BUSTED: Moderna & HHS Are Targeting Our Children With Nanotech

Originally posted at Dispatches from Reality, by Scipio Eruditusdfreality.substack.com


Herod would be proud…

Previous Entries


I — Introduction


 

As of September 2023, per the CDC’s own dataset, nearly 120,000 children have been murdered in the United States alone after the rollout of these bioweapons, brought to you by the United States government and their co-conspirators in Big Pharmakeia.

Such behavior follows a long history by vaccine manufacturers in which they have ascribed clear damage done by their wholly unnecessary injections to “novel” diseases. Take Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) for instance, a diagnosis coined some 6 years after the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (thanks for that Ronnie). Like other such Orwellian named bills like the Patriot Act or No Child Left Behind, this bill has nothing to do with protecting children after being vaccine injured. Instead, this bill gave broad legal indemnities to vaccine manufacturers, essentially freeing them from ever having to face a lawsuit for the damage their products have done to their victims. Despite 75% of SIDS cases occurring within 48 hours of a “vaccine”, it was only recently that the TDAP injection even listed SIDS as a possible side effect. Long after it has become adopted as standard of care within the pediatric field, of course.

Continue reading “BUSTED: Moderna & HHS Are Targeting Our Children With Nanotech”

MODERNA TOO: Boosters Show Signs of Self-Assembling Nanotechnology

Originally posted at Dispatches from Reality, by Scipio Eruditusdfreality.substack.com


Beyond the realm of coincidence, negligence or greed…

Previous Entries


I — Introduction


 

Over the past five months, my team and I have inspected over a hundred samples, constituting several hundred hours of live blood & pharmaceutical analysis. The following sample is undoubtedly the most alarming thing I’ve seen under the scope yet. In this sample you will see a level of activity and sophistication that simply cannot be explained away as modRNA technology, salt crystals, dust, or whatever novel excuse is deployed to dismiss these disturbing findings away. Pictures could not do this synthetic symphony justice, and a short video clip has been included to ensure that the fullness of this motion can be properly witnessed.

Continue reading “MODERNA TOO: Boosters Show Signs of Self-Assembling Nanotechnology”

BURNING BOOKS IN A BRAVE NEW 1984 WORLD – THE AGE OF CENSORSHIP

In Part 1 of this article, I explored how Huxley, Orwell, and Bradbury foretold the use of technology by totalitarians to subjugate and control the masses. Now we move on to a currently hot topic – censorship.

“Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.” Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

Nick Tyrone on Twitter: "This Venn diagram isn't possible. “1984” is set in an authoritarian future in which all pleasure is repressed; “Brave New World” in one where people are provided with

Censorship

“There was always a minority afraid of something, and a great majority afraid of the dark, afraid of the future, afraid of the past, afraid of the present, afraid of themselves and shadows of themselves” Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

Fahrenheit 451 Censorship by Riley Curry

“There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people run­ning about with lit matches.” Ray Bradbury

The primary theme of Fahrenheit 451 is censorship. In Bradbury’s dystopia, burning books was the principal method of censorship, directed by the government, but generally supported by the masses. A form of self-censorship developed, as the dullards, intellectually lazy, and willfully ignorant, preferred books to be burned so they felt that would put them on a level playing field with the critical thinkers and intellectually curious minded.

It always comes back to the government doing everything in their power to keep the masses apathetic, ill-informed, entertained, and distracted, to ensure their continued control over society. Bradbury believed the masses would go along with censorship because they already had television, radio, and fast cars, with vacuous programming, loud music, and unceasing advertising creating over-stimulation and distraction for the populace. They were too distracted to read a book, learn, think critically, or question the authorities.

Continue reading “BURNING BOOKS IN A BRAVE NEW 1984 WORLD – THE AGE OF CENSORSHIP”

2023: FOURTH TURNING MEETS MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS (PART 2)

In Part 1 of this article, I laid out the mass formation psychosis theory postulated by Mattias Desmet in his book The Psychology of Totalitarianism and how totalitarian minded politicians and bureaucrats manipulated the masses by creating the covid crisis. Now I will focus on how this will impact the Fourth Turning we are currently trying to survive.

FOURTH TURNING: CRISIS OF TRUST – The Burning Platform

Decades of social indoctrination and degraded ability to think critically has left most people hopelessly unable to resist the vitriolic opinions of those under the spell of coronavirus mass formation. Even though they didn’t necessarily believe the covid narrative, especially when it became clear only the very old (especially when tyrant governors inserted infected patients into nursing homes) and the very obese actually died with covid, these people still went along. Even the CDC admitted only 6% of deaths were attributable to covid alone.

Based upon research like the Milgram Experiment, we know average people will obey authority without question, even when they know their actions are causing pain. The conformity research done by Solomon Asch explains why a huge percentage of the global population just conformed to what appeared to be a majority opinion. Asch’s experiment had 8 test subjects, but 7 of them worked for Asch. They asked them which line was the same length as Exhibit 1. The 7 Asch employees answered C. Only 25% of the case subjects consistently answered A. They were cowed into giving a patently absurd answer due to peer pressure and lack of faith in their own judgement.

Solomon Asch study social pressure conformity experiment psychology

Continue reading “2023: FOURTH TURNING MEETS MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS (PART 2)”

IT’S NOT SAFE OR EFFECTIVE

Daily Dialogue — November 11, 2019 | by Scott Myers | Go Into The Story

Christian Szell: Is it safe?

Babe: I don’t know what you mean. I can’t tell you something’s safe or not, unless I know specifically what you’re talking about.

Christian Szell: Is it safe?

Babe: Tell me what the “it” refers to.

