BEST BUY REVENUE FALLS BY $450 MILLION & PROFIT FALLS BY $225 MILLION: STOCK SOARS

Cut through all the gibberish, spin, bullshit and lies and you see that Best Buy had a horrible fourth quarter after an atrocious fourth quarter last year.

  • Revenue declined by $451 million.
  • Actual profit from the business declined by $225 million.
  • Cash flow from operations declined by $300 million versus last year.
  • They have slashed inventories by $1.2 billion, an 18% reduction. What are they going to sell in 2014?

The Wall Street muppet show continues. Every retailer has reported awful 4th quarter results and Wall Street cheers because it was better than expected. They need muppets. Buy buy buy.

Best Buy Reports Fourth Quarter Results

Non-GAAP diluted EPS from continuing operations of $1.24GAAP diluted EPS from continuing operations of $0.88Annualized Renew Blue cost reductions reach $765 million

MINNEAPOLIS, Feb 27, 2014 (BUSINESS WIRE) — Best Buy Co., Inc. /quotes/zigman/219712/delayed/quotes/nls/bbyBBY+6.66% today announced results for the 13-week fourth quarter (“Q4 FY14”) and 52-week year ended February 1, 2014 (“FY14”), as compared to the 13-week fourth quarter (“Q4 FY13”) and 53-week year ended February 2, 2013 (“FY13”).

Revenue Q4 FY14 Q4 FY13 FY14 FY13
Revenue ($ in millions) $14,470 $14,921 $42,410 $43,913
Comparable store sales % change1 (1.2%) (1.4%) (0.8%) (3.5%)
Domestic Segment:
Comparable store sales % change (1.2%) 0.9% (0.4%) (1.7%)
Comparable online sales % change 25.8% 11.2% 19.8% 11.4%
International Segment:
Comparable store sales % change (1.7%) (12.6%) (3.1%) (12.0%)
Operating Income, Diluted EPS and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Q4 FY14 Q4 FY13 FY14 FY13
GAAP
Operating income (loss) as a % of revenue 3.2% (1.2%) 2.7% 0.4%
Diluted EPS from continuing operations $0.88 ($1.36) $1.98 ($0.80)
Non-GAAP2
Operating income as a % of revenue 4.5% 5.7% 2.8% 3.4%
Diluted EPS from continuing operations $1.24 $1.47 $2.07 $2.54
ROIC3 n/a n/a 9.1% 9.2%

Note: All information regarding the company’s results pertain to continuing operations and do not include the impact of the European business, which was sold on June 26, 2013, or mindSHIFT Technologies, which was sold on February 1, 2014. The extra week in FY13 occurred in Q1 FY13 and contributed approximately $735 million in revenue.

Hubert Joly, Best Buy president and CEO, commented, “As we said in our holiday sales release, the fourth quarter was an environment of declining retail traffic, intense promotion, fewer holiday shopping days and severe weather. In the face of these unusual circumstances, our strategy to be price competitive and provide an improved customer experience resulted in market share gains4 in a weaker-than-expected consumer electronics market.

While we cannot be satisfied with the fourth quarter operating income rate decline of 120 basis points, the decline included the expected approximate 100-basis point negative impact associated with our mobile warranty and new credit card agreement economics that we called out in our Q3 FY14 earnings release. Thus we were able to materially offset the price investments we have been making with substantial cost savings and other operational improvements.”

Joly continued, “Turning to the full year, during fiscal 2014 we made substantial progress against our Renew Blue priorities. First, after only one year, we exceeded our original Renew Blue cost reduction target of $725 million by delivering annualized Renew Blue cost reductions totaling $765 million. Second, we have made progress in stabilizing our top and bottom lines. Domestic comparable store sales were virtually flat for the year. Domestic operating income rate, however, was down 70 basis points versus 130 basis points in the previous year. Again, excluding the impact of the increased mobile warranty expense, our cost savings and other operational improvements have materially offset pricing and other Renew Blue investments.

Third, and very important for our future, we have enhanced how we serve our customers and have been building key foundational capabilities. Most notably, we have: (1) increased Domestic online sales by 20%; (2) significantly increased our price competitiveness; (3) rolled out ship-from-store to more than 1,400 locations; (4) opened 1,400 Samsung and 600 Windows stores-within-a-store and completed the first phase of our floor space optimization; (5) increased our Net Promoter Score by more than 300 basis points; (6) re-launched our loyalty and credit card programs; (7) advanced the transformation of our online platform and customer database; and (8) significantly strengthened our balance sheet through a renewed focus on our core business and a substantially more disciplined capital allocation process.”

Joly concluded, “Our Renew Blue transformation is a multi-year journey, and while it is off to an encouraging start, it is still in the early stages. As we move forward, we will continue to address three business imperatives: (1) improving our operational performance; (2) building foundational capabilities necessary to unlock future growth strategies; and (3) leveraging our unique assets to create significant differentiation that is meaningful for our customers and our vendors. Our focus is on executing against these imperatives in pursuit of our long-term non-GAAP financial targets of 5% to 6% operating income rate and 13% to 15% ROIC.”

Sharon McCollam, Best Buy EVP, CAO and CFO, commented, “With each of the imperatives Hubert just outlined comes year-over-year financial change – both positive and negative – and we know that modeling such changes absent additional information in a transformation like ours is extremely difficult. Therefore, as we have done the past several quarters, we are providing you today with our quarterly estimates of how these discrete financial impacts will affect our quarterly operating income rates for FY15.

These financial impacts continue to include the following business drivers: (1) the negative impact of ongoing pricing investments; (2) the negative impact of our incremental Renew Blue SG&A investments; (3) the temporary negative impact of our mobile warranty costs; (4) the negative impact of the economics of our new credit card agreement; and (5) the offsetting positive impact of the realization of Renew Blue cost savings, which now total $765 million on an annualized basis.

In our Q3 FY14 earnings release, we quantified the net year-over-year impact of these drivers to the operating income rate by quarter as follows: (1) negative 60 to 90 basis points in Q1 FY15; (2) negative 70 to 100 basis points in Q2 FY15; and (3) negative 30 to 60 basis points in Q3 FY15.

Today, due to a higher than expected negative impact from the economics of our new credit card agreement and incremental year-over-year pricing investments, we are now expecting the net impact of these drivers to be negative 70 to 90 basis points in Q1 FY15. In Q2 FY15 and Q3 FY15, however, due to the timing of the benefits, we will begin realizing substantially greater Renew Blue cost savings and will be able to significantly offset the impact of the negative P&L drivers for those quarters.”

McCollam continued, “We will also have discrete year-over-year impacts related to income tax in FY15. In Q1 FY15, we expect to reorganize certain foreign legal entities to simplify our overall structure. This reorganization will accelerate a non-cash tax benefit of approximately $0.87 to $1.01 per diluted share. Due to its materiality, this will be treated as a non-GAAP adjustment. In prior years, this benefit has been historically recognized on a periodic basis. As a result of this acceleration, the company will have a higher quarterly income tax expense and income tax rate going forward on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. For tax purposes, this benefit will continue to be amortized.

In addition, there are other discrete year-over-year income tax-related items that we also expect will have a negative impact on the FY15 income tax expense and the FY15 income tax rate.

We estimate the combined diluted EPS impact of these discrete income tax-related items on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis to be as follows: (1) negative $0.03 to $0.04 in Q1 FY15; (2) flat to positive $0.01 in Q2 FY15; (3) flat to negative $0.01 in Q3 FY15; and (4) negative $0.09 to $0.10 in Q4 FY15.

From a revenue perspective, in light of overall economic concerns, we are assuming that the industry declines in the consumer electronics category that we saw in the fourth quarter will continue. As a result, it is reasonable to expect that total company revenue and comparable store sales will remain slightly negative – similar to Q4 FY14 – in the first half of the year.”

Domestic Segment Fourth Quarter Results

Revenue

Domestic revenue of $12.30 billion declined 1.8% versus last year. This decline was primarily driven by a comparable store sales decline of 1.2%. Excluding a 30-basis point impact from the continuing rationalization of non-core businesses and a 30-basis point impact from a periodic profit sharing payment based on the long-term performance of the company’s externally managed extended service plan portfolio that occurred in January FY13 and did not recur in January FY14, the company estimates Domestic comparable store sales would have declined approximately 0.6%.

Comparable online sales increased 25.8% to $1.57 billion due to: (1) a higher average order value; (2) improved inventory availability supported by our ship-from-store and online distribution center expansion initiatives; (3) increased traffic; and (4) higher conversion on both the core and mobile sites.

From a merchandising perspective, growth in computing, appliances and gaming was more than offset by declines in other categories, including digital imaging, movies and home theater.

