WILMINGTON, DE—To commemorate the “completely fair and honest” 2020 election, Joe Biden has announced a brand new memoir called If I Rigged It. The book is already being met with critical acclaim for its compelling description of a totally hypothetical situation where Biden and the Democrats fraudulently steal the election.
Continue reading “Biden Releases Controversial New Memoir ‘If I Rigged It’”
President Trump took questions from reporters on Thursday evening for the first time since Election Day. And after confirming a few days ago via Twitter that he would tell the GSA to formally begin the transition process, the president confirmed to a group of MSM journalists that he would formally surrender power to Biden should Trump’s rival win the Electoral College vote.
During the scrum, Trump took about 25 minutes to rehash a series of allegations his legal team has so far made while saying flatly that Biden couldn’t have done as well as he did without “fraud”.
Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,
The US Election is still a burning issue almost two weeks after the people went to the polls, and though the race has been called for Biden by every mainstream media outlet in the world, the recounts are ongoing and irregularities manifest.
Trump’s legal team, and many in the alternate media, are claiming the election was rigged. With one voice the mainstream media – and the entire political establishment – denounce these claims as “baseless”, and scream there is “no evidence”.
This is incorrect. There is plenty of evidence, both circumstantial and direct, which breaks down into six basic categories:
Continue reading “6 Factors Which Point To A Rigged Election”
Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
This entire mail-in ballot was orchestrated using a fake pandemic, to begin with. This was a very strategic plot and it has been carried out with masterful execution. You voted for Biden thinking this was just a normal election. I dare to say, you will get what you deserve.
The Supreme Court recently noted, “[e]xtending the date by which ballots may be cast by voters [until] after the scheduled election day fundamentally alters the nature of the election.” Republican Nat’l Comm. v. Democratic Nat’l Comm., 140 S. Ct. 1205, 1207 (2020).
OK. I think the revelations by Edward Snowden and Julian Assange over the last few years have proved beyond the shadow of doubt this country is ruled by a corrupt, lawless, sociopathic, criminal cabal of evil men and women who have been at war with average law abiding families for decades.
These establishment pigs write the laws to protect themselves and screw us. They are not held accountable for breaking laws because they control the law enforcement agencies and the judicial system. They rig the financial markets in their favor, while screwing their clients and the American people through control fraud and blatant stealing. They control the currency and interest rates, crushing the middle class under relentless inflation, throwing senior citizens under the bus, and using free money to speculate without risk.
It has been revealed by the wikileaks emails that everything is rigged. Elections are rigged. The corporate mainstream media propaganda arm of the establishment does what it is told by the political snakes. They feed establishment candidates answers to debate questions beforehand. They fake polls to make the ignorant masses believe the establishment candidate is winning. They present falsehoods as truths. They lie and obfuscate.
In Part One of this article I laid out the case against the criminal establishment and how the regeneracy is being driven by the anti-establishment sentiment sweeping across the land. This atonement Fourth Turning will de-establish decade’s worth of delusional decisions. This election has destroyed the last vestiges of trust in this fraudulent system.
This dysfunctional rigged presidential election reflects the tearing of the civic fabric at points of maximum susceptibility. As a country we have neglected, denied, or delayed necessary action on a plethora of vital issues threatening our long term viability as a nation. The deferral of difficult painful decisions has been a ploy of the ruling class, allowing them to further siphon the wealth of a dying empire, while maintaining control over the masses through laws, regulations, taxes, surveillance, intimidation, technology bread and circuses, and mainstream media propaganda.
This is a country truly divided, much along the lines of the first Civil War. The divisions aren’t just along political party lines, but race, education, geography, gender, age, class, religion and ability to think critically. The presidential polls (IBD) reveal many of these divisions clearly:
Continue reading “CIVIL WAR II – FOURTH TURNING INTENSIFYING (PART 2)”
Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts
Americans are being told by “experts” (read “Hillary supporters”) that election fraud in the US is rare. They are also being misinformed that voting fraud would be detected. The fact of the matter is, as has now been proven, that no vast conspiracy is required. One person suffices to have the machine count the votes as desired. Once the vote is recorded the code erases the elements that would reveal the fraud.
