeemable in gold! This is a real check and balance.

Back to your question about… who should underwrite this debt.

The private sector of course… BUT…

In a more open market and ‘freer’ market. At the moment regulations act as a massive barrier to entry. A small number of players certainly increases prices (interest rate charged).

Access to debt is based on the ability to pay it back. A large number of players keeps the price down and also creates incentives for newer and innovative products.

Unfortunately most of us are asleeping and think govt is the answer.