Gross Profit Rate

Domestic gross profit rate was 20.0% versus 22.3% last year. Excluding the 30-basis point impact from the periodic profit sharing payment described above, Domestic gross profit rate declined 200 basis points. This decline was primarily driven by (1) a 125-basis point incremental investment in structural and promotional pricing; (2) a 40-basis point negative impact of the new credit card agreement, which has less favorable economics than the expired agreement due to changes in both the regulatory environment and overall consumer credit market; (3) a 35-basis point negative impact from increased product warranty-related costs associated with higher claims frequency in the mobile phone category; and (4) a lower gross margin in mobile due to lower attachment rates on mobile service plans. These impacts were partially offset by the realization of Renew Blue cost reductions and other supply chain cost containment initiatives.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)

Domestic SG&A expenses were $1.96 billion or 16.0% of revenue versus $2.06 billion or 16.5% of revenue last year. On a non-GAAP basis, Domestic SG&A expenses were $1.91 billion or 15.5% of revenue versus $2.05 billion or 16.4% of revenue last year. This 90-basis point rate decline was primarily driven by (1) the realization of Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives; (2) tighter expense management throughout the company; (3) lower legal-related expenses; and (4) lower incentive compensation. These impacts were partially offset by Renew Blue investments in online growth and advertising.

International Segment Fourth Quarter Results

Revenue

International revenue of $2.17 billion declined 9.6% versus last year. The decline was primarily driven by (1) the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; (2) the loss of revenue from large format store closures in Canada and China; and (3) a comparable store sales decline of 1.7%. Comparable store sales were negatively impacted primarily by declining industry trends in Canada and Mexico.

Gross Profit Rate

International gross profit rate was 21.3% versus 22.3% last year. This 100-basis point rate decline was primarily driven by increased promotional activity and a mix shift into lower margin products in Canada.

SG&A

International SG&A expenses were $369 million or 17.0% of revenue versus $460 million or 19.2% of revenue last year. On a non-GAAP basis, International SG&A expenses were $363 million or 16.7% of revenue versus $425 million or 17.7% of revenue last year. This 100-basis point rate decline was primarily driven by Renew Blue cost reductions and tighter expense management in Canada, and to a lesser extent, the elimination of expenses associated with previously closed stores.

Renew Blue Cost Reduction Initiatives Update

Since the company’s Q3 FY14 earnings release, Renew Blue annualized cost reductions have increased $260 million, bringing the total Renew Blue annualized cost reductions to $765 million ($570 million in SG&A and $195 million in cost of goods sold). The additional $260 million in cost reductions ($230 million in SG&A and $30 million in cost of goods sold) is primarily driven by (1) the optimization of the field and store operating models in the U.S. and Canada; (2) structural changes to certain compensation and benefits programs; and (3) ongoing optimization of returns, replacements and damages.

The company has already exceeded the $725 million North American cost reduction opportunity it presented at its Investor Day in November 2012. Today the company is increasing the target to $1 billion. These additional cost reductions are expected to come primarily from the optimization of (1) returns, replacements and damages and (2) logistics and supply chain.

Restructuring Charges and Non-Cash Impairments

During Q4 FY14, the company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges totaling $115 million primarily related to severance charges associated with the Renew Blue SG&A cost reduction initiatives outlined above. The majority of the $115 million is expected to be paid in cash in FY15.

The company also recorded $65 million of non-restructuring asset impairments (within the SG&A expenses line). These non-cash impairments were primarily a result of store-related impairment charges in the Domestic segment.

Please see the table titled “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” attached to this release for more detail.

mindSHIFT Transaction

On February 1, 2014, the company completed the sale of mindSHIFT Technologies, a business-to-business technology services provider it had acquired in December 2011. Results from mindSHIFT are now presented as discontinued operations.

Dividends

On December 31, 2013, the company paid a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per common share outstanding, or $59 million.

Conference Call

Best Buy is scheduled to conduct an earnings conference call at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time (7:00 a.m. Central Time) on February 27, 2014. A webcast of the call is expected to be available at www.investors.bestbuy.comboth live and after the call.

(1) Best Buy’s comparable store sales is comprised of revenue at stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months as well as revenue related to other comparable sales channels. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from the comparable store sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquired stores and businesses are included in the comparable store sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portion of the calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to the International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The calculation of comparable store sales excludes the impact of revenue from discontinued operations and the extra week of revenue in FY13. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, Best Buy’s method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers’ methods. Online revenue is included in Best Buy’s comparable store sales calculation.

(2) The company defines non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP SG&A, non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share for the periods presented as its gross profit, SG&A, operating income and diluted earnings per share for those periods calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) adjusted to exclude restructuring charges, non-restructuring asset impairments, gains on sales of investments and the required tax allocation impact from the sale of the company’s European business.

These non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with an understanding of the company’s financial performance adjusted to exclude the effect of the items described above. These non-GAAP financial measures assist investors in making a ready comparison of the company’s gross profit, SG&A, operating income and diluted earnings per share for its fiscal quarter and year ended February 1, 2014, against the company’s results for the respective prior-year periods and against third party estimates of the company’s gross profit, SG&A, operating income and diluted earnings per share for those periods that may not have included the effect of such items. Additionally, management uses these non-GAAP financial measures as an internal measure to analyze trends, allocate resources, and analyze underlying operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for, or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, GAAP financial measures and may differ from similar measures used by other companies. Please see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this release for more detail.

(3) The company defines non-GAAP return on invested capital (“ROIC”) as non-GAAP net operating profit after taxes divided by average invested capital for the periods presented (including both continuing and discontinued operations). Non-GAAP net operating profit after taxes is defined as our operating income for the periods presented calculated in accordance with GAAP adjusted to exclude the effects of: (i) operating lease interest; (ii) investment income; (iii) net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests; (iv) income taxes; (v) all restructuring charges in costs of goods sold and operating expenses, the effect of Q2 FY14 LCD legal settlements, and goodwill and tradename impairments; and (vi) the noncontrolling interest impact of the restructuring charges, and transaction costs related to the disposition of our interest in Best Buy Europe (BBE). Average invested capital is defined as the average of our total assets for the trailing four quarters in relation to the periods presented adjusted to: (i) exclude excess cash and cash equivalent and short-term investments; (ii) include capitalized operating lease obligations calculated using a multiple of eight times rental expenses; (iii) exclude our total liabilities, less our outstanding debt; and (iv) exclude equity of noncontrolling interests.

This non-GAAP financial measure provides investors with a supplemental measure to evaluate how effectively the company is investing its capital and deploying its assets. Management uses this non-GAAP financial measure to assist in allocating resources. Trends in the measure may fluctuate over time as management balances long-term initiatives with possible short-term impacts. Our ROIC calculation utilizes total operations in order to provide a measure that includes the results of and capital invested in all operations, including those businesses that are no longer continuing operations. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for, or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, GAAP financial measures and may differ from similar measures used by other companies. Please see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this release for more detail.

(4) Share gain is determined by reference to information from The NPD Group and other industry sources. According to The NPD Group’s POS Weekly Tracking Service, revenue for the CE industry was down 3.2% during the 13 weeks ended February 1, 2014 compared to the 13 weeks ended February 2, 2013. The CE industry, as defined by The NPD Group, includes TVs, desktop and notebook computers, tablets not including Kindle, digital imaging and other categories. It does not include mobile phones, gaming, movies, music, appliances or services.

Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements:

This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 as contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that reflect management’s current views and estimates regarding future market conditions, company performance and financial results, business prospects, new strategies, the competitive environment and other events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” ”assume,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” “guidance,” “plan,” “outlook,” and other words and terms of similar meaning. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the potential results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those contained in such forward-looking statements are the following: general economic conditions, changes in consumer preferences, consumer confidence, consumer spending and debt levels, online sales levels and trends, average ticket size, the mix of products and services offered for sale, credit market changes and constraints, product availability, sales volumes, competitive initiatives of competitors, including pricing actions and promotional activities of competitors, profit margins and the impact of pricing investments on our revenue, weather, natural or man-made disasters, the company’s ability to react to a disaster recovery situation, changes in law or regulations, including changes in tax rates, foreign currency fluctuation, availability of suitable real estate locations, the company’s ability to manage its property portfolio, the impact of labor markets and new product introductions on overall profitability, the availability of qualified labor pools, the company’s ability to retain qualified employees. management turnover, failure to achieve anticipated expense and cost reductions from operational and restructuring changes, disruptions in our supply chain, the costs of procuring goods the company sells, failure to achieve anticipated profitability increases from operational and restructuring changes, failure to accurately predict the duration over which we will incur costs, acquisitions and development of new businesses, divestitures of existing businesses, failure to achieve anticipated benefits of announced transactions, integration challenges relating to new ventures and unanticipated costs associated with previously announced or future restructuring activities, our ability to protect information relating to our customers, A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other matters can be found in the company’s annual report and other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including, but not limited to, Best Buy’s Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2013. Best Buy cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not complete, and any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Best Buy assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement that it may make.