The entire purpose of the presstitutes reporting a non-existent Hillary lead is to create in advance acceptance that she won, thereby discrediting in advance any challenge to the rigged outcome.
The demographic data is fascinating and provides insight into how Civil War II will play out. Don’t expect to hear about this poll on any of the MSM propaganda channels. The LA Times poll also shows Trump ahead.
Trump Expands Lead Over Clinton To 2 Points — IBD/TIPP Poll
| Clinton | Trump | Johnson | Stein | Other | Not sure | |
| OVERALL | 39.7% | 42.1% | 7.3% | 3.6% | 2.2% | 5.1% |
| Region | ||||||
| Northeast | 47% | 38% | 6% | 6% | – | 3% |
| Midwest | 40% | 37% | 12% | 4% | 2% | 5% |
| South | 37% | 50% | 5% | 2% | 1% | 5% |
| West | 38% | 37% | 6% | 5% | 6% | 7% |
| Age | ||||||
| 18-44 | 37% | 36% | 15% | 5% | 3% | 5% |
| 45-64 | 38% | 48% | 4% | 5% | 1% | 4% |
| 65+ | 46% | 44% | 2% | 0% | 2% | 6% |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 33% | 46% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 5% |
| Female | 45% | 39% | 6% | 2% | 3% | 5% |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 32% | 51% | 8% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
| Black/Hispanic | 61% | 17% | 9% | 3% | 2% | 9% |
| Income | ||||||
| Under 30K | 42% | 39% | 3% | 4% | 2% | 11% |
| 30K-50K | 39% | 42% | 10% | 4% | 3% | 2% |
| 50-75K | 38% | 44% | 8% | 5% | 0% | 4% |
| 75K+ | 45% | 40% | 7% | 3% | 2% | 3% |
| Education | ||||||
| High School | 20% | 60% | 8% | 1% | 2% | 9% |
| Some College | 36% | 46% | 6% | 2% | 3% | 7% |
| College Degree or more | 47% | 35% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 3% |
| Party | ||||||
| Democrats | 77% | 8% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Republicans | 7% | 84% | 4% | 1% | 1% | 3% |
| Ind./Other | 28% | 44% | 13% | 7% | 4% | 5% |
| Ideology | ||||||
| Conservative | 19% | 67% | 4% | 1% | 3% | 6% |
| Moderate | 47% | 32% | 11% | 4% | 1% | 5% |
| Liberal | 72% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 3% | 3% |
| Investor | ||||||
| Yes | 44% | 39% | 5% | 4% | 2% | 5% |
| No | 35% | 45% | 10% | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Area Type | ||||||
| Urban | 53% | 29% | 7% | 5% | 1% | 4% |
| Suburban | 41% | 39% | 8% | 4% | 3% | 5% |
| Rural | 27% | 57% | 7% | 2% | 1% | 6% |
| Parental Status | ||||||
| Parents | 33% | 43% | 10% | 5% | 3% | 6% |
| Non-Parents | 42% | 42% | 7% | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| White | ||||||
| White men | 26% | 55% | 9% | 5% | 1% | 4% |
| White women | 38% | 47% | 7% | 2% | 2% | 4% |
| Black/Hispanic | ||||||
| Black | 70% | 14% | 4% | 3% | 1% | 8% |
| Hispanic | 45% | 22% | 18% | 2% | 4% | 9% |
| Women | ||||||
| Single women | 50% | 34% | 8% | 2% | 2% | 5% |
| Married women | 42% | 42% | 5% | 2% | 3% | 6% |
| Household Description | ||||||
| Upper/Upper Middle | 42% | 48% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| Middle | 40% | 41% | 9% | 4% | 2% | 5% |
| Working | 41% | 35% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 8% |
| Lower | 15% | 71% | 3% | 3% | – | 8% |
| Religion | ||||||
| Protestant | 36% | 46% | 8% | 2% | 3% | 6% |
| Catholic | 37% | 47% | 6% | 3% | 1% | 5% |
| Other | 40% | 46% | 4% | 3% | 1% | 5% |
| None | 52% | 23% | 12% | 7% | 3% | 1% |
| Union Household | ||||||
| Yes | 49% | 33% | 8% | 4% | 2% | 4% |
| No | 37% | 44% | 8% | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Two-candidate question | Clinton | Trump | Other | Not sure |
| OVERALL | 41.7% | 42.2% | 4.7% | 11.3% |
| Intensity of Support | Strong | Moderate |
| Clinton | 59% | 40% |
| Trump | 68% | 32% |
| Zeitgeist (Likely To Win) | Clinton | Trump | Too Close |
| Overall | 52% | 20% | 20% |
| Democrats | 77% | 6% | 12% |
| Republicans | 26% | 37% | 29% |
| Independents | 46% | 22% | 21% |
“Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury to sustain it.” ― Lysander Spooner
We all know the BLS artificially suppresses the CPI through bullshit substitution adjustments, quality adjustments, and various other incomprehensible hedonic adjustments made by government apparatchiks at the behest of their politician bosses. Some obscure theoretical academic calculation called owners equivalent rent accounts for almost a quarter of the CPI weighting.