Christian Szell: Is it safe?

Babe: Yes, it’s safe, it’s very safe, it’s so safe you wouldn’t believe it.

Christian Szell: Is it safe?

Babe: No. It’s not safe, it’s… very dangerous, be careful.

Marathon Man debuted in 1976, so a majority of people have probably never seen this movie or this terrifyingly sadistic scene. Szell is trying to make sure his bounty of diamonds obtained from his days at Auschwitz are safe. Babe has no idea what Szell is talking about. He is just trying to survive. But Szell drills into Babe’s tooth until he hits a live nerve, generating excruciating pain, before Babe escapes and outruns his pursuers. That scene has always stuck in my brain, and it strikes me as having enormous relevance in the wake of events over the last two years.

Szell probes Babe’s mouth until he finds a cavity and jams his instrument into it causing tremendous pain. He then then puts oil of clove on the tooth and it relieves the pain. He then states, “relief is comfort”. That is a perfect analogy to this covid cavity scheme. The powers that be lockdown the world, destroying small businesses and putting tens of millions out of work, then throw some stimmies and unemployment payments at those they have hurt and say, “relief is comfort”. Then they proceed to drill into a live nerve as their next act.

COVID-19 Vaccine Clinic — Open Health Care Clinic

The term “safe” has been bandied about with reckless abandon by our overlords, as they have sold the world a false bill of goods with these mRNA poison injections. Whenever I hear their putrid propaganda spewed by some athlete, Hollywood liberal, MSM bimbo “journalist”, or paid off medical shill, that the vaccines are “safe and effective” it’s like Szell drilling into a live nerve in my tooth. I want to scream in terror and make a run for it. I think our beloved mass murderer – Fauci – fits the bill as the Szell character in this story of corruption, deceit, greed, murder, and obfuscation.

Continue reading “IT’S NOT SAFE OR EFFECTIVE”

THE MOST DANGEROUS MOVE YET BY THE mRNA VACCINATORS

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

On Wednesday morning Moderna released supposedly positive data from a trial of its Omicron-specific booster mRNA shot.

Do NOT be fooled by the company’s spin on the data – a claim credulous reporters are gladly abetting.

In reality, the trial showed that Omicron-specific boosters don’t work very well against the Omicron variant. Even after being given an booster designed against Omicron, people made far fewer neutralizing antibodies against it than they did against the original coronavirus – which of course is no longer a threat.

How could Moderna say the trial succeeded, then? Because the Omicron booster did produce somewhat more neutralizing antibodies against Omicron than the original Moderna booster did.

The problem with this comparison is that the original booster basically stops working against Omicron after a few weeks. In fact, a growing body of evidence suggests that boosted people are MORE likely to be infected with Omicron than the unvaccinated.

So the Omicron booster works marginally better against Omicron than the original booster – which very quickly doesn’t work at all.

Welcome to the new definition of mRNA shot success.

Continue reading “THE MOST DANGEROUS MOVE YET BY THE mRNA VACCINATORS”

The dose makes the poison

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

A major new study adds more evidence that Moderna’s high-dose mRNA shots are more dangerous than Pfizer’s smaller jabs; will public health bureaucrats acknowledge reality as they push more boosters?

A huge new study shows mRNA shots sharply raised the risk of dangerous heart damage in Scandinavians who received them last year, and that Moderna’s 100-microgram shot was significantly more dangerous than Pfizer’s 30-microgram dose.

For young men, who are at particularly high risk of post-jab heart inflammation, the gap was especially significant.

Data from the study, published in a peer-reviewed journal called JAMA Cardiology, show that giving 1 million men aged 16-24 two doses of Moderna’s vaccine would lead to almost 300 hospitalizations for myocarditis and a related illness called pericarditis. Most would come after the second dose. Using Pfizer’s shot instead would lead to about 100 hospitalizations.

Continue reading “The dose makes the poison”

Another Moderna booster trial, another death

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Participants in Moderna’s clinical trials for its mRNA booster Covid shots keep dying.

And Moderna keeps obscuring their deaths.

Last week, Moderna disclosed a death in its newest booster trial in a single chart on page 49 of a 53-page report, while elsewhere in the report inaccurately claiming the trial had “no fatal events.”

Today, a reader pointed out another death in an earlier Moderna booster trial, this one from cardiac arrest in a 72-year-old man. The victim had received his third or “booster” dose nine days before.

The death appears to have occurred in August 2021, at least six weeks before the Food and Drug Administration held a hearing in October to discuss authorizing a Moderna booster at a dose lower than the one used in the August trial.

But the death was not mentioned at the hearing.

Continue reading “Another Moderna booster trial, another death”

What’s two times zero?

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Moderna says its new Covid mRNA booster makes twice the Omicron antibodies. Think DAYS of extra protection. Yay! Also, what’s with the post-booster death Moderna went out of its way not to mention?

This morning Moderna spun results from a 900-person trial testing its “variant-specific” Covid booster jab as a big positive. The usual media outlets that have failed to ask a single tough question about mRNA shots in 18 months agreed.

But reading the trial findings, as opposed to Moderna’s press release about them, offers a very different picture. The trial makes clear that tinkering with booster design does not change the core problem with the mRNA shots, which is that the antibodies the jabs produce do not last.

Worse, page 49 of the 53-page report reveals one person in the trial died after receiving a booster dose. Moderna did not discuss the death or offer any details about it anywhere else in the report – or anywhere in its its press release this morning about the trial. In fact, earlier in the report, Moderna incorrectly said that “there were no fatal events” in the trial.

Continue reading “What’s two times zero?”