BEST BUY CO., INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Revenue $ 14,470 $ 14,921 $ 42,410 $ 43,913
Cost of goods sold 11,553 11,589 32,720 33,547
Restructuring charges – cost of goods sold 1 1
Gross profit 2,917 3,331 9,690 10,365
Gross profit % 20.2% 22.3% 22.8% 23.6%
Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,333 2,522 8,391 8,954
SG&A % 16.1% 16.9% 19.8% 20.4%
Goodwill impairment 822 822
Restructuring charges 115 168 159 420
Operating income (loss) 469 (181) 1,140 169
Operating income (loss) % 3.2% (1.2%) 2.7% 0.4%
Other income (expense):
Gain on sale of investments 2 20
Investment income and other 9 3 27 19
Interest expense (23) (28) (100) (109)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense 457 (206) 1,087 79
Income tax expense 146 254 398 349
Effective tax rate 32.0% (122.7%) 36.7% 443.6%
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations 311 (460) 689 (270)
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (17) 81 (166) 37
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest 294 (379) 523 (233)
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) (1) (2) (1)
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (29) 11 (15)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $ 293 $ (409) $ 532 $ (249)
Amounts attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations $ 310 $ (461) $ 687 $ (271)
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (17) 52 (155) 22
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $ 293 $ (409) $ 532 $ (249)
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders
Continuing operations $ 0.89 $ (1.36) $ 2.01 $ (0.80)
Discontinued operations (0.04) 0.15 (0.45) 0.07
Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 0.85 $ (1.21) $ 1.56 $ (0.73)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders
Continuing operations $ 0.88 $ (1.36) $ 1.98 $ (0.80)
Discontinued operations (0.05) 0.15 (0.45) 0.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 0.83 $ (1.21) $ 1.53 $ (0.73)
Dividends declared per Best Buy Co., Inc. common share $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.68 $ 0.66
Weighted average Best Buy Co., Inc. common shares outstanding (in millions)
Basic 346.3 338.1 342.1 339.0
Diluted 352.6 338.1 347.6 339.0
BEST BUY CO., INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in millions)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Excluding Best Buy Europe
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 2, 20131
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,678 $ 1,826 $ 1,665
Short-term investments 223
Receivables 1,308 2,704 1,075
Merchandise inventories 5,376 6,571 6,042
Other current assets 900 946 821
Total current assets 10,485 12,047 9,603
Net property and equipment 2,598 3,270 2,918
Goodwill 425 528 528
Tradenames 101 131 105
Customer relationships 203 77
Equity and other investments 43 86 61
Other assets 361 522 249
TOTAL ASSETS $ 14,013 $ 16,787 $ 13,541
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 5,122 $ 6,951 $ 5,933
Unredeemed gift card liabilities 406 428 424
Accrued compensation 444 520 425
Accrued liabilities 1,272 1,639 1,316
Accrued income taxes 147 129 121
Short-term debt 596
Current portion of long-term debt 45 547 544
Total current liabilities 7,436 10,810 8,763
Long-term liabilities 976 1,109 1,029
Long-term debt 1,612 1,153 1,150
Equity 3,989 3,715 2,599
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY $ 14,013 $ 16,787 $ 13,541
(1) Represents the assets, liabilities and equity as of Feb 2, 2013 excluding Best Buy Europe.
BEST BUY CO., INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in millions)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests $ 523 $ (233)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to total cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 701 876
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 15 41
Goodwill impairments 822
Restructuring charges 259 457
Loss on sale of business 143
Stock-based compensation 90 117
Realized gain on sale of investment (18)
Deferred income taxes (28) (100)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (9)
Other, net 71 68
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities:
Receivables 7 (217)
Merchandise inventories 597 265
Other assets (70) (110)
Accounts payable (986) 38
Other liabilities (273) (432)
Income taxes 54 (152)
Total cash provided by operating activities 1,094 1,422
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment (547) (742)
(Purchases) sales of investments, net (180) 56
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred upon sale 206 25
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired (31)
Change in restricted assets 5 74
Other, net (1) 16
Total cash used in investing activities (517) (602)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repurchase of common stock (255)
Borrowings of debt, net 381 70
Dividends paid (233) (224)
Issuance of common stock 171 27
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 9
Other, net (9) (14)
Total cash provided by (used in) financing activities 319 (396)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH (44) 1
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 852 425
ADJUSTMENT FOR CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR 202
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AFTER ADJUSTMENT 852 627
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 1,826 1,199
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ 2,678 $ 1,826
BEST BUY CO., INC.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
($ in millions)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Domestic Segment Performance Summary
Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Revenue $12,298 $12,519 $35,831 $36,716
Gross profit $2,454 $2,796 $8,274 $8,741
SG&A $1,964 $2,062 $7,006 $7,365
Operating income $393 $650 $1,145 $1,040
Key Metrics
Comparable store sales % change1 (1.2%) 0.9% (0.4%) (1.7%)
Gross profit as a % of revenue 20.0% 22.3% 23.1% 23.8%
SG&A as a % of revenue 16.0% 16.5% 19.6% 20.1%
Operating income as a % of revenue 3.2% 5.2% 3.2% 2.8%
Adjusted (non-GAAP) Results2
Gross profit $2,454 $2,797 $8,010 $8,742
Gross profit as a % of revenue 20.0% 22.3% 22.4% 23.8%
SG&A $1,905 $2,053 $6,887 $7,342
SG&A as a % of revenue 15.5% 16.4% 19.2% 20.0%
Operating income $549 $744 $1,123 $1,400
Operating income as a % of revenue 4.5% 5.9% 3.1% 3.8%
International Segment Performance Summary
Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Revenue $2,172 $2,402 $6,579 $7,197
Gross profit $463 $535 $1,416 $1,624
SG&A $369 $460 $1,385 $1,589
Operating income (loss) $76 ($831) ($5) ($871)
Key Metrics
Comparable store sales % change1 (1.7%) (12.6%) (3.1%) (12.0%)
Gross profit as a % of revenue 21.3% 22.3% 21.5% 22.6%
SG&A as a % of revenue 17.0% 19.2% 21.1% 22.1%
Operating income (loss) as a % of revenue 3.5% (34.6%) (0.1%) (12.1%)
Adjusted (non-GAAP) Results2
SG&A $363 $425 $1,368 $1,552
SG&A as a % of revenue 16.7% 17.7% 20.8% 21.6%
Operating income $100 $110 $48 $72
Operating income as a % of revenue 4.6% 4.6% 0.7% 1.0%
(1) Best Buy’s comparable store sales is comprised of revenue at stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to other comparable sales channels. The portion of the calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to the International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
(2) Please see table titled “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the back of this release.
BEST BUY CO., INC.
REVENUE CATEGORY SUMMARY
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Domestic Segment Summary
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Consumer Electronics1 32% 33% (5.9%) (5.0%)
Computing and Mobile Phones1 46% 44% 2.9% 11.4%
Entertainment 11% 12% (5.6%) (18.9%)
Appliances 5% 5% 17.1% 11.7%
Services2 5% 5% (9.2%)3 6.2%3
Other 1% 1% n/a n/a
Total 100% 100% (1.2%) 0.9%
International Segment Summary
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Consumer Electronics1 31% 34% (10.0%) (17.8%)
Computing and Mobile Phones1 39% 38% 2.7% (5.0%)
Entertainment 11% 10% 0.6% (17.8%)
Appliances 15% 14% 3.8% (14.7%)
Services2 4% 4% (0.7%) (12.8%)
Other <1% <1% n/a n/a
Total 100% 100% (1.7%) (12.6%)
(1) During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the “Consumer Electronics” revenue category to “Computing and Mobile Phones” to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices. Prior years have been recast for comparability.
(2) The “Services” revenue category consists primarily of service contracts, extended warranties, computer related services, product repair and delivery and installation for home theater, mobile audio and appliances.
(3) The Domestic comparable store sales for the “Services” revenue category reflects a periodic profit sharing payment based on the long-term performance of the company’s externally managed extended service plan portfolio that occurred in January FY13 and did not recur in January FY14. Excluding this impact, comparable store sales would have been (2.6%) in Q4 FY14 and (0.9%) in Q4 FY13.
BEST BUY CO., INC.
REVENUE CATEGORY SUMMARY
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
Domestic Segment Summary
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales
Twelve Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Consumer Electronics1 30% 32% (5.6%) (7.7%)
Computing and Mobile Phones1 48% 45% 4.7% 7.0%
Entertainment 8% 10% (16.3%) (21.5%)
Appliances 7% 6% 16.7% 10.1%
Services2 6% 6% 0.2%3 0.3%3
Other 1% 1% n/a n/a
Total 100% 100% (0.4%) (1.7%)
International Segment Summary
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales
Twelve Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013 Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
Consumer Electronics1 28% 31% (9.4%) (17.2%)
Computing and Mobile Phones1 40% 39% (1.7%) (4.1%)
Entertainment 7% 8% (9.3%) (17.1%)
Appliances 20% 17% 8.4% (17.3%)
Services2 5% 5% (5.3%) (10.0%)
Other <1% <1% n/a n/a
Total 100% 100% (3.1%) (12.0%)
(1) During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the “Consumer Electronics” revenue category to “Computing and Mobile Phones” to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices. Prior years have been recast for comparability.
(2) The “Services” revenue category consists primarily of service contracts, extended warranties, computer related services, product repair and delivery and installation for home theater, mobile audio and appliances.
(3) The Domestic comparable store sales for the “Services” revenue category reflects a periodic profit sharing payment based on the long-term performance of the company’s externally managed extended service plan portfolio that occurred in January FY13 and did not recur in January FY14 Excluding this impact, comparable store sales would have been 2.2% in FY14 and (1.6%) in FY13.