It has no relation to reality as it has increased by only 12% since 2012, while the Case Shiller Housing Price Index is up 52% over the same time frame. The median price of existing home sales is up 30% over the same time frame. It also has no relation to rent increases, as they have gone up 22% nationally since 2012. It’s essentially a made up number by goal seeking bureaucrats doing the bidding of their establishment masters.
Guest Post by Stilton Jarlsberg
Democrats and Republicans alike are all aflutter following Donald Trump’s refusal to say that he’ll automatically accept November’s election results without first determining that the results are actually honest. “My stars!” the media is gasping while reaching for smelling salts, loosening their corsets, and briskly flapping lace fans near their faces.
Well here’s a little Hope n’ Change bulletin we’d like to add: we will never accept Hillary Clinton as president of the United States. She will never be “our” president, and we will never accept the legitimacy of the appallingly corrupt process which has gotten her this close to the White House.
Granted, it’s entirely possible that Donald Trump, in his infinite and annoying Trumpiness, would have the ability to lose any election including one which was entirely fair – but the Left isn’t taking that chance. Thanks to Wikileaks and Project Veritas, we now know that this entire election cycle has been shaped by the Democrats’ flood of dirty money, dirty deeds, systemic corruption, and collusion with the media.
We know that Hillary and her cronies hold the American people in complete contempt, and that their idea of irredeemable “deplorables” not only includes hardcore Trump supporters, but virtually every person of faith, every person who believes in the sanctity of life, and every person who believes this should be a nation of laws and equal justice for all.
By definition, Hillary Clinton is an illegitimate candidate, and there is nothing that can happen on November 8th which could make her a legitimate president in our eyes.
After months of exposing damaging internal information from both the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, much of which actually points to criminal behavior but seemingly has no impact on the polls, Julian Assange has concluded that “There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary,
rigged media and rigged ‘pied piper’ candidate drive consolidation.”
There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged ‘pied piper’ candidate drive consolidation.
Sadly, it is difficult to disagree with the assessment. That an
establishment democratic candidate could endure an extended FBI
investigation, in which multiple federal laws were clearly and
intentionally broken, and clear evidence of corruption and collusion
between the FBI and State Department is mind boggling. Throw in
evidence from WikiLeaks clearly linking the DNC to criminal efforts to
incite violence at rallies, numerous examples of pay-to-play activities
at the Clinton Foundation, blatant media collusion, etc, etc, and it
actually becomes quite frightening.
And, while no amount of corruption or scandal seems to sway an American electorate that is intent upon driving the bus off the cliff, Assange has promised a “surprise” for Tim Kaine and the “persecuted christian woman”, Donna Brazile.
We have a suprise in store for @TimKaine and @DonnaBrazile.
And while we certainly look forward to one more “October Surprise,” we’re sure it’s just one more damning piece of information that will be promptly ignored by the corrupt mainstream media and an oblivious American electorate.
The Trump campaign stepped up their “election rigging” rhetoric over the weekend with a tweet storm from Trump that blasted the “dishonest and distorted media” working in coordination with the Clinton campaign and alleged voter fraud at polling places.
Trump surrogate, Rudy Giuliani also appeared on CNN and made some of the more aggressive election rigging claims we’ve heard so far in this election cycle. Among other things, Giuliani said that the election is “absolutely being rigged” with dead people voting in numerous precincts as Democrats bus people from polling station to polling station where they vote “four, five, six, seven, eight, nine times.” Finally, Giuliani concluded by saying “if you want me to tell you that the elections of Chicago and Philadelphia are going to be fair, I would have to be a moron to say that.” Per Bloomberg:
Trump said in a Twitter message Sunday that the Nov. 8 election is “absolutely being rigged” at polling places and through media coverage. Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani said election fraud was a sin committed almost entirely by Democrats in America’s inner cities, where populations tend to be heavily minorities.
“They leave dead people on the rolls, and then they pay people to vote those dead people four, five, six, seven, eight, nine times,” said Giuliani, one of Trump’s most prominent supporters, on CNN’s “State of the Union.” He added, “dead people generally vote for Democrats.”
Cheating by Republicans is rare, Giuliani said. “They don’t control inner cities the way Democrats do,” he said.
Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
The preparation to declare the election a fraud is in high gear. The newspapers are full of the planted story that Russia will hack the election to ensure Trump wins – not Hillary. The Democrats are now putting out the argument that Wikileaks’ source on all these emails is also Russia saying they use to be about the truth. They are even trying to claim that the emails are fake. Moving this plot to cartoons demonstrates this is a full fledged campaign for the coronation of Hillary regardless of what the people vote.
This Simpson episode had made the press in Russia. Homer cannot be found in the voter registration. Vladimir Putin, while on horseback, says: “Do not worry! My hackers let you, but that does not matter. 102% of votes received Trump. Business is business! “.
This is heating up on every front. NBC is claiming it has learned that CIA is planning a major cyber attack against Russia. This is all part of conditioning the American people that if Trump wins, it will be a fraud so they will not allow that to happen and call the whole thing void.
The perfect excuse has been set. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY the establishment will allow Trump to win regardless of the votes. It will be declared a fraud and probably an act of war. The preparations are in play.
Guest Post by The Zman
In the 1992 election, the one thing that jumped out to me was the enthusiasm for Clinton at public events. He had big raucous crowds, while Bush had smaller, older crowds. The press had all the same horse race stories we see today, but it felt like Clinton had all the enthusiasm on his side, despite the tight polls. One of the things I recall is not seeing any Bush bumper stickers, but lots of Clinton stickers. That always stuck in my head as a useful metric when trying to gauge the intentions of the voters.
This ad hoc measure held up in the following election, as Dole was just a sacrificial candidate the GOP put up just so they could have someone on the ticket. In 2000, this metric really did not hold up as I saw many more Bush signs and his crowds were much bigger than Gore’s crowd, but it was a razor thin result. That said, it held up very well in 2004 as Bush clearly had the more enthusiastic voters. I recall seeing a clip of him at an event that looked like a rock concert. I knew he was going to win handily.
Guest Post by The Zman
Reading this long column by James Pinkerton the other day got me thinking about how strange things seem today, compared to not so long ago. Pinkerton used to be on TV a lot when I bothered watching cable news. He would be the libertarian, as well as contrarian, guy on the panel of a current affairs show. That was the standard model for current events programming. They would rustle up some columnists and have them talk about issues presented by a moderator. Maybe they would add some shouting to punch it up a bit.
That seems like a long time ago for the simple reason it seems so quaint and innocent. When a guy like Cal Thomas or Bob Novak moved to TV, they brought with them a long history of opinion writing. You knew where they were coming from most of the time. They still wrote columns for newspapers and they had seen a lot of politicians come and go, thus giving their opinions a salty flavor. Even the lefty chat show guys were old newspaper men, who had seen and heard it all.