BEST BUY CO., INC.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
The following tables reconcile operating income, net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented for continuing operations (GAAP financial measures) to adjusted operating income, adjusted net earnings and adjusted diluted earnings per share for continuing operations (non-GAAP financial measures) for the periods presented.
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
$ % of Rev. $ % of Rev.
Domestic – Continuing Operations
Gross profit $2,454 20.0% $2,796 22.3%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Adjusted gross profit $2,454 20.0% $2,797 22.3%
SG&A $1,964 16.0% $2,062 16.5%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (59) (0.5%) (9) (0.1%)
Adjusted SG&A $1,905 15.5% $2,053 16.4%
Operating income $393 3.2% $650 5.2%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 59 0.5% 9 0.1%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 3 0.0%
Restructuring charges 97 0.8% 81 0.6%
Adjusted operating income $549 4.5% $744 5.9%
International – Continuing Operations
SG&A $369 17.0% $460 19.2%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (6) (0.3%) (35) (1.5%)
Adjusted SG&A $363 16.7% $425 17.7%
Operating income (loss) $76 3.5% ($831) (34.6%)
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 6 0.3% 35 1.5%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 819 34.1%
Restructuring charges 18 0.8% 87 3.6%
Adjusted operating income $100 4.6% $110 4.6%
Consolidated – Continuing Operations
Gross profit $2,917 20.2% $3,331 22.3%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Adjusted gross profit $2,917 20.2% $3,332 22.3%
SG&A $2,333 16.1% $2,522 16.9%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (65) (0.4%) (44) (0.3%)
Adjusted SG&A $2,268 15.7% $2,478 16.6%
Operating income (loss) $469 3.2% ($181) (1.2%)
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 65 0.4% 44 0.3%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 822 5.5%
Restructuring charges 115 0.8% 168 1.1%
Adjusted operating income $649 4.5% $854 5.7%
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
$ % of Rev. $ % of Rev.
Net earnings (loss) $310 ($461)
After-tax impact of restructuring charges – COGS 0 1
After-tax impact of net LCD settlements1 6 0
After-tax impact of non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 42 31
After-tax impact of goodwill impairment 0 821
After-tax impact of restructuring charges 74 107
Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale2 4 0
Adjusted net earnings $436 $499
Diluted EPS $0.88 ($1.36)
Per share impact of restructuring charges – COGS 0.00 0.01
Per share impact of net LCD settlements1 0.02 0.00
Per share impact of non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 0.12 0.09
Per share impact of goodwill impairment 0.00 2.42
Per share impact of restructuring charges 0.21 0.31
Per share income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale2 0.01 0.00
Adjusted diluted EPS $1.24 $1.47
Twelve Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
$ % of Rev. $ % of Rev.
Domestic – Continuing Operations
Gross profit $8,274 23.1% $8,741 23.8%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
LCD settlements3 (264) (0.7%) 0 0.0%
Adjusted gross profit $8,010 22.4% $8,742 23.8%
SG&A $7,006 19.6% $7,365 20.1%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (84) (0.2%) (23) (0.1%)
LCD settlement legal fees3 (35) (0.1%) 0 0.0%
Adjusted SG&A $6,887 19.2% $7,342 20.0%
Operating income $1,145 3.2% $1,040 2.8%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Net LCD settlements3 (229) (0.6%) 0 0.0%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 84 0.2% 23 0.1%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 3 0.0%
Restructuring charges 123 0.3% 333 0.9%
Adjusted operating income $1,123 3.1% $1,400 3.8%
International – Continuing Operations
SG&A $1,385 21.1% $1,589 22.1%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (17) (0.3%) (37) (0.5%)
Adjusted SG&A $1,368 20.8% $1,552 21.6%
Operating loss ($5) (0.1%) ($871) (12.1%)
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 17 0.3% 37 0.5%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 819 11.4%
Restructuring charges 36 0.5% 87 1.2%
Adjusted operating income $48 0.7% $72 1.0%
Twelve Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
Feb 1, 2014 Feb 2, 2013
$ % of Rev. $ % of Rev.
Consolidated – Continuing Operations
Gross profit $9,690 22.8% $10,365 23.6%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
LCD settlements3 (264) (0.6%) 0 0.0%
Adjusted gross profit $9,426 22.2% $10,366 23.6%
SG&A $8,391 19.8% $8,954 20.4%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A (101) (0.2%) (60) (0.1%)
LCD settlement legal fees3 (35) (0.1%) 0 0.0%
Adjusted SG&A $8,255 19.5% $8,894 20.3%
Operating income $1,140 2.7% $169 0.4%
Restructuring charges – COGS 0 0.0% 1 0.0%
Net LCD settlements3 (229) (0.5%) 0 0.0%
Non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 101 0.2% 60 0.1%
Goodwill impairment 0 0.0% 822 1.9%
Restructuring charges 159 0.4% 420 1.0%
Adjusted operating income $1,171 2.8% $1,472 3.4%
Net earnings (loss) $687 ($271)
After-tax impact of restructuring charges – COGS 0 1
After-tax impact of net LCD settlements3 (142) 0
After-tax impact of non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 67 41
After-tax impact of goodwill impairment 0 821
After-tax impact of restructuring charges 104 271
After-tax impact of gain on sale of investments (12) 0
Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale2 18 0
Adjusted net earnings $722 $863
Diluted EPS $1.98 ($0.80)
Per share impact of net LCD settlements3 (0.41) 0.00
Per share impact of non-restructuring asset impairments – SG&A 0.19 0.12
Per share impact of goodwill impairment 0.00 2.42
Per share impact of restructuring charges 0.30 0.80
Per share impact of gain on sale of investments (0.04) 0.00
Per share income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale2 0.05 0.00
Adjusted diluted EPS $2.07 $2.54
(1) Represents interim period tax reporting impact of Q2 FY14 LCD-related legal settlements.
(2) Tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale and resulting required tax allocation between continuing and discontinued operations.
(3) Includes settlements reached in Q2 FY14. Settlements reached prior to Q2 FY14 are not included.
BEST BUY CO., INC.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
($ in millions)
(Unaudited and subject to reclassification)
The following information provides a reconciliation of a non-GAAP financial measure to the most comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The company has provided the non-GAAP financial measure, which is not calculated or presented in accordance with GAAP, as information supplemental and in addition to the financial measure that is calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Such non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for, or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, the GAAP financial measure. The non-GAAP financial measure in the accompanying news release may differ from similar measures used by other companies.The following table includes the calculation of Adjusted ROIC for total operations, which includes both continuing and discontinued operations (non-GAAP financial measures), along with a reconciliation to the calculation of return on total assets (“ROA”) (GAAP financial measure) for the periods presented.
Calculation of Return on Invested Capital1
Feb 1, 20142 Feb 2, 20132
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
Operating income – continuing operations $ 1,140 $ 169
Operating loss – discontinued operations (206) (14)
Total operating income 934 155
Add: Operating lease interest3 517 587
Add: Investment income 33 32
Less: Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (NCI) 9 (16)
Less: Income taxes4 (629) (763)
NOPAT $ 864 $ (5)
Add: Restructuring charges and impairments5 256 1,340
Add: NCI impact of BBYM profit share buyout, restructuring charges and impairments (38) (3)
Adjusted NOPAT $ 1,082 $ 1,332
Average Invested Capital
Total assets $ 14,174 $ 16,551
Less: Excess Cash6 (1,564) (554)
Add: Capitalized operating lease obligations7 8,272 9,397
Total liabilities (10,453) (12,485)
Exclude: Debt8 1,674 2,140
Less: Noncontrolling interests (160) (627)
Average invested capital $ 11,943 $ 14,422
Adjusted return on invested capital (ROIC) 9.1% 9.2%
Calculation of Return on Assets1
Feb 1, 20142 Feb 2, 20132
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests $ 523 $ (233)
Total assets 14,174 16,551
Return on assets (ROA) 3.7% (1.4%)
(1) The calculations of Return on Invested Capital and Return on Assets use total operations, which includes both continuing and discontinued operations.
(2) Income statement accounts represent the activity for the 12 months ended as of each of the balance sheet dates. Balance sheet accounts represent the average account balances for the 4 quarters ended as of each of the balance sheet dates.
(3) Operating lease interest represents the add-back to operating income driven by our capitalized lease obligations and represents fifty percent of our annual rental expense which is the multiple used for the retail sector by one of the nationally recognized credit rating agencies that rates our creditworthiness, and we consider it to be an appropriate multiple for our lease portfolio.
(4) Income taxes are calculated using a blended statutory rate at the enterprise level based on statutory rates from the countries we do business in.
(5) Includes all restructuring charges in costs of goods sold and operating expenses, goodwill and tradename impairments, non-restructuring impairments, and the BBE transaction costs.
(6) Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are capped at the greater of 1% of revenue or actual amounts on hand. The cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments in excess of the cap are subtracted from our calculation of average invested capital to show their exclusion from total assets.
(7) The multiple of eight times annual rental expense in the calculation of our capitalized operating lease obligations is the multiple used for the retail sector by one of the nationally recognized credit rating agencies that rates our creditworthiness, and we consider it to be an appropriate multiple for our lease portfolio.
(8) Debt includes short-term debt, current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt and is added back to our calculation of average invested capital to show its exclusion from total liabilities.

SOURCE: Best Buy Co., Inc.

OBAMA’S RED LINE JUST CROSSED BY RUSSIA – NOW WHAT YOU SNIVELING WEASEL?

Obama warned the elected government of the Ukraine to back off on defending itself against revolutionaries in the streets. Russia begs to differ with Nobel Peace Prize winning Obama. The red line has been crossed this morning. Your move Mr. Obama. I predict another speech and then he’ll play some basketball in the White House gym, put out a press release about the tremendous success of Obamacare, and do an interview with a liberal shrew on MSNBC about another executive order to force all businesses to raise the minimum wage to $10.12 per hour. He did a study and the the extra 2 cents will save the world and create 1 million new jobs.

Does this Fourth Turning seem to be calming down or heating up?

Pro-Russian Gunmen Seize Ukraine Crimean Parliament; Russia Puts Jets On High Alert; Hryvnia In Record Plunge

Tyler Durden's picture

All those clips we showed in the past few days of Russian forces amassing in the Crimean (such as this one)? Well, turns out they were all predictive of what has just happened in the Crimean region parliament at Simferopol, where around 120 pro-Russian Gunmen occupied the parliament building and raised the Russian flag. The scene was the site of Wednesday’s scuffles between Tatar groups and pro-Russian supporters. As Euronews reports, local Tatar leader Refat Chubarov posted that the buildings have been occupied by men in uniforms bearing “no recognisable insignia.” Kyiv says it would regard any movements by Russian military in Crimea outside Moscow’s Black Sea Base in Sevastopol as an act of aggression. Following the fall of President Viktor Yanukovych divisions in Ukraine have come to the fore. All this happens as Russian troops in the area are building up and at the same time as Russia put fighter jets on combat alert, according to Interfax.

The Russian flag flies atop the parliament building:

Euronews clarifies that the 120 men that seized Crimea parliament “have enough weapons to defend [the buildings] for a month” according an MP quoted by Interfax agency. Former Crimean Prime Minister and UDAR MP Serhiy Kunitsyn said to the agency that he spent all the night in contact with the armed group, “These professionally trained people are armed. They brought weapons – automatic weapons, grenade launchers, and machine guns,” he said, while speaking from the Ukraine parliament on Thursday.

According to Bloomberg, the group is allowing deputies to enter the legislature in the city of Simferopol for a possible vote on the status of Crimea, home to Russia’s Black Sea fleet, the Center of Journalist Research said. Ukraine prosecutors began a terrorism probe. .

“Provocateurs are on the march,” Acting Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said on his Facebook Inc. page as police cordoned off the block around parliament. “It’s time for cool heads, the consolidation of healthy forces and precise actions.”

At the same time Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry summoned Russia’s acting envoy in Kiev for immediate consultations.

“I am appealing to the military leadership of the Russian Black Sea fleet,” said Olexander Turchinov, acting president since the removal of Viktor Yanukovich last week. “Any military movements, the more so if they are with weapons, beyond the boundaries of this territory (the base) will be seen by us as military aggression

Reports Reuters:

There were mixed signals from Moscow, which put fighter jets along its western borders on combat alert, but earlier said it would take part in discussions on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) financial package for Ukraine. Ukraine has said it needs $35 billion over the next two years to stave off bankruptcy. The fear of military escalation prompted expressions of concern from the West, with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen urging Russia not to do anything that would “escalate tension or create misunderstanding”.

 

Polish foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski called the seizure of government buildings in the Crimea a “very dangerous game”.This is a drastic step, and I’m warning those who did this and those who allowed them to do this, because this is how regional conflicts begin,” he told a news conference.

 

It was not immediately known who was occupying the buildings in the regional capital Simferopol and they issued no demands, but witnesses said they spoke Russian and appeared to be ethnic Russian separatists.

 

Interfax news agency quoted a witness as saying there were about 60 people inside and they had many weapons. It said no one had been hurt when the buildings were seized in the early hours by Russian speakers in uniforms that did not carry identification markings.

 

“We were building barricades in the night to protect parliament. Then this young Russian guy came up with a pistol … we all lay down, some more ran up, there was some shooting and around 50 went in through the window,” Leonid Khazanov, an ethnic Russian, told Reuters. “They’re still there … Then the police came, they seemed scared. I asked them (the armed men) what they wanted, and they said ‘To make our own decisions, not to have Kiev telling us what to do’,” said Khazanov.

 

About 100 police were gathered in front of the parliament building, and a similar number of people carrying Russian flags later marched up to the building chanting “Russia, Russia” and holding a sign calling for a Crimean referendum. One of them, Alexei, 30, said: “We have our own constitution, Crimea is autonomous. The government in Kiev are fascists, and what they’re doing is illegal … We need to show our support for the guys inside (parliament). Power should be ours.”a

As a reminder, so far Putin has been silent on his views about the sovereignty of the Crimean region which is host to the critical Russian Sevastopol naval base. Russian President Vladimir Putin has ignored calls by some ethnic Russians in Crimea to reclaim the territory handed to then Soviet Ukraine by Soviet Communist leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1954. The United States says any Russian military action would be a grave mistake. But Russia’s foreign ministry said in a statement that Moscow would defend the rights of its compatriots and react without compromise to any violation of those rights.

Russian Lenta, citing the Crimean information agency, reports that the Crimean deputees have begun a referendum on the status of the Crimean autonomy, which is not quite a secession. Yet.

Elsewhere, Ukraine’s deposed president, who as we reported first some time ago had fled to Russia, reappeared, as expected in Russia, and claimed legitimacy to his post saying the Ukraine’s “mob” actions were illegal . From Reuters:

Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovich said on Thursday he was still the legitimate president of his country and that people in its southeastern and southern regions would never accept the “lawlessness” brought by leaders chosen by a mob. Russian news agencies quoted a statement by Yanukovich as saying he had asked Moscow to guarantee his personal safety.

 

The statement could not be independently verified and it was not clear where Yanukovich was, although some media groups have suggested he is in Moscow after fleeing Ukraine, where he was toppled by opposition forces at the weekend.

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman said he had no information and could not comment on the statement.

 

“I, Viktor Fedorovich Yanukovich appeal to the people of Ukraine. As before I still consider myself to be the lawful head of the Ukrainian state, chosen freely by the will of the Ukrainian people,” he was quoted as saying.

 

“Now it is becoming clear that the people in southeastern Ukraine and in Crimea do not accept the power vacuum and complete lawlessness in the country, when the heads of ministries are appointed by the mob.”

 

“On the streets of many cities of our country there is an orgy of extremism,” he said, adding that he and his closest aides had been threatened physically.

 

“I have to ask the Russian authorities to provide me with personal safety from the actions of extremists.”

 

Russian television showed what it said was a copy of the statement.

 

Interfax news agency quoted a source in the authorities as saying Moscow would ensure Yanukovich’s safety on the Russian territory.

 

“In connection with the appeal by president Yanukovich for his personal security to be guaranteed, I report that the request has been granted on the territory of the Russian Federation,” the source was quoted as saying.

And just to make sure tensions reach a fever pitch, Interfax reported a few hours ago that Russian fighter jets along the Western Border were put on high alert:

The crews of fighter jets deployed in Russia’s Western Military Districts have been placed on high alert as part of surprise combat drills ordered by Russian President and Supreme Commander-in-Chief Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, the Defense Ministry said.

 

“Our fighter jets are constantly patrolling the airspace over border districts,” the ministry said in a press release, seen by Interfax-AVN on Thursday. “As soon as they were put on high alert, aviation units of the Western Military District redeployed to their operative air fields,” it said.

 

At the moment, “the district’s bombers are tackling combat training tasks targeting an imaginary adversary at aviation training ranges,” the ministry said.

Not surprisingly, the Ukraine economy, already in critical condition, is shutting down and the Hryvnia is imploding: Ukraine’s currency weakened 10.3 percent to 11.2 per dollar at 12:21 p.m. in Kiev, the lowest level since it was introduced in 1996, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The central bank imposed capital controls this month to stem its decline.

DO WHATEVER THE HELL YOU WANT

Our attorney general recently told state’s attorney generals they don’t have to enforce laws they don’t agree with. Sounds great to me, so I’m going to do whatever the hell I want, and when I’m arrested and jailed (if the cops don’t kill me first) I’ll make mention of our attorney general. Do you think it’ll work? Laws are for the for the little people, not liberal progressive party members. So sorry.

null

SHOULD WE KEEP LAWS WITH WHICH WE DON’T AGREE?

Attorney General Eric Holder recently told state Attorneys General that they are not required to enforce laws with which they don’t agree. Especially state laws prohibiting gay marriage. In Obama’s America, it’s hip to be queer. Not normal.

Holder and President Obama have made a mockery of their Oaths of Office when they swore to uphold the laws of the land and uphold the Constitution. They have enforced only laws that fit their leftist agenda while bypassing Congress and ignoring laws already on the books.

The revelation made by Holder to state Attorneys General that they are do not have to enforce laws in which they disagree begs a few questions:

1. Why have laws if one individual can single-handedly decide the laws validity or enforcement based on his or her personal ideology? Doesn’t this invalidate the entire system in a democratic republic where we elect leaders to vote the way their constituents would have them vote?

The same question could be expanded to federal judges who often override state laws or referendums against the will of the majority of the citizens. Again, a single individual deciding what laws will be enforced. Many judges are political appointees who agree with the ideology of the regime in power.

2. If an Attorney General can decide which laws will be enforced, shouldn’t the proletariat be allowed to decide what laws they want to keep? Aren’t there law-abiding citizens in blue states who believe they are guaranteed the right to firearm ownership by the Constitution? Shouldn’t these individuals be allowed to own or carry guns because they disagree with the laws created by their elected officials?

AWD has a concealed carry permit but cannot legally carry in a federal building. Are federal buildings immune to violence? Experience tells us no but AWD must walk unprotected into the post office every time I want to mail a package. Should I ignore the federal law that stupidly forces me to potentially be at the mercy of a madman who doesn’t follow federal gun law? I think I will!

I certainly support a strong defense in America and don’t mind my tax dollars going towards our military. But I have a huge problem with the dollars siphoned away each paycheck to support moochers on welfare, food stamps and other social programs. Some are victims of Obama’s economy but tens of millions are professional leeches too lazy, ignorant, and worthless to work. Why should I subsidize their existence with my hard-earned income? I would prefer to use that money for the benefit my own family. And smoking, drinking and running around with hot women! Woo hoo! Maybe I shouldn’t pay taxes! Except the IRS already seizes the money before I even see it!

AWD doesn’t like speed limits! Or long stop lights either! I’m a busy cat and have places to go and liberals to piss off. Stop signs? Ain’t nobody got time for dat! Don’t think I or anyone else should keep those laws anymore! And what Attorney General or other politician hasn’t had a DUI? Enough of those DUI laws too! Go catch a murderer instead of a guy who blows one-millionth of a percent above the limit!

2. What if an Attorney General decides he or she won’t enforce gun laws in their state? Or protect the citizens from federal law with which he or she doesn’t agree? Will Holder hold them accountable if the ignoring of that law doesn’t fit the leftist, PC will of Obama? Ask Arizona after they passed SB1070!

America used to be a country of laws and that’s what differentiated us from other countries. Everyone was equal under the law. Now we are a country of politically correct suggestions at the behest of statist thugs in power of the White House and Department of Justice who look the other way when it benefits them politically or ideologically. They see no reason to abide by the Constitution or the system that has worked remarkably well for over 230 years. Want more illegals who will vote Democrat forever? Don’t enforce federal immigration laws and sue states that dare pass immigration legislation that mirrors federal law. It’s so easy when you are a tyrannic thug with an agenda! It’s even easier when the Party of the loyal opposition is so corrupt and cowardly that they sit on the sidelines watching it all happen.

Watch for more and more executive orders from Obama and more laws that benefit everyone but American producers to be enforced by Holder. Also, watch as Holder continues to ignore the protection of civil rights for anyone who is not a minority.

Obama and Holder are not incompetent or dumb. They are evil.

Read more at http://angrywhitedude.com/2014/02/keep-laws-dont-agree/#Ej2570GGuAW2bYvB.99

null

CONSTITUTIONAL TIPPING POINT

It’s now emperors act. They change laws or pass executive orders whenever they feel like it. They order drone strikes, and threaten foreign leaders and sovereign nations at will. They spy on everyone, censor information, and control the media. It’s all happening here folks, and the Congress is finally getting around to doing something about it. Under normal circumstances, such a leader would be impeached, but not our first (half) black president. If his actions stand, this country is no longer a democracy, and no longer a representative government, it is a dictatorship.

null

‘The Imperial Presidency’

House holds hearing on executive overreach

BY: Elizabeth Harrington

http://freebeacon.com/the-imperial-presidency/
February 26, 2014 5:42 pm

Members of Congress and constitutional law experts testified before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, warning that the legislative branch is in danger of ceding its power in the face of an “imperial presidency.”

The hearing, “Enforcing the President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws,” focused on the multiple areas President Barack Obama has bypassed Congress, ranging from healthcare and immigration to marriage and welfare rules.

Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, testified that the expansion of executive power is happening so fast that America is at a “constitutional tipping point.”

My view [is] that the president, has in fact, exceeded his authority in a way that is creating a destabilizing influence in a three branch system,” he said. “I want to emphasize, of course, this problem didn’t begin with President Obama, I was critical of his predecessor President Bush as well, but the rate at which executive power has been concentrated in our system is accelerating. And frankly, I am very alarmed by the implications of that aggregation of power.”

What also alarms me, however, is that the two other branches appear not just simply passive, but inert in the face of this concentration of authority,” Turley said.

While Turley agrees with many of Obama’s policy positions, he steadfastly opposes the method he goes about enforcing them.

“The fact that I happen to think the president is right on many of these policies does not alter the fact that I believe the means he is doing [it] is wrong, and that this can be a dangerous change in our system,” he said. “And our system is changing in a very fundamental way. And it’s changing without a whimper of regret or opposition.”

Elizabeth Price Foley, a law professor at Florida International University College of Law, agreed, warning that Congress is in danger of becoming “superfluous.”

“Situations like this, these benevolent suspensions as they get more and more frequent and more and more aggressive, they’re eroding our citizens’ respect for the rule of law,” she said. “We are a country of law and not men. It’s going to render Congress superfluous.”

Foley said Congress is not able to tackle meaningful legislation out of fear that Obama would “simply benevolently suspend portions of the law he doesn’t like.”

If you want to stay relevant as an institution, I would suggest that you not stand idly by and let the president take your power away,” she said.

Panelists and members of Congress dismissed the idea of impeachment, and instead focused on lawsuits to challenge the constitutionality of the president’s unilateral moves.

Four House members testified on the first panel during the hearing to highlight legislation they have sponsored to thwart the administration’s executive overreach.

Impeachment would “surely be extremely divisive within the Congress and the nation generally, and would divert the attention of Congress from other important issues of the day,” said Rep. Jim Gerlach (R., Pa.).

Gerlach, who testified before the committee, introduced H.R. 3857, the “Enforce the Take Care Clause Act,” which would expedite the review and injunction process for federal courts to challenge executive actions. Such a challenge would have to pass a supermajority in both chambers in order to be fast-tracked.

Given the growing number of examples where this President has clearly failed to faithfully execute all laws, I believe it is time for Congress to put in place a procedure for a fast-track, independent review of those executive actions,” he said.

Gerlach said he proposed the bill due to Obama’s repeated alterations to his signature law, the Affordable Care Act.

The ACA has been revised, altered and effectively rewritten by the president and his administration 23 times since July,” he said.

“When we have these constant changes at the president’s whim think about what that does to businesses’ planning capabilities and hiring capabilities and their expansion capabilities,” Rep. Tom Rice (R., S.C.) said. “We shouldn’t wonder why our economy is struggling.”

Rice has proposed the “Stop This Overreaching Presidency (STOP) Resolution” as a remedy. The resolution, which has 114 cosponsors, would direct the House to file lawsuits against four of the president’s unilateral actions, including the employer mandate delay in Obamacare and deferred action program for illegal immigrants.

Turley said Congress must take action to regain their power as the “thumping heart of our system.”

“The fact is, we’re stuck with each other,” Turley said. “Whether we like it or not in a system of shared powers. For better or worse we may deadlock, we maybe despise each other. The framers foresaw such periods, they lived in such a period.”

 

Sour Thoughts from the Police Beat

Guest Post by Fred Reed

 

Things Don’t Work Like They Spoza

February 25, 2014

A cause of this dysfunction is the notion that criminals can “pay their debt to society,” and then be all better, as if crimes were purchases made on a credit card. Say that a marginal human wielding a bolo knife crawls through a window, burglarizes the house, and gets caught and sentenced to five years. He gets out some time later having “paid his debt”—actually the citizenry have paid $20K a year to keep him fed and comfortable. He is now thought to have been cleansed and ready to make a fresh start.

Not a chance.

As any cop can tell you, career criminals commit almost all crime. When Willy Bill gets caught carrying a television out from someone’s window,, you will find, with the absolute certainty one associates with bankruptcy in a Democratic administration, that he has a rap sheet going back to puberty. Two years after getting out for one offense, he will be arrested for another. Normal, civilized people don’t suddenly think, “Gosh, slow day. I guess I’ll do a little burglary.”  Either you don’t do it at all, or it’s all you do.

Whenever I covered a guy who stabbed a woman thirty-seven times while robbing her at an ATM, I knew he would prove to be be out on parole for something similar. He always was. Which is why three-strikes-and-you’re-out makes considerable sense, at least for serious crimes: e.g., forcible rape, armed robbery, and ADW, though not for felony shoplifting or peddling grass.  You can cage a rattlesnake after it bites someone, but when you letit out, it is still a rattlesnake.

Which brings up to parole and the phoniness of sentencing.

Suppose that a judge gives Willy Bill fifteen years for a bloody robbery. This looks good to the public: Grr, woof, bow-wow. Sernness. But Willy gets time off for good behavior, and a parole-eligibility date in seven years or next Wednesday, whichever come first.  The sentence he gets isn’t the sentence he serves.  It has to do with crowding in prisons and, I strongly suspect, a desire to make it appear to the public that criminals are being punished when they aren’t much.

Then you have Willy Bill and his parole hearing. Parole boards often consist of gullible citizens with no experience of criminal behavior. Further, Willy is a good con man. He does great repentance-speak. He is All Fixed Now. Nobody produces better sincerity than a psychopath who wants out. It’s forty-weight. You could lube a diesel with it. The parole board bites. Three months later he kills a woman.

Jesus is responsible for much of this mayhem. Prisons churn out conversions to Christ like Hershey’s does chocolate kisses. I once spent a week of work days in the Cook County Jail in Chicago when a friend was head of IAD there. He arranged for me to interview prisoners. I heard a common song: “I done wrong. I know I did. But I found Jesus. He my man now. All I want is serve my savior.”

Sure. Any day now. But it convinces parole boards, some of them anyway. When he gets out, whatever he did, he’ll do again. Within weeks, most likely. He’s doesn´t know how to do anything else. The system rests on the idea that criminals can get better. Mostly they don’t. They can’t.

(Incidentally, if you want a marvelous (I thought, anyway) book about how scams work in the slam, try Games Criminals Play. It’s a hoot.)

Then comes plea-bargaining, a labor-saving device for prosecutors and judges. America is supposed to have trial by jury. It says so in the Constitution we used to have. Actually, something over 90% of cases are pleaded. If ten percent of criminals had a jury trial, the system would stop like a two-dollar watch.  Our legal system supposes we are a civilized people, and that such peoples don’t  commit a lot of crime. Try that in Detroit, Newark, Camden, Chicago.

Suppose that an urban hairball slingin’ rock on the corner fires seven times at a competitor with a stolen Glock, missing because he has no idea how to shoot. He is arrested for attempting murder, which is exactly what he was attempting. The public defender pleads him down to aggravated assault or malicious jaywalking, or maybe Inappropriate Thought, which is what we pay PDs to do: keep violent felons on the street (which, by the way, they know perfectly well they are doing.). What with time off and a probably stupid parole board that additionally has been told to let people go because the slams are full to bursting, a few years later he’s out and, sure enough, kills….

Then there is drug rehab, a profitable scam that doesn’t work. It is profitable in part because it doesn’t work: a city will pay several times for the rehab of the same addict. Dopers amount to a reusable resource for the rehab racket.

A judge doesn’t want to send an endless stream of crack-heads, scag monkeys, and pill freaks to the slam. There isn’t enough room. Sending them to rehab sounds humanitarian, progressive, and improving. Actually, with very few exceptions, it is useless, as all involved know.  I have sat in a police car outside a rehab house in Washington and watched an inmate come out, score, and go back in. The cop I was with did nothing. There was no point in doing anything.

Jury trials are in large part a scam. I don’t have a better idea, but that doesn’t keep them from being scams. To begin with, you are supposed to face an impartial jury. The Foundering Fathers stuck this in so that ordinary citizens wouldn’t be railroaded by kangaroo juries packed with the equivalent of the King’s littermates. It was a perfectly good idea. However, in the racially divided America of today, jurors of another race are unlikely to be impartial. Space aliens would come closer. Think of the passions ignited nationally in the cases of Rodney King, OJ Simpson, and George Zimmerman. The same emotions poison lesser trials that few hear about. Not good.

Another problem is that s, except in high-dollar cases with alpha-shysters, juries are sometimes composed of people who weren’t smart enough to avoid jury duty. They can resemble the waiting room in a bus station. People with a Macy’s-Basement IQ simply can’t understand the what is g oing on. A woman I know was a juror in a civil trial in Washington in which both sides stipulated that sexual harassment was not involved. Despite this, the jury wanted to give the complainant an award for having been sexually harassed.

Finally, trials are not about truth, justice, and beauty, but about winning. Period. Neither lawyer wants a jury of people who think objectively, as for example twelve physicists. In a rape case, the defense will try to seek a censorious Aunt Polly spinster who will think, “Well, if she went into that awful biker bar in a three-inch miniskirt, she deserves what she got, the trash.” The prosecutor will want a hard-nosed law-and-order type who will think, “If we can’t keep our women safe from this kind of animal, what the hell kind of country are we?”

If that ain’t impartial, I can’t imagine what might be.

JC PENNEY LOSES $235 MILLION IN 4TH QTR & $1.9 BILLION FOR THE YEAR: STOCK SOARS

JC Penney stock is soaring by 12% after hours because they ONLY lost $235 million in the 4th quarter. Back up the truck and buy buy buy. This is a can’t miss investment. CNBC and Wall Street are gaga. The new CEO who was the old CEO before he got fired for the Apple douchebag is blathering about the tremendous 2014 that awaits JC Penney. The Wall Street lemmings are buying this load of bull again and trying to convince muppets to buy this piece of shit dying retailer.

Here are the facts:

  • 4th quarter revenue FELL by $102 million versus last year’s horrific 4th quarter.
  • Free cash flow PLUNGED by $169 million versus last year’s horrific 4th quarter.
  • For the year, their revenue fell by ONE BILLION dollars and they managed to lose $1.9 BILLION versus ONLY losing $1.5 BILLION the year before.
  • Despite producing lower sales in the 4th quarter, their inventory ROSE by $600 million, a 25% increase. Inventory should grow at the same rate as sales at a well run retailer. They missed by that much. This means massive discounting and plunging margins for the 1st quarter.
  • Their debt ROSE by $2.6 BILLION in one year. They must repay $700 million in the next 12 months. Good luck with that.
  • They now have $5.6 BILLION of debt versus $3 Billion of equity.

This dog is still on course for bankruptcy, but the Wall Street shysters don’t care about facts. They have a recovery story to sell to the muppets. JC Penney is back baby!!!!! But buy buy.

JCP’s Quarter In Charts: Retailer Generates Least Amount Of Cash Flow In Holiday Quarter In Recent History

Tyler Durden's picture

Moments ago JCP did what it does best: released results that missed expectations, with Revenues in the traditionally strongest, holiday (Q4) quarter of $3.78 billion below the $3.86 billion expected, and comp sales up 2.0% below the 2.1% expected. Additionally, the company’s profit margin was 28.4%, the second lowest in recent history, and only better than the 23.8% posted a year ago when the company was openly imploding. But the red flag was Free Cash Flow, driven entirely by inventory liquidation, was $246 million: the lowest such amount for the holiday quarter also in history. Whether or not this miss was not quite as bad as a worst case miss could be, whatever that means, is unclear but for now the traditional post-earning squeeze has pushed the stock higher. How long this particular squeeze persists is unclear, but likely depends on the longer-term viability of the company, and recent trends. To determine what these are, here are some charts showing how the company has performed in recent years.

First, here is JCP’s all important Free Cash Flow. While in Q4 JCP generated a little over $200 million in cash, it is the next three quarters that matter, as this is when the company burned the bulk of its cash. As a reference point: last year, in the Q1-Q3 period, JCP burned $3 billion.

 

JCP better not intend on burning $3 billion this year too. Why? Because as it reported, it expects its liquidity “to be in excess of $2 billion at year-end.” Really? How? Because that inventory build and $2-3 billion cash need will hardly grow on trees.

Next, we look at revenue: while this missed as we noted above, it was the only bright spot in the earnings report – the good news: it wasn’t an all out crash, even if like FCF, it was the lowest revenue for the holiday quarter in recent history.

 

Next, and perhaps most troubling, was the reason for the company’s subar free cash flow creation: in a nutshell, the company did not sell nearly enough inventory in the quarter. As the following chart shows, JCP liquidated, and thus generated “only” $812 million in inventory cash in the quarter: in prior years this number was always greater than $1 billion. This likely means even greater mark downs in coming quarters as JCP scrambles to dump even staler products.

 

Last and almost least, was JCP’s profit margin in the quarter. Surprisingly, it was a substantial 28.4%. Why? See the chart above – the company opted to not liquidate stale inventory and pull  margins down even lower. This was “good” for the profit margin, but bad for cash flow creation, and even worse for future quarter margins.

Finally, the cherry on top in the newsflow had nothing to do with JCP per se, but with the SEC: as readers will recall, it was back on September 26 when the company announced on CNBC it would not do a follow on offering only to announce, a few hours later, that it was doing precisely such a follow on equity offering. We were disgusted and appalled. We are more disgusted and appalled by the SEC which has announced the following:

  • J C PENNEY: SEC NOT RECOMMENDING ACTION
  • J C PENNEY: SEC NOTICE SAID AGENCY CONCLUDED INVESTIGATION

And that, in a nutshell, is all you need to know about our criminal markets.

A CONVICT IS THE PERFECT ECONOMICS PROFESSOR AT A PRESTIGIOUS BUSINESS SCHOOL

One of our major competitors shoots themselves in the foot with this dimwitted move.

 

Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre To Teach Economics Class At University of Chicago

Submitted by Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Just in case you thought for a second that the sorry discipline we call economics couldn’t stoop any further into the gutter of academic idiocy and irrelevance, think again. It’s now being reported that ex-Goldman Sachs trader Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre (recently convicted on six counts of securities fraud) will be teaching an honors economics class at the “prestigious” University of Chicago.

There’s nothing like an esteemed University setting the already culturally accepted example that ethics are for suckers. Stealing, cheating and corruption are the values most exalted in today’s world. It doesn’t matter how you achieve your wealth, as long as you attain it. After all, it’s not as if you’ll ever get in trouble for it as long as you work for a “Too Big to Jail” bank.

From the UK’s Independent:

Fabrice Tourre, the former Goldman Sachs trader convicted on six counts of securities fraud six months ago, will teach an honours class in economics at the University of Chicago this spring.

 

Mr Tourre’s weekly Thursday afternoon seminar, called “Elements of Economic Analysis”, is part of his studies for a PhD in economics, after he completed a masters in operations research at Stanford University.

 

Last August, a federal court found “Fabulous Fab”, as he famously styled himself in emails to his girlfriend, liable for six of seven counts of securities fraud relating to the Abacus 2007-AC1 mortgage-linked collateralised debt obligation.

 

At the time, The New Yorker magazine wrote that Mr Tourre was the “only Wall Street banker to be found guilty of any charges having to do with the financial crisis” of 2008.

Don’t worry Fab, modern economics essentially bases its principles on your behavior. A match made in crony heaven.

Full article here.

Proof That Airport Screening Is Nothing More Than “Security Theater”

Guest Post by Mark Nestmann

Have you ever wondered what really goes on behind the scenes at Transportation Security Administration airport checkpoints?

Wonder no more. Recently, a former TSA screener wrote a tell-all article for Politico Magazine describing how America’s airport security apparatus actually works.

It’s not a pretty picture. At the bottom of the pecking order, the TSA passenger screening agents act a lot like teenaged boys. They spend much of their time reviewing the digital images of attractive females – “Alfalfas,” in TSA lingo – recorded on airport body scanners.

It’s even worse at the top of the TSA food chain. Consider the saga of the Rapiscan scanner, which began after an inept terrorist with a bomb hidden in his underwear tried to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day 2009. The bomb failed to explode, but America’s top-secret national security bureaucracy went into high gear following this “Underwear Bomber” incident. Its mission: to come up with new ways to detect bombs or weapons hidden under clothing.

It quickly became apparent that no one in the national security bureaucracy – starting at the top with Homeland Security Administration Secretary Janet Napolitano – really cared about whether a proposed solution actually worked. It was far more important to direct the billions of dollars Congress had appropriated to “fight terrorism” to the right place.

Rapiscan was one of the most politically connected companies with which Napolitano had to contend. Its chief lobbyist was none other than former Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff. Within weeks, Napolitano ordered more than 300 of Rapiscan’s machines, at $150,000 each. That’s not chump change.

From the outset, it was clear the devices didn’t work. One instructor at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport admitted as much when the machines were being installed. “They’re s**t,” he said. One problem is that body fat and plastic explosives look a lot alike on the scanners. Another is that firearms are virtually invisible to the devices if turned sideways in a pocket.

When the politicians in charge of our national security believe catering to lobbyists is more important than – well, security – you know we’re in trouble.

Unfortunately, the TSA doesn’t do much better when it doesn’t rely on lobbyists. Take the TSA’s “Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques” (SPOT) program. It’s based largely on the theory that our thoughts lead to unintentional “microexpressions” that can reveal concealed emotions. A media-savvy police officer at Boston’s Logan Airport figured out that if he claimed the technique was “racially neutral,” it might catch on.

He was right. The TSA didn’t want to offend anyone who might actually blow up an airplane. So instead, over the next decade, it spent nearly $1 billion deploying more than 3,000 “behavioral detection officers” to US airports to identify suspected terrorists. But according to a report issued late last year by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), it’s been a total waste of money.

The report revealed that in 2011 and 2012, the TSA referred 61,000 passengers to law enforcement agencies for investigation. Only 365 of these individuals were arrested – primarily for immigration-related offenses. The TSA’s behavioral experts didn’t find a single terrorist. On the other hand, the GAO found that 16 people who were later charged with terrorism-related activities managed to board airplanes – despite Rapiscan, SPOT, and all the rest of the TSA’s security initiatives.

This is the system you finance with your tax dollars. It’s worse than you ever imagined. It is, in the words of security expert Bruce Schneier, “security theater” at its finest.

Preventing airplanes from blowing up isn’t the real purpose. The actual objective is to create the appearance of security, while catering to the wants and needs of lobbyists and the voting public whom the mainstream media whip into a frenzy to “do something” about terrorism.

The TSA’s lack of success in detecting terrorists hasn’t stopped it from engaging in that time-honored pastime of “mission creep.” Not content to just screen passengers at airports, the TSA now sets up mobile screening centers along America’s highways and at bus depots and train stations. There’s no evidence this deployment does anything except give travelers headaches… but it satisfies the “do something” mentality.

Next time you hear a politician say we urgently need to “do something” – about anything – remember the TSA. If you care to do a little investigation, check out the politician’s campaign donors. Look into the politician’s background to find any business associates or family members who might stand to gain financially if he or she gets the “urgently needed” measures enacted. Always keep in mind that the actual priorities have little, if anything, to do with the stated needs.

Unfortunately, the tendency to placate powerful private interests is a characteristic of all bureaucracies. It’s impossible to avoid completely, as you’ve no doubt noticed when transiting through an airport.

But there are ways you can minimize the damage to your wealth, your privacy, and your dignity. One of the best ways I know is to seek solutions to those things you need in countries where bureaucracies aren’t running amok.

In many cases, this means living, working, investing, and traveling in countries where Big Brother isn’t – at least not yet – well funded enough to set up the kind of politically entrenched and immovable bureaucracies like the TSA.

For instance, in the Caribbean and many South American countries, airport security is considerably more relaxed than in the United States, yet terrorist-related incidents are extremely rare. You walk through a metal detector, present your boarding pass to the gate agent, and board the plane. That’s all.

It boils down to what’s important to you. If you believe that bureaucracies like the TSA consistently act in your best interests, do nothing. If you don’t, consider the alternatives.

Mark Nestmann
Nestmann.com

RON PAUL: DOWNSIZE ENTIRE MILITARY EMPIRE

“You don’t need hundreds of thousands of troops planning for the next war because nobody’s going to invade us, nobody’s going to attack us,” Paul said. “What I really want is [President Barack Obama] to downsize the foreign policy, because if you stay involved in 140 countries . . . stirring up trouble, and you downsize the military, you run into a problem. So, it’s our intervention that needs downsizing. But I certainly agree that in this day and age, we shouldn’t be building all these weapons.”

NEW HOME SALES SURGE!!!

Here is the blaring headline in the MSM:

 

New home sales hit five-and-a-half year high in January

 

The Wall Street shysters and CNBC bimbos are ecstatic. Of course, maybe we should examine the facts within the Census Bureau report:

  • There were 34,000 new homes sold in the entire country in January. There are 75 million homes in the country.
  • Of these 34,000 new homes “sold” in January, 10,000 were actually built. A contract can be cancelled for a nominal penalty amount. When housing went south for Toll Brothers, the cancellation rate exceeded 30%.
  • There were 32,000 new homes sold last January.
  • The median price has fallen by 7% since April.
  • New home sales are pacing 70% below 2005 levels, 40% below levels in the mid-1980’s when mortgage rates were 12%, and 25% below levels in the mid-1960s.
  • Mortgage purchase applications fell last week to the lowest level since 1995. Do mortgage applications fall to a 19 year low if housing is going gangbusters?

The MSM is spinning a yarn to keep the ignorant masses sedated. Do these charts reflect a strong recovering housing market? Housing has begun its 2nd collapse in the last 8 years.

ONE OF THESE DAYS IT WON’T MISS

Via Discover Magazine Blog

SPLUUURT! A Huge Flare Explodes from the Sun

By Tom Yulsman | February 25, 2014 10:03 pm

Twisted magnetic fields on the Sun suddenly released on Monday, causing a massive flare of radiation that hurled a giant loop of plasma many times larger than the Earth out into space.

This x-class flare was observed by NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory satellite. The video above shows SDO’s view in different wavelengths of light.

X-class solar flares are the biggest. This one was the strongest one yet observed this year, and one of the biggest during the current solar cycle.

Here are six still images showing the start of the event in different wavelengths:

Solar x-class flare

These images from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory at 7:25 p.m. EST on Feb. 24, 2014, show the first moments of an X-class flare in different wavelengths of light – seen as the bright spot that appears on the left limb of the sun. Hot solar material hovers above the active region in the sun’s atmosphere, the corona.
Credit: NASA/SDO

And here’s a closeup showing the sun in ultraviolet light at the time of the flare:

Solar X-class flare

The X-class solar flare erupted on the left side of the sun. This composite image, captured at 7:45 p.m. EST on Feb. 24, shows the sun in ultraviolet light with wavelengths of both 131 and 171 Angstroms. (Source: NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center)

Pretty impressive! And if the huge blast of material from the sun’s atmosphere, called a coronal mass ejection, that resulted from this event were to be heading our way, satellites, radio communications, and electrical grids would be at risk. Luckily, that’s not the case, according to NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center:

Although impressive, the source of this event is well off the Sun-Earth line and the coronal mass ejection (CME) associated with this event is not headed directly at Earth. Analysis continues to determine what, if any, geomagnetic impact this will have.

Whew!